Sathoarder #17⚡

#nostr npub1m5mr8y7wgvcufav43hgda376xsm0t5qrerur30m23ek6w8gmn88q9hympt

@MartyBent Not everyone. Actively unfollowing people that repost war shit.

Everyone is doom scrolling the war today. Meanwhile 5 massive wins just happened: 1️⃣ Square is auto-enabling bitcoin payments for millions of sellers on March 30th 2️⃣ CFTC told self-custody wallet devs they don't need to register as brokers 3️⃣ Oklo got dual nuclear approvals from DOE and NRC 4️⃣ El Salvador quietly became the Dubai of the Western Hemisphere 5️⃣ SAVE Act advanced in the Senate 51-48 Never doom. We're going to win. tftc.io/square-bitcoin…

@JimJones1913 @Jethroe111 @MicroStrategy That opinion is pretty popular with me.

@Jethroe111 @MicroStrategy Unpopular opinion: Plebs should focus on self custody of their corn and not be distracted a company in the bush that does not prove proof of reserves.

GM. You have to understand the revolutionary nature of $STRC Unlike any other credit instrument mirroring a bond, where the PAR value fluctuates, STRC upends this. THE PRICE IS THE TARGET. @MicroStrategy wants the "PAR" value to remain constant and the INTEREST fluctuates to maintain it. The % is reevaluated every month using the last 5 trading days VWAP to adjust. Thus we are now at 11.5% and the value of STRC is near constant. They are learning; finding the sweet spot. That sweet spot will change due to markets and they have the ability to constantly adjust. Remarkable. And I can see why they jumped ahead of all other participants in this perp, and why they used AI to craft it. Just remember. Strategy and @saylor are not your friends. They are a global growth company using their treasury operations through leverage to financialize Bitcoin. Every Bitcoin they remove from the market is probably gone forever. Don't trade. Don't get overleveraged. DON'T LOSE YOUR BITCOIN.

@evoskuil @BitcoinBrabant @adam3us @BitMEXResearch @knutsvanholm @BashCo_ Will it support LND or Core Lightning?

The initial release is just the beginning. Libbitcoin is not just a node, or just a server, it’s a full stack high performance development environment. It’s organized for builders, for test, for perf, for scale, for simplicity, and importantly for choice. We don’t dictate your configuration. Old behaviors are not deleted from the code codebase, they are superseded. So you can disable/enable whatever consensus forks you want or don’t want, you can set whatever p2p protocol level or features that you want. There is wide latitude for configuration. There is pervasive high speed eventing, and an integral log system, with extensible event capture. Events can be routed to the console, file system, and/or client-server endpoints. So you will see detailed presentation of behavior, which can be extended for research, curiosity, automation, etc. The built-in admin console operates over http/s (and ws/s), like a typical router. There is an integral block explorer, which is every bit as robust as ones built on an RDBMS with a dedicated web server front end. Yet it will far outperform such systems in latency and scale. Over time these services over integrated endpoints will expand to fully support the critical Bitcoin use cases, including mine pooling. The objective is not just to make a node, but to invigorate the ecosystem that matters, the one that revolves around you - not centralized services.

"BIP-110 restrictions are bypassable. The innovation damage is not. Bitcoin's strength is its credible commitment to neutral, predictable rules. BIP-110 trades that, and Bitcoin's upgrade future, for a spam filter that doesn't even filter spam. That's not a cleanup. That's a downgrade." -@bittyrunes thread x.com/BittyRunes/sta…

@MitchellAskew Hmmmm. When new difficult problems present themselves for the 'miners', the difficulty to mine new units seems to get adjusted waaaay down 😅

Fiat has no difficulty adjustment

@adam3us @theonevortex I don't disagree with b) however I highly doubt the core 30 changes will make any difference in their behavior either way. So all this now just seems to be about stubbornness and pride. Childish stuff.

@sathoarder @theonevortex having them go to lengths, is a) trivial, and b) fake pubkeys are objectively worse for nodes scalability (bloats UTXO set cache, which lives in memory and can be a bottleneck for nodes).

"Bitcoin is literally already money, 110 makes it a worse money" @theonevortex

@theonevortex @adam3us @theonevortex, you know I wasn't talking about on-chain data being a matter of opinion. You're dishonest, weak and pathetic.

@theonevortex @adam3us I think calling it a mal-incentive is a matter of opinion and that could be the problem. Perhaps it would have been better for people who want shit transactions confirmed to have to go to those lengths?

