Steven Bakos🇺🇸

@dan79355014 @skillz17q Another retard who “knows something”

here is my question i know law pretty good more then most but when you encounter judges like this that are either ignorant or just being dishonest and also you can point out that the court and the crown are paid by same people conflict of interest can t get fair trial that way and they ignore all this what are your recourse

He is on the side of the prosecutor. They're getting paid by the same entity, and they both hold bar cards.

@RealCandaceO @BasedSolutions1 Doxx her back! Tit for tat

For clarity, my family absolutely does NOT own 1 million dollar in cars, nor do we own a black TRX pick-up truck. This is categorically false. Nonetheless, Laura Loomer just accurately doxxed my personal car, (a new range rover my husband bought me for my birthday after 7 years of marriage), as well as our family car that we use to drive the kids in. We just received a tip that she is allegedly pulling personal informationvia her soon to be husband. Allegedly, Loomer's husband, who goes by "Jake" at work, is the IT guy for Tameron Auto (owned by Cannon) in Pensacola, FL. The person is alleging that Laura encouraged him to break the law on her behalf, violating the Driver Privacy Protection Act (DPPA) and pulling personal information (home details, financing details, etc) so she can go after her enemies. They claim Andrew "Jacob" Simpson is using his employer's dealer accounts to access personal information regarding LLCS, which would include the new LLC that we used to purchase that car in. They claim the minority partner in Tameron/Cannon Auto has shared the video of Jake & Larry at the White House Hannukah event getting congratulations from Trump on their engagement. He allegedly tells “Jake” to bring that video to all the meetings and share it. If this is true and Laura is using her fiancé to hack user data with the express goal of stalking her adversaries, it is a crime. And a very serious one on that. @AnaKasparian it may have been how she hacked personal information about your husband’s job as well. Car dealers have access to everything you might fill out to get a car— which includes banking information.

@TopLobsta This is the lie

This is the conspiracy to everything.

@Bugimus Looks like a wookie

Todd Standing: Real Experiencer or Hoaxer? My Honest Take (and Why I Can’t Fully Trust Him) Todd Standing. Super controversial, and my gut screams “narcissist”—he comes across way too needy for people to believe him, almost giddy for validation as the one who’ll finally prove Sasquatch. I’ll admit right up front that I don’t like Todd’s demeanor—it’s full-scale cringe. That can taint my opinion, and I own it. I’m 100% convinced Bigfoot is real (my account shows I chase real evidence: tracks, audio, sightings). But belief doesn’t mean buying every claim. His most well-known stuff—the crisp “Jake” and “Jane” faces—still feels off, and this Gaia clip only heightens the suspicion. In this Gaia footage Todd treats the creatures like personal buddies and mentors, zooming in on eye spacing and head size while framing himself as uniquely trusted. Dramatic, spiritual, heavy on the “I’m the chosen connector” vibe. Pair that with the recent Cabin in the Woods defense by Robert Maxwell (needle scaling arguing massive heads, rebuttals to image manipulation and props, eye sizing). They make some strong technical points. I’ll link Robert’s full video in the replies. Dr. Jeff Meldrum is consistently objective and measured in his language. He calls the portraits some of the most astounding in history, notes they give the feeling of looking into a real creature’s eyes, and finds them worthy of serious study with “potential authenticity.” He’s diplomatic, intrigued by anatomy/gait/variations, and had his own sighting with Todd—but he doesn’t go full “100% proven, unmanipulated Sasquatch.” As Meldrum leaned toward authentic, I actually lean toward hoax. Here’s my specific suspicion as someone pretty handy with Photoshop: If I really worked at it with the right tools and time, I could take a human face (Todd’s or similar), enlarge the upper head proportionally (20-30%), preserve the core features, add fur texture, composite it into the forest with foreground needles, and create something that looks exactly like the Jake stills/video frames. And as the Cabin defense itself demonstrates when they morph/scale the upper portion of Todd’s head to Jake’s, the proportions line up eerily well once adjusted for size. Todd even does the head-size demo—glasses, ruler—looking genuinely excited that his own head couldn’t possibly match. This is just a hypothesis I want to rule out before making any firmer judgments. Without raw, unedited video files (full metadata, longer takes, multiple angles), we can’t verify whether simple post-production enlargement or compositing happened. Todd releases edited clips, cites protection/editing choices, and teases “more coming,” but that selective pattern—plus his production background and history of selling “ultimate proof” DVDs—keeps the red flags flying. VFX/forensic analysts (Poling & Falconer’s detailed NAWAC document is taken as gospel by a lot of the Bigfoot community) still flag unnatural lighting, movement, and lack of dynamic biology. In the spirit of fairness, I must add that “Kabota,” with the dark face and wrinkles, is much more intriguing to me. With Meldrum, I’m saying that looks far more authentic than the others. I’d love to do a more focused analysis of that video if Todd ever releases more details about it. The bottom line: I truly think Todd had real experiences. But I strongly suspect he is also a hoaxer and therefore should not be trusted. I feel exactly the same way about Dr. Steven Greer in the UFO world—I think he had genuine alien contact but also faked flares for his paying followers. Once someone does that, they must be called out and not trusted. I do not see this as “Todd is full of crap and Bigfoot isn’t real.” I see Todd as a dedicated experiencer *and* hoaxer. This is a family squabble as opposed to a tribal war. I would be cautious about trusting his presented evidence as authentic Bigfoot footage. But don’t dismiss the whole Sasquatch phenomenon either—real ones are elusive masters of the forest, not known to pose for crisp portraits. In fact, everything I’ve seen points to the exact opposite. They’ll connect with trusted people and decline recordings. I could be wrong—happy to be proven so. What do you think after seeing the Gaia clip? Did you watch the full Cabin in the Woods defense? Did Meldrum’s measured take or the head-size demo change your mind on “Jake,” or does the digital-alteration possibility (and raw-footage gap) raise the same flags for you? Civil discussion please—what’s your take on Todd’s claims? 👇🐞👣 #Sasquatch #ToddStanding

