topdresearch

2K posts

topdresearch banner
topdresearch

topdresearch

@topdresearch

Toronto Parkinson's Research Interest

Toronto, Ontario Katılım Şubat 2019
379 Takip Edilen480 Takipçiler
Alberto J Espay
Alberto J Espay@AlbertoEspay·
Snake oil for the rich.
Alberto J Espay tweet media
English
3
0
14
1.8K
topdresearch
topdresearch@topdresearch·
@AlbertoEspay @movedisorder Great facts. Like facts. Is it the load, or level of misfolded proteins associated with neurological disease Or is it the level of remaining protein?
English
1
0
1
162
Alberto J Espay
Alberto J Espay@AlbertoEspay·
Couldn't pathology in #Parkinsons be the brain's response to age-related exposures? PD and age-matched controls have the same pathologies! Here are some highlights of yesterday's data at the 2024 #MDSCongress in Philadelphia. (1/5) @movedisorder
Alberto J Espay tweet media
English
3
7
56
11K
topdresearch
topdresearch@topdresearch·
@ScienceofPD @PDandHDLab AUC in the low 80s seems to need some work to be predictive when 50 is flip a coin. Pretty interesting cohort at baseline with a nasty mean updrs score and old enough to have 20-25 percent die due to old age.
English
0
0
0
53
topdresearch
topdresearch@topdresearch·
@ParkinsonsEU The word, smart therapy has a perceptual problem as well in that by default. Other therapies are not smart. there are plenty of good choices without starting a new problem when trying to fix another
English
0
0
1
27
Parkinson's Europe 🌷
Parkinson's Europe 🌷@ParkinsonsEU·
We'd love to hear what you think about this latest research: if we rebrand advanced #Parkinsons therapy to "smart therapy" do you think it would make it more appealing?
Michael Okun@MichaelOkun

When we say 'advanced therapy' for Parkinson's disease, does this affect perception? Does it affect the willingness to 'take it up?' You bet it does. Should we rebrand to 'smart therapy?' Georgiades, @profsimonlewis @basbloem and van der Plas tackle the issue @journal_PD and suggest leaning into change. Key Points: - The authors point out that words matter especially to perception. - Could using the term advanced therapy trigger an impulse to 'chase a reassurance that their disease has not yet progressed and resist a potentially life-changing therapy?' - The authors advocate to change the message to “Smart Therapy”. - Smart in their view leaves out the focus on the 'negative connotations' of disease progression. My take: The commentary makes perfect sense to me, however I am very interested to know how persons w/ Parkinson's feel about this proposal. Is it time to rebrand? Would 'get smart' deliver more impact to more people? Is it disingenuous to deemphasize progression of a progressive disease? Is there room for nuance as the saying goes: cave quid dicis, quandō, et cui – beware what you say, when, and to whom. @PDavengers content.iospress.com/articles/journ… #Parkinson @ParkinsonDotOrg

English
1
0
1
469
topdresearch retweetledi
Andrew Lees
Andrew Lees@ajlees·
Barely a day goes by without me seeing someone with an abnormal movement disorder in the street or on the Tube.Only a minority would ever be seen in a neurology clinic. More will be seen by mental health services, drug rehabilitation clinics and day centres for the elderly.
English
5
3
42
2.5K
topdresearch
topdresearch@topdresearch·
There is lots we don’t know and much yet to learn in PD. Classification systems can help zero in closer on groups of patients to figure out if synuclein is friend, foe or innocent bystander @AlbertoEspay @ajlees @MichaelOkun @basbloem @RayDorseyNeuro @BrundinPatrik @KBI_UHN
Integrated Movement Disorders Program (IMDP)@IntegratedMove

Check out the commentary by Hugh Johnston (former patient advisory board chair) about the new biologically based model for classifying PD, called "SynNeurGe", by Dr. Tony Lang & team! Article: ow.ly/qNtx50R6P4k Full issue of Connect: ow.ly/qNtx50R6P4k

English
0
0
2
249
topdresearch retweetledi
Michael Okun
Michael Okun@MichaelOkun·
Big news with positive result announced for a randomized study of a GLP-1 agonist for Parkinson's just released @NEJM. A new era for Parkinson's or alternatively, more questions than answers raised by Meissner and colleagues. Key Points: - This multi-center French trial studied Lixisenatide which is a glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist used for in diabetes. - The trial was a phase 2 double-blind randomized and placebo-controlled. - The authors wanted to know whether this drug would affect the progression of motor disability. - Who did they study? Parkinson's treated and with symptoms less than 3 years. - If you enrolled, you received daily subcutaneous lixisenatide or a placebo. - The primary outcome was a change in the motor PD scale called the MDS UPDRS when on dopamine medication after one year. - There were 78 people in each group. - The motor scores slightly improved in lixisenatide and worsened by 3 points in the placebo group. - There was a very short 2 month washout period where those getting the active drug stopped it and the benefit persisted. - Nausea was the most common side effect and occurred in about 1/2. My take: We have continued our multiple year love affair with various diabetes drugs and their potential links to Parkinson's disease, however the current study results are the most promising. Interpret with caution: there is a number called the 'clinically meaningful threshold' and those reading this study should appreciate that the results 'fell short' of this important metric. There will certainly be many arguments among experts as to whether this study met a minimum threshold for neuroprotection, and my personal opinion is that it did not. Here is an important message: In my view do not rush to prescribe this drug or try to creatively acquire it. We have been down this road many times including leukemia drugs, cough syrups and lithium. The data is not yet there to proceed to prescribing. More importantly, the weight loss associated with GLP-1’s is not desirable in the majority of cases of Parkinson’s disease and the nausea and vomiting will not be a welcome symptom. We must ask the important questions as to why the non-motor outcomes did not change, and why the other GLP-1 studies have been negative? Is there a blind spot here we are missing? Please appreciate this was trialed in only very early Parkinson's disease and thus there may be 'generalizablility' concerns. I do not want to diminish a great paper with a randomized design and encouraging data, however let's not rush to the drug store counter. Perhaps we should consider ad augusta per angusta – to glory through narrow spaces by continuing to follow the data with diabetes drugs and see where it leads and what it teaches us. nejm.org/doi/full/10.10… #Parkinsons #OZEMPIC #diabetes #GLP1
Michael Okun tweet media
English
16
194
597
76.3K
topdresearch
topdresearch@topdresearch·
A classification system for PD that recognizes 1) we need to understand if synuclein is friend foe or innocent bystander, 2j there are many types of PD some which don’t involve synuclein and 3) a positive SAA without clinical PD is not a disease #5" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">canva.com/design/DAF5WHt…
English
0
0
0
79
topdresearch retweetledi
Sarah Lidstone, MD PhD
Sarah Lidstone, MD PhD@SarahLidstone·
I’m very proud of @GGilmourMD's fantastic new review on diagnosing #FMD. There are many excellent reviews on this already, and here’s what we add that’s different (tweet summary). Moving Beyond Movement: Diagnosing Functional Movement Disorder pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36893796/
English
6
33
97
15.6K
topdresearch
topdresearch@topdresearch·
@DrTFromKC @ajlees @jonstoneneuro @AlanCarson15 @AlbertoEspay Good question. Apologies for the curt tweet. Am suggesting there is a significant overlap and that prevalence is fairly common that patients with PD will have a basket of FND that ensues. Also am suggesting that incidence of malignant phenotype amongst them is low.
English
0
0
0
82