Sabitlenmiş Tweet
esmee?
49 posts


@StoopsnJunk @xevekiah no but the person who you donated your kidney to might-- which is the point of the argument, you dimwitted wet sock
English

@xevekiah Will that kidney ever grow up to be a mother/father/husband/wife/brother/sister/doctor/role model/just an egirl with thoughts she won't keep to herself?
No? Then STFU with your psychotic justifications for murdering unborn humans out of convenience.
English

Should it be illegal to refuse to donate blood or a kidney to someone who’s dying, even if it’s a child? If a child in your family needed your kidney and you couldn’t or wouldn’t give it, should the law force you to or send you to prison?
If your answer is no because that violates bodily autonomy, a basic human right, then you already understand the argument for legal abortion. No one is required to give up bodily autonomy for someone else, no matter their age or relationship.
You might call it murder, but even laws around killing have exceptions. Self defense is legal when someone’s life is at risk. If abortion were banned in every situation, even when the mother’s life is in danger, then by that logic self defense shouldn’t exist either. But it does.
Most people wouldn’t accept losing their bodily autonomy or their right to stay alive, so it’s worth considering what it means to take that right away from others.
Kia 🧸ྀི@xevekiah
what unpopular opinion about ABORTION can put you in this position???
English

@Allmos_ @macnerd74 @soigomaa buddy do you really believe it's worth arguing/debating with someone who is clearly engagement farming lol
English
esmee? retweetledi

Well, when a child is conceived, the DNA split is 50/50 from both parents. Except for one small detail: mitochondrial DNA. It’s passed down only through the mother and never through sperm.
Which means something interesting: all living humans can trace their mitochondrial line back to one woman, not one man.
And every daughter born continues passing that same line forward.
Happy Women’s Day 💐
English

@bIIoodIine @EstrogelWalls you cannot claim to be a feminist while shaming women's bodies and saying "why is it black tho?"
English

@L08818 @EganFilm @AdamKinzinger also notice how you COMPLETELY ignored all the other things i said, and went straight for an ad hominem? unfortunately you're wrong babe... please do research on AI the dangers of using it as a source like that! because this is quite embarrassing for you ml <3
English

This is UNACCEPTABLE AND INSANE.
U.S. Embassy London Consular@USAinUKConsular
Effective immediately, all individuals applying for an F, M, or J nonimmigrant visa are requested to adjust the privacy settings on all of their social media accounts to ‘public’ to facilitate vetting necessary to establish their identity and admissibility to the United States under U.S. law.
English

@L08818 @EganFilm @AdamKinzinger not sure why you thought pulling out my tweet 3 years ago from when i was 16 was a "gotcha" moment. classic red herring + ad hominem, admit you were wrong and concede babe
English

@L08818 @EganFilm @AdamKinzinger i am pointing out your ignorance of using AI as a tool in debate, something that is known to make mistakes (which it literally says in the bottom of the website by the way), and also is known to destroy our environment.
you are the clown :)
English

@L08818 @EganFilm @AdamKinzinger it's because you're using a robot to think for you, and your writing is not your own. professors and teachers will invalid scores of students who are caught using AI because it's an invalid way to present information.
once again; i am not disagreeing with you.
English

@L08818 @EganFilm @AdamKinzinger i never said i disagreed with your claim. i'm very much aware of the fact that your posting on social media can affect your visa application status. this is pretty common knowledge. however, using AI as your source, a robot that literally thinks for you, makes your-
English

@L08818 @EganFilm @AdamKinzinger yes, even when it's "factually correct". you're citing a literal robot, which is known to make mistakes, as your source. it's disingenuous to use AI as a source, especially in academia, research, debate, etc. it's showing your ineptitude to do your own research. clown.
English

@semendrainer69 @EganFilm @AdamKinzinger Even when it’s factually accurate?
Clown.
vocal.media/education/how-…
English

@SuboptimalAGI @bkatsr @samosaur @AdamKinzinger you do know that non-citizens are also offered protections under the constitution, right ?
English

@bkatsr @samosaur @AdamKinzinger No, because I’m an American citizen so I have rights that are protected by the Constitution.
Someone who is not an American citizen does not share that level of protection.
English

Noone is "policing" speech or invading anyone's privacy.
If our gov wants to examine their social media as a requirement for a visa, and the applicant CHOOSES not to share it, they don't have to.
They just don't obtain a visa.
It's quite simple.
And it's precisly what our "allies" do to our citizens who wish to obtain visas. Are you also outraged by that?
Nah. Bc this is about opposing Trump for you, not opposing the policy.

English
esmee? retweetledi











