glimlach

250 posts

glimlach banner
glimlach

glimlach

@onchaincrawler

hello

Katılım Ekim 2024
308 Takip Edilen47 Takipçiler
Peter Schiff
Peter Schiff@PeterSchiff·
Oil prices and bond yields continue to rise, with oil above $85 and yields on 10- and 30-year Treasuries now at 4.63% & 5.14%, respectively. These trends will likely continue and are bearish for the economy and corporate earnings. How much longer can stock investors ignore this?
English
63
40
301
26K
glimlach
glimlach@onchaincrawler·
Is something cooking with $ASTEROID? About $300k worth of tokens were withdrawn from exchanges over the past week.
glimlach tweet media
English
0
0
0
5
lyxe
lyxe@cryptolyxe·
Pavel Durov bullposting crypto utility through telegram bullish for gram
lyxe tweet medialyxe tweet media
English
15
7
76
15.5K
glimlach
glimlach@onchaincrawler·
@ChainLinkGod Overall, yeah, I think most serious people have the feeling that someone just created a token for an online casino.
English
0
0
0
3
Zach Rynes | CLG
Zach Rynes | CLG@ChainLinkGod·
The reason why PumpFun $PUMP trades at a lower revenue multiple than Hyperliquid $HYPE is pretty straightforward: 1. Investors view perps (Hyperliquid) as having more durable revenue with larger future growth potential beyond the crypto sphere, than memecoin launchpads (PumpFun) which are solely retail gambling focused 2. PumpFun has notable team/investor token unlocks creating ongoing sell pressure and VC overhang for holders/buybacks to absorb, whereas Hyperliquid has unlocked/sold only a fraction of what they could have and has no VC overhang to deal with 3. PumpFun sold both tokens and equity to investors, creating a dual token vs equity conflict of interest misalignment problem with unclear boundaries of value accrual, whereas Hyperliquid has not sold equity and just has token 4. PumpFun has already reduced token value accrual from its buyback and burn mechanism from 100% to 50% of revenues, whereas Hyperliquid remains 99% of revenues, discretionary decision token holders had no say over 5. People generally don’t trust the PumpFun team nearly as much as they Hyperliquid, e.g., team promising an airdrop and not doing it, etc 6. Bad vibes associated with investing in memecoin platforms, akin to investing in payday lenders or private prisons, vs Hyperliquid being a more ‘clean’ bet on 24/7 markets that is more Wall Street digestible Could any of this change at any time? Yep, and that’s a fine thesis to have Will HYPE or PUMP perform better in short term? I have no idea, I hope both do well But the difference in historical and current valuation between the two assets is not inexplicable and it’s not just a trust issue
Ansem 🐂🀄️@blknoiz06

the trust issue on $PUMP is really the entire discount to the trade because ppl legitimately dont even believe their revenue numbers are real thats how bad it is nobody ever mentioned if hyperliquid's revenues were real or not when it went down -70% to $10 while doing buybacks, but the discussion around pump is almost entirely negative because of the negative bias around memecoins & team's lack of comms hyperliquid's revenue is easy for CT traders to understand because CT natives all trade perps and understand how exchanges work, in comparison very little of the large accounts on CT trade microcaps on pump.fun so they cannot grasp how they're still making money in a bear market the trend on revenues of hyperliquid & pump are almost identical

English
23
12
168
35.2K
CRG
CRG@MacroCRG·
incredible.
CRG tweet media
English
18
16
360
16.2K
glimlach
glimlach@onchaincrawler·
@blknoiz06 & @pumpfun are running one of the best marketing strategies we’ve seen in a while. You all saw how this guy bought $PUMP with $100k through his public wallet, knowing full well that everyone would start talking about it. At the same time, he has repeatedly pointed out the rather low credibility of @a1lon9 and the team in his posts, comparing their revenue to Hyperliquid He deliberately avoids saying he’s working with them, fully understanding how CT would react to that. However, more than half of the success here depends on the PumpFun team. I think this is a special operation aimed at restoring trust. $ANSEM simply cannot afford to fail. This is a one-of-a-kind successful experiment.
glimlach tweet media
Pump.fun Ecosystem@PumpfunEco

Ansem (@blknoiz06) just bought $100K worth of $PUMP 👀

English
1
0
2
260
glimlach
glimlach@onchaincrawler·
@JavierVG_ don’t understand why all the MetaDAO graduates are trading so cheap
English
0
0
0
108
Ansem 🐂🀄️
Ansem 🐂🀄️@blknoiz06·
@andyyy pump having the same 2Y revenue as hyperliquid and trading at a 50x lower valuation bc they refuse to acknowledge their core user base is genuinely hilarious
English
111
40
654
52.4K
Andy
Andy@andyyy·
Revenue meta turned out to be a multi-year phenomenon. Looks like the haters were right...revenue is not a meta...its the foundation for real capital allocation into a growing industry from investors who value assets based on cash flows, P&L, and growth forecasting. Welcome to the big leagues, fellow crypto investors.
Andy tweet media
English
62
33
449
73.7K
glimlach retweetledi
based16z
based16z@based16z·
Ben Pasternak you would’ve loved Robinhood Chain…
English
20
7
416
30.5K
glimlach
glimlach@onchaincrawler·
@RunnerXBT Everyone had a few days to buy it around the $1M mark. You can make money on pretty much anything, but sitting around whining and complaining is something only you can do, bro.
English
0
0
0
42
RunnerMU
RunnerMU@RunnerXBT·
so the new "shiny on-chain thing" mooned for 4 days in a row followed by -75% lmeow
RunnerMU tweet media
English
13
1
71
9.6K
glimlach
glimlach@onchaincrawler·
@blknoiz06 @RDRembert on one hand, it looks like @blknoiz06 is running this campaign together with @Pumpfun, but at the same time he managed to paint them in a not-so-great light in his posts. I think this is actually really good marketing.
English
0
0
3
14
glimlach retweetledi
Bold
Bold@boldleonidas·
Bold tweet media
ZXX
92
68
1.3K
59.1K
glimlach
glimlach@onchaincrawler·
Let’s be real. @brian_armstrong coin dumped because he chose not to jump back into the memecoin game to protect his reputation. If he had started shilling it hard, we would’ve ended up with the exact same pattern anyway — just from way higher prices. The outcome is always the same. It’s better to see this drop now at $30M than later when it’s sitting at $200-500M. People who lost money (and let’s be honest, most did) are always gonna be pissed. base:0xb2000000000000000000007bf6d5cbb0e24cb301
Sue@sue_xbt

Someone say a prayer for this guy He topblasted 50 ETH ($88,000) into $BRIAN at $34m last night Not even 24 hours later, it’s worth 1.5 ETH ($3,000) after @brian_armstrong changed his pfp and nuked the coin to zero 😭

English
0
0
4
138
glimlach
glimlach@onchaincrawler·
@AltcoinSherpa lmao, let's just spam charts of every single ticker, draw random lines on them, and go "hmm, maybe I'll buy... or maybe not, gotta think about it
English
0
0
3
41
Altcoin Sherpa
Altcoin Sherpa@AltcoinSherpa·
yeah lets go from Ansem to Cashcat to Brian and keep assuming that these pumps are going to get bigger and bigger....
Altcoin Sherpa tweet media
English
6
2
46
9.3K