Rebuilding Reality

The only cure for mass psychosis is an educated population. People don't understand psychological control and emotional manipulation. It starts with repetition. If you tell a child they're stupid often enough, they'll believe you. If you tell a population someone else is your enemy over and over again, they'll believe you. Next it becomes generational. It starts by waking up to the control the messaging has over people's minds and mental health. Politicians aren't the problem. The Globalist Media Complex is the problem.

@Duckett62 @ABDanielleSmith @nenshi Huh? I think you're confused.

@ABDanielleSmith @nenshi I trust a librarian to ensure my children are viewing age appropriate material in an appropriate space. I do NOT trust the UCP to determine this! Libraries should be safe spaces!

Alberta parents want their kids focused on the basics at school. Our government is not backing down on this. The NDP don’t agree and based upon the “equity card” meltdowns from their recent convention, one can see why…

No he didn't. He wants to be Prime Minister. It's unreasonable to expect him to promote the separation of a province when he's running as Federal leadership. Just because he's not riding on your train doesn't mean he doesn't care about Alberta. We have Danielle for the province. Polievre can deal with the federal Liberals.

@AnaPoilievre @PaolaQP1231 @StevenBartlett Nice, but the conservatives are finished in this country and it will be a one party liberal dictatorship soon l. Your husband 💩on Alberta. We won’t forget

Last week, my husband sat down with @StevenBartlett from the Diary of a CEO. The behind the scenes on how we got such short notice to do his podcast was insane. Finding flights and trying to cram everything into a short period of time. We were on route to wrap up Pierre's USA tour when we got the email, we were in NYC. So now we had to figure out how to get to LA fast, and back on time for Monday's meetings in Ottawa. There was no way we were going to pass on this. Why? My personal thoughts were because I have watched Diary of a CEO for over a year, and what I have seen from Steven and his team is beyond anything else out there. The level of research they do on their guests, and their capacity to ask ANY question, the tough ones, the more personal ones, in such a professional manner. It is not about trying to get a “gotcha” moment. It is about truly getting to know and understand the person sitting across from Steven. This time, it was my husband. I saw him like in no other interview. Finally relaxed, being himself, so open to talk about everything, including his childhood, his adoptive parents AND biological parents. But also about our beloved Valentina. I can say with confidence that this is THE MOST IN-DEPTH interview Pierre has ever done. Steven did not hold back. But he does it with respect, and in a format that allows people to fully explain themselves. That is the magic of these long-format platforms. Pierre got to share his vision for Canada, the problems, the solutions. He also got to explain his WHY, which really is rooted in his childhood experiences. I am thankful for platforms like this that, in my personal opinion, are doing a better job than the current media out there. But even more thankful that there are hosts like Steven who operate on the principle of hearing all sides with an open mind and allowing people to express themselves. If I can be honest with you, my favourite YouTube channel is not Diary of a CEO. It actually is BEHIND THE DIARY (@behindthediary). That is where you get to see how Steven does it, how he builds a team. One thing I remember well is when he mentioned that he needs to work with people who keep an open mind because his goal is to talk to everyone. From Michelle Obama to Boris Johnson to Kamala Harris, and now my husband Pierre Poilievre, Steven sits there with an open mind and asks ALL questions without holding back. It is also important to note that it is equally important for the guest to do the same. So naturally, our team had no limitations on what he could ask. This is by far my favourite interview. 🫶🏻 Go watch it : youtube.com/watch?v=9JxaES…

There's also a time to remove a regime that murders 30,000 innocent citizens for peaceful protest, hangs homosexuals from cranes, kills Christians by firing squad, and equips constant terrorism in the Middle East. They've also flaunted building nuclear weapons and wouldn't accept a peace deal from Trump to stop. We're all sick of 60+ years of terrorism. It's evil.

@Modster99 @renewreality @TheMilkBarTV cost of discipleship… you’re telling me to read the entire book while quoting, cost of discipleship. Where Jesus speaks of being willing to love him before family the refuses to acknowledge him. Be the sword… this is not in context to justify war. Blessed are the peacemakers.

