Plidof

Today, as a shareholder of Chintai equity, I added 1,000,000 $CHEX. Not a short-term flip, but because this is one of the most serious RWA developments in tokenisation right now. Here’s why 👇 @ChintaiNetwork @ChintaiNexus #CHEX

@SplyceFi first product launch is close everything will make sense when it lands

@oct_gems $CHEX for RWA.

Here are a few projects I am keeping an eye on from the top narratives right now 👀 Layer-1: $KAS, $KTA, $MON RWA: $ONDO, $ZBCN, $CFG Prep Dex: $HYPE, $ASTER, $LIT Neobanks: $TEL, $MNT, $AVICI What about you? 👇

Still balls deep in $chex, the new warchest is hugely positive news, simple as. Ive been in favour of it for years, trust in david or fak off, if u knew david u wouldn't be worried. Still some dumbasses messaging me that Chintai is a scam, this place is full of toxic children fml

1/ @GunnisonCap and the @ChintaiNetwork team minted an additional 250 million $CHEX tokens. I was not part of this decision. But having been deeply involved with Chintai for years, I believe it was the right call, provided certain things happen going forward. Here's why. A thread.

@loancyborg @RalfWeinand @ZeusRWA @HoneyB_BTC 👀Still on for this month?

@RalfWeinand @ZeusRWA @HoneyB_BTC We will 100% start making noise starting in March. Looking forward to having everyones support and continuing with the mission to scale, real yield on chain.

RWA vaults.

Join our CEO @GunnisonCap for the next community update on: ⏰ Wednesday 3/11 12pm EST. 👇🏻x.com/i/spaces/1wxWj…

@0xWara You only need $CHEX.

You need to stack these 3 coins for the next 9 months to retire $SUI $HYPE $MON Stop overtrading and choose your winners wisely

@ScofieldOnchain If you want an RWA token that is rewarded directly on network usage and fees (and also happens to be totally distributed and deflationary) then you want $CHEX.

For those wondering how to position themselves this year in the RWA space… The reality is there isn’t one answer. It depends on what you actually want. Do you want exposure to an RWA project token where the upside comes from business growth, usage, and value potentially flowing back to holders if the model works? Or do you want direct exposure to real-world cash flows, earning yield from credit, Treasuries, real estate, or other income-producing assets? Those are very different bets with different risk profiles. Positioning isn’t about copying someone else’s portfolio. It’s about understanding your own risk tolerance and choosing exposure that aligns with it. Maybe you want access to assets you were never able to buy before, like pre-IPO equity or private credit. Or maybe you want to back the teams building the infrastructure that makes tokenization possible in the first place. Different goals lead to different decisions.

@zkToha Is it still deploying?

Deploying

@oct_gems $CHEX for RWA. The $ONDO token has no relationship with network usage; $CHEX does.

Here are a few projects I am keeping an eye on from the top narratives right now 👀 Layer-1: $KAS, $KTA, $QUBIC Privacy: $ZANO, $XMR, $ZEC RWA: $ONDO, $CPOOL, $ZBCN Neobanks: $TEL, $TITN, $AVICI What about you? Which projects are your favourites from these narratives? 👇

@stacy_muur You need to look into $CHEX. Once utility is turned on tokenomics will align with usage.

Most crypto tokens are designed backwards. You make money by selling, not by holding. Which means every other holder is your competition from day one. Founders are timing their vesting unlock, investors are timing theirs, and retail is trying to front-run both. Nobody is actually aligned; everyone is just playing musical chairs. The fix isn't complicated in theory, if holders earn by holding rather than selling, the incentive flips. You stop trying to outmaneuver other holders and start trying to grow the protocol. Your competition becomes other protocols, not your own community. The reason it hasn't happened comes down to two things: • Distributing revenue to holders looked too much like an unregistered security under existing law. That legal risk killed the idea before it started for most teams. • The infrastructure to do it cheaply didn't exist. Gas costs on the mainnet Ethereum made programmatic revenue distribution impractical. L2s solved the second problem, and L1 is scaling. Regulation is close to solving the first. The teams paying attention to this now have a real head start. Worth reading the full piece ↓

@flowing_phases @Shiretowndown @fintechfrank @andyyy @SplyceFi already tracking them. splyce's RWA tokenization on solana puts them right in the middle of where vault infrastructure is heading

RWA started 2025 at $3.5B ended at $12B that's $8.5B added in 12 months then the last 2 months grew $8.6B more same growth in 2 months as the entire year before that's what you call acceleration

@nicrypto Take a look at @SplyceFi which are focused on retail investors.

Is this really bullish for crypto? RWAs on Ethereum just crossed $150B. Not bad at all But is this actually good for crypto devs, or is it just TradFi moving onto Ethereum? Sure, a 200% move over the year is impressive But we know most of that capital is institutional. It’s not like it’s building new crypto-native systems. We can argue that RWAs mean crypto is evolving Or, we can just agree that financial giants have found a new wrapper. Do you think RWAs are a breakthrough for Defi…or did Wall Street hijack our space?

Great framework @SilvioBusonero — the barriers you've mapped are exactly what @chintainetwork, @splycefi & @archntwrk are building through. Your article identifies standardized legal wrappers and compliance as two of the biggest blockers. Chintai is purpose-built for both. Its dual MAS licenses allow it to deliver full end-to-end tokenization — from issuance to secondary trading — within a compliant and auditable framework, supporting multiple fund structures like VCCs, SPVs, and private funds. This puts Chintai upstream of the lending market — it's the origination and compliance infrastructure that makes RWAs safe enough to list as collateral in the first place. The compliance problem isn't solved at the protocol level; it's solved at the asset. $5–10B deal flow projected for FY2026. Organic distribution is one of the hardest unsolved problems you raise. Splyce attacks it directly as the dedicated distribution layer for RWAs on Solana. Their S-Token structure with Chintai is exactly the vault-registrar thinking Securitize is pursuing — compliance isolated at the asset level, not the protocol. Users never directly hold the security tokens but gain full yield exposure through DeFi-compatible mirror tokens. Composable, permissionless, AML-compliant. You note borrower demand is currently driven by speculation. Bitcoin holders are structurally the opposite — long-term holders seeking yield without selling. Yet less than 1% of Bitcoin participates in DeFi. Arch enables native Bitcoin DeFi without bridging or wrapping. Combined with Chintai's RWA infrastructure via their HoneyB integration, this opens a collateral base and borrower demographic the rest of the RWA lending market isn't touching — genuinely organic demand, not incentive-driven. The stack: Chintai originates → Splyce distributes on Solana → Arch mobilizes Bitcoin capital natively. Three distinct problems from your framework. One coherent ecosystem. The road to $10B runs through infrastructure like this. #RWA #RWALending #DeFi #Bitcoin #Solana #Tokenization

@zkToha Wen launch? Weren't you guys just waiting for the security audit to be completed and now it's done?

Listen carefully kids Just some history class: we have been busy with vaults since 2022