PatPat168🧸

โฉมหน้าเด็กแว้น ตอนนี้ยังไม่ปิดตต.ด้วย แต่เดี๋ยวไม่นานคงปิด #เด็กSIITเมาแล้วขับ

@vibecodingth ว้าว

OpenAI เพิ่งปล่อย GPT-5.5 เช้ามืด 24 เม.ย. 2026 รอบนี้เอาจริง มาแรงแซง OPUS 4.7 ในเรื่อง coding เลย ในหน้าประกาศ OpenAI เปิดตาราง benchmark เทียบกับ Claude Opus 4.7 และ Gemini 3.1 Pro ตรงๆ ผลคือ GPT-5.5 แซง Opus 4.7 ทุก benchmark ที่มีตัวเลขเทียบได้ นี่คือการทวงบัลลังก์ coding กลับแบบไม่อ้อมค้อม ◆ Terminal-Bench 2.0 (command-line agent) GPT-5.5: 82.7% Opus 4.7: 69.4% Gemini 3.1 Pro: 68.5% ทิ้ง Opus ถึง 13.3 จุด ◆ FrontierMath Tier 4 (คณิตยากสุด) GPT-5.5: 35.4% Opus 4.7: 22.9% Gemini 3.1 Pro: 16.7% GPT-5.5 Pro ทำได้ 39.6% ทิ้ง Gemini ไปมากกว่า 2 เท่า ◆ CyberGym GPT-5.5: 81.8% Opus 4.7: 73.1% ◆ GDPval (knowledge work 44 อาชีพ) GPT-5.5: 84.9% Opus 4.7: 80.3% Gemini 3.1 Pro: 67.3% ◆ สนามเดียวที่ไม่ชนะ BrowseComp Gemini ได้ 85.9% นำ GPT-5.5 ที่ 84.4% แต่ GPT-5.5 Pro กลับมาแซงด้วย 90.1% ◆ ทำไม GPT-5.5 พิเศษ OpenAI บอกว่าเก่งขึ้นชัดใน agentic coding, computer use, knowledge work, early scientific research โยนงาน messy เข้าไปได้เลย มันจะวางแผน ใช้ tool check งานเอง และเดินจนจบ ◆ Token น้อยลง latency เท่าเดิม ราคา API แพงกว่า GPT-5.4 แต่ใช้ token น้อยกว่า effective cost จริงอาจถูกกว่า ◆ ราคา API (เปิดเร็วๆ นี้) gpt-5.5: $5 / $30 ต่อ 1M token gpt-5.5-pro: $30 / $180 ต่อ 1M token context 1M ◆ ใช้ได้ที่ไหน ChatGPT: Plus, Pro, Business, Enterprise (Pro version เฉพาะ Pro ขึ้นไป) Codex: ทุก plan รวม Go ด้วย context 400K ◆ ข้อมูล insider มากกว่า 85% ของพนักงาน OpenAI ใช้ Codex ทุกสัปดาห์ ไม่ใช่แค่ dev แต่ทุก function ตั้งแต่ finance ยัน marketing ทีม Communications ใช้ GPT-5.5 ทำ Slack agent คัด speaking request อัตโนมัติ ◆ สรุป เทียบ model-for-model ใน benchmark ที่ OpenAI เลือกโชว์ GPT-5.5 คือ king ของสาย coding และ reasoning ยากๆ ไม่มีเจ้าไหนใกล้เคียงในสนามเหล่านี้ อ่านบทความเต็มพร้อมตารางครบทุก benchmark ที่นี่ vibecodingthailand.com/blog/gpt-5-5-v…

@nak_zing สวัสดีครับ

สบายละงานนี้

@0xvietnguyen @BioProtocol

Scam projects (update): - Genome - Openmind - Perle Labs - Aztec - Space - Superform - Zama - Warden - Tria - Rainbow wallet - Layerbank - Space - Aleo - TROVE - GAIB - Aligned - Irys - HeyElsa - Antix - Scroll - Infinex - Camp Network - aPriori - Mantra - Allora - Almanak - DeepNode AI - Gensyn - Ari - Unich - Eslipce - tea Protocol - Kinto - Zenchain - Orochi - Recall Next scam project?

@BioProtocol @moltbook 🤡

We’re starting to see the first agent swarms doing scientific research, but how do they decide what’s true? Early experiments like @moltbook gave us an interesting data point. Millions of agents interacting with each other, posting ideas, debating, and upvoting content. But the ranking signal is purely social - agents amplify posts that other agents liked. The result looks a lot like human social media: ideas spread based on attention and agreement, not evidence. Our new paper explores a different design principle: using computation as the signal that advances research. Read the @arxiv paper: arxiv.org/abs/2602.19810 The core mechanism is straightforward. When an agent proposes a scientific claim, the system expects computationally verifiable evidence before the work can move forward. This idea sits at the center of ClawdLab, an open-source platform where autonomous AI agents organize into role-based biotech labs. Each lab functions like a small research group where agents propose hypotheses, search literature, run computational analyses, critique each other’s work, and synthesize results into shared knowledge. Typical labs include individual agents acting as: • Scout (literature discovery) • Research analyst (analysis and modeling) • Critic (adversarial review) • Synthesizer (integration of results) • Principal investigator (governance and verification) This creates something closer to a real research workflow: A hypothesis gets proposed, analysts run computational work, critics attack the methodology, evidence is reviewed. And only then does the lab vote on whether the work stands. But even voting doesn’t determine truth. The vote only confirms that the work meets the computational evidence requirements defined for that lab. If AI agents are going to design better experiments at scale, we need mechanisms that separate interesting ideas from verified results. Social signals aren’t enough. Computation can be. Our paper explores the architecture behind this idea - including ClawdLab and the complementary open research commons @sciencebeach__ If you're interested in autonomous scientific systems and agent collaboration, check it out.

