Abdullah

@tamnvvn i also came across your open source screen recorder tool "screenarc" through chatgpt, but unfortunately its not available on wayland lol. I still found it cool tho, all the best!

About 80% of my recent website traffic is coming from chatgpt. Thank you chatgpt! (Even though I don’t use it that much myself)

@lnzov @imranye low iq retard

@imranye No it's not. Eating pork and drinking alcohol are the only haram things for most muslims 😃.

I finally watched this whole thing and I have a dumb question isn’t this type of fraud haram ?

life: achieved - digital nomading with my wife i don’t need $1M ARR this is what complete feels like she’s building a new mobile app, i’m building soreel b2c and b2b together 😍

One of the coolest ideas in mathematics is the estimation of a shape's area by throwing random points at it. Don't believe this works? Check out the animation below, where I show the method on the unit circle. (Whose area equals to π.) Here is what's behind the magic:

@toxiccowboy1 pig eats pigs, nothing new

To all my Muslim peeps out there, Merry Christmas 🎁🎁

@Xeer nah thats too far bro

kids, if you think 6-7 is funny, wait til you meet 9-5 😭

don’t know why you keep making this about religion specifically. by your logic a terrorist could pick up a nursery rhyme book, a philosophy text, a political manifesto, even a tweet, and twist it into justification. your logic is fallible because you’re assuming the text creates the violence. it doesn’t. these people are already violent. they’re already radicalized. they’re already looking for permission. they can literally use anything. they choose religious scripture because it appeals to the masses and gives emotional weight, not because the text itself commands it. that’s why the same verses get recycled over and over while everything else is ignored. and let’s be real, most of these “terrorist organizations” people bring up aren’t even grassroots religious movements. they’re proxies. tools. geopolitical chess pieces. their real goals are power, control, destabilization, money. religion is just the easiest scapegoat because it rallies people and shuts down nuance. strip the religion away and you’ll still find the same violence under a different banner. also funny how this logic only ever gets applied to Islam. Muslims aren’t the ones who mass-bombed civilians in two world wars. Muslims didn’t kill hundreds of millions of innocent people through industrial warfare. Muslims aren’t the ones running concentration camps or open air prisons right now. but somehow Islam is framed as uniquely violent while modern history says otherwise. so no, the issue isn’t “jihadists don’t need context.” the issue is people pretending context doesn’t matter only when it’s convenient. cherry picking isn’t proof of doctrine. it’s proof of bad faith. if scripture alone caused violence, then every Muslim would be violent. they’re not. end of story. do better.

@xuqcf The whole point is that Jihad terorrorists don't need context to inspire them to kill people. That's the whole point I'm making. Terrorist organizations cherry pick the quran and hadiths and use them as guiding principles while ignore the peaceful or opposing verses.

It is very much about religion too, though. The Bondi Beach attack proves it: Two Muslim shooters targeting a Hanukkah celebration. One Muslim hero stopping them. Same Quran. Opposite actions. One can read Islamic doctrine and become Rumi writing about divine love in joy & ecstacy. Another can read it and get October 7th. You can read the Torah and become a peace activist. Or you can become Baruch Goldstein. Christianity gave us both Mother Teresa and the Crusades. But you can’t read Buddhism and get “mass shooting.” You can’t read Jainism and get “holy war.” That’s why we don’t have Buddhist terror cells. No Jainist suicide bombers. The texts simply don’t contain the instructions. Actions stem from beliefs. Beliefs stem from which verses you choose and how you read them. The hero and the terrorists at Bondi were reading the same book with different levels of consciousness. Until we transcend in our ability to see Rumi in the Quran & in all holy books over what Naveed saw… we’ll keep getting both.

@aymanalabdul literally contrary to what every CEO is doing. Don't listen to people on twitter, who have no idea what they are talking about.