@CAMELCASTOff He won’t show

Going live on KICK after getting struck by TheQuartering on my YouTube channel. Pre debate stream leading up to YellowFlash's show! JOIN NOW! Link below

@goddek So you can clean your messes during Shabbat?? 🧐

Why do they treat God as if He were an autistic toddler?

@KarlWuckert The entire memorial

Everyone has a moment. What was it that made you start questioning Erika Kirk?

@TNTJohn1717 I’ve heard and I’m still trying to confirm that Calvinism is linked to the Rosicrucians

Do you believe Calvinism helps people understand the gospel more clearly, or does it make the plain words of Scripture harder to believe? A. Helps clarify truth B. Creates confusion C. Still studying it D. Never trusted it

@YellowFlashGuy @TheQuartering Not holding my breath he’ll show

I am going LIVE at 9pm EST! Quartering begged for this and agreed in my DM's "see ya Friday." He has the link. It's time to address the allegations. You beta cuck @TheQuartering, I have clips, screenshots, and time stamps all ready. I'm gonna whip you boy.

@TNTJohn1717 AaaaaaaaMEN!!!! 🙏🏻🔥❤️

🚨‼️I have reached the point where names do not move me anymore. I do not care if the man is famous, dead, beloved, quoted by millions, followed by presidents, praised by scholars, or treated like the last honest voice in America. If what he says lines up with the Book, fine. If it crosses the Book, he is wrong. It really is that simple. I am not here to protect reputations. I am here to compare what men say with what God said. That is the problem with celebrity Christianity. People say they love truth until truth steps on one of their favorite names. Then suddenly the issue is tone, style, respectability, influence, fruit, platform, legacy, or how many people were helped. None of that is the standard. Scripture is the standard. The moment a man, movement, preacher, teacher, author, friend, or hero says something against the word of God, I take God’s side against him every single time. Even if my best friend on earth told me something contrary to Scripture, I would reject what he said and take the Bible. That is not hatred. That is loyalty. There is nobody walking this earth who stands between me and God. Nobody. Not John Piper. Not Paul Washer. Not John Calvin. Not Erica Kirk. Not a president. Not a king. Not a bestselling author. Not a brilliant apologist. Not even the preacher I enjoyed the most growing up. If they cross the Book, I leave them standing there and I keep walking with the Book. I am not claiming to be perfect. I am not. But my Bible is perfect. That is why I preach it unashamedly. That is why I do not panic when people get offended after I expose one of their idols. Their reaction is not my problem. Their attachment is the problem. If you can follow a man right up to the point where he contradicts Scripture and still defend him because you like him, then you have something in your heart that should not be there. And let me say this plainly. I am not doing this for clout. I am not chasing followers. I am not trying to build a fan base. I honestly do not know how this page got this big except that people are starving for somebody to just say, What does the Bible say? My method is not complicated. I compare statement with Scripture. If a man says something true, good. If he gives me a seed thought worth developing, good. But where he leans to his own understanding, twists a text, softens a doctrine, or moves off the page, that is where I part company with him. At the judgment seat, nobody is going to be able to say, I went along with the error because I liked the preacher. That excuse will burn like paper. Jesus said the word He spoke will judge men in the last day. In the end, nothing will stand but that Book. So I settled this a long time ago. I am not following personalities. I am not bowing to platforms. I am not protecting sacred cows. Let God be true, but every man a liar.

