Jenny Johnson

@Bungles71 @jackieb12902590 She might need to get a proper job soon

@jackieb12902590 Roberts: He probably won't know for instance that the baby thrived for two days with no evidence of any birth injury. Bennett: There are lots of papers and they've been published over the past 50 years. And if you go to the literature, what you find is that the way in which this

Roberts proclaiming that prof Phil Bennett is ignorant. #LucyLetby

@jackieb12902590 I truly don’t understand the mentality and the hate that comes from people who are so convinced of Lucy Letbys guilt that they spend their entire lives trying to convince others that every theory that is put forward by those who believe that she was wrongly convicted is dishonest

@SaraLockwood_x @toadmeister Lucy Letby isn’t a murderer either. It happened to her. It’s happened to many people.

@toadmeister Well im not a murderer so it couldnt happen to me. Who is he to determine an MoJ when hes only interviewed people who agree with his viewpoint? Its for the courts to decide. Not a man with zero legal or medical experience

After interviewing over 60 experts who all agree after examining the evidence that Lucy Letby is wrongfully jailed, Christopher Morris has a warning for us all: such a miscarriage of justice could happen to you. dailysceptic.org/2026/07/16/the…

@GuerrillaCarl She needs to get a job, or start a hobby. It must be exhausting being so obsessed

Report stalking or harassment Date: 13 July 2026 Time: 18:47 This report has been sent to Cheshire Constabulary via the Single Online Home reporting service. SHB-31279-26-XXXX-01

@NickBarberX @gill1109 But nobody put it out there but you. You started it off.

@gill1109 Thank you mentioning where I live and giving people the information to look it up. Just had an incident outside my house with a man mentioning Lucy Letby. Family and children terrified. Well done Professor Emeritus.

@SaraLockwood_x @ClarkeMicah Maybe put yourself forward as an expert witness in the retrial then. You seem to know the lot.

@ClarkeMicah This has nothing to do with the Letny case. Nottingham was years and years of poor care. Chester only had a problem while Letby was on her murder rampage, and since she was removed, its performance is as good as any other. How does that work then

Lead letter in today’s Daily Mail

@mellycatslave @NeilWilbyMedia @MartynPitman Because she’s desperate to derail the chances of a retrial or an exoneration. Any port in a storm. I wonder what it’s like to be that full of hate that you spend your life trying to destroy someone’s chance of justice. It’s very warped.

@NeilWilbyMedia @MartynPitman It looks like she is actively trying to get to get dirt on him, get him in trouble…😨…Xxx

Isn't it great Tom to see that our Debs has extended her sphere of personal expertise from Medicine, Law and Statistics into Policing policy and Parliamentary practice. In addition to a barage of pointless FOIARs & BSB complaints I foresee letters to MPs and the Speaker now!🤭

@suvsknowsbest @NeoDoc11 You can see the whole picture actually. When the whole picture unravels into a tissue of fantastical lies then it needs to be re-examined. In order to prevent these ‘murders’ reoccurring the Thirwall enquiry needs to accept who the real liars are.

The Thirlwall Inquiry is not there for people to use as criminal evidence as the Inquiry is about how to prevent a murderers from doing this again. People keep using the information as a tool to point out incidents which proves Letby is innocent when she has already been found guilty 15 times! Excerpt from Barrister MS LANGDALE K.C. in the Thirlwall Inquiry about looking at evidence as a whole and why the Court of Appeal refused Letby’s application. She states: "The purpose of this Inquiry is to reduce the risk of this happening again." And "I make it absolutely clear that it's not for me as a chair of this public enquiry to set about reviewing  the convictions. The Court of Appeal has done that, with a very clear result." And "There is a requirement in every case to take into account all of the evidence and to consider each piece of evidence in the context of all the other evidence.  Medical or scientific evidence in a case should never be compartmentalised or examined in isolation from the wider canvas.  Those who do this will be less likely to see the picture as a whole and in failing to see the picture as a whole, they may reach conclusions that are not only wrong, but are speculative and damaging."

