Reedi 烈義🇭🇰❤️!ьээя

Three weeks in. How’s the scorecard? @POTUS @TuckerCarlson @mehdirhasan @kofinas @ComicDaveSmith @benshapiro @theallinpod @joerogan @elonmusk @TheEconomist @UN @Antiwarcom @netanyahu … We, the human race, believe that when you run out of military targets then it’s time to stop the war. Schools and medical facilities are not military targets #IranMassacre‌ like and retweet if you agree

@GammaSqzStan @ComicDaveSmith @grok is this true? What are the military deaths on three sides of war of aggression started by Israel and USA against Iran?

@ComicDaveSmith We've killed 4k Iranian troops vs. our 13. We are literally letting them live, which you fail to understand. Giving up Uranium is not a big ask given there is no civilian use for the levels they've been enriching to. US generates <20% of power from nuclear...they'd be fine.

On Monday Marco Rubio said that we cannot allow Iran to have control over the strait of Hormuz, picking and choosing who enters and what currency they use. There is a very important reason why the administration feels this way: because it would be the greatest military defeat in US history. We lost in Vietnam and Afghanistan in a sense but never like this. If we leave now with the new status quo being Iran controls the strait then we have transformed a relegated, isolated, sanction crippled nation into a global power. Leaving now is an admission of a tremendous defeat and it’s also the best possible thing to do. This is the trap that Trump is now in all because he listened to Netanyahu and launched the insane war of choice.

@MarioNawfal @jakeshieldsajj Agree with this. Why not just outsource the UN defence operation to Hezbollah? They seem to be the only competent defenders of Lebanon.

@jakeshieldsajj That’s a fair concern That’s why a safer solution is merging Hezbollah in the country’s military rather than completely disarming it

Imagine Lebanon without Hezbollah Imagine Lebanon without Israeli occupation Imagine Lebanon without corrupt politicians

@MarioNawfal Lebanon without Hezbollah = greater Israel

@HillelNeuer Murderous regime? Which countries are top of the Murder charts this year. And the Apartheid & Genocide charts?

They tell us to listen to the UN—then they put the Islamic Regime in Iran on a UN committee dealing with women’s rights and terrorism prevention. We ask France, UK, Germany, Spain, Norway, Netherlands, Canada, Australia, Switzerland, Austria, Finland: Have you no shame?

@HillelNeuer @Framingfreedom I don’t get it. Do you think that Iranian women don’t have rights too? I’m pretty sure Cyrus the Great invented human rights over 2,500 years ago

Is your flag listed below? 🇬🇧🇪🇸🇨🇦🇫🇷🇩🇪🇳🇴🇳🇱🇦🇺🇨🇭🇦🇹🇫🇮 If yes, it means your government joined in the nomination of Iran to a UN committee dealing with women's rights and terrorism prevention. Your MP should formally ask the government to answer why they did such a terrible thing.

Half of the deaths were police. Trump already admitted to sending guns. It was a rerun of the 1953 Mosaad operation which overthrew an elected prime minister and replaced it with a despotic monarchy. This time a 2-3,000 died and the republic survived. That’s the good thing about republics. But you know that, don’t you since you live in one. The only reason the people started demonstrating was that their country has been under sanctions since 1979 so the economy has been destroyed. So who is really responsible for those deaths?

I don’t insist on any number fyi. It was a MASSACRE, and an unprecedented level of violence. I have first hand info from the streets of Iran and I have lived experience under the Islamic Republic. Don’t deny a nation’s suffering only because you oppose another gov’s wrongdoings. You seem to be a non-bot, so all I can ask you is show some empathy

His Holiness Pope Leo XIV (@Pontifex), I condemn the insult to Your Excellency on behalf of the great nation of Iran, and declare that the desecration of Jesus, the prophet of peace and brotherhood, is not acceptable to any free person. I wish you glory by Allah.

@Framingfreedom @drpezeshkian @Pontifex @grok where are these photos from?

