For Hume The Bell Tolls

15.2K posts

For Hume The Bell Tolls banner
For Hume The Bell Tolls

For Hume The Bell Tolls

@seashelljulia

One must imagine Sisyphus napping. tweets don't represent my employer. I follow a lot of people I hate (not you though)

Katılım Ağustos 2018
1.4K Takip Edilen246 Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
For Hume The Bell Tolls
For Hume The Bell Tolls@seashelljulia·
Underappreciated cause of lib-left fighting on here is that the 80th percentile MAGA member is still dumb as a bag of rocks and the modal conversation with them is like dragging your face across cement. Very rare to find a lib as useless to talk to as the average rightoid
English
5
7
36
4.2K
For Hume The Bell Tolls retweetledi
recious pecious
recious pecious@haleyvemealone·
My fav malapropism
recious pecious tweet media
Español
22
122
3.5K
89.3K
For Hume The Bell Tolls retweetledi
Zac Hinz
Zac Hinz@DrPepperMD·
@MattZeitlin My daughter is in the 4th grade, and all 4th graders receive a free pass to national parks. I was tooling around on the website, and I saw the list of free days for everyone.
Zac Hinz tweet media
English
5
6
58
4.6K
Graham Hancock
Graham Hancock@Graham__Hancock·
Attn @FlintDibble : (1) you have been boasting and preening for nearly two years that you "won" your debate on the JRE with me and that your self-proclaimed brilliant performance "tanked" my audience. Usually, it is the loser of a debate, not the winner, who asks for a second round. I must therefore assume that your petulant demands to go "face to face" with me again mean you’ve known all along that you failed yourself and embarrassed your profession very badly when you sat down with me for JRE 2136 and that everything you've said on the matter since then is simply the smelly gas of a deeply insecure man. (2) In your pinned post of March 10th 2026 you accuse me of cowardice and lack of integrity and claim that I "rejected two different offers to go face to face” with you "on major, international media outlets". From whence came the “two different offers” for me to go face to face with you in a second debate? When and where were these “offers” made? And in what way, where, did I reject these offers? (3) For the avoidance of future doubt let me be clear. I am content for JRE 2136, the debate that you claim you won, to stand as the permanent record of what passed between us and to continue to allow those who are still interested to make up their own minds on the matter. I see no point in sitting down with you again to accommodate your neediness.
Graham Hancock tweet media
English
309
176
3.1K
110.1K
Tom Bombadil
Tom Bombadil@SidesMars·
"Hancock and other pseudoarchaeologists center White Europeans as able creators while chalking up the accomplishments of other peoples to outside influences: the Atlantis civilization, aliens, lizard people, or the “lost” empire of Tartaria. Real archaeology inoculates people against the online and in-person racists who take Hancock’s polished presentation of a mysterious civilization and twist it into overt white supremacy." Outright lie in the first sentance.
English
1
0
0
23
matrixbot
matrixbot@thematrixb0t·
New leaked Epstein documents show the FBI removed the hard drive from the prison's camera system and wiped all footage from the night Jeffrey Epstein was murdered..
matrixbot tweet mediamatrixbot tweet media
English
808
14.6K
45.2K
4.8M
For Hume The Bell Tolls retweetledi
Tim
Tim@trouble_man90·
Incredible. Basically trump’s mind is so gone that flattery and trying to bribe him with gifts and participation trophies is pointless because he won’t even remember it a few days later. Wow
Jonathan Lemire@JonLemire

“But most allied leaders have stopped trying to find the hidden logic behind Trump’s actions, and they understand that any contribution they make will count for nothing. A few days or weeks later, Trump will not even remember that it happened” theatlantic.com/ideas/2026/03/…

