PartialContext
532 posts




Exmos like to talk about their “journey” But a journey has a meaningful destination. Wandering is not the same as being on a journey. Telling people to go “wherever they want” as if all paths are equally good or valid is the definition of wandering. Somewhere deep down they know this. And somewhere deep down they know they have a thirst they can’t quench.







Brad Wilcox said, “Your patriarchal blessing is not so God can tell you what you already know. It is the chance for Him to tell you what He NEEDS you to know.” How does this change your approach to your patriarchal blessing?


















Deutero Isaiah is the open and shut evidence that the Book of Mormon is not historical. There is no way certain chapters of Isaiah could have been on the brass plates. It’s really time members talked about the book as a transformational/spiritual but not a historical.
















There’s something about the timing of Jasmin’s video on the Holy of Holies, the second endowment, and the specific language used that hits my conspiracy radar. The church has asked not to discuss this topic. And then Oaks shares the picture and Jasmine has a good detailed and very carefully worded video. It’s one of those topics discussed by critics of the church often. There are interviews on Mormon Stories of people that have gone through the second anointing, and Ben Park recently did a deep dive into its history. I don’t think Jasmin would have tackled this topic unless being asked to. And the wording she used to me sounds like a script approved by someone else. I’m convinced she is a PR arm for the church, as someone who can speak on topics the church can’t. If this video stays up (meaning the church doesn’t ask her to take it down) then to me it’s more evidence to support this idea.