@CorySwan @grok The Straight of HorMoos is about 15 feet Cory.

hey @grok is the Strait of Hormuz only two miles wide like the TV personality says?

@TheBlueMatt @hodlonaut @adam3us @SvartHette @Pledditor @jonatack Dude, stop gaslighting and just own it.

Valuable certainly, but “extremely valuable” to the point that he deserved jobs that others got? No. I know you (and he) have claimed that DEI is the reason other people might have gotten more funding/jobs/etc over him from several different organizations that claim is very wrong. From what I can tell there has never been a single hiring/funding decision in the history of the many companies funding Bitcoin Core contributors that considered anything except intelligence, commitment, and history of contributions. The other day you tried to claim that I suggested anything but that but that claim was also wrong. At no point have I ever suggested, nor thought, that hiring decisions should consider anything but the above. I have stated, and do think, that it’s worthwhile for companies and groups funding bitcoin core contributors (and indeed, any company hiring) to reach out to people that might otherwise not apply for a job or program and encourage them to. Lots of research shows that when you do that you end up increasing the intelligence/skill of the people you end up hiring, not decreasing it - more applicants means more people to choose from.

Wouldn't it be nice if "Today's News" was actually news, and not just a repackaged version of your "For You" feed.

Straight of HorMoooooos

@Dyor_Fudd I'm certain if we addressed that it would IsLaMoPhObIc

It’s crazy man, while you occupied thinking about Epstein, we got the whole Islamic world where pedophilia is the norm.

@CaffeSatoshi Mute

What if AI could finally reveal the identity of the mysterious creator of Bitcoin? A venture capitalist believes the answer might arrive sooner than we think. Nic Carter from Castle Island Ventures says advanced AI models could eventually identify Satoshi Nakamoto using stylometr, the analysis of writing style. Researchers at Cornell University recently published a paper suggesting large language models are far more powerful than traditional methods at identifying anonymous online authors. In other words, your writing style might not stay anonymous forever. Carter believes the breakthrough could happen within a few years. AI could analyze emails, forum posts, code comments, and compare them with known writers to find statistical matches. BUT this idea isn’t new. Back in 2014, linguistics students at Aston University used stylometry and suggested Nick Szabo might have written the Bitcoin whitepaper. He has always denied it. Szabo is frequently mentioned because he created Bit Gold, an early concept for decentralized digital money that many consider a precursor to Bitcoin. The mystery of Satoshi remains one of the biggest in modern tech. Why? Because the creator is believed to control 1 million BTC, worth tens of billions of dollars. Even more fascinating: Those coins have never moved since Satoshi disappeared from the internet over a decade ago. No spending. No selling. Nothing. If AI eventually identifies Satoshi, it wouldn’t just solve a mystery. It would raise huge questions about: • Privacy • Anonymity online • The origins of the most important monetary network of the digital age. Whether Satoshi is ever revealed or not, the idea that AI might solve the mystery shows something bigger: We may be entering an era where true anonymity on the internet becomes nearly impossible.

@BitPaine July 18th, 2022: @satskeeper_ posted block 7 on the #Stackchain. That is the best 7.

I’ve never been happier to see the number seven in my entire life.

@TabarnakDan There's likely some place where a wannabe influencer can buy follows

I find it odd that someone with such retarded takes can actually have 179k followers.

@RT_com Fake and ghey

US CARRIER ABRAHAM LINCOLN ‘FLEES’ AFTER ATTACKED BY 4 CRUISE MISSILES — IRAN’S IRGC

@taodejing2 I would never advise someone to sell nor do I judge someone if they do. A good buddy of mine sold some recently and eliminated a large debt. I congratulated him. I'm much the same, debt is something I hate, like a Sword of Damocles hanging over you. You do you man. Still frens

@sathoarder Since nothing is guaranteed everything is subjective.

People care way too much about other people’s financial decisions. Stay in your lane.

@sierracatalina Pre-mined shitcoin Created a insider class of mETH whales Flipped to proof of stake so mETH whales continue to control and enrich themselves So, No, just 💩

is eth the new btc? words I never thought I would say. but seriously. is it?

@elonnaire @ScooterMagruder x.com/i/status/20245…

@ScooterMagruder *women's.

THE UNITED STATES IS THE BEST COUNTRY IN THE WORLD AT HOCKEY.