English
7
145
1.5K
54.4K
For Hume The Bell Tolls retweetledi
radbro
radbro@radbro·
Stepped into a faraday cage and my internal monologue disappeared
English
172
1.2K
21.9K
369.2K
For Hume The Bell Tolls retweetledi
Rep. Dan Goldman
Rep. Dan Goldman@RepDanGoldman·
This is the document I unredacted on the House floor. It confirms numerous lies by Trump, including that Trump never expelled Epstein from Mar-A-Lago - despite his repeated claims that he did. It is also proof of the DOJ’s massive cover-up because there was no basis to redact it other than to protect the President. DOJ still hasn’t disclosed 3 million pages of the Epstein Files. If they are trying to hide this, what else are they hiding? We need answers @AGPamBondi, @DAGToddBlanche
Rep. Dan Goldman tweet media
English
1.2K
6.6K
16K
174.2K
Aaron Jack
Aaron Jack@AaronJack87·
@Graham__Hancock @FlintDibble Graham uttered annihilated Flint in that debate. The entire @joerogan audience saw mainstream archeology’s inability to look at new facts in a fair and unbiased way.
English
2
0
0
186
Swagoo McSaucin
Swagoo McSaucin@SwagooMcSaucin·
@IscoTempo I caved two days ago and to not even get the read receipt hurt more ngl
English
1
0
1
14K
For Hume The Bell Tolls retweetledi
Orla Joelsen
Orla Joelsen@OJoelsen·
Denmark prepared for a possible U.S. attack: Flew blood supplies to Greenland and planned to blow up runways Key sources in Denmark and Europe are now revealing for the first time what happened during the most critical days, when Donald Trump threatened to take Greenland “the hard way.” When Danish soldiers were rapidly deployed to Greenland in January this year, they brought explosives with them. The plan was to destroy runways in Nuuk and Kangerlussuaq to prevent American military aircraft from landing troops on the island, should the U.S. president ultimately decide to seize Greenland by force. They also transported blood supplies from Danish blood banks so wounded personnel could be treated in case of combat. This is reported by DR, which over the past year has spoken with central sources in the Danish government, top military officers, and high-ranking officials and intelligence sources in Denmark, France, and Germany. All sources have played—and continue to play—key roles in the international crisis triggered by the United States’ demand for control over Greenland. Together, the sources describe an unprecedented year marked by sleepless nights. None of them had concrete intelligence of specific American attack plans against Greenland. Still, many feared in January that the historically important ally, the United States, could attack at any moment. At the same time, Denmark reached out to its European allies, leading to closer cooperation. “With the Greenland crisis, Europe realized once and for all that we must be able to handle our own security,” said a French senior official involved in the intense period. A rapid-response force consisting of Danish, French, German, Norwegian, and Swedish soldiers was first deployed to Nuuk and Kangerlussuaq. Shortly after, a main force followed, including: -Soldiers from the Danish Dragoon Regiment in Holstebro -Elite troops from the Jaeger Corps -French alpine troops trained for cold and mountainous warfare At the same time, Danish fighter jets and a French naval vessel were sent to the North Atlantic. According to several sources, the goal of having multinational troops on the ground was to ensure that any U.S. attempt to take Greenland would require a large-scale hostile action—thereby deterring such an attempt. “We have not been in such a situation since April 1940,” said a Danish defense source, referring to the days before Denmark’s occupation during World War II. Unlike in 1940, when Denmark chose not to resist militarily, the government and defense leadership this time decided—after extensive confidential discussions—to take the opposite approach: If the U.S. attempted an attack, Danish forces would be armed and ready to fight. Danish F-35 fighter jets deployed north were also fully armed. All this despite the understanding that Denmark could not realistically withstand a U.S. military attack. “The cost for the U.S. had to be raised. The U.S. would have to carry out a hostile act to take Greenland,” said a senior Danish defense source. Source: DR
English
337
1.4K
4.8K
965.7K
Rich Nagy
Rich Nagy@NagyRich·
@foster_type Trumps request for aid from US allies and China was just pretense for this very thing. Now the US can take full control of the straight because “well someone has to.”
English
4
0
0
2.7K
Foster
Foster@foster_type·
In all seriousness, if we're going to take Hormuz we should actually take it. Annex strategic outpusts along the Iranian coast, turn them into Gibraltar by way of the Green Zone. Ring them in minefields and kill anything that approaches. More strategic than Greenland and more sensible too. If you supported that you should support this.
English
82
5
140
257.2K