Timi Ajiboye

37.8K posts

Timi Ajiboye banner
Timi Ajiboye

Timi Ajiboye

@timigod

I like to make things, especially things that work on computers. First-Class Citizen of The Internet. Now @contextdotbuild, prev @browsercompany.

London, England Katılım Eylül 2009
248 Takip Edilen55.1K Takipçiler
Timi Ajiboye
Timi Ajiboye@timigod·
@tszzl I can accept that there are likely better Pauls than Chalamet
English
0
0
0
95
roon
roon@tszzl·
the dune movies were doomed from the start to be good and not great due to the casting of chalamet as paul. he does not have the gravitas for a child-god and is much better suited for kind of silly coming of age movies
English
1.1K
96
3.3K
3M
roon
roon@tszzl·
project hail mary was unfortunately a middling adaptation of a good book. the script has the unfortunate affect of “language model populism” - where every single line has to be some sort of punched up comedic zinger yet still unremarkable. visuals were uninspired and trite and more or less identical to other space movies. everything good about the film comes from the wonderful world scaffolding of the book and the hard science fiction of it all that lets you suspend disbelief on the alien rocky the movie doesn’t really try to get into the xenolinguistic stuff even at the depth the book tries (someone called it “arrival for idiots” which unfortunately hit ) the thing that elevated the book is the commitment to a hard science fiction engineeringporn fiction at a level nobody else is able to write. the direction of the movie doesn’t really convey the same feeling successfully, and you’re left with flat characters, an alien that is more human than several humans i know, and a marvel populism gosling and the german woman are great as actors, but this movie will not be remembered in a year. it is disappointing to see people do so little with a quarter billion, insane acting talent, and incredible source IP
English
213
27
1.3K
302.4K
Timi Ajiboye retweetledi
Balaji
Balaji@balajis·
Yeah, but streaming is a transitional form. It will likely be replaced by AI-generated video over time. Streaming already competes with everything else on the Internet. You don’t commit to a two hour stream. Users click away quickly. Moreover, AI video will reduce the cost of hiring new actors (who are often hard to manage) and increase the lifespan of old ones indefinitely. So you’ll see Stallone and Schwarzenegger, in their prime, forever. They’ll be like Mickey Mouse. In a real sense, American culture is now a “finished product”, like French culture. It’s not like France is innovating on baguettes and the Eiffel Tower. Similarly, thanks to AI, you will see endless remixes of the past glory days of America, especially the 1980s, but also earlier eras. You already see that now on X. All the romanticized past. That’s part of why Hollywood is getting deprecated. You can only tell the same stories, the same sequels, with the same actors, to the same audience, so many times. Meanwhile, all cultural innovation has moved to the Internet.
WildPinesAI@wildpinesai

@balajis coal mine didn't close, it changed owners. streamers spend $101B on content this year with the same Hollywood talent

English
30
19
178
59.4K
Timi Ajiboye retweetledi
Balaji
Balaji@balajis·
I am sympathetic to @RamboVanHalen and his critique of KPI-driven clickbait. Obviously, there's truth to it. On the other hand, for generations, Hollywood's blind spots were obvious. Thanks to the decentralization of media, new stories will get told. Eventually, some will become art. reason.com/2000/06/01/hol…
Balaji tweet media
Rambo Van Halen@RamboVanHalen