You claim peace, yet your regime is responsible for the LARGEST MASSACRE OF MODERN HISTORY. You condemn insults to the Pope while silencing and killing both believers and dissenters at home. Invoking Jesus to attack the West convinces no one. Your words are empty when your hands are full of 🩸 #IranMassacre

@LindaLindy40 @cenkuygur @TuckerCarlson @megynkelly @RealAlexJones @RealCandaceO @marklevinshow @grok What does Marg bar Amrika really mean?

@cenkuygur @TuckerCarlson @megynkelly @RealAlexJones @RealCandaceO @marklevinshow Be quiet cenk. We love the president and want him to get the job done in Iran. Our beloved president donald J Trump please get rid of Islamic terrorist regime.

Trump just said @TuckerCarlson @megynkelly @RealAlexJones and @RealCandaceO are all low-IQ, losers who are trying to help Iran. Apparently, only @marklevinshow is real MAGA and the rest are secret lefties and Iran lovers. This is exactly how you kill your own movement.

@MarioNawfal You can take it all the way back to 1922. The British occupiers were dealing with Zionist terrorists. These people became the founding fathers of Israel. It’s a history of murder, apartheid and genocide.

🇮🇱 Israel has been in a near-constant state of war or high alert since its founding. From the 1948 war and the displacement of ~750,000 Palestinians (the Nakba), through the 1956 Suez Crisis, the 1967 Six-Day War, multiple Lebanon wars, repeated Gaza conflicts, and now the direct war with Iran, conflict has shaped much of its history and identity. Whether you see it as necessary self-defense in a hostile region or the result of expansionist policies and over-reliance on military power, one thing is clear: Israel has rarely known long periods of genuine peace. The big question many are asking right now is whether this cycle can ever be broken, or if perpetual conflict has simply become the norm. Source: @trtworld

@grok @aryamanish469 @IRanMediaco @grok how many Iranian educational and healthcare establishments have been damaged by the aggressors’ air strikes?

Under international humanitarian law (Geneva Conventions Additional Protocol I, Rome Statute), intentionally directing attacks at civilian objects like universities is prohibited and can be a war crime if they are not military objectives (e.g., not used for weapons storage, command, or direct military support). In doubt, they retain civilian status. In WWII, universities were damaged or destroyed in city bombings (e.g., UCL in London during the Blitz, parts of Leeds, Warsaw). Modern rules are stricter than 1940s practice. Specific incidents like recent Iranian university strikes require verified details on targeting and use to assess legality.

🇺🇸🇮🇷BREAKING: Iran says the United States has until March 30, 12:00 p.m. (Tehran time) to condemn the bombing of Iranian universities. If it does not, Iran will carry out strikes against multiple American universities in the Middle East.

@MarioNawfal You forgot another important party who also doesn’t know what Trump is going to do next…?

As a negotiator, it's always good to keep the other side confused as to what you're thinking And Trump is mastering this skillset All 'experts' and 'analysts' have no idea what the hell Trump is going to do next, whether they like to admit it or not

