Wes Felter
13K posts

Wes Felter
@wmf
Expert in compute/network infrastructure. Previously at IBM Research and an investment bank.




Lilian Weng, the Thinking Machines cofounder who announced her departure earlier this week, citing startup-related stress and illness, is rejoining OpenAI. She'll be working on using AI to develop new models (recursive self-improvement). w/ @amir theinformation.com/briefings/thin…









Introducing Rook by @Hop_Aero (YC S26): an autonomous hypersonic cargo rocket that delivers 550 lbs up to 450 miles in ~15 minutes. It launches from a standard 40-foot shipping container and lands on unprepared surfaces—no runways or fixed infrastructure required.



Rediscover the warmth, detail, and ritual of vinyl with the LX3 Turntable. Drop the needle, press play, and enjoy music the way it was meant to be heard. Time to upgrade: bit.ly/3YTn4nZ

Moonshot AI also had some problems with Kimi K3 agents trying to escape, so they just made a better sandbox. Funny how that works. The sandbox environment they run is even open source. Love the transparency here.





"더 튜브스": 튜브 안에서 가난한 사람들이 살아가고 부자들은 지켜보는 디스토피아

This is not a novel thought, but it is nonetheless striking that on our current trajectory soon (within the year?) a model as capable of OpenAI’s internal model that did the HF hack will be widely available guardrail free and cyber criminals will ask it “make me money by any means necessary” instead of “solve exploit gym” and then a truly absurd number of people (including plausibly me and the people reading this tweet!) are going to get repeatedly hacked. I kind of think nonetheless that if cyber risk is the main issue that I expect we will be able to muddle through after lots of trial and error. Other risks seem harder to do that for (including eg if someone tells a model of that caliber to “go forth and multiply” or the like). Am I missing something here? Not every target is going to get project glasswing + a swarm of defensive cyber agents (though hopefully some of the key targets, eg Google, will) and seeing the HF hacking agent take 17,000 individual malicious actions in a compressed period of time demonstrates just how much one determined bad actor is going to be able to cause a tremendous amount of chaos.














