andrew

13.6K posts

andrew banner
andrew

andrew

@shellscape

Whale Psychologist • @rollupjs core • that @jsxemail guy

Florida Katılım Eylül 2008
1.3K Takip Edilen2.8K Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
andrew
andrew@shellscape·
well I found out the hard way that NPM doesn't like symlinks buuuut JSX email v2.0.0 is released! Tons of good shit: - config file support - plugins. Oh yes, plugins. - massive email client compat updates - CSS Inlining - NEW components - bananas faster preview and render
andrew tweet media
English
5
11
45
10.5K
andrew retweetledi
Declaration of Memes
Declaration of Memes@LibertyCappy·
French man arrives in Texas and gets the French beat out of him YEEHAW PARTNER
English
74
486
3.6K
102.6K
Eric Pachman
Eric Pachman@EricPachman·
The US labor force is a living, breathing map. 🇺🇸 Watch the number of counties with labor forces in structural decline spread like a virus across America between 2010 and 2025. Shout out to @JMBDaecius for the idea to do this. #Economics #LaborForce #Trends
English
65
210
1.3K
249.7K
andrew
andrew@shellscape·
@glcst that's outstanding.
English
0
0
0
43
Glauber Costa
Glauber Costa@glcst·
@shellscape we have been hiring mostly from our community of contributors on tursodatabase/turso
English
1
0
1
244
Glauber Costa
Glauber Costa@glcst·
Turso now includes unlimited active databases in every plan. We already had unlimited databases, but we would charge you based on how many of them were active. That is now gone. You want a database, you get a database.
English
33
31
300
67.8K
andrew
andrew@shellscape·
@mitsuhiko nothing that hasn't always been going on. it's just far easier to hear about it now. US has roughly 6mil more flights each year than the EU.
English
0
0
1
228
andrew
andrew@shellscape·
@vasuman I remember when docusign was incredibly suspicious and people thought you were nuts for requesting an unenforcible digital signature.
English
0
0
2
120
vas
vas@vasuman·
In my experience there’s no better way to destroy your credibility than to use cheap knockoffs of popular software If you send a client a Docusign link you at least appear to have a real business If you send them something else they immediately just assume you’re broke Also if your company has 10 people who need to send the maximum amount of documents, you’re probably making many millions To the aspiring b2b founders reading this, don’t cheap out on any client facing part of your stack Anyone telling you otherwise has not played this game seriously before
Nav Toor@heynavtoor

DocuSign Personal: $10 to $15 per month. DocuSign Standard: $25 to $45 per user per month. DocuSign Business Pro: $40 to $65 per user per month. A 10-person team on Business Pro pays $4,800 to $7,800 a year. To put signatures on PDFs. A team of 50 pays $24,000 to $39,000 a year. And there is a 100-envelopes-per-year cap on most plans. Send more contracts and you pay extra. Need SMS delivery? $0.40 per send. Need ID verification? $2.50 per attempt. Need premium support? $5,000 to $50,000 per year add-on. You are rationing digital signatures in 2026. DocuSign is a $10 billion company built entirely on this pricing model. Now meet DocuSeal. A free and open source alternative to DocuSign. Created in 2023 by a Ruby developer named Alex who was simply trying to sign one document and realised every solution online was overpriced or required a subscription. Three weeks later he had a working alternative. He pushed it to GitHub under the AGPL-3.0 license. Today it has 11,800+ stars and over 1,000 forks. Bootstrapped. No VCs. No paywalls. Here is what DocuSeal does: - Upload any PDF and turn it into a fillable, signable form - Drag and drop signature fields, dates, checkboxes, file uploads, and 13 field types - Send to multiple signers with custom signing order - Automated email reminders - Mobile signing on any device - PDF signature verification built in - Audit trail for every document - Bulk send and templates - Full API access - Self-host with one Docker command Here is what DocuSeal costs: Zero. Forever. Unlimited documents. Unlimited signers. Unlimited storage. DocuSign limits envelopes. DocuSeal doesn't. DocuSign charges per SMS. DocuSeal doesn't. DocuSign charges for ID checks. DocuSeal doesn't. DocuSign sees your contracts on their servers. DocuSeal doesn't. Here is the wildest part: The median DocuSign contract per Vendr is $17,250 per year. One Reddit thread has people saying "they want me to pay $4.80 per e-signature." Self-host DocuSeal on a $5 cloud server and a 50-person team can sign as many contracts as they want without paying a single dollar. Your contracts never leave your server. Your client lists. Your NDAs. Your employment agreements. None of it touches a third-party company. For individuals who only sign a few contracts a year, you save $180. For small teams of 10, you save up to $7,800 a year. For a 50-person company, you save up to $39,000 a year. Your documents. Your signatures. Your server. 100% Open Source. (Link in the comments)