So glad this is finally public so I can comment on it openly. I have seen a fair number of HR investigations over the years. In my experience, whistleblowers are often formally investigated before they are pushed out, or as a way of “teaching a lesson” to anyone who challenges the status quo. This is actually one of the most competent internal investigation reports I have seen. What surprised me most was the outcome. Usually, management plays an active role in managing out people who raise concerns - such as Lucy, who was clearly DATIXing poor standards and practices within the neonatal unit. Dr Brearey and Dr Jayaram were in management positions at the time and therefore carried responsibility for patient safety and culture within the department. So that would have been a pretty major motivator to want her out if she was shining the spotlight on their managerial/leadership failures. Lucy Letby was never going to be safe returning to a workplace where she was clearly being bullied by a group of colleagues (most of whom were consultants and thus in a position of power over her) unless individual accountability followed. At the very least, that should have meant formal warnings, apologies to Lucy, and mediated discussions. Management could have supported her with a temporary redeployment to another clinical unit so she could continue practising while matters were resolved. Clinical work was clearly what Lucy wanted to continue doing. Some people in these situations , where redeployment is necessary during HR investigations, choose to remain in management or leadership roles instead, but that wasn't what Lucy wanted. So in essence the hospital made a strong start with doing a competent HR investigation - but by failing to follow through properly, the situation escalated to the point where consultants went to the police. What nobody seems willing to ask is this: if the consultants genuinely believed Lucy was murdering babies, why did they only go to the police after they were found to have bullied her? If you truly believed a nurse was a serial killer, is it reasonable to accept that a consultant would really think that internal Trust procedures were an appropriate way to deal with it? UK trained consultants are NOT politically naïve. Consultant appointments are highly political positions, and consultants understand very well how NHS systems actually work. It stretches credibility, and that's a generous description, to claim the consultants genuinely believed reporting concerns over a serial killer internally was what they thought was the right thing to do. If they truly thought Letby was such a prolific killer, were they not concerned she might harm children outside work as well? This entire case is a national disgrace, and I suspect it will remain in history as one of the most consequential modern witch hunts in British healthcare. Witch hunts within the NHS are unfortunately, however, very common - often carried out through internal employment procedures or GMC processes. But turning that common dynamic (whose root cause is toxic leadership practices) into the conviction of a serial killer is something else entirely. An extraordinary outcome, enabled by a broken medical "expert" system and sealed by an inadequate police investigation and criminal justice system. What a world we live in. I hope everyone involved in this MoJ - or anyone who knew what was happening and could have helped but chose not to - gets what they deserve. @LucyLetbyTrials @drphilhammond @PrivateEyeNews @NadineDorries @ClarkeMicah @peter__duffy @MartynPitman @willcpowell @DavidDavisMP @DavidRoseUK @PeterElston1 @Michelehal7344 @Voice4theDead @reasonoverfear @Oversig58651516 @Seagreen2707 @RexvsLucyLetby

@saintant @amy_shield88239 @sarahknapton No it didn’t. Air embolism has been disproved by the panel of scientists. There were no murders.

@amy_shield88239 @sarahknapton X ray medical evidence made a large amount of the evidence for the murders

This is a big deal. New scientific evidence is a clear reason for a case to go back to the Court of Appeal. The CCRC cannot ignore this. telegraph.co.uk/news/2026/04/2…

@Telegraph @AllisonPearson I saw a couple stealing nicotine patches and electric toothbrushes. I reported it to a member of staff. They approached the thieves who dumped their haul in the freezers. There £900 worth of stolen goods. They said thanks and gave me a bottle of champagne. Times have changed.

✍️ 'Most of us would regard Walker Smith’s action as principled and laudable, I think, yet so deep is the warped, risk-averse, legalistic health-and-safety culture adhered to by businesses like Waitrose that this dedicated staff member soon regretted it' | Writes @AllisonPearson Read the full column below 👇 telegraph.co.uk/news/2026/04/0…

@BRD0464 @davidkurten There’s no real substantiated evidence to support her guilt either. Just circumstantial evidence that is not true evidence. So let’s just wait and see shall we. I don’t see a monster. Just a chaotic hospital stretched to breaking.