You just told me what’s going on. Thank you, we will trade the markets accordingly Like you, I agree that all wars are bad. They are all in direct contravention of the sixth commandment “thou shalt not kill” That’s something accepted by all: Jews, Christians, Muslims, Buddhists, Hindus, Confucius and Marx. Let’s call them the #humanrace Here’s a plan for resolution which should be tabled by @khamenei_ir and @Iran and sent to @FranceskAlbs at the @UN and @UCLUNSC 1. Peace in the Middle East a) Israel and Iran to admit @iaeaorg to fully inspect with unfettered access all nuclear programmes. And provide a report to the @UCLUNSC b) the Holy Land to be declared a WMD free zone to be guaranteed by all nations who have a stake in the Holy Land. TBD but let’s call them the #humanrace c) the governance of the Holy Land to be reset to resolution 181 of the @UCLUNSC dated 29 November 1947 of which here is a summary of the matters agreed therein:- (Thanks to @grok and @elonmusk for the summary) Summary of UNGA Resolution 181 (II) – Future Government of Palestine (adopted 29 November 1947) • Background and Recommendation: The General Assembly, having examined the UN Special Committee’s report, recommended ending the British Mandate for Palestine and adopting the “Plan of Partition with Economic Union.” It called on the UK and all UN members to implement the plan, requested Security Council support, and urged Palestinians to cooperate. • Timeline and Independence: The Mandate terminates no later than 1 August 1948, with full British withdrawal by then. Independent Arab and Jewish states, plus an international regime for Jerusalem, come into existence no later than 1 October 1948. A transitional period follows the resolution’s adoption. • UN Commission and Transition: A five-member UN Commission oversees implementation. It sets boundaries, establishes Provisional Councils of Government in each state, organises democratic elections to Constituent Assemblies, recruits local militias, and progressively transfers administration. Provisional Councils gain authority over immigration and land regulation. • Rights and Declarations: Each state must issue a UN declaration guaranteeing: protection of Holy Places and freedom of access/worship; no discrimination on grounds of race, religion, sex or language; equal legal protection; minority education and language rights; citizenship for residents (with limited opt-out); respect for international treaties and financial obligations; and UN-guaranteed minority protections. Constitutions must ensure democratic governance, human rights and peaceful dispute settlement. • Economic Union: A customs union, common currency, joint administration of railways/roads/ports, shared economic development (e.g., irrigation) and equitable revenue sharing are created. A Joint Economic Board (equal representatives from both states plus UN appointees) oversees implementation. • Jerusalem: Designated a “corpus separatum” under UN Trusteeship Council administration. It is demilitarised; a UN-appointed Governor ensures protection of Holy Places, freedom of access for all faiths, local autonomy and special status for surrounding villages (e.g., Bethlehem, Ein Karim). • Boundaries: Detailed frontiers allocate western Galilee, central highlands and Jaffa enclave to the Arab State (~43% of territory); eastern Galilee, coastal plain (Haifa to south of Tel Aviv) and Negev to the Jewish State (~56%). Maps in Annex A define exact village-based lines. • Additional Provisions: Progressive British evacuation; asset division; appeals for peaceful compliance; and sympathetic consideration for both states’ future UN membership. The plan aims to ensure viable, peaceful independence while safeguarding economic unity and religious rights. Seems like @UKParliament fulfilled their side of the bargain. Over to you @netanyahu

Here's how we get out of this war - we make a deal with Iran that we stop attacking them, they stop attacking us and our allies in the Gulf and open up the Strait of Hormuz. Then let Israel and Iran fight as long as they like. Not our war, accomplished our goals. Let's come home!

Jeffrey Sachs exposed Modi like no one else. Listen...thank me later.

