Someguy0474

The modern Right would never dream of integrity like this.

@JillianMichaels It didn't give 94% of its territory, you liar. It offered to return stolen property and, if history is anything to go by, would have dishonored its offer immediately.

Name one country in history that gave away 94% of its territory and still got called the aggressor. It sounds completely impossible, but when you actually look at the 2008 realignments, the maps tell a story that both sides are absolutely terrified to admit. We are trapped in a loop of boring, recycled talking points because nobody has the spine to look at what happened to the remaining 78% of the land. Here is the exact moment the entire argument falls apart… Watch the full episode on my YT channel! Link is in the comments 📷

@daltonwelbern @itsFaithMerrill @EvanAKilgore @RealCandaceO Whybwould every single student have strong opinions about Candace? It's more likely that many haven't even listened to her before.

Is it really that odd that creators who work for Turning Point are all on the same page? Might be a hard concept to grasp being in love with Candace but companies have this thing called “training” where they train new and existing employees so they can have unified messaging. Anybody who has worked at all in life knows this.

I find it super odd and suspicious that all these no-name creators that TPUSA picked up for the “pick up the mic tour” all consistently have the same talking points about @RealCandaceO. 🤔 We love the propaganda being spilled nowadays

@_eva_inga @thejjalvarez @ericweinstein Yes, a political actor engaged in politics to win political and financial support. Appeals to authority are fallacious.

@thejjalvarez @ericweinstein George Washington disagrees with you. x.com/rozrothstein/s…

In the Judeo-Christian western world, Islam is:

@Cryptogal3 @EmilioDelaCroix @ericweinstein Modern Jews are not the faithful Jews of Christ's era, the first Apostles. They reject Christ, and so are spiritually akin to Pagans.

@EmilioDelaCroix @ericweinstein To ignore Chritianity's Judeo roots is a joke. Jesus NEVER denounced his religeon. Never.

@_eva_inga @MongooseSix @ericweinstein American and European Jewish political heads are the dominant voices screeching for the importation of 3rd world Muslims. They are more alike, especially in their hatred for Christians, than either is alike to Christians.

@MongooseSix @ericweinstein Wrong. The setting is perfectly apt. Jews were in America and the west from the beginning, and the founding fathers were clear that they were welcome. Islam, absolutely not so, and muslims really didn’t come here until hundreds of years later.

@ericweinstein Jews who have not been adopted by Christ are spiritually equal to pagans, in need of salvation.

@ericweinstein What world are you talking about? There is the Jewish world and the Christian world, with no overlap. Those Jews who have been adopted by Christ are Christians, descendants both by blood and by faith. Gentiles are by faith only, but these brethren are equal before the Lord.

@lamps_apple @ShadowofEzra Trump is indeed a murderous fraud who betrayed his voter base. Thatnis established fact. Dillon's words do nothing to alter that reality.

This is demoralization at work. It attacks the relationship between Trump and his supporters. It tells Republicans that their leader is a murderous fraud, their loyalty was exploited, their judgment cannot be trusted, and one of their most powerful political memories was manufactured to control them. Freud described this mechanism in Group Psychology and the Analysis of the Ego. He wrote that misgivings about a leader can produce panic “though the danger remains the same.” Once confidence in the leader collapses, the bonds connecting members of the group begin collapsing with it. The conspiracy also attacks the country’s ability to maintain a shared reality. If a shooting witnessed by thousands, recorded from numerous angles, investigated through physical evidence and paid for with an innocent man’s life can simply be declared staged, then no event can ever be known. Every election becomes fraudulent. Every crime becomes a government operation. Every victim becomes an actor. Every piece of contrary evidence becomes evidence of a larger cover-up. Citizens trapped inside that worldview eventually stop believing that political action matters. They distrust their leaders, their institutions, their neighbors and their own senses. They become isolated, cynical and politically useless. Dillon uncovers nothing about Butler. He trains Republicans to treat courage as theater, sacrifice as a prop, murder as entertainment and loyalty as stupidity. A country taught to laugh at its own wounds will eventually lose the will to defend itself. That is the point.

Tim Dillon says he wants President Trump to come clean and admit to the world that he staged his assassination attempt in Butler, Pennsylvania. He wants President Trump to do a one-hour special on CBS with Bari Weiss and explain how he “staged” his assassination attempt. “I don’t care if he staged the assassination attempt.” “Explain to us how you did it.”

@dannycantalk Another sad example of someone believing he is on par with God. A divine creator of the entire universe is the definition of objectivity. He made the objects, and has supreme authority over what they are. The very definition of Good is in him.

If morality comes from God it isn't objective. It's just God's subjective preferences.

@cappadocianist @OrthodoxOrigen When Paul wrote Romans 13, he did not call for Christians to sieze control of the Roman government and remove "sanction" from their persecution or perversion.

