工人团结起来! SWAA

55.1K posts

工人团结起来! SWAA banner
工人团结起来! SWAA

工人团结起来! SWAA

@prodbyswaa

radical spam, ask grok = get blocked

Los Angeles, CA Katılım Ağustos 2009
229 Takip Edilen481 Takipçiler
工人团结起来! SWAA retweetledi
youth code orange
youth code orange@thamosdeaf·
I like that building high speed rail in California requires nine thousand years of environmental impact studies but throwing up a data center the size of Texas takes fourteen seconds with zero material public support.
English
135
13.4K
95.5K
817.6K
工人团结起来! SWAA retweetledi
LA City Controller Kenneth Mejia
WANT us to audit & do fraud, waste, and abuse investigations WITHOUT getting our budget cut in retaliation? ✂️ Want us to be able to audit any City program no matter how expensive & regardless of where that program is housed? 🔎 YOU can help us! 💪🏼 Charterreform.lacontroller.app
English
9
40
109
2.6K
工人团结起来! SWAA retweetledi
Alan MacLeod
Alan MacLeod@AlanRMacLeod·
In the Kunduz Hospital attack (2015), Barack Obama became the only Nobel Peace Prize winner to bomb another winner (Doctors Without Borders).
American Values 🇺🇸@AVGirl4Life

What is the #1 thing Obama will be remembered for?

English
168
11.5K
51.4K
894.3K
工人团结起来! SWAA retweetledi
Malwarebytes
Malwarebytes@Malwarebytes·
You have four days left to enjoy encrypted chats on Instagram. Once May 8th rolls around, your chats will be visible to Meta.
Malwarebytes tweet media
English
121
2.1K
11K
469.7K
工人团结起来! SWAA retweetledi
工人团结起来! SWAA retweetledi
julia 🔻🪂
julia 🔻🪂@haesoook·
Just finished Revolutionary Suicide by Huey P Newton and I am fucking sobbing
julia 🔻🪂 tweet media
English
17
439
2.5K
33.2K
工人团结起来! SWAA retweetledi
Ken Klippenstein
Ken Klippenstein@kenklippenstein·
Here's 73-year-old Senator Susan Collins vibrating like an electric toothbrush in her re-election campaign announcement 😬
English
805
1.7K
23.4K
2.3M
工人团结起来! SWAA
@aakashgupta Does this mean the suit is pursuant to potential protections of ai application reviews of just white collar jobs or are the implications across the board for all employers?
English
0
0
3
2K
工人团结起来! SWAA retweetledi
Aakash Gupta
Aakash Gupta@aakashgupta·
Derek Mobley applied to over 100 jobs. He was rejected from every single one. Several rejections came at 1am, within minutes of submitting. He just became the lead plaintiff in the largest AI lawsuit ever certified. May 2025, Judge Rita Lin granted preliminary certification of a nationwide ADEA collective in Mobley v. Workday. Workday's own court filings represent that 1.1 billion job applications were rejected through its software in the relevant period. The court discussed potential class size in the hundreds of millions. If you're over 40 and you applied to a Fortune 500 in the last 7 years, your application was probably processed by Workday. You may be in the class. The legal precedent matters more than the headline number. For decades, the vendor screening applicants for an employer was not directly liable under Title VII. The employer was the only defendant. In July 2024, Judge Lin ruled the AI vendor itself qualifies as an "agent" of the employer and can be sued directly. First time. The "we're just the tools" defense evaporated in a single ruling. Same precedent now extends to every HR tech AI vendor in the pipeline. Greenhouse. Eightfold. HireVue. Paradox. None of it is priced into any of their valuations. Combine that with the rest of 2024. Air Canada lost in February for $812 because its chatbot hallucinated a refund policy, killing the chatbot-as-separate-entity defense. iTutorGroup paid $365K to the EEOC, confirming the algorithm doing the discriminating moves liability nowhere. Gemini cost Alphabet roughly $90B in market cap in days for one weekend of bad image generation. Every legal shield around AI in production got tested in court and lost. The AI PMs interviewing for foundation model roles can recite all four by month. Most engineers shipping AI at work cannot.
Aakash Gupta tweet mediaAakash Gupta tweet media
Aakash Gupta@aakashgupta

Reports are that Anthropic has a dedicated safety & ethics interview round. Here's how to build the first principles to crack it. Start with the distinction most candidates miss. AI safety is stopping the model from causing harm. Mechanical and observable. A guardrail that blocks medical misinformation. A confirmation gate before an agent sends an email. AI ethics is deciding what the model should and shouldn't do. Upstream and often invisible. A policy that the model won't draft termination letters. iTutorGroup's hiring AI worked exactly as designed. The ethics of the design were the failure. Then learn the sizing framework. The candidates who scored highest in our Cohort 3 mocks all used SHIR in the first 90 seconds of every safety question, before they proposed anything. S: Severity. Physical harm sits above discrimination sits above embarrassment. H: Harm scope. 10 users versus 10M users is a different response. I: Immediacy. Active harm or latent risk. Sets response speed. R: Reversibility. Can the action be undone. Determines whether you ship with monitoring or add hard confirmation gates. Pause, write the four letters on a notepad, then come back with structure. That move scored higher than any other in mocks. Then memorize four precedents. Cite by name and month. Air Canada chatbot, Feb 2024. British Columbia tribunal held the airline liable for a chatbot hallucinating a bereavement fare. The defense that the chatbot was a separate legal entity got rejected. Companies own their AI's representations. iTutorGroup, Aug 2023. $365K EEOC settlement. Hiring AI auto-rejected women 55+ and men 60+. About 200 qualified applicants screened out. Bias liability lands on the employer even when the algorithm does the discriminating. Mobley v. Workday, July 2024. First AI vendor held directly liable as an "agent" under Title VII. Collective certification followed under ADEA in May 2025. Vendor liability is no longer theoretical. Gemini image gen, Feb 2024. Alphabet shed roughly $90B in market cap in the days after the pause. Sundar called the outputs "unacceptable." The cost of acting is almost always lower than the cost of being seen as not acting. Then practice the three moves that consistently scored highest in our cohort mocks. Tier the response. Three options side by side with a cost on each. Binary "pull or ship" reads junior. Reframe under pushback. When the VP says "wait until earnings," the highest-scoring answer reframed revenue to headline. End with documentation. If leadership overrides you, write a memo to the manager, the safety lead, and legal. On the record. The full kit: → Video version on YouTube: youtube.com/watch?v=RaBw5S… → Coaching with Ankit Virmani (AI PM, Uber), Prasad Reddy (ex-CPO), and Dr. Bart Jaworski (12,000+ PMs coached) in Cohort 3, which opens tomorrow: landpmjob.com → Mock walkthrough and writeup on the newsletter: news.aakashg.com/p/safety-ethic…

English
101
2.2K
10K
3.5M
工人团结起来! SWAA retweetledi
Radical Graffiti
Radical Graffiti@GraffitiRadical·
A message from Mary, a 72-year-old Amazon worker from North Carolina projected onto Jeff Bezos’s $120 million penthouse before tonight’s #MetGala, chaired by Bezos.
English
160
4.2K
19.1K
2.9M