English
162
17
561
227K
andrew
andrew@shellscape·
I am unsure how to take this
andrew tweet media
English
0
0
0
65
andrew
andrew@shellscape·
@boydmyers no lie I rolled up at the stoplight two days ago to one of our people blaring journey. and right after an actual radio station commercial. I was aghast.
English
0
0
1
49
andrew
andrew@shellscape·
@JackLinFLL sad. I loved it for work versus driving from Tampa
English
0
0
0
24
Branch Floridian
Branch Floridian@JackLinFLL·
Called it! I mean who ever thought this thing was viable in SFL??? AT any rate we atill have Tri-Rail, Amtrak and two freight train tracks to keep the SFL drivers vs trains shenanigans going. I suppose in the end Brightline was the Spirit Airlines of the rails.
Branch Floridian tweet media
Branch Floridian@JackLinFLL

My Brightline thread

English
23
7
49
4.2K
andrew
andrew@shellscape·
@LtRevDan a double banger reply. this must be a big day for you. disabling replies and then following up on every QT sure seems like you're the one seething. now kindly fuck off with your midwit nonsense.
English
0
0
0
7
andrew
andrew@shellscape·
@ruisilva450 yes that's being used frequently as an argument against dissent
English
0
0
0
40
andrew
andrew@shellscape·
@isAdrisal @deno_land They had me right up until npm compat. I thought forcing the ecosystem off of npm towards the golang model was a great idea. But yes still following their dev.
English
0
0
1
312
Adriano
Adriano@isAdrisal·
@shellscape It is not there yet, but @deno_land seems to be moving in exactly the direction you describe. Most of the commits for the last few months have been all about node compat.
English
1
0
1
378
andrew
andrew@shellscape·
@izadoesdev who's crying ya goof? By your definition you're crying about crying. Would have been great if your QT had any original substance at all.
English
0
0
0
138
Iza
Iza@izadoesdev·
i won't understand the people crying over bun adding features that are intrinsically very BUN themed it's an all-in-one toolkit to replace node, mainly for web servers, and everything they've added so far does exactly that, while giving the best "native" support, performance, and still being lean image handling has been one of the more annoying API things to handle. if you just want a node replacement, by all means, fork bun and remove these features if you don't want them, it's open source, but getting rid of bun because of it is kinda crazy
andrew@shellscape

I would have liked to see bun keep with node compat, and overtake node itself. all of these addons could have been managed as just that - a secondary stdlib of the kitchen sink. Instead, we have a garbage plate (iykyk) of whims and massive drift with node proper

English
5
0
40
3K
Rhys
Rhys@RhysSullivan·
on a 'new npm', someone (probably bun) should make a concept of first class vendoring of dependencies i want the source repo of my deps to be in my node_modules/ instead, and to have a low friction way to publish my patches so others can use them w/out being PR slop
English
11
0
92
8.7K
dax
dax@thdxr·
everyone wants so badly to be able to say "this is what the next github should be" but no one believes what they're saying enough to go do it
English
67
9
449
90.3K