Roamin' Roddy

@WatcherGuru I have been scammed by Sparklo finance and the Oryen network in the past.

JUST IN: 🇺🇸 FBI Director Kash Patel says the FBI will find crypto scammers and bring them to justice.

@Chot4a Ask musk if he would chip in?

What would be the price of $LUNC if it burns 90% of it's Supply and receives other major listings? 🔥🚀🌕 👇👇👇

@BankXRP Isn't that the point of an open public ledger?

Chris Giancarlo just made a point that deserves more attention: everyone's scared of CBDC surveillance, but stablecoins already have ZERO privacy. 👀 Anti-CBDC act protects you from a threat that isn't even live yet, while this loophole sits wide open.

@Cointelegraph All the senate does is take vacations.

🇺🇸 UPDATE: The US Senate is likely to resume debate on the CLARITY Act this week as lawmakers return from the Memorial Day break.

@CrazyCryp2022 Incorporate LUNC into GTA6 and the burn rate would go through the roof.

Realistic $LUNC Talks 🔥 This viral $0.37 roadmap is making rounds again 👀 Here’s what would actually need to happen for it to be possible: • Continued aggressive burns (we’re at 447B+ already) • Major USTC repeg progress (Market Module reactivation) • Huge adoption + real utility on Terra Classic • Multiple big exchange listings (Coinbase, Robinhood etc.) • Overall bull market tailwinds $0.37 would require burning trillions more + massive demand — extremely ambitious but not impossible in a parabolic cycle. What’s your realistic 2026 target? Reply with your number 👇 #LUNC #LUNCArmy #TerraClassic #RealTalk #BurnBabyBurn $LUNC $USTC #LUNCBurn @MrDiamondhandz1 @Yourpop8 @stablefeng @LunaClassicHQ @StationWallet @Chot4a @terra_army @vs_bull_lunc @LunaClassicDAO @HappyCatKripto @LunaClassWorld @Greenpeace06_09 @L_U_N_C @kerim_3453 @BSCGemsAlert @binance @WhaleSatoshi @MrOlusile @CryptoAnu_ @TerraClassic_

@BitcoinMagazine @SenLummis @TheBitcoinConf Are we trying to let China win?

JUST IN: 🇺🇸 US Senator Cynthia Lummis announces Bitcoin and crypto market structure legislation will get marked up "in May." 👀 "We are gonna get it to the finish line." 🚀

@BankXRP @SenatorTimScott The reverse carry trade with Japan has already started. Japan classified XRP as a financial product. Is Congress really going to let Asia beat the US in the Crypto race. Time is ticking to the Treasury dollar and that money is coming back home to roost. Hyper inflation is coming.

The countdown to the Clarity Act is ON Tim Scott expects major components to be settled in the next few weeks. The goal? A complete framework for digital assets by summer 2026. Tim Scott & Maria Bartiromo on Fox Business: Mornings with Maria

@_Crypto_Barbie What time?

⚠️ TODAY THE CLARITY ACT WILL BE PRESENTED TO THE SENATE BANKING COMMITTEE 👀 FULL REGULATORY CLARITY IS PENDING… ⏳

@EleanorTerrett Just let the federal reserve drop banks as clients if they dint agree with a reasonable stable coin yields. Problem solved. Play nice or you dont get to play at all.

🚨NEW: New details are emerging about the latest legislative text outlining a compromise on stablecoin yield and rewards, along with early reactions from crypto industry leaders who reviewed it today. According to an internal stakeholder email shared with me, the proposal would prohibit platforms from offering yield “directly or indirectly” for holding a stablecoin or in a manner that resembles a bank deposit. The restriction would apply broadly to digital asset service providers (exchanges, brokers, etc.) and their affiliates to limit workarounds, and would bar anything “economically or functionally equivalent” to interest. The proposal would also permit activity-based rewards tied to user activity, including loyalty, promotional, or subscription programs, provided they are not deemed economically or functionally equivalent to interest. It would also direct the @SECGov, @CFTC, and @USTreasury to jointly define permissible rewards and establish anti-evasion rules within one year. One industry leader who reviewed the text today tells me the draft is a “departure” from what had been previously discussed with the White House, warning the “economic equivalence” standard is vague and could be interpreted more restrictively by future regulators. They also point to limits on tying rewards to balances or transaction amounts, which could make incentives difficult to structure. “Overall, this is a more narrow and restrictive approach toward crypto,” they said. Another says the text is “largely in line with expectations” and reflects a balanced outcome, preserving transaction-based incentives while making clear stablecoins cannot function like interest-bearing deposit accounts. “This is the best possible result,” they said, noting that the text is broader than the initial Tillis-Alsobrooks proposal, which would have been more restrictive on crypto. Up next: Bank reps are set to review the text tomorrow.

@SMQKEDQG Will it be passed before Q2?

