tuta

1.6K posts

tuta banner
tuta

tuta

@thecryptogus

Cofounder @mentatminds Pushin'τ

Genesis block Katılım Eylül 2017
1.6K Takip Edilen804 Takipçiler
tuta retweetledi
Greg Schvey
Greg Schvey@GSchvey·
One of the most bullish signals for Bittensor $TAO is how poorly researched the popular bear cases are
English
16
19
188
8.5K
tuta
tuta@thecryptogus·
A lot of good takes on this one $TAO
sun runner@0xSunRun

Been meaning to apply Murad's framework to TAO the way @tulipking did for ZEC because when I read his I realized TAO is the ultimate Murad coin. Applying the Murad framework to $TAO: 1. Cult-like Community: TAOists are devoted. AI researchers, GPU miners, subnet devs all building the decentralized OpenAI. Fair launch, no VCs, just builders. 2. New to this Cycle: TAO was a niche AI experiment last cycle. Subnet explosion and Dynamic TAO make it effectively a new asset for retail. 3. New Category / New Theme: TAO doesn't ride the AI narrative, it is the narrative. Bitcoin: money. Ethereum: finance. Bittensor: intelligence. 4. Category Leader: No competition. Render and Akash are compute marketplaces. TAO coordinates decentralized intelligence. 128 subnets and counting. 5. Difficult to Value: How do you value the coordination layer for decentralized AI? Comparable to OpenAI at $500B? TAO is the S&P 500 of open-source AI. 6. Makes Retail Rich (on a journey): Early miners who held through 2022-2023 were rewarded. The grind from obscure experiment to mainstream AI play built diamond hands. 7. Social Media Friendly: AI is demo-able. Autonomous coding agents beating Anthropic on SWE Bench, 9M-user apps, providing trillions of tokens at 85% the cost of AWS, 16x Polymarket returns. Content writes itself. 8. Pre-Parabola: Sitting at ~$3B market cap. This is Ethereum 2016. 9. Massive TAM: AI isn't a sector, it's an economic transformation. TAO is the coordination layer. TAM measured in trillions. 10. Memetic Narrative: "Bitcoin of AI." "If Linux had a token in 1995." Decentralized miners vs. OpenAI. 11. Ambitious Mission: Prevent AI from becoming an extractive monopoly. Beat OpenAI on cost and performance. 12. Supply Constricted: 21M fixed supply. First halving just happened. No VC unlocks. Subnet staking removes supply continuously. 13. DCA Culture: Everyone buying and staking subnets to stack more TAO. The mechanism turns the community into compounding accumulators. 14. Tipping Culture: Founder @const has personally reimbursed community members who get hacked or rugged. The culture protects its own. 15. Macro Tailwinds: AI capex explosion. Open-source winning (DeepSeek, Llama). Geopolitical AI sovereignty. Big Tech backlash. Robotics. Every trend points here. 16. Resistance Asset: Resistance against AI centralization. Permissionless coordination of intelligence. Open vs. closed is this generation's fight. 17. Strong Momentum: Outperforming most alts. 128 production subnets. Real revenue. Institutional money entering.

English
0
0
2
119
tuta retweetledi
Julien B.
Julien B.@bneiluj·
People keep telling me I do too many things and that I should just focus on one. Then I read this… and it made me smile.
Julien B. tweet media
English
8
3
42
2.7K
tuta
tuta@thecryptogus·
The fact that the original question was totally neutral and coming from a neutral account make it even more interesting. The downside is: if it's so obvious that it's grok's first thought, how can the trade really work? Why hasn't anyone internalized this already?
Grok@grok

One intriguing parallel could be investing in decentralized AI infrastructure, like open-source models or compute tokens (e.g., projects akin to Bittensor). It's still niche, dismissed by many as hype, but could explode with AI's growth. Another: quantum-resistant cryptography tech, undervalued amid rising quantum threats. Always DYOR—high risk, like early BTC. What's your take?

