TURBANMAN ਪੱਗ ਮੈਨ

Paaji, I am an Indian first. Just like you represented India through cricket, I too always saw Punjab through the spirit of India. Because you called me “didi,” I am replying with that same emotion. I may not understand politics deeply, but we AAP supporters speak from the heart. Parties can be changed overnight…but will you ever be able to truly trust BJP leaders, especially after seeing what happened to protesting farmers? Over 700 farmers lost their lives. Barricades, tear gas, water cannons, bullets - all used against peacefully protesting farmers. The same farmers who feed the nation were branded as agents and insulted for asking justice. Punjab will never forget that pain. You had already earned immense respect long before AAP made you Rajya Sabha MP. Your name, your struggle, your identity - all were built by your own hard work. Honestly, even your Parliament attendance showed that power or political ambition never seemed important to you. Today, ask yourself honestly - ED factor/fear may be common among many of you. But, using you, if other defectors who engineered this switch - some not even from Punjab - get minister posts and political rewards next month, you may be left carrying the tag of “traitor” for life. As a MP from Punjab, you should demand Punjab’s long-pending RDF funds. Those funds belong to the people of Punjab, not to any political party. Politics should remain between parties. Common people should never suffer because of political revenge, by stopping their rightful funds.

📖 ਭਾਈ ਗੁਰਦਾਸ ਜੀ — ਸਿੱਖੀ ਦੇ ਪਹਿਲੇ ਵਿਆਖਿਆਕਾਰ ✨ ਮਹਾਨ ਵਿਦਵਾਨ, ਕਵੀ, ਧਰਮ ਪ੍ਰਚਾਰਕ ਅਤੇ ਆਦਿ ਸ੍ਰੀ ਗੁਰੂ ਗ੍ਰੰਥ ਸਾਹਿਬ ਜੀ ਦੇ ਪਹਿਲੇ ਲਿਖਾਰੀ ਨੂੰ ਕੋਟਿ-ਕੋਟਿ ਪ੍ਰਣਾਮ 🙏🌸ਸਿੱਖ ਇਤਿਹਾਸ ਵਿੱਚ ਉਨ੍ਹਾਂ ਦਾ ਯੋਗਦਾਨ ਸਦਾ ਅਮਰ ਰਹੇਗਾ ⚔️📚

Dear Raghav Chadha, If loyalty can change after marriage, surname can too. Regards, Concerned "Chadha Community" . why not change your Sir name too from Raghav Chadha to Raghav Chopra? @raghav_chadha @ParineetiChopra #raghavchadha

@raghav_chadha Parineeti da Yaar, Raghav Gaddar

Congratulations to the entire BJP family on the impressive election results, with West Bengal marking a historic & decisive victory that stands out as truly remarkable. The outcomes from Assam and Puducherry further reflect people’s continued faith in development and strong governance. This victory stands as a testament to the decisive leadership of Hon’ble PM Shri @narendramodi Ji, the strategic vision of Hon’ble HM Shri @AmitShah Ji, and the dedicated efforts of BJP National President Shri @NitinNabin Ji. A win for every citizen aspiring for a stronger, more developed India 🇮🇳

Hi Sandeep @SandeepPathak04 I will take a stand on what happened today and speak out, but on 4 conditions - 🔹Leave BJP 🔹Resign as MP 🔹Apologize to the people of Punjab (as you became MP because the people of Punjab voted for AAP and chose AAP MLAs) 🔹Unblock me, call me, and explain your side of the story. You know from the very first day that I have been giving you honest feedback, believing there would always be room for improvement that would eventually benefit both AAP and you. The worst feeling you might be going through today is that no one from AAP is standing in support of you despite your years of hard work and sacrifices. People's support is at the very core and central aspect of politics (data is secondary). In your journey in AAP, there has been real, honest hard work, along with a few mistakes too. I am extremely pained that because you switched to BJP, no one is now recollecting the hard work part, and only highlighting mistakes mixed with some allegations which may not be true and are politically motivated. I could very well stay silent today realizing that I know almost nothing about the real truth behind these dramatic incidents unfolding. But in the past, I proudly said many times that I got the opportunity to work in AAP through you. I mentioned to you many times that I drew energy to contribute to AAP because of your presence in the party that is trust anchor point. It is super clear that we all started our journeys here to stand up for what is right for our country and to speak out against what is wrong. I am just an ordinary person, but I still have the courage to voice my opinion when something is not right. If any of your family members are closely following what is happening now, they would still advise you on the above 4 points. They may seem impossible for you today, but very soon you will realize that you are still at a point of safe exit today and can still rebuild your life (like t=0). Knowing that there is still room for this safe exit as of today, I cannot stay calm and chose to express my honest opinion. 'Not the axe that cuts the tree, but want to be like that person who sowed the seeds for that tree so that tree can be replenished, rejuvenated, replicated, repeated elsewhere'

What she did was real ‘Jan Akrosh’ - women don’t want this rubbishy drama. Will courts wake up for people or allow this Tamasha to continue all over India?