Watch Candace Owens lies to her audience and rewrites history... In December, during her sit-down with Erika Kirk, Candace said they didn’t have access to additional evidence - and that authorities “could very well” have more evidence they simply couldn’t share with the victim’s friends and family. Today, she told her audience: “When I sat down with Erika, I explained to you that her lawyer told me that right now we don’t have any evidence. Right now (Dec 2025), the state is going to go out there and find the evidence.” Not only does she gaslight her audience about what she previously said, she also expects them to believe Tyler Robinson was arrested and charged with no evidence - which is completely implausible and idiotic.

@jodoucette2025 @JasminLaine_ Agreed. I'll be watching.

@renewreality @JasminLaine_ Well, how about we agree to disagree and watch how this all plays out?

BREAKING: Trump tells Erika Kirk to “sue their ass” at the White House Easter lunch today. Presumably, he’s referring to Druski’s “Conservative Women” skit.

My two cents: Government sponsored media, corrupt elections, Liberal censorship, Trump Derangement Syndrome. Pierre is accused of being like Trump for anything he does out of step with the Liberals, so he's been too restrained on the big issues. Unless he totally embraces Trump and goes for broke, they will keep him squeezed out. The Liberals and the mainstream media are as corrupt here as Democrats are in the US. Pierre needs to ignore the polls. I hope these interviews will release his courage to take a stronger position on the more controversial topics.

@ConradRed4 @StevenBartlett Must be more than that. Voters didn't choose him. Perhaps it is more about comfort zones.

Could this be the next Prime Minister of Canada? Recently, I’ve been finding myself up all night trying to figure out what the hell is going on in the world and if we're on the verge of World War III… So, today I’m sitting down with Pierre Poilievre who is the leader of Canada's Conservative Party and Leader of the Opposition. He became one of the youngest MPs elected to Canadian parliament and has spent 2 decades fighting for working class people and fair opportunities. Pierre told me that he’s on a mission to make Canada the freest and most affordable place in the world, and he’s not stopping until that happens. To give you more context on his background, Pierre was adopted at birth by two school teachers who struggled financially and ended up losing multiple homes which meant that they had to start again from nothing several times throughout his childhood. That experience shaped what he believes about work, money, and fairness. When speaking about his parents, he told me that they taught him that it doesn’t matter where you come from. It matters what you do. That belief is now at the centre of everything he’s trying to change.

If that were true she would shut up and present the reciepts to authorities. Blabbing everything out on the internet isn't how law enforcement catches bad guys. No, Erika doesn't have to prove herself innocent. She has legal rights. Maybe the defence will call Candace in as an expert and submit her receipts as evidence.

@renewreality @JasminLaine_ Candace has receipts for anything she has put out there. The onus would be on Erika to provide evidence that Candace is not being truthful.

I really don't care. The lack of logic just bugs me. If the shooting was in an auditorium the staff would come after and wash the floors, and maybe even replace the flooring. It doesn't matter- the police already examined it! No one preserves a crime scene for an indefinite time. The tape goes up, then the tape comes down, and people can do whatever they want after that. It's just annoying seeing so many people believing online drama. Knock yourself out.

Why are you making excuses for covering up a crime scene? You know how ridiculous you sound? You’re saying in this case unlike every other investigation, there’s nothing to see here. Absolutely ridiculous sorry but it just doesn’t sound very intelligent and it is not how a real investigation is conducted EVER. you’re so worried about what Candace is making. Do you know how much Erika and TPUS USA have made off Charlie’s death alone? Keep up. There are public records showing they’re nonprofit…… profits. They spend millions on disparaging Candace all over social media. Why ? What they rake in makes Candace’s Pay look like chump change. None of you can even explain why they wouldn’t want anyone and everyone to do as complete of an investigation as possible no matter who it is that’s doing it. You think this looks normal? It tells us they are so threatened by her revealing exactly what they’re up to. So much of it has nothing to do with Charlie’s death. Too many people in TP USA are millionaires living in mansions. These are facts and yet you’re worried about Candace getting paid for investigating this shit show one road at a time.

