Sam K

Not to mention nutritionist, lawyer, virtual assistant, ghostwriter, business coach, etc etc Sure you might still need some of these things but instead of paying $700/hr for 20 hours for a lawyer, it’s now ask Claude and get 90% of the work done then pay a lawyer for 1-3hrs to check it It used to not work this way cause AI sucked and the lawyer would have to re-do a lot of the work costing even more at the end of the day, but I’ve spoken to a bunch of lawyers now who agree that AI gets it way more right than wrong now across the board $200/month is free

🚨BREAKING: Claude can now review contracts like lawyers at Baker McKenzie (for free). Here are 7 Claude prompts that replace $10,000 legal review consultants.👇

🚨 BREAKING: AI-generated art CAN'T be copyrighted in the U.S.

The real story here is worse than a fumble. It’s a three-step own goal. January 9: Anthropic locks Claude Code OAuth tokens, killing every third-party tool that built on Claude subscriptions. OpenClaw, which recommended Claude Opus 4.5 as its default model, wakes up to a broken integration. No warning. No partner outreach. January 27: Anthropic’s legal team sends the cease-and-desist over “Clawdbot” sounding too similar to “Claude.” Steinberger complies at 5 AM on a Discord call. During the 10-second window where he releases the old GitHub and X handles, crypto scammers hijack both accounts and run a $16M pump-and-dump scheme. The chaos reflects on the entire Claude ecosystem. February 15: Steinberger announces he’s joining OpenAI. So Anthropic had the fastest-growing open source project in AI history (145K+ GitHub stars, 2 million visitors in a single week), built by a guy who sold his last company for ~€100M, whose tool literally recommended Claude as the default model to millions of new users. Their response was to cut off his API access and send lawyers. Steinberger spent last week in San Francisco meeting with every major lab. He explicitly said he could have built OpenClaw into a massive company but chose OpenAI because he wanted “the fastest way to bring this to everyone.” Meanwhile OpenClaw has already spread to China, with Baidu planning direct integration into its main app. This is a project that was essentially a free distribution channel for Claude. Millions of developers installing a tool that defaults to your model. The growth marketing team at Anthropic should have been sending gift baskets, not legal notices. Sam Altman just got handed an open-source agent framework with global distribution and a brilliant founder, because Anthropic’s legal department moved faster than their partnerships team.

If you don’t enforce your trademark, you don’t actually have one. Point blank. “The real story here is worse than a fumble. It’s a three-step own goal…” Everyone’s arguing about APIs, partnerships, and founder drama. But the legal piece is way simpler and way more boring. If Anthropic lets “Clawdbot” coexist next to “Claude” in the same AI ecosystem, that’s textbook trademark risk. Similar name, same audience, same space. If you don’t step in, you weaken the mark. Enough inaction and you can lose it entirely. That’s why companies send C&Ds even when it looks stupid or self-sabotaging. Courts don’t care about “vibes” or growth hacks. They care whether you enforced your rights.

Very excited to present Scribble Together! It's an experiment: - I created the algorithm not knowing what the colors will be - I've asked 20 friends to create palettes - Collectors can select their palette I'll share the palettes and more details soon! Let's have fun :)