Sabitlenmiş Tweet
Steady State
1.3K posts

Steady State
@vedichi_
year 2 on my own peptide + glp-1 stack. i log everything, then post what the data says: timelines, pairings, what to expect. built pepvault to track it.
Katılım Ocak 2014
750 Takip Edilen298 Takipçiler

@purrptide no flushing or sleep change for me - low daily subq, not a bolus. you nailed why it's in there though, GHK's doing the ECM work BPC/TB don't.
English

@Breedlove22 same for me - the lift shows up as endurance over weeks, not a next-day hit, since it's the mitochondria doing the work. clean enough that it's easy to just keep running.
English

@alexaaronlab everyone's racing to sell the compounds. the gap's the layer after - logging what you run and reading whether it moved anything. i track mine or i'm just guessing on stuff i inject weekly.
English

@eliterecomp solid - rotating off actual HRV and CGM beats guessing every time. i ran cjc+ipa no-DAC to keep the pulse intact, same logic. what's your tell it's time to swap one out?
English

Point is these aren't interchangeable. DSIP for raw slow wave, Ipamorelin for GH-timed pulses, Epitalon for rhythm repair, Selank for the stress piece that tanks everything else. I rotate based on what my Hume scale, CGM overnight trends, and HRV actually show, not hype. Pick the layer that's breaking for you first. Sleep is the multiplier — dial it and the rest of the protocol lands harder.
English

🧵 Most guys chasing peptides for recomp or recovery treat sleep like an afterthought. Big mistake. Your GH pulses, recovery, and even how well the rest of the stack works all ride on sleep architecture. Four peptides actually target different layers of it at night. Here's the practical breakdown.
English

@min145nie your pants sliding off IS the proof though - the scale just can't read recomp. i went months with a flat number while my clothes kept loosening. your mom's not lying.
English

my mom has been saying this because my pants are starting to slide off but i lowkey feel she's lying because my weight and bmi are still the same
eva@dollsnings
my dream
English

@theDeafRow just don't let the corpses quit at week 2. week 3-4 is the payoff.
English

@Hasmukhdhd heart and kidney data's the real part - 'slows aging' is still mostly hope, no clean aging-biomarker readout yet. seeing anything beyond the cardiometabolic endpoints?
English

Excited about the buzz: Could weight-loss drugs like semaglutide (Ozempic/Wegovy) be longevity drugs too?
Early research shows GLP-1s may reduce inflammation, protect the heart, and potentially slow aging beyond just shedding pounds.
Not a magic pill yet — more studies needed — but the future of metabolic health looks promising!
What do you think — game-changer or hype? 💊🧬
#GLP1 #Longevity #WeightLoss #HealthTech
Adalaj, India 🇮🇳 English

@PatternNotes a lot of that lean mass number is glycogen plus bound water - DXA can't tell it from muscle, reverses on refeed. does the fiber quality come back with training on-drug, or stuck till off?
English

PART 1: THE MUSCLE PANIC IS MEASURING THE WRONG VARIABLE
GLP-1 receptor agonists reduce lean mass. In DXA substudies, roughly 39% of the weight lost on semaglutide and 25% on tirzepatide was classified as lean mass.
But lean mass is not synonymous with skeletal muscle. It also includes water, organs, connective tissue, and other fat-free compartments. The headline number is doing more work than it can bear.
Still, it has birthed a genre: you’re melting your muscle, you’ll end up skinny-fat, you’re accelerating sarcopenia.
That framing misses a crucial distinction:
Mass and quality are different variables — and obesity is associated with damage to the second one.
Obesity is associated with fewer efficient, fat-oxidizing Type I fibers, more fatigue-prone Type IIx fibers, intramuscular fat, and chronic low-grade inflammation.
The result may be a large volume of tissue that is loud in the wrong signals and quiet in the right ones.
High mass. Low signal.
A large transmitter buried in static.
A thin, sarcopenic 75-year-old and a 300-pound 40-year-old may therefore arrive at overlapping forms of muscle dysfunction and impaired immune surveillance. One has too little functional tissue. The other has abundant tissue of degraded signaling quality.
Different routes. Overlapping destination.
Aging and sarcopenia are also associated with altered myokine signaling, with IL-7 and IL-15 proposed as links between skeletal muscle and immune aging. IL-15 is especially important for the survival, proliferation, and activation of NK cells and subsets of CD8+ T cells.
The hypothesis follows: when muscle quality deteriorates, immune cells may lose part of the trophic support that sustains them.
English

