
S.E. Cupp
53.8K posts

S.E. Cupp
@secupp
JOBS: Author, CNN, NYDN. iHeart. LIKES: John. RELIGION: Jack. SIGN: The one everyone gets along with. SKILLS: @jeopardy winner. @inaraorg
Instagram @secupp Katılım Ocak 2009
10.4K Takip Edilen407.4K Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet

We're all dealing with a lot. Here's what I'm going through. I hope it finds its way to someone who needs to know they're not alone. Thanks for reading, and bearing with me. ❤️
nydailynews.com/opinion/ny-ope…
English
S.E. Cupp retweetledi

S.E. Cupp retweetledi

GOP Senator John Kennedy on why he felt it was important to apologize and acknowledge the truth about the bombing of a school in Minab, Iran, which multiple reports indicate was caused by a U.S. military targeting error.
“Because I think it's the truth…we're investigating, but I'm not gonna hide behind that…I think it was a terrible, terrible mistake.
I wish it hadn't happened. I'm sorry it happened. I can assure you it wasn't intentional. And when you make a mistake, you ought to admit it.”
English
S.E. Cupp retweetledi

S.E. Cupp retweetledi
S.E. Cupp retweetledi

When we announced that @ConanOBrien would be one of our first podcast guests, the response was pretty uniform:
How in the world do you know Conan? (Truth is, I didn’t —but when you’re dying from cancer, it’s awkward for people to say no.)
More seriously, Conan is a funny man, a rooted dad, and now — weirdly — a movie star.
Check out our latest #NotDeadYet
podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/not…
English
S.E. Cupp retweetledi

my latest for CNN: Trump and his top officials warned for **years** war with Iran would waste American lives, be destabilizing, costly, and not in our interest.
One example:
Trump: "He’ll start a war, you know, lives will be wasted for no reason.”
Hannity: "That would be the most chilling abuse of powers, what you're describing in American history."
Trump: "It will be in a mess."
English
S.E. Cupp retweetledi
S.E. Cupp retweetledi

“.. another glitzy fundraiser at Mar-a-Lago Saturday night as the Middle East was lit up by Iranian missiles ..”
@thedailybeast
thedailybeast.com/trump-hosts-bi…

English
S.E. Cupp retweetledi
S.E. Cupp retweetledi

S.E. Cupp retweetledi

Trump/Hegseth operational security: at a restaurant a 2-minute walk from the White House, someone was having a conversation about the attacks on Iran that were going to start in 6 hours. Loud enough for the founder of @TMZ to talk about it in real time with his podcast cohost.
TMZ@TMZ
🚨 EXCLUSIVE: A group at a Washington D.C. restaurant was talking openly in the bar area Friday afternoon about a national secret that was about to literally explode hours later -- the bombing of Iran. Details: tmz.com/2026/02/28/men…
English
S.E. Cupp retweetledi
S.E. Cupp retweetledi
S.E. Cupp retweetledi
S.E. Cupp retweetledi

The paid grifters, partisan hacks, and bots are out in force—misleading people about the Constitution and the law—to defend Trump’s unconstitutional war.
Here’s an important Iran war PSA:
Contrary to what you may have heard about the War Powers Resolution (50 U.S.C. §§ 1541–1550), it does not allow the president to take military action for any reason for 60–90 days without congressional approval so long as the president notifies Congress within 48 hours.
Section 1541(c) of the War Powers Resolution states clearly:
“The constitutional powers of the President as Commander-in-Chief to introduce United States Armed Forces into hostilities, or into situations where imminent involvement in hostilities is clearly indicated by the circumstances, are exercised only pursuant to (1) a declaration of war, (2) specific statutory authorization, or (3) a national emergency created by attack upon the United States, its territories or possessions, or its armed forces.”
Of the three cited authorities, not one indicates a presidential power to take unilateral (without Congress’s approval) offensive military action.
The first two authorities allow the president to take offensive military action but only with Congress’s express approval (Article I of the Constitution grants Congress the exclusive power to declare war).
The third authority allows the president to take defensive military action without Congress’s approval in the event of a specific type of national emergency, a sudden unforeseen attack on the United States (happening too quickly for Congress to meet) necessitating immediate action to protect Americans.
It’s for this last situation (or for situations in which the president introduces forces into hostilities unlawfully) that the War Powers Resolution provides for the oft-mentioned 48-hour report to Congress (§ 1543) and 60-day (up to 90-day) timeline (§ 1544). If there’s an attack in progress on the United States (i.e., currently happening), we expect the president to respond swiftly to neutralize the attack and protect Americans—and then we will hold the president to account.
The Framers of the Constitution agreed at the debates in the federal convention of 1787 that the president should have the “power to repel sudden attacks” but not the power to otherwise introduce forces into hostilities without congressional approval.
The War Powers Resolution does not confer any new authority on the president to take offensive military action without congressional approval—nor could it under our Constitution. It instead checks the president when, as the Framers contemplated, the president introduces our Armed Forces into hostilities to repel a sudden attack.
The fact that previous presidents have violated both the Constitution and the War Powers Resolution does not—and cannot—change the law or make any present military action lawful.
English
S.E. Cupp retweetledi
S.E. Cupp retweetledi
S.E. Cupp retweetledi

S.E. Cupp retweetledi