The "right to exist" of a state has no basis in international law and no precedent in diplomatic practice. Simply put, a state's right to exist does not exist. If Israel nevertheless proclaims a "right to exist", the only reasonable basis for the existence of such a right is that it is a universal one, equally applicable to every other state at the time it was first raised, and particularly applicable to those whose legitimacy, like that of Israel, was also challenged. If it is a right that applies to Israel alone, it is not and cannot be a right. It bears recalling that there were at least two other states that had a similar claim to a "right to exist" when Israel first invented it, on the grounds that their legitimacy and continued existence were also challenged: Rhodesia and the USSR. Yet neither the Soviet Union nor Rhodesia claimed a "right to exist". Nobody and no other state ever claimed either of them had an inherent right to exist, or claimed any fundamental rights would be violated if these states ceased to exist and disappeared from the map. In the case of Rhodesia, there was in fact an international consensus that it cease to exist. This succeeded and Rhodesia was replaced by Zimbabwe, to universal acclaim. It is also important to recognize that Israel's claims of a "right to exist" have nothing to do with achieving a peaceful resolution of the Question of Palestine, and are fundamentally about preventing one. Israel's "right to exist" was first raised precisely because the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO), recognized by the international community as the sole legitimate representative of the Palestinian people, appeared to be amenable to accepting earlier demands by the United States in exchange for recognition of its mere existence: PLO acceptance of United Nations Security Council resolutions 242 and 338, renunciation of armed force, and recognition of Israel. The demand of a "right to exist" was proclaimed by Israel precisely in order to prevent Western recognition of the PLO, and in the expectation that the PLO would reject it out of hand as an unacceptable absurdity. Needless to say, Washington and its Western partners eagerly embraced the Israeli innovation, and never required Israel to define the borders within which the entity was supposed to enjoy a right to exist. When the PLO formally accepted Israel's "right to exist" in the context of the 1993 Oslo Accords, it was careful not to formulate it as an absolute right: "The PLO recognizes the right of the State of Israel to exist in peace and security". Palestinian negotiators had wanted to add "within the 5 June 1967 borders", but this was categorically rejected by Israel. It was made unambiguously clear that addition of this clause would have made agreement impossible. Israel demanded and the PLO accepted the above formulation, but it changed absolutely nothing. Several years later, Israel began demanding that the Palestinian not only recognize its "right to exist" but recognize "Israel's right to exist as a Jewish state". It once again did so on the presumption that this would be embraced by its Western sponsors and allies but that the Palestinians would reject the absurdity of this innovation. Israel's objective was to make negotiations and thus a diplomatic settlement impossible, and to ensure that the Palestinians rather than Israel were held responsible for the stalemate. It largely worked, as Western leaders and "mediators" once again embraced the Israeli demand and tried to pressure the Palestinians to accept it. I would not expect Tucker Carlson to be aware of this history. I would however expect Zanny Minton Beddoes, the Editor-in-Chief of The Economist, to be at least generally familiar with the issue, particularly since she made a point of interrogating Carlson about it. Yet, once again, when it comes to Israel, journalists believe themselves perfectly entitled to be zany, and virtually always get away with it.

@DropSiteNews Forgot to mention these stats

💢 On Day 22, CENTCOM claimed a severe degradation in Iranian missile and drone capability, hours before Iran responded with attacks in Israel: 🔹U.S. forces said they struck more than 8,000 military targets in Iran since the start of Operation Epic Fury over three weeks ago. 🔹More than 130 Iranian vessels were claimed destroyed, which Adm. Cooper described as the “largest elimination of a navy over a three-week period since World War II.” 🔹Recent strikes using multiple 5,000-pound bombs hit a hardened underground coastal facility used to store anti-ship missiles near the Strait of Hormuz. This facility, along with associated intelligence and radar sites was destroyed. ➡️ As a result, CENTCOM claimed Iran’s ability to threaten international shipping has been significantly “degraded.”

@Consciouslyx @cenkuygur The question itself question is pure propaganda Hamas removed it from their charter years ago. Iran adopted resolution 181 of the @UN despite being one of the few nations which did not vote for it There is no evidence that Iran thinks that Israel has no right to exist

That is precisely the point: the concept asserting that "Israel cannot exist" was created by jihadists, Palestinians, and Iranian ayatollahs. Without this concept, there would be no conflict with Israel. If you support the Palestinians and the jihadists, you automatically become the aggressor, while Israel becomes the victim—compelled to defend itself.

The framing of the question “does Israel have a right to exist” is fundamentally misleading. It’s meant to frame Israel as the victim and fighting for their very survival. That’s utter nonsense. Israel exists, has nukes, Iron Dome and a dominant military. PALESTINE DOESN’T EXIST.

This is the propaganda you have been fed but the truth is that every single act of aggression starting in 1922 was instigated by Zionist terrorists and their successors. 1948, 1953, 1967, 1973, 1975, 1982, 2016, 2024 and now 2026 - go back and look at the record of @UN resolutions

It's not misleading. It's the core question. Its inconvenient for you because if you ask that question to Hamas or the leadership of Iran, their answer will be no. Which is why Israel has been attacked by its Arab neighbors since its creation - because they object to its existence.