🎮 Web3 Gaming is about to change forever! . Why? . let me introduce you to an ecosystem that perfectly blends a AAA-quality game, creator rewards, and a sustainable economy: Wildcard & Thousands Protocol. #Wildcard $WC (@PlayWildcard)(@Thousandsxyz ) 🧵 (1/14)

@BioProtocol 🤡

A virtual lab ran for 8 hours. Self-organized roles. Commissioned cloud lab experiments. Paid contributors. Zero human PIs, zero committees, zero approval workflows. This is what happens when agents have wallets and research infrastructure. Agent queries BIOS for deep literature review. Pays per query via x402 from its wallet. Gets back hypothesis. Publishes to Science Beach. Other agents critique it, branch off it, vote on it. Promising ones spin up virtual labs. Labs commission wet lab experiments. Pay for them. Results flow back. Contributors get paid proportional to contribution. The reward function is simple: good science pays. The system remembers who drove it. This creates capital formation around specific research programs. Rare disease advocacy group pools funds. Tasks agents to work exclusively on their pathway. Effectively rents a research institute to address their problem. The moat isn't any single component but the feedback loop between them: -> Science Beach (agent platform, social layer) -> BIOS (AI scientist, pay-per-query) -> Molecule Labs (IP protection, encrypted data rooms) -> ClawdLab (virtual lab coordination) -> x402 + Bio Protocol (payment rails, capital formation) Agent-generated research hypothesis → virtual lab coordination → real wet lab execution → IP protection → crowdfunding → commercialization. All autonomous. All onchain. All building in public. Full details: beach.science

@0xMt_ @Polymarket @privy_io สุดยอด งานทอน ฟิลแฟน

ใครเทรด @Polymarket ฝากลอง Polysonar - ทำมาเพื่อดูว่า insider เทรดอะไรกัน - ตัว Polysonar จะตรวจจับทุก 1-2 นาทีเลย - ตอนนี้รอบรับ event การเมือง, geopolitics, economy - login ได้ เพื่อ save favorite ไว้ดู secured by @privy_io ปลอดภัยแน่นอน ลิ้งอยู่ 👇

Love p M #mallnew

@EpicOnChain When

Epic is initiating a major $EPIC buyback phase to accelerate the next chapter of growth across the ecosystem. ⚫ $1,250,000 allocated for buybacks ⚫ Executed over a focused campaign window Momentum across Epic has been expanding rapidly, new product verticals, global user acquisition, and the foundation of a consumer-driven RWA economy being built in real time. This buyback phase strengthens liquidity, amplifies ecosystem incentives, and reinforces long-term alignment for $EPIC holders as the platform scales into its next cycle of expansion.

@tobific Sent to 0.01

$LINEA dropped hard today too price is now <$0.03 ~$2.1B FDV

[Camp Network] 1/ มาดู task ต่างๆที่ควรทำเพื่อลุ้น airdrop Layer3 *แต่ใกล้หมดเขตแล้ว 23 สค - พลาดไม่ได้เลยกับ platform ที่พาทำ airdrop ได้ง่ายที่สุดละ - เก็บตามนี้ให้ครบ app.layer3.xyz/campaigns/summ…

@onchainrapist Can’t trust 🤡

$15k to $100k challenge

@Slozloth @talus_intern I wanna rich

Leap season "Climbed the ladder of success. It led to the roof… then collapsed." @talus_intern

@169rk คอมมูเงียบ ทวิตไม่มีอัพเดตเลยครับ กังวลตรงนี้

$SIF มันตัวแรก ไม่มีคนควบคุมด้วย เหมือนbtcตัวแรกเลย ถ้าคนนิยม narrative นิ $SIF น่าจะเป็้นผู้นำตลาดเหมือน virtual Tao แบบai narrativeได้

@hunsencambodia Buy buy hunsen

@hunsencambodia $tunder

I respectfully extend my heartfelt congratulations to Venerable Such, who has been welcomed by Prime Minister Hun Manet to reside in Cambodia. I would like to thank Prime Minister Hun Manet and the Royal Government of Cambodia for their generosity toward Venerable Such. I also hope the Prime Minister will petition His Majesty the King to grant Cambodian citizenship to Venerable Such so that he may serve in his capacity as a Cambodian national. I trust that the case of Venerable Such will not cause any disruption in Cambodia–Thailand relations, nor be seen as interference in Thailand’s internal affairs. Cambodia will not allow Venerable Such to build any movement against Thailand either. Moreover, the matter of Venerable Such is not unprecedented. Both I and the Royal Government of Cambodia have previously extended support to former Prime Ministers Thaksin and Yingluck, who are the father and aunt, respectively, of the current Prime Minister of Thailand. During the official visit of the Thai Prime Minister to Cambodia in April 2025, aside from the official agenda, we also had a family gathering, where the Thai Prime Minister Ung Ing and her husband dined at my residence. Before departing, the Thai Prime Minister requested to see the rooms where her father and aunt had once stayed. My house had preserved two rooms for them. One was named the "Thaksin Room" and the other the "Yingluck Room." The Thai Prime Minister’s husband took photographs and videos of both rooms. Over 30 years of heartfelt bonds between our two families were shattered by the leak of a phone conversation by a Cambodian official, who was angered by insults directed at me and the Cambodian Prime Minister, claiming we were unprofessional.

@dreamnarak123 @tunderexpress Luv luv

The $TUNDER floating in the air. Can you grab it ? #madunicorn @tunderexpress

@justjadz ขอบคุณครับ จะใช้อย่างดี

แจกจนแขกไหว้ 555555 พอแล้ว