So the FBI said months ago that Charlie Kirk‘s assassination has been thoroughly investigated by them and they are leaving it to the Utah authorities. But now since their narrative has been questioned with this fragment not matching the gun they’re not buying the ATF report they’re back in it again using old debunked forensics. Sounds like they’re going to make that fragment match that gun no matter what! Fed slop at it again. youtu.be/khXgPOLefGc

Who told you Erika was a 'honey pot'? That sounds like something someone told you to think. Who cares if Candace spent more time with Charlie? He chose Erika to be his wife and mother of his children. That instantly made Erika more important to him than Candace ever was. Is Candace jealous of Erika? Does she think she owns him because of some amount of "time" she spent with him? That's bizarre. That's creepy ex-whatever she was. A working acquaintance? If she was his girlfriend that's even more creepy. Let the guy go. Maybe Erika needs to do some kind of digital restraining order. This is like a new form of cyberstalking--"investigating" the murder of someone's husband and terrorizing his wife online.

@renewreality @RedWavePress Her husband already has 100s of millions. She's not doing it for the money. She spent more time with Charlie over the years than Erika did. Erika was a honey pot.

During the White House Easter Lunch, President Trump spotted Erika Kirk in the crowd and urged her to “sue their a$$[es] off” — directing her to go after the scumbags defaming her. “Hello darling… You’re doing well, right? I think you should sue them, but you know. I told her, you ought to sue some of these people. They’re so jealous of Erika.” “I said you ought to sue their—I can say it, you’re not allowed to say this you have to be nicer—sue their a$$ off.” God Bless Erika Kirk!

People start doing things for greed and jealousy. I notice no one is complaining that Candace is a CEO and spending all of her time doing this "investigation" and producing a podcast instead of taking care of her children, but they're accusing Erika of not spending enough time with her children when other people are running the organization activites. I don't believe Candace has good intentions. Have you seen her doing positive, uplifting things for people? I haven't. Does she build people up or tear them down?

I think this position has degraded in most schools. I've seen it in the contempt displayed towards certain political "beliefs" by professors, and avoidance of speakers or balanced presentation of political positions. Unfortunately many don't see what they're doing because departments self-filter to a specific ideology and they believe their views are the only right ones. I think university students are just as vulnerable as younger students to the authority influence of professors and universities on ideology. I spoke with a lot of students who felt the pressure and felt forced to conform to the curriculum and professor's views.

@renewreality @cancivlib It doesn't mean they can't talk about their beliefs. It means they need to take care to separate personal convictions from pedagogy, and in some age groups, that means limiting the personal as younger students accept their teacher as a stronger "authority"

Alberta’s new education bill entrenches censorship under the guise of neutrality, by restricting expression and centralizing decision-making power over what can be taught and discussed in schools. ccla.org/press-release/…

What could there have possibly been in some fragments on the ground? They don't need his blood in the grass, or footprints, or any other fragments they didn't find at the time. Maybe they paved it so students wouldn't think of Charlie's blood on the ground every time they walked there. This isn't a magical mystery show. He was clearly shot on video, there's a fragment, there's casings, there's a rifle, there's witnesses, testimony, DNA, etc. Maybe they can prove matches with some things or maybe they can't. That's why they have expert witnesses. Sometimes experts agree and sometimes they don't. We'll see if the defence attorney asks Candace to testify on Tyler's behalf. It will come out in trial. Meanwhile Candace will make about $100 million off of her followers, and won't give a dime back for all your efforts.

We all will watch the trial and there better be some questions brought up on how this investigation became a shit show by the FBI. Maybe they can answer why the crime scene was contaminated immediately by some guy standing on the very chair that Charlie was just murdered on minutes before to get an SD card out of a camera. Or the fact that they decided to cover the crime scene with concrete just days after Charlie was murdered. Maybe they can explain why they did not keep Charlie‘s phone and gave it to his wife. that people went back into that car and took things out like their laptops and Charlie’s necklaces? Contaminating another crime scene . Evidence that they should have kept in custody and thoroughly investigated now they didn’t do that. they sold the car. There’s so much more, but these glaring missed steps were on purpose. they actually used concrete to cover up any possible evidence where are all the other fragments? I imagine they’re under concrete. We will never know because not only is their contamination there’s cover-up. What do you think? There were no plans of doing this new remodel on UVU so I wonder who decided concrete should’ve been poured on a crime scene. The FBI has been so use to doing whatever they want and depending on the bought and paid for mainstream media to back up their narrative they made too many mistakes this time. A governor who says we’ve got him. Who the hell is he say we’ve got him. The transparent deceit was glaring. What happened to? We have a suspect in custody because we are a nation that says people are innocent until proven guilty by a jury of our peers. A wife who forgives a kid that didn’t publicly say I did it another person who says he is guilty before proof beyond a reasonable doubt. Why doesn’t his wife want this intensive investigation to make sure that whoever did this is convicted . In all my years, I’ve never seen a bigger shit show than this. And it has nothing to do with Candace followers. Or anyone else who points out these glaring mistakes in this investigation. Yes let’s see what at this trial brings if it ever gets to trial. I only hope they don’t kill this kid before trial.