‼️WHY THE CRYPTO MARKET STILL NEEDS THE CLARITY ACT‼️ The recent classification of a majority of digital assets as non-securities is a major step forward.☝️ It removes a key overhang and confirms that much of the market does not fall under securities law.💯 That matters. It gives institutions more confidence to engage and reduces immediate regulatory risk. But that only solves one piece of the puzzle.🧩 It answers what these assets are not, however, it does not fully define how the entire system operates, integrates, and scales within traditional finance.🌐 That’s where the CLARITY Act comes in. What the CLARITY Act actually unlocks: • Clear legal framework for banks✅ Banks can directly participate in digital asset markets without operating in regulatory gray areas • Full integration into the financial system✅ Creates a pathway for digital assets to plug into traditional infrastructure at scale • Defined regulatory boundaries (SEC vs CFTC)✅ Removes overlapping jurisdiction and conflicting interpretations that have slowed innovation • New bank capabilities✅ – Trading & settlement – Custody services – Digital commodity brokerage – Operation of alternative trading systems (ATS) • Reduced enforcement risk✅ Institutions can build without fear of retroactive penalties or unclear rules • Acceleration of tokenization✅ Banks can develop and deploy tokenized asset platforms with legal certainty • Institutional-grade market access✅ Opens the door for asset managers, corporate treasuries, and HNW capital to enter through regulated channels • Increased investor confidence✅ Consistency and transparency in oversight drives larger capital inflows • First-mover advantage for early banks✅ Institutions that move early can capture market share as trusted providers The CLARITY Act is key to unlock full-scale institutional adoption. This is all documented below.📝👇

@RippleXrpie Sounds like Canada needs to tap their own supply of oil.

🚨WTF!!?? 👀 🇨🇦 The Bank of Canada has admitted that the economy is broken and that there are no solutions to fix the situation.

@SMQKEDQG Do we need the CLARITY act anymore if crypto has been defined by the CTFC and SEC collaboration?

“XRP: confirmed not a security.”✅

@RippleXrpie Better run that by the Clarity act.

🚨BREAKING: The new CFTC Chair - Mike Selig says that the US plans to approve crypto perpetual futures within the next month! #XRP 💥CRYPTO HOLDERS ARE ABOUT TO CREATE GENERATIONAL WEALTH💥

@_Crypto_Barbie CONGRESS is not in session.

🚨 THEY WANT TO DISTRACT YOU: CLARITY ACT DEADLINE LOOMS ON MARCH 1ST ⏳ WW3 HAPPENING IN THE FOREGROUND, NEW FINANCIAL SYSTEM LOADING IN THE BACKGROUND 🤫

@WatcherGuru I propose no more banking bailouts.

JUST IN: 🇺🇸 US federal banking regulator proposes rule to restrict stablecoin rewards.

@DeFiTracer Its President's day. Federal holiday

🚨 BREAKING: 🇺🇸 US SENATE WILL DISCUSS $BTC AND CRYPTO MARKET BILL AT 2:00 PM SOURCES REPORT THAT THIS BILL WILL INJECT $2T INTO THE MARKET GIGA BULLISH FOR CRYPTO!!

@socoolrainbow @BMNRBullz The Genius act is enough.

@BMNRBullz 그냥 하지마 폐기시켜

🚨 CLARITY ACT WHITE HOUSE STABLECOIN YIELD UPDATE Today’s meeting was described as productive, but no agreement was reached. What changed: banks arrived with written “prohibition principles” and, for the first time, acknowledged the possibility of limited exemptions for transaction based rewards. That’s a meaningful shift from earlier positions. The core divide remains: 🔹 Crypto wants broad definitions of “permissible activity” 🔹 Banks want those definitions narrowly constrained Tone is softening. The room was smaller. Negotiations went deeper. Next steps: 🔹 Industry talks continue in the coming days 🔹 White House urging a deal by March 1 🔹 Senate Banking staff now directly involved THIS IS THE CHOKE POINT FOR STABLECOINS. $BTC $ETH

@EleanorTerrett @Paxos @_jikim @crypto_council Leave passive stable coin yields alone. It is the own banks fault that they are not as attractive as the crypto exchanges. More flies with honey.

🚨NEW: White House meeting just wrapped. More color soon. For now, additional crypto attendees: A rep from stablecoin issuer @Paxos and @_jikim, CEO of @crypto_council. Some Senate Banking Committee staffers and folks from the White House Crypto Council were also in the room.

@EleanorTerrett Give us the stable coin yields.

🚨SCOOP: The next iteration of the White House stablecoin yield discussions between crypto and the banks has been scheduled for Tuesday, a source within the banking industry tells me. The confab will again be staff-level, but this time representatives from the banks themselves will be present, alongside industry trade groups. More to come on expected attendees.

@_Crypto_Barbie Give the people passive yields on stable coins and tokenization of the stock market and they will

🚨 BREAKING: TREASURY SECRETARY SCOTT BESSENT URGES CONGRESS TO PASS THE CRYPTO MARKET STRUCTURE LEGISLATION: "WE HAVE TO GET THE CLARITY ACT ACROSS THE FINISH LINE!" 📝✔️ #XRP