Rob Krugman

487 posts

Rob Krugman banner
Rob Krugman

Rob Krugman

@robkrugman

Chief Digital Officer @Broadridge / focused on #digitalsolutions, #defi,#customerengagement & #idmgmt / more than 25+ years of experience in #tech. Views my own

New York Katılım Haziran 2009
612 Takip Edilen346 Takipçiler
Alex
Alex@ivandemigoal·
Age yourself by naming an NHL goalie you grew up watching. I’ll start: Carey Price.
English
7.9K
60
2.4K
685.9K
Rob Krugman
Rob Krugman@robkrugman·
@AmericanAir flight 1925 from DFW to LGA sitting waiting 10 feet from the gate to be tugged to the gate for 15 minutes. Do better
English
4
0
0
96
Jesse Pujji
Jesse Pujji@jspujji·
I hired an ex McKinsey consultant to compile all my companies' sales materials. I wanted to see how each company reaches over $20M in annual revenue. He collected: - Recordings of sales calls - Sales scripts - SOPs - Led gen systems - etc 100s of top companies paid me for access to it. Today I'll give it away for free. Comment "sales" to get a copy.
English
1.2K
32
650
151.2K
lindsey vonn
lindsey vonn@lindseyvonn·
I DID IT!!!! 🥈P2‼️After everything I’ve been through, I fought my way back on to the podium!! I can’t even start to describe what this means to me… I have been overwhelmed with emotion and support from so many people. I want to say thank you to everyone who believed in me! Going to enjoy this moment and reflect. More soon! Sun Valley, you showed up! Thank you 🙏🏻🙏🏻 🇺🇸 🇺🇸 USA!!!
lindsey vonn tweet medialindsey vonn tweet media
English
409
415
9.2K
339.6K
Ben Kelly
Ben Kelly@benkellyone·
Everyone needs a small business portfolio that makes at least $100k/year. Last year, mine made over $750k. Want to do the same? - Like this post - Comment “Portfolio” And I’ll DM you a doc with the 10 steps I used to build mine. (Must follow, 24 hours only)
English
155
8
207
39.5K
CC Sabathia
CC Sabathia@CC_Sabathia·
FIRST BALLOT HALL OF FAMER!!!!! I LOVE YOU ALL!!!
English
2.5K
7K
76.5K
2.7M
Rob Krugman
Rob Krugman@robkrugman·
Whatever genius is responsible for the new traffic pattern at JFK should be fired immediately. I get there is construction but come on, this is moronic
English
0
0
1
91
Rob Krugman retweetledi
Kendall Baker
Kendall Baker@kendallbaker·
Well folks, I think I've found the "Photo of the Day." My goodness, what a shot of Gabriel Medina! 📸 Jerome Brouillet/AFP via Getty Images
Kendall Baker tweet media
English
43
904
9.1K
739.1K
Rob Krugman retweetledi
a16z crypto
a16z crypto@a16zcrypto·
Interested in learning about DAOs? Here are some of our resources. 🧵
English
27
70
337
65.8K
Rob Krugman retweetledi
Historic Vids
Historic Vids@historyinmemes·
Watch how Steve Jobs responded to an aggressive question (1997)
English
157
584
4.3K
1M
Rob Krugman retweetledi
RYAN SΞAN ADAMS - rsa.eth 🦄
Stablecoins will happen in the U.S. because BlackRock and the banks want them to happen. This could not be more obvious. The new BlackRock BUIDL fund on Ethereum is a high bandwidth pipeline between U.S. Treasuries and USDC. Pipelines will bring trillions onchain. The USDC issuer Circle is (likely) will IPO soon. BlackRock has ownership in Circle. The banks will backdoor themselves into stablecoins - by acquiring/partnering/controlling crypto native companies - and they'll lobby for stablecoin legislation and make it happen along the way. The US does not have the political will to build a central bank digital currency. They're create one defacto through private bank issued stablecoins on public crypto networks like Ethereum. As long as we preserve open, permissionless, decentralized protocols like Ethereum at the bottom of the stack - then crypto wins. The liquidity and legitimacy from this will make crypto unstoppable.
English
70
133
804
181.7K
Rob Krugman retweetledi
Harvard Business Review
Harvard Business Review@HarvardBiz·
By encouraging your top performers to consider outside job offers, you’re communicating that you care about their development. s.hbr.org/3u66jKv
English
6
7
23
17.8K
Rob Krugman
Rob Krugman@robkrugman·
This!!!
amit@amitisinvesting

