For Hume The Bell Tolls
16.2K posts
@seashelljulia
One must imagine Sisyphus napping. tweets don't represent my employer. I follow a lot of people I hate (not you though)
Subjective Morality = No Morality
It’s not weaponization when everyone is found guilty by a jury of their peers and every appeal is lost. Republicans are offended when they get caught, not for actually committing the crimes.
Controversial Florida gov candidate James Fishback marries mystery woman just weeks after split from girlfriend trib.al/zqfbuVB
An Oxford academic has warned that students using AI can obtain a degree without reading any books Katherine Rundell warns that reliance on AI is creating a ‘vast counterfeiting of knowledge’ in universities 👇 telegraph.co.uk/news/2026/05/2…
The past is America. The present is a foreign country.
Say something nice about Georgia.
@turtlelambvase @norvid_studies @lu_sichu @max_spero_ i had the same intuition as norvid's op and my sense is random text would bias towards human because pangram is calibrating for *specific* basins of ai post-training text where human is the default / low false positives. some evidence
I used to love to cook and eat Indian food. Today, the thought of entering an Indian restaurant makes me sick to my stomach.
@GregTSargent I received the memo that we’re no longer talking about moderating or moving to the center. I just think it is helpful to take specific things Dems have said or done in the past that voters disagreed with and start saying things they agree with instead. slowboring.com/p/shmoderation…
Yes, Josh, I read it. And it does not say what you’re pretending it says. Skandalakis wrote that the indictment alleged a compelling set of acts that, if proven, would establish a conspiracy to overturn the 2020 election. He also wrote that the effort shifted from a legitimate legal challenge into a campaign to stop the counting of electoral votes, including the use of fraudulent elector certificates. He declined to continue the case because of prosecutorial discretion, presidential immunity, venue, resources, delay, and his view that the stronger case was federal. That is not the same thing as “people were prosecuted merely for asking questions.” You keep trying to flatten the distinction because the actual distinction is fatal to your argument.
Kari Lake challenged the 2022 Arizona governor’s race in court, repeatedly tried to overturn the result, lost, and was not prosecuted. So no, Josh, people are not prosecuted merely for “raising questions” about elections. There is a legal way to contest an election: file in court, present evidence, accept the ruling. The Georgia case was about alleged conduct far beyond asking questions—fake electors, pressure on officials, false statements, and an effort to overturn a certified result. That distinction is not hard. It’s just inconvenient for your martyr narrative.
