Ward of the Mark

@AngelMom0817 @RealCandaceO (As explained on my show yesterday, this is because the DOD’s IT department has imprinted the e-mail with canary tactics to identify individual leaks)

@RealCandaceO This is definitely bullshit! Show the actual evidence or it’s a lie! These are the rules you created you evil piece of shit, so play along!

🚨BREAKING: As we reported on our show yesterday, approximately 1 Hour following the WHCD shooting, the White House Military Office sent an e-mail directing the amplification of Erika Kirk’s “I want to go home” video clip. Unfortunately, the e-mail was sent to the wrong internal groups. They then attempted to have I.T revoke the e-mail. When that failed they ordered every person to destroy the e-mail. I have manually retyped the relevant portion of the e-mail that they wanted destroyed. (As explained on my show yesterday, this is because the DOD’s IT department has imprinted the e-mail with canary tactics to identify individual leaks) So the question now is— why did the military so quickly prioritize making Erika Kirk the face of WHCD shooting? Is that normal emergency protocol or was this unnaturally preplanned?

@Informerhub @RealCandaceO (As explained on my show yesterday, this is because the DOD’s IT department has imprinted the e-mail with canary tactics to identify individual leaks)

@RealCandaceO Here is another one: 😂🤣🤡

@PamelaNTenn @RealCandaceO (As explained on my show yesterday, this is because the DOD’s IT department has imprinted the e-mail with canary tactics to identify individual leaks)

@RealCandaceO You owe us better conspiracies.

@ChaShalee @RealCandaceO @MrsErikaKirk (As explained on my show yesterday, this is because the DOD’s IT department has imprinted the e-mail with canary tactics to identify individual leaks)

@RealCandaceO YOU typed an email YOURSELF to AGIAN lead us to believe that @MrsErikaKirk is so "EVIL”. 🤣 Man you are ruining your reputation and the followers that back you are on a level of retarded that I’ve never seen in real life.

@neededsafespace @RealCandaceO (As explained on my show yesterday, this is because the DOD’s IT department has imprinted the e-mail with canary tactics to identify individual leaks)

HAHAHAHA. You really posted this and expect people to believe it came from the military? Have you ever actually seen an official military email? Where’s the header? Where’s the classification marking if applicable? Was this supposedly sent over SIPR or NIPR? Where are the Privacy Act warnings? Subject line formatting? Distribution info? And if this was a real email, why not post the actual email and redact names instead of typing out some clean version yourself? That is the part that makes this look fake as hell. If you had the original, posting a redacted screenshot would end the argument instantly. Instead we get a typed recreation that somehow magically requires everyone to trust you. This is starting to look like the same energy as that Mitch Snow police report.

@jus_juul @RealCandaceO She went to Michigan, not home.

@RealCandaceO Why didn’t her security & “family” take this traumatized widow home? Why did they leave her to suffer while lingering around a crime scene? Why were the cries of this widow ignored?

@paramounttactcl @RealCandaceO CO has named the girl Erika sexually groomed at age 15- one of her sources. CO named the TPUSA employees that were fired and leaked info to her. A Kolvet was one of her big sources in the beginning. While trying to discredit Mitch you confirmed he was on FH by his son’s testimony

Every single one of @RealCandaceO's sources is anonymous. The only one she felt was credible enough to bring on her show was Mitch Snow. Let that sink in.

@paramounttactcl @RealCandaceO You moron, Andrew Kolvet was a big source for months. It was Andrew that told Candace Charlie had texted him and Dan Flood the night before his assassination to tell them he thought they were going to kill him. Harrison Smith posted Charlie thought Israel was going to kill him

@GrahamAllen Pipe down pip squeak. Team Candace!!

Candace Owens Has Given Her Cult Permission To Go After People’s Families! It’s Evil, And It Cannot Be Allowed!