WHY DID BLACKROCK GET BEHIND $BTC BITCOIN IN THE FIRST PLACE? So, one of the things I’ve been fascinated by in the past few months is how quickly Larry Fink switched his tone around Bitcoin. Fink is argued to be one of the most powerful men on planet Earth. This is a guy who embodies the traditional financial system — $BTC is a threat to that. How does someone like that switch to being in favor of Bitcoin? Well…reports today revealed how he truly thinks about Bitcoin. Many people think Blackrock got into Bitcoin for the fees the $IBIT ETF would collect. Sure, that’s one reason, but it’s not the deeper story. Today, Larry Fink basically said that GenZ/Millennials don’t trust the financial system, they aren’t saving for retirement, and they have lost hope. From Bloomberg: “Young people “have lost trust in older generations,” Fink wrote. “The burden is on us to get it back. And maybe investing for their long-term goals, including retirement, isn’t such a bad place to begin.”  As a result, he said Blackrock is focusing on new initiatives to get younger people engaged in investing/saving/the markets. Although Bloomberg reported this today, he’s obviously been thinking like this — and likely seeing it in Blackrock’s data — for the past few years. It seems like Larry Fink switched to becoming excited about $BTC Bitcoin because he realized this was a digitally native way to get younger people excited about retirement. If young people want to buy Bitcoin over Gold and Blackrock could be the firm to provide them exposure — they may end up using Blackrock for a variety of other financial needs as they get older, cementing Blackrock’s relationship with a generation who feels let down by the financial system. It almost seems as if $BTC is the last hope Fink has that will get younger generations into the concept of saving/retirement investing. This way, his firm will have millions of people over the next two decades that associate products like the $IBIT ETF in a positive way with Blackrock — ultimately leading to the longevity and stability of the company for decades to come.

English
0
0
0
44
Rob Krugman retweetledi
Misha
Misha@mishadavinci·
Blockchain technology & web3 are the future. But 99% are unaware. Here's a list of 25 key terms so you can get up to speed:
English
32
114
482
146.4K
Rob Krugman retweetledi
Sahil Bloom
Sahil Bloom@SahilBloom·
In 2009, Stanford business professor Tina Seelig split her class into groups and issued a challenge: Each group had $5 and 2 hours to make the highest return on the initial money. At the end, they'd give a short presentation on their strategy. The results were fascinating... Most of the groups followed a basic approach: • Use the $5 to buy a few items. • Barter or resell those items. • Repeat • Sell final items for (hopefully) more than $5. These groups made a modest return on their initial $5. A few groups ignored the $5. They thought up ways to make the most money in the 2 hours of allotted time: • Made and sold reservations at hot restaurants. • Refilled bike tires on campus for $1 each. These groups made a better return on their initial $5. The winning group took an entirely different approach. They had three core realizations: 1. The $5 was nothing more than a distraction. 2. The 2 hours of time was not enough to make an attractive, outsized return with a mini-business (like selling restaurant reservations or filling bike tires). 3. The most valuable "asset" was actually the presentation time in front of a class of Stanford students. Realizing the value of this hidden asset, they offered the presentation time to companies looking to recruit Stanford students. They struck a deal to sell the time slot for $650, netting a monstrous return on the $5 of initial capital. The losing groups thought in linear, logical terms and achieved a linear, logical outcome. The winning group thought differently. So, what can we learn from this story? There are two types of problems: 1. Low-Stakes: Lower potential, linear rewards. Decisions are easily reversible. 2. High-Stakes: Higher potential, asymmetric rewards. Decisions are not easily reversible. With low-stakes problems, given the reward potential is low and the decisions are easily reversible, we can use shortcuts and heuristics to choose our path. We can take a logical, linear approach. With high-stakes problems, the high, asymmetric reward potential means we need to think differently. We want to take a creative, non-linear approach. Three steps to start thinking differently: Step 1: Avoid the Distraction There will always be an "obvious" solution that is simple, clear, and entirely wrong. In the challenge, the $5 was nothing more than a distraction. It was a trap. To find the best path, you have to avoid the distraction. Step 2: Ask Foundational Questions Ask and answer questions that expose and vet underlying assumptions and logic. • What's the real problem you are trying to solve? • What's your hypothesis? Why? • What are your core assumptions? Why? • What evidence do you have? • What are your core options? • What alternatives exist? This takes time, but it's an essential exercise when facing a problem with the potential for non-linear rewards. Step 3: Select the High Leverage Approach Slow down and evaluate the options on the table. Select the path most likely to generate the asymmetric, attractive risk-adjusted returns. If the story teaches us one thing, it's this: Creative, non-linear, asymmetric thinking generates creative, non-linear, asymmetric outcomes. If you enjoyed this or learned something, follow me @SahilBloom for more in future.
Sahil Bloom tweet media
English
272
2.2K
11.4K
2.8M