virtualcitizen69

@hollowearthterf @DrewVento 300 is correct

@DrewVento Well I’m not a hooker but from what you see online it’s like 300 at least for someone who isn’t a drug addict or troon

It makes economic sense to just buy a hooker now tbh

When you’re too young to have been an investor in 1999 when anyone with a brain was worried we were in a bubble. 👇🏼

Nobody talks about how taking away WFH took away our free time. Time you could invest into your family, friends, hobbies and passion projects. The 1-3 hour commute is a deliberate and unnecessary decision to take away our freedom.

Its weird how older boomer white male attorneys will staff their firms with almost nothing but women.

@Skipxbeat @MeltingSnowBro I know that. I'm saying the laws need to be changed so that it is impossible to continue doing this.

@virtualcity69 @MeltingSnowBro That's not true at all 90%+ is for entry level positions. Top abusers of the H-1Bs are companies like Cognizant, Infosys, Tata, Wipro etc. which are just consultant and outsourcing companies who cause data breaches for companies that hire them.

US employers crying, beating their fists, and pissing their pants at the news that they might have to employ Americans.

The final form of feminism is mass prostitution.

The idea that choosing a suboptimal degree (in a society that otherwise treats 18 year olds as incompetent, mind you) should condemn you for life is a sign of profound socioeconomic dysfunction, not an ironclad law of nature.

No, Zoomers definitely have it worse in many ways. Gen X got the first rugpull, then Millennials got a bigger one, and Zoomers even bigger. '08 GFC was bad, but it wasn't "+30% inflation in 5 years" bad. We at least had a decade before our rugpull #2. Zoomers never had a chance.

People don't realize that relationships are not just inevitabilities. Society needs to actually be designed to sort and funnel M/F together. It cannot just abdicate this duty so everyone after college has to rely on dumb luck and publicly traded jewish dating apps

My favorite piece of California lore is the fact that the state could have a budget surplus if it just stopped paying for Healthcare for illegal immigrants But they won't So instead they have one of the worst deficits in the country

This is untenable. The reality is that a kid who is faced with a $250 charge every date, who has to go on multiple dates, who is dealing with a fickle dating pool, will just give up. They will opt out of dating. Evidenced by significant dating, marriage, and birth rate decline.

The answer is most certainly status and wealth. Women are now very accomplished and well-paid compared to 50+ years ago and they really don't want a husband with less than they have, and a lot of average guys intuit this fact and don't even bother trying as a result.

not loving this economy where if you didn’t own assets prior to 2020 you’re just fucked forever.

A skill I had to learn was to launder my questions through female coworkers - ask them, and if they don't know, they'll go ask the old guys who'll happily help her, and then she relays it to you. But if you ask them directly they just kind of hate you.

Incredible

Buy a GM car if you like your engine exploding in the middle of the highway, killing you and your family quickly, but not fast enough to avoid the regret...

“wHy aRe tHerE iNdiaNs In pOrTuGaL?!” Because they are good slaves, you are not. I hate essay-posting but allow me a rare indulgence: To understand what is happening now, you need understand that this isn’t the first time it’s happened. Why are there Indians in Kenya? Suriname? Fiji? Burma? Because Indians have always been the preferred servile class of elites. The evidence for this goes back hundreds of years. I’ve spoken about British colonial Burma before, and it is a great example of what this looks like. Even after extensive efforts to bring them to heel, the majority of the Burmese ethnic groups were far too resistant to submit to the British empire to be reliable labor. They refused to abandon their culture and ways of life to be slave drones for British pocketbooks. So the Brits started importing Indians to be their colonial administrators, preferring them as labor because they were easier to control and satisfy. By the 1940s, Indians made up almost 20% of the population of the entire country. Another great historical example of this is Suriname - a small country in South America that had been under Dutch colonial rule for 300 years. The Dutch abolished slavery in 1863, forcing colonial plantation owners to have to hire labor to do the work they had previously been using slaves for. But… they didn’t want to pay former slaves or Indigenous locals a living wage for the work. So what did the Dutch elites do instead? Import Indians. Today, Indians still make up 27% of the population. 27%. Of a tiny, obscure South American country. We could basically go through the list of every country with a non-negligible Indian population and the theme would be consistent: They were brought there by elites who needed a submissive, easily exploitable labor pool when local labor asked for better living conditions or wages. Why? Because Indians never did. They are a population that seems fully content with subjugation (even Marx noticed this). So it’s easy to see why they were such an ideal population for the intensive global expansion era of colonial empires. And it’s even easier to see why they are perfect subjects for late capitalism now. They are the culturally, psychologically, and physically ideal organism for the dominant system. There’s 1.4 billion of them. They are deeply socially stratified and so expect and even enjoy inequality. Their cuisine is cheap, meat-free slop. They live amongst trash and filth with no qualms. They don’t care about the environment. Their reaction to death and abuse is blank-eyed indifference. They are physically and spiritually malleable. They not only adopt and internalize the demands of the dominant system as personal ambition, they believe this servitude makes them better than everyone else who hasn’t. Absolutely IDEAL subjects. You, on the other hand, are not the ideal subject. You want to live in a high-trust society. You would shed tears if someone tried to cut down the apple tree you climbed as a child to build a data center. You want to see and experience beauty. You want your own space. You have an expectation that your living conditions will improve over time. You would not be content to live in a room with 10 other people, work 16 hours per day for pennies, and eat cheap slop. You are a liability. Just like the Burmese and Surinamese slaves were. And as we continue to crawl deeper into this late capitalist hellscape, you and your silly little needs will come into increasing conflict with those of the system. Thus, you WILL be replaced by people far easier to control and far less concerned about their own welfare or the welfare of everyone and everything around them. … Unless you do something about it. But the system has already locked-in that you won’t, and that you’ll just sort of fade into nothingness, distracted by meaningless comforts and terrified of the uncertainty of change. So “why are Indians in [wherever]?” Because you are about to not be.

@bizlet7 "Mediocre white men" discourse is infuriating because A: Avg. white man is still more competent than 90% of world, and B. White societies should be set up so that average, even below-average white men can have a decent job and family, not only self-starter genius entrepreneurs.

This is how the world is supposed to work. You’re supposed to empower these extremely mid genetics men to position of like ‘Director of Toy Engineering’ and give him some stock options and have the women see him as desirable. Now this very same man would be working as an uber driver with the foid having his job as childless single 38 year old.