@paramounttactcl @RealCandaceO Oh shut up, Gary. You’re so irrelevant, you lying prick

Undeniable proof that @RealCandaceO lied. She didn’t just get it wrong — she knowingly lied to her audience, treating them like idiots. This is also clear evidence of reckless disregard for the truth and actual malice in her defamation of Brian Harpole and Erika Kirk. I break down exactly why she’s going to lose the Harpole defamation case. Watch below 👇 *Uploaded the directly to X bc I know some don't like switching platforms to view videos. This one's important for people to see. Please share! @dhillonlaw

@paramounttactcl @RealCandaceO Judge also ruled that the defense get more time to prepare since the “overwhelming evidence” hasn’t been given to them. You’re such a spineless op, Gary. No one respects you, but you continue to be useful by accidentally proving Candace is right and the TPUSA crew are liars.

🚨Cameras will be allowed during Tyler Robinson’s trial. Everyone will get to see all the evidence that @RealCandaceO says doesn’t exist.

@BlakeSNeff You’re so full of it. Team Candace!!

As revolting as this is, I'm actually a little glad that Candace said this, because it renders her agenda so transparent. It's not "asking questions," it's not a hunt for "the truth." It's emotionally manipulative high school-level bullying from a narcissist. She is bitter that a person far better than her eventually saw her for who she really was, so she wants postumous revenge by attacking his family and the people he chose to put ahead of her. How can people still fall for this act?

@NihiloX Trump called Candace back in Feb 2025

🚩 Blake is accusing Candace of having illicit relationships with people —simply because she can communicate with them. To start, her name is CANDACE OWENS. When she talks, people listen. When she asks questions, people answer — NO ONE WANTS TO BE ON HER THUMBNAIL. Candace could call the sitting president, and he would probably consider whether or not to answer her call. That says something. Great journalism by @danksterintel 🔥

@JeremyDBoreing Yeah, I’m gonna go with Candace over your lying face. Team Candace!

Last week Candace Owens told the world the Daily Wire had laid off over 50% of its workforce — then updated it to “60% absolute bloodbath.” I’m sure it will shock you to learn those figures aren’t anywhere close to the truth. But there’s a much bigger story beyond Candace’s "mistaken" reporting. The story is how lying has become the default operating system for huge swaths of both legacy media and the new online right. The Grift Industrial Complex rewards speed, sensationalism, and telling the audience exactly what it wants to hear over anything resembling journalistic standards, due diligence, or basic honesty. I know this world because I helped build part of it. We broke past the old gatekeepers for good reason. The old gatekeepers broke all of their own standards. But too few in new media even have standards to break. They say bad money drives out good. It turns out bad journalism does too. youtu.be/z59rdbK7VR4?si…

@JeremyDBoreing Team Candace!!