@OrthodoxOrigen It depends what you mean by that, but we recognize all government authority as given from God. Why would we sanction grave moral errors using the authority from God?

Yes I am a practicing Catholic, Yes, I also fully support the legal and equal rights of LGBT people. Enough with the Reddit flavored assumptions that Catholicism=ultra conservatism or legal illiteracy.

Yeah…nah. Here’s what I think is happening instead. I haven’t wanted to say this, but there is a problem with organized Skepticism even more than conspiracy theories. My claim is that from hard evidence NOT ONE of the following is an extraordinary claim: The CIA not only gathers intelligence but kills people, violates rights, gaslights and evades scrutiny and oversight. The U.S. hides bioweapons programs. The U.S. engages in regime change through charity and aid programs. We in the U.S. medically experiment on our own citizens without consent. We run drugs. The DOJ and FBI are actively and flagrantly obstructing justice. Putin easily kills people outside Russia. We conspire and use academics for sheepskin washing our dirty work. U.S. newspapers actively avoid reporting stories about which the U.S. population is desperate for information. They also carry extremely non neutral biases. We actively conspired to hide open and obvious presidential dementia. And by extension, there are massive conspiracies at every level below that one. At a mind boggling level. There are Special Access programs that are about real and/or fake NHI/UFOs Etc. ———— The last thing we need is skeptics telling us the bar for such conspiracies and/or governmental accountability requires extraordinary evidence. Somehow the skeptics have it totally wrong. After Watergate, Iran-Contra, COVID, Church/Pike committees, etc. these are no longer extraordinary claims to raise. They are ordinary claims. I have no idea whether Lindsay Graham died of natural causes. But I can tell you the difference between a skeptic and a scientist looking at the claim. A skeptic’s first move is to lurch for the budding conspiracy and try to pull the idea of foul play off the table first and then to require a mountain of evidence to consider such a thing. A scientist firmly grabs the skeptic’s hand and forces him to put the hypothesis back on the table and says “Uh, you’re not in charge here. There’s a history…and I’m going to need to see something other than reference to null hypotheses, William of Occam and Carl Sagan…because that’s not how science and investigation works.” Time for extra scientific skepticism to die I think. Covert operations and conspiracies are difficult enough to document as it is. We don’t need skeptics as self appointed referees.

@JoshRKlein @WesleyLHuff We just actually understand history in a way Wes isn't employing.

@WesleyLHuff The people who just hate the Jews and insist that Judeo-Christian is a Jewish imposition on real Christian virtue don't care about your logic Wes. haha

So much noise online regarding the term "judeo-Christian." Guys -- in academia it's simply the term that describes the combined corpus of Old and New Testaments. The Jewish heritage of the Hebrew scriptures combined with the New Testament. That's it. I know you want there to be some conspiracy but there isnt, that's the way we're using it. It has nothing to do with geo-politics or a one world order.

@Loungin_Ape @jj_sutcliffe @WesleyLHuff God will save many of them through the Church, as he will save many Gentiles.

@Loungin_Ape @jj_sutcliffe @WesleyLHuff Did you not bother reading the rest of Romans, particularly chapters 9-11? The Church is the sum of all descendants of Israel by faith. Any Jews who live apart from the church are unredeemed sinners, spiritually equivalent to a pagan.

@WesleyLHuff "Christian" accurately and coherently describes it, and did so until very recently, maybe 100 years of the last 2000. The Hebrew scriptures are fully revealed in the NT, and have been fully integrated within the Church. Any "judeo" outside the church is meaningless.

@AwayFromDaMire @VVeritatum It's not equivalent, but is very similar.

@VVeritatum False equivalency arguments have made discourse pointless 🤦‍♂️

I’m not sure how a guy goes from texting his so-called friends “I think they’re going to kill me” to suddenly dying… Seems like important context

@Parab3llum @cyr_actual @FenixAmmunition If it goes through, it's inconclusive and my search will continue. As I said earlier, I hesitate to say "impossible", but it's so improbable that I find essentially any alternative (2nd shooter, mic boomboom+inserted fragments, alien lazerbeem) more plausible.

@someguy0474 @cyr_actual @FenixAmmunition And if it goes through? Once is enough? Because the entire contention is that while it may not be likely the bullet would behave this way, it is entirely possible.

If these queerbaits shooting meat in their backyard had any credibility the defense team would be asking for their data, but none of it is admissible in court because it's not science.

@Amuk31 @jeremykauffman It's explicitly welfare, just thrown into a "contract" so midwits will defend it. If you take the money, you're still a welfare queen.

@jeremykauffman It is not "welfare" for the government to keep its end of a contract. Quite the opposite.

~80% of government spending is on welfare The biggest remainder is the military, which is also welfare