Jack

2.1K posts

Jack banner
Jack

Jack

@secjack_

the real thing. backend @Tplus_cx

Brisbane, Australia Katılım Eylül 2023
1.2K Takip Edilen652 Takipçiler
Kevin 🇺🇦
Kevin 🇺🇦@dj_d_sol·
The rust compiler has six months to get fast before it is confined to permanent underclass and AI feeds us goslop forever
English
4
0
17
1.3K
Michael Egorov
Michael Egorov@newmichwill·
@banteg Darn. And I am still using poetry and flake8 😭 (didn't get the "bad devex" memo because everything just worked perfectly already)
English
2
0
6
1.7K
Jack retweetledi
Lossfunk
Lossfunk@lossfunk·
🚨 Shocking: Frontier LLMs score 85-95% on standard coding benchmarks. We gave them equivalent problems in languages they couldn't have memorized. They collapsed to 0-11%. Presenting EsoLang-Bench. Accepted to the Logical Reasoning and ICBINB workshops at ICLR 2026 🧵
English
147
272
2.1K
1.1M
Jack
Jack@secjack_·
@DaveTaylorNews perfect time for it as they can use oil as an excuse
English
0
0
0
334
David Taylor
David Taylor@DaveTaylorNews·
I think there's an outside chance the RBA will hike by 0.5% -- one and done
English
37
3
176
46.7K
Jack
Jack@secjack_·
@andreaslbigger have you been snooping prior to the CVEs being released too?
English
0
0
0
36
Andreas Bigger
Andreas Bigger@andreaslbigger·
Duration multiplication (resubmission_timeout * 2) will panic in debug mode (or wrap in release) if resubmission_timeout exceeds ~292 years.
English
2
0
4
441
Jack
Jack@secjack_·
Jack tweet media
ZXX
0
0
1
60
Jack
Jack@secjack_·
brutal
f4lc0n@al_f4lc0n

I Saved Injective's $500M. They Pay Me $50K. I like hunting bugs on @immunefi . I'm decent at it. - #1 — Attackathon | Stacks - #2 — Attackathon | Stacks II - #1 — Attackathon | XRPL Lending Protocol - 1 Critical and 1 High from bug bounties (not counting this one) Life was good. Then I found a Critical vulnerability in @injective . This vulnerability allowed any user to directly drain any account on the chain. No special permissions needed. Over $500M in on-chain assets were at risk. I reported it through Immunefi. The next day, a mainnet upgrade to fix the bug went to governance vote. The Injective team clearly understood the severity. Then — silence. For 3 months. No follow up. No technical discussion. Nothing. A few days ago, they notified me of their decision: $50K. The maximum payout for a Critical vulnerability in their bug bounty program is $500K. I disputed it. Silence again. No explanation for the reduced payout. No explanation for the 3 month ghost. No conversation at all. To be clear: the $50K has not been paid either. I've seen others share bad experiences with bug bounty payouts recently. I never thought it would happen to me. I can't force them to do the right thing. But I won't let this be forgotten. I will dedicate 10% of all my future bug bounty earnings to making sure this story stays visible — until Injective pays what I deserve. Full Technical Report: github.com/injective-wall…

Norsk
0
1
2
227
Jack retweetledi
Sigma Prime
Sigma Prime@sigp_io·
We’re hiring a Rust engineer to develop MEV and block-building systems at the core of Ethereum. The ideal fit writes high performance Rust, understands EVM execution mechanics deeply, and is familiar with the transaction supply chain.
Sigma Prime tweet media
English
10
21
233
13.8K
Jack retweetledi
Jack retweetledi
sam.rise
sam.rise@sam_battenally·
Unreleased mainnet looking good here RISE will top this soon It's about to get fun
sam.rise tweet media
English
62
55
182
14.2K
Jack retweetledi
'(Robert Smith)
'(Robert Smith)@stylewarning·
The UNIX "philosophy" stopped at "basic text utilities" instead of "pipelines with text as I/O". Like why doesn't Linux/Mac come with anything interesting? sed, awk, grep, "TUIs", yawn... I want cooler stuff. Like an integrator. So I built `integral`. $ integral '1/(1-x^3)'
'(Robert Smith) tweet media
English
28
34
732
89.3K
tensorfish
tensorfish@tensorfish·
Predictions 2028 - sub agents becomes irrelevant, context loss is solved by having 10mil+ context window - mcp servers will primarily for used auth - the few moats left are speed, legal, and relationships
English
1
0
4
702
Jack
Jack@secjack_·
@NRLman @rationalaussie I agree that this likely won't happen but in all fairness if such a massive deleveraging really occurred we'd have to bail them out (at least CBA) which would be our own GFC
English
0
0
0
189
NRL man
NRL man@NRLman·
@rationalaussie All the property haters been calling for this scenario forever seem to forget that if it does happen (which it hasn't yet) we can just default and hand back the properties to the bank. There really isn't a lot to lose other than a deposit.
English
3
0
1
1.5K
Rational Aussie
Rational Aussie@rationalaussie·
Honestly, I think this is the beginning of the end for the Australian Property Ponzi Scheme. This energy supply shock is unprecedented and will cause massive inflation, at the same time job losses triggered by AI are just beginning. Who wants to square that circle? Are they going to raise rates and bankrupt home owners, or print money and subsidise the Ponzi scheme? How much money will they have to print to plug that hole? The RBA will probably play with the one tool in their toolbox and increases rates, but eventually the government will see the crisis unfolding and end up subsidising home owners and renters with fake printed currency. Nominally house prices might even go up, but in real terms they'll go backwards. It's over. There's no coming back from the series of events that now seem to be in motion. Who the FK is retarded enough to spend a million bucks on a dogbox in this environment? We are an economy built on quick sand. Massive change is on the horizon.
English
155
59
1K
52.6K