The CEO should be the laziest person in the company Not because they do nothing… But because they built a machine that runs without them

@ycombinator @NavierAI there are literally 5 different bigger services that do this how tf they raised $5M

Congrats to @NavierAI on their $5.6M seed! Engineering has undergone two major shifts: CAD replaced manual drafting (1960s), then simulation enabled virtual testing (1990s). Navier introduces the third: Agent-Driven Engineering (ADE). Their AI agents automate repetitive workflows between design and engineering, enabling teams to triple output and compress cycles from months to weeks. Built on autonomous vehicle tech from SpaceX, Tesla, and Aurora, they're already working with aerospace and automotive companies. axios.com/pro/enterprise…

I’m gonna be blunt because this actually matters. You’re talking very confidently about a book you clearly haven’t read in context. The phrases you keep repeating like “kill the infidels” or “fight those who don’t believe” were never general commands. They were revealed during an actual war with the polytheists of Mecca who started the conflict, broke treaties, expelled Muslims from their homes, and tried to wipe them out. That’s not me spinning theology. That’s just history. Take the verse everyone loves to butcher: “kill them wherever you find them.” You stop mid-sentence and ignore who “them” is referring to, which groups are named, and what the verses before and after say. The same passage literally says don’t transgress, stop fighting if they stop, protect anyone seeking peace, and even escort enemies safely if they ask for protection. That’s not selective scholarship, that’s just reading the page fully. Your argument assumes the Qur’an says “go kill nonbelievers because they don’t believe.” It doesn’t say that anywhere. At all. There is zero verse that commands killing someone for disbelief. None. Disbelief is not the target. Active hostile combatants in a specific war were. This is where your Buddhism comparison breaks. You’re comparing absolute pacifist traditions like Jainism or Quakers to a religion that governed an actual society with laws, courts, treaties, and rules of war. Islam isn’t a monastery religion. It came to a persecuted community that eventually had to defend itself. Having rules for war isn’t glorifying violence. Islam was actually one of the first systems to restrict warfare. No killing civilians, no women or children, no destroying crops, no forced conversions, no killing monks or priests. Groups like ISIS, Hamas, Boko Haram don’t “follow the Qur’an literally.” They violate its core rules of war completely. That’s why Muslim scholars across the world condemned them immediately. You say “they don’t need theology, the plain meaning is obvious.” That’s just wrong. Arabic isn’t English, and Qur’anic Arabic is high-context and legal. “Fight those who fight you” isn’t vague. And “kill them wherever you find them” already has a defined referent earlier in the passage. Ignoring that isn’t plain reading, it’s dishonest reading. Radicalization also doesn’t work the way you’re describing it. People don’t wake up neutral, read one line, and suddenly want to kill. It feeds on grievance, humiliation, political violence, identity collapse. Then the text gets weaponized to justify what they already want to do. You’re right that selective reading exists. You’re wrong about why it’s possible. It’s not because Islam contains some hidden murder license. It’s because any complex legal or moral system can be abused if you rip it out of context. The difference is Buddhism can only be abused by ignoring its texts. Islam can be abused by lying about what its texts mean. That’s not a flaw in Islam. That’s the cost of being a civilization-building religion instead of a retreat philosophy. So no, the Bondi attack doesn’t prove Islam “contains violent instructions” the way you’re framing it. It proves you can misquote anything if you don’t read it, political violence always looks for divine cover, and people who haven’t studied the Qur’an shouldn’t pretend half-quotes override 1400 years of scholarship. Criticize religion all you want, that’s fair. But at least argue against what Islam actually says, not a caricature built from headlines and ripped verses.

Abdullah, appreciate the respectful response – but I think you’re actually making my point while believing you’re refuting it. You say “if the text itself was the cause, outcomes wouldn’t be opposite.” Exactly. That’s my argument. The Quran contains “kill the infidels” AND “to you your religion, to me mine.” The fact that opposite outcomes exist proves the text provides raw material for both. Ahmed followed the peaceful verses. Naveed followed the violent ones. Same book. Different selections. Your Buddhist violence examples actually prove the distinction I’m making. Yes, Buddhist nationalists committed atrocities in Myanmar… but they had to ignore Buddhist texts to do it. Buddha says even if bandits were sawing you limb from limb, you should maintain loving kindness. The most radical literalist Buddhist is meditating in a cave somewhere. Hamas, ISIS, Boko Haram, the Taliban – they quote the Quran accurately when calling for violence. That’s the difference between violating your scripture and following it. You say “nobody wakes up peaceful, reads a verse, and suddenly wants to kill.” But that’s exactly what radicalization is. When someone reads “Fight those who do not believe in Allah… kill them wherever you find them,” they don’t need a theology degree to understand it. The plain meaning is kill nonbelievers. Yes, scholars can contextualize it. Yes, other verses preach peace. But Naveed didn’t need scholarly context to read “kill the infidels” and know what it means. Here’s the test: Find me the Jain suicide bomber. Find me the Quaker terrorist cell. You can’t – because their texts contain no divine commands to kill unbelievers. The most radical Jainist is panicking because they accidentally stepped on an ant. Religion functions as an operating system for human behavior. You can’t get a mass shooting from “be kind to all sentient beings.” You can get one from “Paradise awaits those who kill unbelievers.” That hadith exists. Find me a Jain or Buddhist verse that justifies killing non jains or buddhists. The Bondi shooters, we can assume, read the violent verses, ignored the peaceful ones, and acted. That selective reading is only possible when both options exist in the text. This isn’t unique to Islam of course btw… and agin i love the religion overall… i can call out the Crusades, the Inquisition, Old Testament conquest narratives. Holy wars are called holy wars for a reason. People build their lives around believing their religion is true and are willing to die for their God. When a holy book contains explicit kill commands, you’ve handed people a divine directive for murder. They just have to choose which verses to follow. So i really don’t think thr Bondi attack demonstrates “individuality” as you claim. I think it shows that Islam contains both peaceful and violent instructions – and which one you follow depends on which verses you prioritize.