@markkaplan20 fair on the muscle loss - that's the piece that makes rebound worse. but 'doesn't touch insulin resistance' overstates it, dropping visceral fat lifts sensitivity on its own. labs really flat post-loss for you?
English

GLP-1 Drugs Do Not Fix the Cause
Ozempic is a $50 billion industry built on one idea: make the patient eat less.
It works. You lose 15 to 20% of your body weight. You look different in the mirror. Your doctor is happy. The scale moves.
But look at what has not changed.
Before GLP-1: insulin resistant. High triglycerides. Chronic inflammation. Inflamed gut. Cells refusing to respond to insulin. Metabolically broken.
On GLP-1: thinner. But still insulin resistant. Still inflamed. Still metabolically broken. And 40% of the weight you lost was muscle, the single most important tissue for glucose disposal in the human body.
After GLP-1: 75% regain the weight within 2 years of stopping. But now they have less muscle than when they started. Which means their metabolic capacity is worse than before they took the drug.
The scale went down and came back up. The root cause was never touched.
GLP-1 drugs suppress appetite. That is all they do. They do not reverse insulin resistance. They do not heal the gut. They do not reduce chronic inflammation. They do not restore insulin sensitivity at the cellular level.
You cannot starve your way out of a metabolic disease. You have to fix the metabolism.
Remove the processed food. Remove the seed oils. Remove the sugar. Move your body. Build muscle. Sleep. Manage stress. Test the root cause markers.
The weight loss will follow. Because you fixed the engine, not just the fuel gauge.
You lose weight. You lose muscle. You stop the drug. You gain it all back. The root cause was never addressed.

English

@2Varalakshmi weaning slow beats cold turkey, agreed. and you don't have to fully stop - i keep a low twice a week dose that just quiets hunger. plenty park there long-term.
English

@Steadi_lady @Sisi_Yemmie @asemota appetite comes right back when you stop, yeah. but the regain isn't a given - i've watched people use that quiet window to build the habits, and the loss holds after the drug's gone.
English

@Sisi_Yemmie @asemota Not really. many people regain a significant portion of the weight back after stopping.
This is because Ozempic reduces appetite & helps regulate hunger. When it's stopped, appetite often increases again.
English

@OrganLinda @SamaHoole zero loss and muscle going is the worst outcome - gym pivot's the right call.
English

@SamaHoole Saw muscle going in my arms,extreme fatigue after jab,loss of motivation, feeling flat. No stomach problems. Zero weight loss. Stopped. Week later back on the treadmill bike gym, will find another way, not forking out £200 pcm to wait and see weight loss.
English

They call it the cure for obesity. Here is the fine print.
Month 1: starts the weight-loss jab. The weight falls off. Miraculous.
Month 3: down two stone, delighted, telling everyone who'll listen.
Month 5: the nausea is constant now, and food has stopped being a pleasure.
Month 6: the muscle is going too, not just the fat. The face has aged a decade.
Month 8: bent double with stomach cramps, gut seized, gallbladder playing up.
Month 9: sick of feeling sick, comes off it. The appetite roars back within a fortnight.
Month 12: the fat returns, the muscle does not. Net worse off than the day he started.
Month 13: back on the jab, this time understood to be for good.
Year 3: £200 a month, forever, nausea and all, to manage a thing a plate of meat and eggs would have handled.
A subscription with a needle, renewable for life.

English