@davidkurten You don't get to decide. There's NO evidence to back you up. Misinformation & disinformation won't get the monster Letby off her 15 x WLOs. She IS a convicted evil child killer. She will die in prison & rightly so #innocencefraud #LetbyGriftCult

Lucy Letby is the victim of a gross miscarriage of justice. There should be no further delay in quashing the convictions against her based on the mountains of evidence that prove her innocence. She should be freed immediately. #FreeLucy

@LucyLetbyTrials Well he needs re-examine the evidence

"I support the court judgment in the case of Lucy Letby, Wes Streeting says" hamhigh.co.uk/news/national/…

@RoyalFamily @parkrunUK Love him.

🏃‍♀️ Surprising Sandringham parkrunners!🏃 Ahead of #WorldCancerDay next week, The King paid a surprise visit to participants of Sandringham parkrun this morning, organised in partnership with the charity Move Against Cancer and Sandringham’s 5K Your Way group. 5K Your Way encourages anyone impacted by cancer to walk, jog, run, cheer or volunteer at more than 120 designated parkrun events across the UK and Ireland on the last Saturday of each month - bringing communities together through movement, friendship and encouragement.

@MaggiesTwitt @PolitlcsUK @theipaper Ban the people who cause accidents regardless of age. I’m 70. Never had an accident because I don’t have an issue with following the Highway Code. I think it’s an outrageous idea and most accidents are caused by young drivers aged 17-24.

@PolitlcsUK @theipaper They aren’t banned already if they fail their eyesight tests? 😭 Everyone should be made to retake a driving test at 75 and again at 80. And forever banned at 85.

🚨 NEW: The Government is consulting on banning over 70s from driving if they fail mandatory eyesight tests [@theipaper]

@sisbruuv @benonwine Because it’s got nothing whatsoever to do with Charle Kirk. Most of them will never have heard of him. It’s a march against our government in the UK.

@benonwine But Charlie is American,why is it not happening in the US?

Police have just announced there is around 3 million people at Unite The Kingdom March. 👏✊🙏✌️ The Left could only dream of those numbers, they are out battled and out numbered. The British People are AWAKE! 🇬🇧

@mrsemjay @nogulagsagain Remind me again who is grooming young girls and committing sex crimes. So the education of little boys doesn’t appear to be working.

@nogulagsagain She is doing it to protect the young ones these images can corrupt the mind of little boys

@piersmorgan Whatever has happened to her it takes hour upon hour even a day of serious crying to get that amount of soreness around the eyes and so I reckon this has been building for weeks. No way is this a personal problem. If it’s causing that much angst she wouldn’t be in work.

So much disingenuous guff being spewed about Rachel Reeves. If a male Chancellor cried in the Commons because he’d had a row with the Speaker, the media would be rightly merciless. If you can’t stand the heat, Rachel, get out of the political kitchen. Your job is too important.

@AnneHoo69082784 @GBNEWS Cancer doesn’t pick and choose who dies.

@GBNEWS What about the poor sods dying from cancer because they can’t afford private 5* medical treatments like Charlie boy. Dying on NHS waiting lists.

King Charles gives update on cancer treatment as he shares positive news during royal engagement gbnews.com/royal/king-cha…

@aviandies @jandersonyart I get the need to find ‘different’ art and push the envelope in terms of creativity. But I genuinely didn’t understand the thinking behind picking the winner. Is it a statement of going against the grain? I do believe he can paint. But I think is bold images aren’t that great yet

Sorry guys but you have lost a viewer. After this years consistent selection of weird artists to progress each round, you excelled in the final by selecting the worst one there. @jandersonyart , you were robbed. #PortraitArtistOfTheYear #paoty

@yashar @FLHSMV Cruelty beyond belief

Florida Troopers rescued a dog that was tied to a fence in Hurricane Milton’s path. Thankfully this pup is in safe hands now and has already been to the vet.