@KanekoaTheGreat How does dude stay blurred ??

🚨BREAKING: DOJ releases HD slow-motion footage of Cole Allen shooting a Secret Service agent. US Attorney Jeanine Pirro: "There is no evidence the shooting was the result of friendly fire."

@TopLobsta @DavidLCorbo Dead 💀 🤣🤣🤣🤣

He stole my mic

@alleytopfiles Worst actress EVER

Buckle UP Everyone Here we GO! We’re not gonna be morbidly, awkward. Using Charlie’s Voice over yours? This was really weird pls watch till the end.

@DavidLCorbo Hybrid 😏

This Mf looks scary 🫣

Ironic he’s arguing with a Jew. Iykyk

@TNTJohn1717 She’s always been a bit cuckoo cachoo. Praying for her

Kaylah Hodgins Exposed - When Commandment Legalism, Conspiracy Prophecy, and Private Interpretation Replace the Sufficiency of Scripture There are some people who go bad in public all at once. They wake up one morning, throw away the Book, deny the gospel, and run straight into open apostasy with the brakes cut and the hazards flashing. Then there are others who drift into error in a way that is actually more dangerous because it sounds zealous, sounds serious, sounds studious, and sounds like they really care about truth. They quote a lot of Scripture. They talk about holiness. They warn about deception. They talk about obedience, the commandments, the mark of the beast, the remnant, the day of the Lord, and hidden truths the churches are supposedly ignoring. To the average undiscerning listener, that can sound like bold Bible teaching. But boldness is not the test. Volume is not the test. Novelty is not the test. Scripture rightly divided is the test. And when you hold Kaylah Hodgins up against that standard, the problem becomes plain very fast. Her material does not simply show a few rough edges. It shows a pattern of legalistic salvation confusion, speculative prophecy, extra-biblical theorizing, and private interpretation masquerading as spiritual depth. That is what makes this especially sad. This is not somebody that sounds like a complete unbeliever mocking the Bible. This is somebody who sounds like she wants people to take the Bible seriously. That is exactly why she can mislead people. She takes real biblical words and then starts building unstable systems around them. She takes the Ten Commandments and turns them into a practical test of whether someone is really saved. She takes rapture passages and overlays them with transfiguration language, aurora theories, antique commentary, and strange symbolism. She takes the mark of the beast and turns it into a giant web of Ethiopian canon speculation, chip theories, hand-and-forehead symbolism, and law-keeping categories. She takes the church’s need for discernment and turns it into a remnant mentality where most pastors are blind, most visible Christians are asleep, and only the people following her line of reasoning seem to be awake. That is not spiritual maturity. That is how sectarian confusion grows. And for me, this one carries an added burden because this is exactly the kind of voice many sincere people will share for a season because it feels fresh, feels intense, feels “deeper” than the average shallow church content online. Then after a while, the deeper you listen, the more the center goes crooked. The gospel gets muddied. Assurance gets tied to commandment-keeping. Grace gets pushed into the background. Christ’s finished work gets verbally affirmed but functionally weakened. Private theories begin to multiply. The sensational starts swallowing the simple. Before long, the hearer is not standing on the plain words of God anymore. He is standing on a wobbling tower of Bible verses, antique sources, Ethiopian texts, conspiratorial pattern-matching, and spiritualized guesswork. That is why this must be called out plainly. When somebody starts leading people toward works salvation and unstable prophetic systems, silence is not kindness. Silence is surrender. Chapter 1: The Gospel Gets Corrupted When Commandment-Keeping Becomes the Proof of Salvation The first and biggest issue with Kaylah Hodgins is the way she handles salvation and assurance. In her commandment video, she says the Ten Commandments still directly apply, treats them as the practical outworking of love to God and neighbor, and then goes much further by framing commandment-keeping as the real proof of whether a person has been healed, knows God, and is truly walking in the Spirit. She explicitly says this is not about earning salvation, but then repeatedly builds a structure where obedience to the commandments becomes the active evidence that separates the truly saved from the self-

@imelizabethlane Still can’t cry

Erika Kirk leaving the scene

@Andywarski @PoweroftheTruth Will you be streaming live on Rumble or just a clips channel?

Hey everyone! We now have an official rumble spot. We also have a big announcement tonight - 8:30PM EST - WE BACK! Promo video coming in a few

@FightofFaith Yes

Christians Only Have you experienced a miracle?

@ThrillaRilla369 Zero

If you went to school in the 70s, 80s, or 90's. How many kids did you know with gender dysphoria?