VIKRAM मोदी का परिवार

Today, our delegation met @CEOWestBengal and registered a strong objection regarding the repeated and highly suspicious disruptions in CCTV surveillance at multiple strong rooms where polled EVMs and VVPATs are stored. This is a direct and deliberate violation of @ECISVEEP own guidelines, which clearly mandate 24×7 uninterrupted CCTV surveillance with continuous recording and access for authorised party representatives. We have made strong demands to: 👉 Immediately compile a complete report of all instances of CCTV malfunction, disruption, or downtime across every strong room in the state. 👉 Provide full, unedited CCTV recordings along with detailed logs showing all periods of interruption. 👉 Restore all CCTV systems to full, uninterrupted functionality with real-time monitoring and accountability for every lapse. 👉 Ensure continuous and unrestricted access to the surveillance feed for authorised representatives as per ECI protocols. Any attempt to tamper with the mandate of the people through technical sabotage will not be tolerated.

Sabotaging Nicobar isn't saving the planet; it's gifting the Indian Ocean to China on a platter. From Niyamgiri and POSCO to now the Great Nicobar Project, the strategy is clear: Oppose everything, stall everyone. Who does this 'activism' really benefit? The answer lies in Beijing, not the Bay of Bengal. When China builds bases in Cambodia and Myanmar, it’s 'strategy.' When India builds an 'Unsinkable Aircraft Carrier' in Nicobar, it’s an 'ecological disaster'? This isn't activism; it’s Green Colonialism. It’s a hybrid war where turtles are used as shields to keep India’s economy trapped in a museum. Is this political desperation or a deeper ideological pact? Watch @ashu_nauty Ashish Nautiyal rip apart the 'Reel-baazi' of the Anti-Nicobar lobby.

Dissent vs Duty: Know the Line @abhishekaitc Article 1 defines India as a “Union of States”—an indissoluble nation where no state can break away. Every MP swears under the Third Schedule to uphold the sovereignty and integrity of India. Strong criticism of the government is democratic and valid. But any rhetoric that undermines national unity or crosses into incitement against the constitutional order is not just politics—it raises serious constitutional questions. An MP’s words carry weight. The mandate is to debate within the Constitution, not against it. Disagree. Debate. But don’t dilute the idea of the Union of India.