Arthur’s Daily

6.2K posts

Arthur’s Daily banner
Arthur’s Daily

Arthur’s Daily

@tickedybooo

South East Londons finest

South East London, England Katılım Kasım 2022
668 Takip Edilen212 Takipçiler
Richard Marsden
Richard Marsden@Delicaboy·
@narindertweets Dog poo contains E. coli, Salmonella, Campylobacter, and Yersinia, which can cause severe gastrointestinal illness, infections, and diarrhea in humans. The waste also carries parasitic worms (like Toxocara canis) and protozoa (like Giardia) that can persist in soil for years. 💜
English
75
0
32
10.3K
Narinder Kaur
Narinder Kaur@narindertweets·
I'm sorry, but how is it ok to put your dog on train seat meant for passengers? This is so unhygienic...ewwww someone will be expected to sit where dog bum has been?
English
2.4K
56
634
419.1K
Arthur’s Daily
Arthur’s Daily@tickedybooo·
@spudly77 Championship better league anyway. All the premiership bollocks removed. No var. wank supporters. 2bob wage thief players. Enjoy
English
0
0
0
20
ClarksonsFarm
ClarksonsFarm@ClarksonsFarm1·
What does Britain do better than any other Country?🇬🇧
English
4.7K
85
1.1K
280.9K
dan barker
dan barker@danbarker·
Belgrove House, opposite Kings Cross, looks nearly finished. Its design won an architectural award a few years back. This will definitely become the latest front page 'How on earth did that get built?' argument when it opens.
dan barker tweet media
English
70
21
306
38.4K
Joss Sheldon
Joss Sheldon@JossSheldon·
"Left-wingers want high taxes" Err, no... Left-wingers want to tax the rich. They want to redistribute that wealth to the masses, and invest in public services, to improve the lives of regular folk. Right-wingers want to tax the poor. They want to give your money to the rich.
English
2.7K
1.9K
9.5K
191K
Arthur’s Daily
Arthur’s Daily@tickedybooo·
@Daniel_BrownUK @karl_fh There’s a reason why the lady that lives behind me hasn’t done a days work in her life yet drives a Mercedes, smokes, drinks and has 4 children without a father to be seen. Give her the payment card instead of cash. Then I wouldn’t have a problem
English
0
0
0
5
RŌNIN
RŌNIN@ronin21btc·
Surprised she didn’t chuck in bar of Cadbury’s Fruit and Nut to seal the deal.
English
4
0
21
7.1K
The Purple Pimpernel
The Purple Pimpernel@Eyeswideopen69·
Five unconditional failures in fourteen years. And still they claim “only the Tories can fix” the Britain THEY broke When your house is on fire, you don’t call an arsonist.
The Purple Pimpernel tweet media
English
150
1.9K
4.6K
42.2K
Arthur’s Daily
Arthur’s Daily@tickedybooo·
@djh84 @THemingford That guaranteed is it? Because I know plenty that have taken 6 months off with stress or bad backs. If you run an sme that’ll break you. There’s a fine line between a happy worker a complete piss taker. Sub work out to sole traders now. More expensive day rate.100% more reliable
English
1
0
0
6
David
David@djh84·
@tickedybooo @THemingford Happy employees are less likely to go sick, and more likely to do extra based on goodwill. If you look after staff, they'll look after you
English
1
0
0
12
Arthur’s Daily
Arthur’s Daily@tickedybooo·
@djh84 @THemingford No difference to profit if a worker is happy or not. Big difference in profit when long term sick has to be paid for and cover brought in.
English
1
0
0
6
David
David@djh84·
@tickedybooo @THemingford Does having happy employees, and low staff turnover, make any business profitable, or more profitable?
English
1
0
0
14
Sue M
Sue M@SueMerrell5·
@THemingford Couldn’t agree more. When I think how long and hard unions fought for these rights and Farage would destroy them all given the chance.
English
1
0
0
33
Arthur’s Daily
Arthur’s Daily@tickedybooo·
@StephenP311275 @THemingford Bang on mate. Fucking Unite the union. Load of old bollocks. Had them on more than one job. Take the subs quick enough, then stitched blokes up everywhere.
English
0
0
1
5
StephenP
StephenP@StephenP311275·
@THemingford Unions only line their own pockets. I've worked in construction for 38 years. Pin up a few posters on site and pretend they're here for the worker. Leeches, there in name only, taking backhanders to look the other way. Seen accidents hushed up countless times. Parasites.
English
1
0
5
44
Arthur’s Daily
Arthur’s Daily@tickedybooo·
@Daniel_BrownUK @karl_fh If it was on a card set to the person it’s impossible to sell on. Bit like me selling my own debit card. I’m not on about paper vouchers. Things have moved on. Give them a pre set card that restricts them from buying crap.
English
1
0
0
10
Daniel_Brown
Daniel_Brown@Daniel_BrownUK·
@tickedybooo @karl_fh They sold the prepaid cards/vouchers for less than what they were worth. "Here is an £80 card/voucher for £50 cash" People would buy them from them.
English
1
0
0
18
Daniel_Brown
Daniel_Brown@Daniel_BrownUK·
@tickedybooo @karl_fh Many retailers hated it and saw it as a headache and costly. And then you have the fact that some shops may be cheaper than others so it restricts people on limited budgets shopping around etc. There are so many issues with it, hence why it never worked anywhere.
English
2
0
0
20
Arthur’s Daily
Arthur’s Daily@tickedybooo·
@Daniel_BrownUK @karl_fh It’s definitely not their money. The point is it’s simple, easy and cheap to manage. Rather than giving cash. Restrictions on what you can’t buy rather than what you can. No fags, booze, lottery tickets etc. Takes the starving kid argument out of it.
English
1
0
0
8
Daniel_Brown
Daniel_Brown@Daniel_BrownUK·
@tickedybooo @karl_fh It's legally their money and you cannot restrict what they spend it on. Everyone is different and has complex needs. You can't say, for example, you can all only get bread, eggs, and milk. Some may have allergies or special dietary needs. Then you have to get retailers onboard.
English
2
0
0
18
Arthur’s Daily
Arthur’s Daily@tickedybooo·
@Daniel_BrownUK @karl_fh Completely disagree. Couldn’t be easier this day and age. Put an allowance on a card. Why would someone buy a voucher for cash that restricts what you can buy? And it most certainly isn’t their money. It’s tax payers that’s been kindly given to them.
English
1
0
0
19
Daniel_Brown
Daniel_Brown@Daniel_BrownUK·
@tickedybooo @karl_fh Been tried across the world and scrapped as it didn't work for various reasons. Too expensive to implement. They would sell the vouchers for cash anyway. Dehumanising and paternalistic. Against human rights as it's their money and should be able to spend it how they see fit.
English
1
0
0
18
Jack
Jack@jackp593·
@karl_fh There’s a massive presumption the money will be used for the kids.
English
1
0
8
376