I put in 25 years. It would be 26 but I haven't worked yet this year and I'm not sure I'll ever work in entertainment again. The writing has been on the wall for quite some time. But it's a sad thing--especially since the collapse of Hollywood is (mostly) self inflicted. Outsiders like to blame the unions and burdensome regulations. That's not exactly wrong, but the big reason is that Hollywood stopped making a product that people wanted to consume. Film is a funny thing. On one hand it's art. But on the other it's a mass consumer product--like a car, or a soft drink. But unlike a typical consumer product, it was something we consumed together. We went to a special place, and sat with strangers, and watched stories. And those stories infected us. They entered our minds and our souls and they implanted things. Deep things. Ancient things. Timeless things. Things like heroism and beauty and love and fear and sex and death and adventure and tragedy and pain and injustice and all the things that make up our dreams. There's a thing we call "cinematic language". It's how we tell a story with images. (And BTW if you want to learn more about the language of visual media, read Scott McCloud's excellent book Understanding Comics.) An odd thing about cinematic language is that it's the same language as dreams. There's a scene in Christopher Nolan's Inception where Leonardo DiCaprio is explains to (the tragic) Ellen Page how dreams work. But what he's really describing is cinematic language. Inception is really a movie about movies BTW. While it's far from my favorite film, I think it's the perfect film. Because the suspension of disbelief is perfect. You believe the plot about dreams because you're familiar with how movies work--maybe not consciously--but you know. Everyone knows. Maybe not everyone has seen a movie, but everyone has dreams. Another odd thing about film: you don't "watch" a movie, you look into it. And you put yourself inside it. Now you're in the dream. And you're hypnotized. Because movies do that too. The motion--the moving images--they hack your brain. We're programed to pay attention to moving things. Even when the things aren't real. Even when they're just light reflected off a screen. So we'd go to these special places--these movie theaters--these temples--and we'd sit, and we'd "watch" and we'd enter the dream. And we did it together. And after the movie was over--and the lights came on, and we'd file out over the sound of popcorn crunching under our feet--we were different. We had become transformed. Sometimes we were changed in minor ways. But sometimes not. Sometimes we were changed in profound ways. And we did it together. Before the movie we were a room full of strangers. But after--on the way out the door--we all had something in common. Because we shared an experience. We'd shared the dream. And we'd all become transformed. And then tech got involved... Streaming turned movies from a communal experience to a personal experience. And that's an issue, but they did something else too. They started developing movies as if they were tech products. But you can't apply a KPI to a dream. At least, not successfully anyway. Because dreams don't work like that--nor does any sort of art. And that's a funny thing about making movies. You try to make the best film you can, but at the end of the day you have no idea if it's good or if it's going to be successful. You just have to hope the audience likes it. Now, you can design a movie that will appeal to a preexisting audience. Marvel movies are like this. There's a large group of fanboy nerds that will see every single one. You can count on them every time. Just like you can count on the Gay Oscar Bait crowd (for example). But those movies are slop. But Hollywood became specialists in slop. Because slop is safe. Because you could apply KPI style metrics to slop. As a result they lost the audience. And the audience is probably never coming back. I wrote a book in 2024 (that was published in 2025). While writing, I thought of it as my farewell to the industry. But looking back, what I was actually writing was a eulogy for Hollywood--the place where dreams were made. And so it goes...

English
18
19
207
58.8K
Timi Ajiboye retweetledi
Ire Aderinokun
Ire Aderinokun@ireaderinokun·
My stay in Lagos has been extended so want to make the most of my time here and meet people building interesting things! Considering hosting an informal brunch with early-stage technical founders, no pitches, would just love to hear what you're working on. If this sounds interesting to you, let me know here: forms.gle/yDuWCGf2jXepSk… Will see interest and set something up!
English
21
136
411
47.1K
Timi Ajiboye
Timi Ajiboye@timigod·
My uncle put me on to coding ~20 years ago, with Visual Basic. Yesterday, I made him use Codex and this is what he had to say.
Timi Ajiboye tweet media
English
36
133
5.3K
146.8K
Aleph
Aleph@alephile·
Happy Pi Day. The Nerds are Winning! 100 Digits of 🥧
English
3
8
29
3.1K
Timi Ajiboye
Timi Ajiboye@timigod·
Tailscale. - Should have always existed. - Unbelievable that it exists.
English
0
4
11
1.6K
Timi Ajiboye retweetledi
Jack Altman
Jack Altman@jaltma·
I might be too much of an optimist but I just don’t buy the permanent underclass thing. I just think no matter how smart AI gets, there’s no way a motivated person will wake up each day and be unable to contribute to society.
English
447
126
2.3K
296.5K
John Schoenith
John Schoenith@eleven21·
I think OpenAI is resetting Codex usage again. I was only about three days into mine, and a lot of us were complaining about how many tokens it was consuming. Back to 100% Anybody else?
John Schoenith tweet media
eric provencher@pvncher

@rudrank 5.4 eats limits for breakfast. You get about 33% less tokens than codex 5.3 With fast mode you get barely any use before it’s gone, even in the $200 plan

English
5
1
3
986
eric provencher
eric provencher@pvncher·
@rudrank 5.4 eats limits for breakfast. You get about 33% less tokens than codex 5.3 With fast mode you get barely any use before it’s gone, even in the $200 plan
English
13
4
57
17.7K
Timi Ajiboye retweetledi
roon
roon@tszzl·
roon tweet media
ZXX
71
76
1.7K
70.4K
Timi Ajiboye
Timi Ajiboye@timigod·
We are [in] the takeoff.
English
0
0
0
605