I'm not sure, but it's not like Erika would be on trial if Erika sued Candace. This is my guess based on trials I've watched: Erika's lawyers could show Candaces posts, allegations, etc. since its all public, and show evidence of the effects on her reputation, mental health, income, etc. Candace would be the defence, so it would be on her lawyers to provide proof of her allegations. The defence could ask for certain things but they'd need to have a reason. They can't just demand to see everything in a person's life because they want to. They have to have just cause. Like police can't do a search of your phone if they don't already have a reason, so Candace couldn't go through Erika's phone records to try to find something. For example, recently an Idaho professor sued a Tik Tok Psychic for defamation because the psychic published 100's of videos saying the professor murdered 4 students from the university, and she wouldn't stop. The professor claimed reputation damage, stress, illness from stress, etc. She didn't have to prove she didn't murder the students. They couldn't go through her personal life to find 'proof' she did it. All the psychic had was her testimony that she believed it. The psychic represented herself, but if she had a lawyer they'd need to provide the proof the psychic based her claims on. They couldn't search the professors house, for example. The psychic's defence was her intuition and tarot cards (even though the actual murderer went to trial and was found guilty). The jury ended up awarding the professor $10 million even though the professor only asked for around $2 million I think. Think of it like someone accused you of something you didn't do. They have to show the proof they had to make the accusation, but they wouldn't have a right to violate your privacy and your life to try to prove you did it. I'm not an expert, I'm just thinking it through.

@renewreality @JasminLaine_ Does it not provide answers? 🤷‍♀️

@jodoucette2025 @JasminLaine_ x.com/bonchieredstat…

@JasminLaine_ We keep hoping! Discovery will be delicious!

@Juno1511859 @JasminLaine_ x.com/bonchieredstat…

@JasminLaine_ Yes! Sue! Let's get discovery! In real life, she wont. She knows why

How to avoid catching brain rot: 1. Read your Bible more than you scroll. 2. Test every voice, and discern whether what they say lines up with scripture or not. 3. Remember, truth is consistent, character-filled, and rooted in Christ. 4. Stop following people who say “Christ is King”, but fail to exhibit any Fruit of the Spirit. 5. Stay grounded in the local church. 6. Renew your mind daily. Romans 12:2

@ImJustDebi @RedWavePress x.com/bonchieredstat…

@renewreality @RedWavePress That still won't stop discovery. So many skeletons have already been revealed. They're just the tip of the iceberg. Erika won't be suing anyone

@ImJustDebi @RedWavePress You know scripture says to deal with the log in your own eye first right? Or he who has no sin cast the first stone? Or bless those who curse you Don't return evil for evil Beware lest you be overcome by the sin?

@renewreality @RedWavePress Exposing evil isn't doing evil. When you see it, you call it out.

Maybe. I don't know. I didn't know Charlie, but it seemed to me that he had a very clear understanding of evil. The difficulty with narcisists is they will point to others and deflect from themselves. They use smoke and mirrors to make other people look like the bad guys. It can be extremely deceptive. They're liars. They project their beliefs onto their enemies. They enlist others to attack for them, and act like they're innocent. God actually says we are not to return evil for evil, we are to pray for our enemies and forgive them. He is the only one who has the power to expose and defeat evil. When people fight evil with evil, they become the evil. They are doing what they accuse others of doing. It's witchcraft.

@renewreality @RedWavePress Evil is evil & needs to be exposed. That's no woman. That's a sociopathic narcissist that needs to be contained.