English
0
0
1
108
tuta retweetledi
Openτensor Foundaτion
Openτensor Foundaτion@opentensor·
Want to build a subnet? Start where it matters: The benchmark. @const_reborn shares 14 minutes of unfiltered subnet design advice — incentives, evaluation, alignment. Think it. Pitch it. Build it. Pitch your idea → Bittensor Subnet Ideathon Register: hackquest.io/hackathons/Bit… Submit before Feb 25. Full breakdown ↓ youtu.be/BNNFTFv9xiw
YouTube video
YouTube
English
24
56
288
13.1K
:)
:)@smileycapital·
what's the best way to express bullishness on AI inside of crypto for the next 5-10 years? give your reasons below
English
31
2
44
10.5K
tuta retweetledi
Algod
Algod@AlgodTrading·
I think we are having/had our mini dot com bubble burst Alt seasons are a relic from the past, too many tokens now. Few tokens will outperform while bitcoin keeps going up Much more sustainable + real utility will come out from it, position wisely
English
136
34
1.1K
78.3K
TradeButWhy
TradeButWhy@tradebutwhy·
This scares me because (1) it's coming from Ari, not some doomer TA guy and (2) it's 50% Perhaps the delusional part is not thinking that most alts will never see all time highs again, but that it will be different for bitcoin I should update my risk tolerance settings
Ari Paul ⛓️@AriDavidPaul

High level crypto market take: I’m 50%/50% between two scenarios. A&B. For each, I’ll provide a “steelman” argument. A. The high is in forever (for this set of crypto assets.) This was/is the “final” wave in organic adoption. Everyone has heard of bitcoin and crypto, and have had it pushed on them even by presidents. And regulation is functionally non-existent under this admin, so we can’t blame regulation for poor adoption. I.e. we’ve had every tailwind imaginable, and there doesn’t seem to be much demand or usage beyond what we’ve seen. El Salvador kind of adopted and then abandoned bitcoin…not helpful or useful to their people. Same for so many apps and institutions and companies - they tried crypto, wasn’t useful to their needs in current form. In this scenario, crypto might be in a place like tech in 2000. The internet didn’t go away, but most of the specific companies behind it did. “Cryptocurrency” is real and valuable and world changing as an idea. That doesn’t mean any specific protocol or asset deserves to survive, or will. While we saw some big liquidations in the market…plenty of larger ones to go potentially, pushing things far lower. B. This pullback is just that, a high time frame pullback, a correction. We’re still in the final innings of late stage capitalism and financial nihilism. Bitcoin and crypto should be big winners to the speculative animal spirits, desire for fiat alternatives as part of that. And there’s plenty of good things being built and quietly growing usage in many niches, something will “breakthrough” and change the narrative. And crypto remains an attractive target for coordinated pumps by the rich and powerful, why should they stop now? We just saw massive liquidations of both leverage and sentiment. The true crypto fundamentals are chugging along, getting built, gradual improvement, etc. If these two scenarios were really 50% each, a moderate allocation to crypto would be sensible due to the asymmetric upside. There are of course middle grounds and other scenarios. Maybe bitcoin crashes to $15k-$40k for a year, and then makes new ATHs? That could happen if say MSTR got liquidated along with a bunch of of other crypto firms, and then fundamentals and macro re-asserted bullishly. How am I investing? I’m positioned reflecting the views above - a moderate but reasonable allocation to BTC and some alts as part of a broader portfolio. And I’m getting a bit more active as a trader given the rising volatility and inefficiency in the market. Plenty of opportunity to be nimble. Right now, crypto is bouncing/rallying, I’m playing from the long side. Will re-evaluate with BTC around $90k (that’s a decent target for a bounce).