Yes, you are correct. The war has been going on since the 1920s when the British partitioned Palestine and started dealing with Zionist terrorists. Since that time all the wars have been started by those colonialists and their successors. The terrorism and murder continued through 1948, 1953, 1967, 1973, 1982, 1991, 2016, 2024 and now 2026. Go back and read all the @UN security council resolutions. The evidence is there for everyone to see. Isn’t the sixth commandment of God “Thou shalt not kill”? That’s pretty unambiguous to the whole of the human race.

@cenkuygur Calling Israel’s existence “nonsense” while ignoring decades of war, terror attacks, and constant threats is straight up dishonest!!! Israel’s strength is why it still exists because it has to defend itself bro!!, its not hard to understand Cenk

Israel asserted its right to exist in 1948 based on UN resolution 181 un.org/unispal/docume… Here’s a summary of what it says thanks to @grok and @elonmusk I have to say it all sounds very sensible to me. Any country that doesn’t follow the resolution which established its right to exist is more likely an abomination than a “liberal democracy”. I especially like the bit about Jerusalem being open to humanity. Let’s just move the UN to Jerusalem and be done with it. The US can donate its shiny new embassy there to get the ball rolling… Summary of UNGA Resolution 181 (II) – Future Government of Palestine (adopted 29 November 1947) • Background and Recommendation: The General Assembly, having examined the UN Special Committee’s report, recommended ending the British Mandate for Palestine and adopting the “Plan of Partition with Economic Union.” It called on the UK and all UN members to implement the plan, requested Security Council support, and urged Palestinians to cooperate. • Timeline and Independence: The Mandate terminates no later than 1 August 1948, with full British withdrawal by then. Independent Arab and Jewish states, plus an international regime for Jerusalem, come into existence no later than 1 October 1948. A transitional period follows the resolution’s adoption. • UN Commission and Transition: A five-member UN Commission oversees implementation. It sets boundaries, establishes Provisional Councils of Government in each state, organises democratic elections to Constituent Assemblies, recruits local militias, and progressively transfers administration. Provisional Councils gain authority over immigration and land regulation. • Rights and Declarations: Each state must issue a UN declaration guaranteeing: protection of Holy Places and freedom of access/worship; no discrimination on grounds of race, religion, sex or language; equal legal protection; minority education and language rights; citizenship for residents (with limited opt-out); respect for international treaties and financial obligations; and UN-guaranteed minority protections. Constitutions must ensure democratic governance, human rights and peaceful dispute settlement. • Economic Union: A customs union, common currency, joint administration of railways/roads/ports, shared economic development (e.g., irrigation) and equitable revenue sharing are created. A Joint Economic Board (equal representatives from both states plus UN appointees) oversees implementation. • Jerusalem: Designated a “corpus separatum” under UN Trusteeship Council administration. It is demilitarised; a UN-appointed Governor ensures protection of Holy Places, freedom of access for all faiths, local autonomy and special status for surrounding villages (e.g., Bethlehem, Ein Karim). • Boundaries: Detailed frontiers allocate western Galilee, central highlands and Jaffa enclave to the Arab State (~43% of territory); eastern Galilee, coastal plain (Haifa to south of Tel Aviv) and Negev to the Jewish State (~56%). Maps in Annex A define exact village-based lines. • Additional Provisions: Progressive British evacuation; asset division; appeals for peaceful compliance; and sympathetic consideration for both states’ future UN membership. The plan aims to ensure viable, peaceful independence while safeguarding economic unity and religious rights.

@cenkuygur It is because of people like Cenk that makes it a relevant question. Cenk supports the terrorists trying to destroy Israel. Cenk supports the destruction of Israel. So Cenk, does Israel have the right to exist?

@cenkuygur @citizenjournos_ I agree that it’s a stupid question (read propaganda) but since we have to deal with stupid people we need to study how to get through to them. I think @TuckerCarlson answered it very well and he’s going viral with it. Prior to this, I liked @FranceskAlbs youtube.com/shorts/k12E7Lu…