The video is Prime Candace. Every manipulative rhetorical technique in the books. She makes roughly 236 claims in roughly 30 minutes in what is probably one of the most concise examples of a Gish gallop I have ever seen. A Gish gallop is firing off so many claims in rapid succession your opponent can’t possibly address them all. Even if every claim is wrong, the preponderance of false claims produces the impression of a devastating case. Coupled with Brandolini’s Law, which posits that the amount of energy needed to refute bullshit is an order of magnitude bigger than that needed to produce it. The whole process is meant to make the accused look crazy for even trying. Candace uses rhetorical sleight of hand to accuse me of accusing her husband of lying on his immigration documents. I might respond that I’ve never made any such claim. But Candace has already suggested I’m working with Laura Loomer to launder the accusation against her. I might respond that I haven’t spoken privately to Laura Loomer in years. But Candace has already moved on to say that I’m coordinating with Ben Shapiro to launder ideas to Laura Loomer. So I might respond that I haven’t spoken to Ben Shapiro in over a year, other than a single text exchange when Charlie died. But Candace has already moved on to calling me a creep. Each of my responses, by the way, will be immediately attacked in its own right. Candace’s audience will insist her accusation is true, even though she has offered no proof, and will likewise demand I provide proof of my counter claim. Asymmetric skepticism and burden shifting. I will not be able to prove that I didn’t make a claim, because one cannot prove a negative. Sure, they won’t be able to show any proof that I did make such a claim, but no burden of proof applies to them. Show us your texts! You must have deleted the texts! You had a stupid haircut as a child! The over 200 accusations scale with your answers. Answering one doesn't drop the total to 235 – it scales it up exponentially, because your answer becomes the source of a new onslaught of charges from Candace and her legion. Pretty soon, not only is the sheer number of accusations condemning, but the sheer number of accusers becomes proof that Candace is winning! Vox populi, vox Dei! Trying to defend yourself against such madness is madness. It’s like trying to nail Jello to a wall. You might think there is one claim I simply have to address: That a Daily Wire employee was arrested for sex crimes involving a minor. But while that accusation is terrible, it has nothing to do with me. As the document Candace posted makes clear, this person was arrested in May of 2025. I left the company in March of 2025. Whatever actions the company did or didn’t take when it learned of the situation, I was not a part of it. To be honest, I’m not actually sure what Candace is accusing me of, other than her deeply twisted statement that “people who support Israel will also protect the Epstein class of pedophiles.” Protect how? What exactly am I being accused of? I would ask Candace to state her allegations clearly and specifically. Otherwise, I choose door number three. By the way, if you employ enough people, you will inevitably employ some terrible ones. Hell, I once employed Candace Owens! Employees are people. If you have enough of them, you have all of the different kinds of people there are. Some will even be criminals, and you will have to fire them, which is what I’m guessing the Daily Wire did in this case. Other than that, I have nothing to say to Candace. She invited me to come on her show to talk about George, but I have nothing to say about George at all. She invited me to talk about this person she says committed this terrible crime, but an hour of “Have you stopped beating your wife,” guilt-by-association slander isn’t my idea of a good time. And I may not be the smartest person in media, but I’m just sophisticated enough to know you can’t have a good-faith conversation with someone who uses rhetoric in such dishonest ways. Candace doesn’t want to talk; she wants to overwhelm me with so many allegations and insinuations, so much projection and presupposition and false consensus signaling that her audience builds a negative narrative about me – whatever negative narrative sticks! I see no reason to engage in that kind of spectacle. Also, my audience is rightly concerned for my safety if I go to Candace’s studio.

@BlakeSNeff @JeremyDBoreing You’re still here Blakey Neff? 🥱

Candace is now complaining that the boss who fired her is a "literal deranged stalker." Here is set of her recent livestreams, btw.

@AagimaakMakwa @TMZ Candace got married first, bot. The last time you imbeciles accused Candace of producing fake texts from Charlie, Andrew Kolvet has to come out and publicly verify their legitimacy.

@TMZ Candace is a liar. Something TMZ is famous for. She's jealous Erika won his heart and not her.

Candace Owens took to X Tuesday to share alleged texts from Charlie Kirk, in which he said he had a feeling from the beginning of Turning Point USA that he “might get wiped out at any time,” and that Owens was the “piece God” meant for him to meet, adding that she “will finish the fight.” (📸: X/RealCandaceO)

@sestewart44 @TMZ She did release these texts months ago. A clear admission you don’t watch the show and therefore you don’t know your butt from a hole in the ground.

@TMZ She's faking making up texts and saying they're from Charlie! She would've released that months ago if it were real!

@LAWW1964 @TMZ The last time you idiots accused Candace of releasing “fake” texts from Charlie, Andrew Kolvet had to come out to publicly verify their legitimacy.

@TMZ Those text messages are fake and fabricated, here’s how iPhone-iPhone texts REALLY look, and I have plenty more to compare to her fake shit, I bet she paid you tp post this lie. This is why no believe trash like this you post.

@pitifulpeeps @TMZ Yet he did. He was speaking his text. The last time you idiots accused Candace of releasing fake texts from Charlie, Andrew Kolvet had to come out and publicly verify their legitimacy.

@TMZ Charlie would NEVER not capitalize “god”