Why does the Bombay high court order about gathering ONLy at Azad Maidan not apply here? Only activists are threatened and pushed to the found so their protests are invisible to the public. @MumbaiPolice @CPMumbaiPolice @DGPMaharashtra

I left for bombay at 6.30 am like the hard working professional that I am & stopped the car at 7 am to make this reel as I’ve long realised that silence is not a virtue & one must speak up when they are disrespected. Yes if wrong things happen at any workplace that are against basic human rights, me & all of us should speak up. I don’t care about the personal trolling, I’m used to it last 5 years since shark tank but the purpose of this reel is to request all the proud Indians in this country to start speaking up when they see something wrong, out of humanity, out of patriotism. Jai hind. Now off to another joyful & complex day at work !

Every evening, as Mohali slows down, one 70-year-old chooses to show up with warmth. Near Sectors 54–55, on the road towards Franco Road, he quietly serves free chai to anyone passing by his home. No banner, no announcement. Just a simple act of seva that has continued for over a year. Winters bring steaming cups of tea. Summers bring both chai and cold drinks. But what truly stays constant is the feeling he offers, that someone cares enough to pause for you. In a world chasing bigger things, he reminds us that sometimes, the smallest gestures leave the deepest impact. Credits : harsimar_daily_vlogs on IG #GoodNewsIndia #Kindness #Inspiring #Punjab [Mohali, Punjab, Kindness, Inspiring India, Good News, Positive News]

You want to increase the number of Lok Sabha seats from 543 to 850. Great do it, but reduce the MP salary, benefits & perks in same proportion as they've to represent less number of people now. Why should taxpayers bear the expenses of salary & VIP treatment of additional MPs..

When I think of Lok Sabha strength being increased from 543 to 850, my first thought is not smaller constituencies, more responsive representatives, and all that. It is - 307 more VIPs. That many more entitled rulers, free tickets, perks, security, expense, sigh.

A courtroom battle turns explosive. As Arvind Kejriwal files a fresh affidavit in the Delhi High Court, the recusal debate takes a dramatic new turn—no longer limited to legal arguments, but now extending to alleged institutional links involving Justice Swarana Kanta Sharma’s family and Tushar Mehta. At the heart of it all: not proven bias, but the perception of bias. Is this a genuine conflict of interest—or a calculated legal strategy in the high-stakes Delhi Excise Policy Case? One question now dominates the narrative: Will justice only be done—or also be seen to be done? @AamAadmiParty @ArvindKejriwal @msisodia @SauravDassss #delhihighcourt #legalnews #latestnews #judiciary

One wrong call in cricket gets reviewed instantly by 3rd Umpire, One wrong judgment in court can ruin lives forever. Than why AI shouldn’t audit judicial decisions too to avoid high stake?? @ArvindKejriwal @MahuaMoitra @KapilSibal @sardesairajdeep

#WATCH: The indomitable @abhisar_sharma has done a video report on not just my revelations in the Justice Swarana Kanta Sharma-Arvind Kejriwal recusal case, but also on the larger issue of increasingly biased and blatantly communal judges in the Indian judiciary. Do watch: youtu.be/z25r6dq21G0?si…

Tens of thousands of children have been displaced by the conflict in #Lebanon. Khalsa Aid is organising activities for children in several IDP shelters. The smiles mean everything.💛 #KhalsaAid #MiddleEast #IDP #Iran #Isreal #Beirut