@VanpeltVentures Id argue, marketing IS building and the spearhead of it.

Marketing isn’t hard It’s just not as fun as building

@1Umairshaikh Investors

Scare a founder with one word

@Jeremybtc Because it sounds nice in theory but practically doesn't work.

You could literally – Buy ChatGPT Plus – Start a business and call it an AI agency – Charge $15K per month – Sign 10 clients That’s $1.8M a year Why is nobody doing this

List of Famous Symbols: Number Systems & Constants ℕ Natural numbers ℤ Integers ℚ Rational numbers ℝ Real numbers ℂ Complex numbers ℙ Prime numbers ∞ Infinity π Pi e Euler’s number i Imaginary unit Algebraic & Analytic Operations + Addition − Subtraction × Multiplication ÷ Division √ Square root ∑ Summation ∏ Product ∫ Integral ∂ Partial derivative Δ Change / difference ∇ Gradient (nabla) |x| Absolute value ‖x‖ Norm ⊗ Tensor product Relations & Comparisons = Equal to ≠ Not equal to ≈ Approximately equal ≡ Identically equal < Less than > Greater than ≤ Less than or equal ≥ Greater than or equal ∝ Proportional to ∼ Similar to Geometry & Vector Symbols ∡ Angle ⊥ Perpendicular ∥ Parallel ↔ Line → Vector ‖ Parallel / magnitude △ Triangle ∘ Composition ⋅ Dot product × Cross product Reasoning & Statements: ∴ Therefore ∵ Because ⊢ Provable / derives ⊨ Semantically entails □ Necessarily ◇ Possibly ⊤ True ⊥ False ⊥̸ Not false Logical Operators ¬ Negation (NOT) ∧ Logical AND ∨ Logical OR ⊕ Exclusive OR (XOR) ⇒ Implies → Conditional implication ⇔ If and only if ≡ Logical equivalence ≢ Not equivalent Quantifiers & Set Theory ∀ For all (universal quantifier) ∃ There exists ∄ There does not exist ∈ Element of ∉ Not element of ⊂ Proper subset ⊄ Not a subset ⊆ Subset or equal ⊇ Superset or equal ∪ Union ∩ Intersection ∖ Set difference ∅ Empty set ℘(A) Power set of A

@MichelleMaison7 @BehizyTweets yeah and I can guarantee she's more beautiful than you are

@BehizyTweets I can guarantee you she’s not super beautiful like she claims to be.

What is going on with White women in Texas? This woman says she converted to Islam to wear the hijab so she could stop getting "hollered at." "I'm like super beautiful, and I don't want a bunch of dudes looking at me."

@fa1zvn bro officially lost the plot

sunni cto + shia ceo >>

@nasdaily btw nas entire family and relatives hate him for betraying his bloodline just so he can have a "comfortable" life. lmaooo, what a traitor to his own people

let me show you my home 1 video every day for 1 week. Let all hell break loose I don't care. The show starts tomorrow :)

@DivineChuk24868 @CodeByNZ its just a syntax brother, nothing to do with programming here. I appreciate the advice tho

@xuqcf @CodeByNZ Bro use strict not equal !== It'll balance 🫶🏻

In today’s world, which one matters more in your experience?