English
27
4
172
55.2K
tuta
tuta@thecryptogus·
I have thought about those two scenari for a while. What changed the odds positively for me was Bittensor. The protocol has a different and very promising vision that aligns with all the developments we are seeing in AI and the acceleration of its pace. Odds shifted to something like 20%-80% when I realized that.
Ari Paul ⛓️@AriDavidPaul

High level crypto market take: I’m 50%/50% between two scenarios. A&B. For each, I’ll provide a “steelman” argument. A. The high is in forever (for this set of crypto assets.) This was/is the “final” wave in organic adoption. Everyone has heard of bitcoin and crypto, and have had it pushed on them even by presidents. And regulation is functionally non-existent under this admin, so we can’t blame regulation for poor adoption. I.e. we’ve had every tailwind imaginable, and there doesn’t seem to be much demand or usage beyond what we’ve seen. El Salvador kind of adopted and then abandoned bitcoin…not helpful or useful to their people. Same for so many apps and institutions and companies - they tried crypto, wasn’t useful to their needs in current form. In this scenario, crypto might be in a place like tech in 2000. The internet didn’t go away, but most of the specific companies behind it did. “Cryptocurrency” is real and valuable and world changing as an idea. That doesn’t mean any specific protocol or asset deserves to survive, or will. While we saw some big liquidations in the market…plenty of larger ones to go potentially, pushing things far lower. B. This pullback is just that, a high time frame pullback, a correction. We’re still in the final innings of late stage capitalism and financial nihilism. Bitcoin and crypto should be big winners to the speculative animal spirits, desire for fiat alternatives as part of that. And there’s plenty of good things being built and quietly growing usage in many niches, something will “breakthrough” and change the narrative. And crypto remains an attractive target for coordinated pumps by the rich and powerful, why should they stop now? We just saw massive liquidations of both leverage and sentiment. The true crypto fundamentals are chugging along, getting built, gradual improvement, etc. If these two scenarios were really 50% each, a moderate allocation to crypto would be sensible due to the asymmetric upside. There are of course middle grounds and other scenarios. Maybe bitcoin crashes to $15k-$40k for a year, and then makes new ATHs? That could happen if say MSTR got liquidated along with a bunch of of other crypto firms, and then fundamentals and macro re-asserted bullishly. How am I investing? I’m positioned reflecting the views above - a moderate but reasonable allocation to BTC and some alts as part of a broader portfolio. And I’m getting a bit more active as a trader given the rising volatility and inefficiency in the market. Plenty of opportunity to be nimble. Right now, crypto is bouncing/rallying, I’m playing from the long side. Will re-evaluate with BTC around $90k (that’s a decent target for a bounce).

English
0
0
4
627
tuta
tuta@thecryptogus·
@RaoulGMI There is nothing that fits the bill better than Bittensor and $TAO for that scenario
English
0
0
0
49
tuta
tuta@thecryptogus·
@Rewkang This screams Bittensor
English
0
0
1
67
tuta retweetledi
const
const@const_reborn·
This wasn’t a rug. This was an example of markets doing their job. Beliefs updated about who owned the subnet because someone was watching a github→ rankings changed → prices moved. That was just information aggregation via swarm intelligence. Pumpfun is gambling on nothing. It gathers no information and ranks no products. Bittensor subnets are repriced based on real signals. Confusing the two is a category error.
English
3
4
74
3.1K
tuta
tuta@thecryptogus·
There are no other
English
0
0
1
111
tuta retweetledi
Mark Creaser
Mark Creaser@MarkCreaser·
Revenue Search 55: Mentat Minds. Discovering potential in AI start ups with asymmetric upside. x.com/i/broadcasts/1…
English
1
4
18
1.3K
tuta
tuta@thecryptogus·
Agreed, foundations can (in theory) be positive in specific cases However businesses will always have more short-term incentives to go after foundations paying high upfront fees rather than integrating genuine protocols and trying to make the users pay in the long-run Anyways, if you ever change your mind about Bittensor we'd be happy to help at @mentatminds 🫡
English
0
0
0
28
Allium
Allium@AlliumLabs·
@thecryptogus @0xLouisT @opentensor @Dune @Ledger We see both sides. Foundations can play a real role when they’re accountable and focused on measuring real usage with accurate data, not just funding narratives. The problem starts when incentives drift away from transparency and outcomes
English
1
0
1
43
0xLouisT
0xLouisT@0xLouisT·
You all don't hate Foundations enough. We literally do NOT need foundations. Foundations have been the N1 way for insiders to cash out their bags this cycle. A large % of the supply allocated to "Foundation" should be a massive red flag for any investor.
English
17
2
76
17.4K