potato chip

Hello world.

@Polymarket Artemis II crew pov

imo one of the coolest things about the story no one is talking about ...

JUST IN: Artemis II crew experiences issues with Microsoft Outlook on their way to the Moon, asks ground crew for assistance.

@balajis Love to see it. Keep building.

Network School is growing. Come visit us at ns.com.

@chamath strat against uncertainty: diversity

In today’s episode of “Clapping as a Strategy”, this is probably nothing for crypto.

fun fact: slack users send 92 messages per day and check the app 13 times daily on average now imagine the resulting strain on your eyeballs compounded over years

@balajis left too woke to compete right too tough to collab smh

You know how socialists don't get capitalism? Well, nationalists don't get diplomacy. The socialist thinks their state is all-powerful domestically, and the nationalist thinks their state is all-powerful globally, so it can seize whatever it wants by force, because it's so strong, and nothing will ever happen, and no one can resist. Both worldviews are wrong, for similar reasons. The socialist hates capitalists so much, and the nationalist hates foreigners so much, that they often just become blinded by hatred. They come to believe the outgroup is so incompetent that they aren't a threat, and have no use, so long as maximum force is employed. And sometimes this mindset takes them surprisingly far! They loot or conquer much more than you'd expect. But eventually, they encounter constraint.

@JoshMalinkovich people solving problems > people scared of job displacement

With the rise of calculators, we did not stop teaching people how to do math by hand. With the rise of the keyboard, the modern day computer, and speech recognition technology, we did not stop teaching people how to write. With the rise of #AI, we will not stop teaching people how to code. And I believe that all of these points will remain true even hundreds of years from now: Surely, people will still need to know how to read - and why would we contrive some new education system that teaches people how to read, but conveniently not how to write? People will still need to be able to do mental math. Yes, you can argue that having a chip in your brain will make it unnecessary for you to understand how the math works, but I disagree. On a fundamental level, people will want to trust the output that that chip is giving them - hence, they will need to understand the math. Would you, a human born 300 years from now, negotiate to purchase something from another human based on the price suggested to you by your brain chip, or might you have an advantage, even in such a world, if you could bargain - requiring basic mental math - with the other person? Surely, we won't forget to add and subtract, as even many animals are able to do this innately, and it is fundamental to our quality of life to be able to do so; why would we teach people to add and subtract, but not to multiply? The argument that AI is going to make thinking obsolete is one that I disagree with highly. I have heard this debate happening in various circles: many claim that the ability of AI to write code means that computer scientists will be out of work in a decade or two. I don't think that developers will truly be out of work, as a whole, until AI can improve itself, maintain itself, repair itself, and survive events such as solar flares, energy grid shutdowns, and the attempts of humans to "take it down". Until then, humans will be in the loop, either to improve, repair, maintain, or oversee AI - and we need computer scientists to do that. When developers are truly out of a job, it won't be a debate anymore. It will be obvious to all. And even when they are out of a job - they will still be developing. Because being a developer is an identity. As is being a welder, a painter, a musician, a mathematician, a doctor, or a scientist - these are not merely careers, but identities. Ask anybody who enjoys their profession whether or not they would do it for free; if the answer is no, then they don't truly enjoy their profession. They represent the fundamental curiosities and interests of people, which will not be satisfied with brain chips, or as-close-as-possible-to-omniscient AI.

Bro disappeared like it never existed.

@notthreadguy is it tho?

kinda ironic the public hates ai the same way they’ve always hated crypto

@AutismCapital smdh

🚨 NEW: Sam Altman and Dario Amodei refuse to hold hands at the AI Impact Summit 2026 in Delhi 😂 😂 😂

@dogeofficialceo bro next question

Are aliens real?

you don't fight monsters by punishing the townfolk you destroy the monster

@uttam_singhk * taps the sign * x.com/p_chip1/status…

people complaining about the coinbase ad is exactly how you know it worked.

@GrindingPoet you don't understand marketing x.com/p_chip1/status…

Coinbase single handedly drove away 5 million retail participants with that ad great achievement

@MorningBrew some nuance ... x.com/p_chip1/status…

Seems like this was the universal reaction to Coinbase's ad

@patrickbetdavid @coinbase its was topical, engaging, strategic it was not timely imo x.com/p_chip1/status…

Give the @coinbase marketing team a massive raise. They crushed it again. Everyone was singing.

@coinbase details matter x.com/p_chip1/status…

If you're talking about it, it worked. Crypto is for everybody.

@AvgJoesCrypto No. x.com/p_chip1/status…

The Coinbase ad was a perfect microcosm of why everyone hates crypto. It took something universally loved, slapped “crypto” on it, and prayed the emotional hijacking would work. A classic bait-and-switch, exactly what retail has come to expect from crypto.

in marketing, no matter which idea you go with, you'll never please everyone @coinbase chose "Turning 100M+ screens into karaoke" and "fun" for everybooody tapping into shared cultural memories/engagment-maxxing the backlash says ppl aren't getting it crypto needs to be less gambling, more problem solving