#ImportantNews: The controversy over the alleged Delhi liquor-scam case before Justice Swarana Kanta Sharma is no longer confined to courtroom conduct alone. Now more troubling questions of proximity, patronage, conflict-of-interest, and the appearance of bias have come to light. Several of the 23 dischargees in the case had formally sought Justice Sharma’s recusal from hearing the CBI’s challenge to their discharge. Even then, the judge has so far resisted calls to step aside, even as former Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal himself appears in person to argue the recusal application. Arguments are now scheduled for Monday, 13 April 2026. In my last Case In Point column for @frontline_india, I had already revealed, through an analysis of all the 165 criminal revision petitions of the same category as Kejriwal’s case, that Justice Sharma clearly departed from her usual pattern of handling such matters and had taken an unusually strange interest in this case. That, along with many other details that if read in singularity can be met with a shrug, but when read together, reveals a troubling pattern and credible fears of apprehension of bias in the liquor case. These by itself had raised serious questions. You may read my piece here: frontline.thehindu.com/columns/delhi-… What has surfaced now makes those questions HARDER to dismiss. Justice Sharma’s son and daughter—Ishaan Sharma and Shambhavi Sharma—have both been empanelled by the Union government before the Delhi High Court and the Supreme Court. According to the empanelment details, both siblings were appointed on the very same days: 11 September 2025 for the Delhi High Court panels and 21 November 2025 for the Supreme Court panels. 1. Ishaan Sharma holds panels before both courts, including the highest Group A panel before the Supreme Court and Senior Panel Counsel status before the Delhi High Court. 2. Shambhavi Sharma, with mere four years of enrolment as advocate, too holds panels before both courts: Group C before the Supreme Court and Government Pleader before the Delhi High Court. 3. Ishaan Sharma also held a panel in the Delhi Development Authority (DDA), under the Union Housing Ministry, till at least 2024 (Check: sci.gov.in/sci-get-pdf/?d…). 4. He also held a panel in the Delhi State Legal Services Authority since 2021 until at least the end of 2024 (Check: cdnbbsr.s3waas.gov.in/s395b7a6d9a47c…). Panel counselship is among the most coveted forms of government legal patronage in the system. Ask any advocate and they will tell you how through these positions, the government allocates litigation, visibility, professional standing, and income. But the more important and troubling part is that they are positions held at the pleasure of the very government whose top law officers are now appearing before Justice Sharma in one of the most politically explosive cases in the country. And that is where the conflict sharpens. Of course, one need not prove an explicit bargain but justice must also be SEEN to be done, especially when it is a case of public interest. The test for seeking recusal of a judge is whether there exists a reasonable apprehension of bias and whether public confidence in the fairness of the process has been impaired. Like I had explained in my column, Indian law on recusal has long recognised that what matters is not just actual bias, but whether a litigant could REASONABLY FEEL that justice may NOT appear to be done. Here, several of the 23 dischargees feel justice may not be done impartially. And now this issue of one advocate, who happens to be the son of a judge, accumulating large number of panels within a relatively short post-enrolment period as an advocate. Ask any lawyer and they will tell you how many more accomplished, brilliant persons, with many more years as an advocate have failed to secure a panel through the formal process. The concerns are many. In this case, the question is whether a judge can continue to hear a politically sensitive challenge brought by the CBI, while her kin hold multiple Union government panels and receive work from the same legal establishment whose top officers allocate cases to them and are now appearing before her? Note this: as per one RTI reply I received, Ishaan Sharma was allocated 2,487 cases in 2023, 1,784 cases in 2024, and 1,633 cases in 2025. In both 2024 and 2025, he was allocated more case files than even Zoheb Hossain, the top, most publicly visible Enforcement Directorate lawyer—by 91 in 2024 and by 582 in 2025. This of course suggests the sustained and substantial allocation of state work before the son. The allocation is done by the topmost in the legal system. Also, this is not the first time that such questions of potential conflict of interest have arisen. In September 2024, I had highlighted the case of Padmesh Mishra, whose appointments across multiple union government and Rajasthan government positions drew scrutiny after his father, Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra, was elevated to the Supreme Court. Check: x.com/SauravDassss/s… The unease then was the same as it is now: when the children of sitting judges begin to accumulate government panels and positions in unusual concentration, something a regular lawyer, perhaps much more brilliant and of more history of practice, can only dream of, particularly after or around the parent’s rise within the judiciary, the issue is of institutional credibility. And no one really needs to state that that credibility is already under strain. Recently, Justice Manmohan of the Supreme Court himself publicly flagged corruption in the appointment of panel counsels by the Union government, questioning whether such appointments are really being made on merit at all. In a system where even a sitting Supreme Court judge is warning that panel-counsel appointments may be infected by extraneous considerations, the appearance of conflict in the present case becomes still harder to shrug away. Check: x.com/barandbench/st… Seen in that light, the present controversy is again not whether Justice Sharma is actually biased. It is about whether the institution can credibly insist that there is nothing to see here. The CBI has just filed an affidavit supporting Justice Sharma. A judge who I have documented, as per her own orders, to show unusual interest in a politically sensitive matter now finds herself in a position where her own kind hold/held as many as SIX government panels between them, while their bosses continue to appear before her. Even if one were to assume the absence of any actual impropriety, does this arrangement augur well for the appearance of judicial independence, especially in this case? The question is whether this not enough evidence of apprehension of bias that should suffice for a recusal. That is the question the High Court ought to have confronted with seriousness. Instead, by resisting recusal in these circumstances, the judge is unfortunately deepening this very suspicion that it should have avoided at all costs, or at least for the sake of institution.

The greatest lesson I learned from going to the Gurdwara: dignity of labor. It shaped who I am.

दौर बदलने पर हिसाब तुम भी चुकाओगे, ज़ुल्म इतना ही करना जितना सह पाओगे।

@hvgoenka The only politician with the courage to say, Vote for me only if I have truly worked for the people, otherwise reject me. @ArvindKejriwal

Who is the politician whom you find genuine, caring and honest?

Modi Govt doesnt want you to see this video 👇