Yawei 🇵🇱🇪🇺🌱⚖️👮❤️🇺🇦
724 posts
Yawei 🇵🇱🇪🇺🌱⚖️👮❤️🇺🇦
@yaawei
Jebac patusiarzy plamiących honor naszej tolerancyjnej ojczyzny. A rude social liberal. Institutions over culture. International law pilled. Vegan sentientist.
Katılım Temmuz 2012
228 Takip Edilen10 Takipçiler
@AmusedToDeath1 But even among the sliced aisle loaves, there are plentiful options besides wonder bread, including quality organic breads. I don't know why eurotrash think it's all wonder bread lol
English
The thing everyone is missing in bread discourse is Americans just prefer the soft sliced sandwich loaf from the aisle regardless of the abundance of other bread
AmusedToDeath@AmusedToDeath1
I can walk to here in 8 minutes.
English
@possumrescuer @mimi_teaching @allgarbled You thinking its too nosey doesnt have much to do with adhd though.
English
@mimi_teaching @allgarbled IDK. I start the questionnaire and then decide somewhere in the first half that they are too nosey and that it’s none of their business. Too much to fill out. They don’t need my life story to clean my teeth.
English
@TrueSlazac @hwrngmelldansen Have you considered that chatgpt will reveal to me where to find more hamburgers?
English
@hwrngmelldansen 5,000 chatgpt questions still consumes a hundred times less water than a SINGLE hamburger lol
English
the thing is, if 5,000 people say "1 question to chatgpt won't hurt" that's 5,000 questions to chatgpt. like you have to be a moron to not understand that.
punkscores #IR2 🎸@punkscores
can we get an etsy witch to make tiktok cease to exist
English
@rpgrealitymll @StatisticUrban So what youre saying is that communism was even more of a failure than we say? It didnt take off anywhere and in the places where it tried to it immediately was taken over by authoritarianism?
English
@StatisticUrban 1. The “Soviet sphere” wasn’t even leftist. It was taken over by opportunists who never abolished capital
2. Elections aren’t free or fair. They’re just another right wing statist idea
3. Liberal “democracy” has failed plenty of times given the endless cycle of (1/2)
English
Where do communists get this utter intellectual arrogance from?
Have their ideas led them to success? Have they overthrown capitalism in the West through revolution? No.
Have they won mass democratic support in free and fair, if bourgeois, elections, where all they have to do is convince people? Also no.
And where they did seize power, did they build paradise? No. The Soviet sphere fell in less than one lifetime after decades of shortages, brutal repression, and economic dysfunction, outcompeted by liberal democracy on every front. Where communism persisted, as in China, it had to become capitalist to survive.
antifa honeypot@mformorphine
must be so blissful being a lib, no ideological framework for why things happen, no coherent understanding of history or economics, just individual issues that you interpret solely based on vibes
English
@sean_domnick @jdcmedlock But we already did coordinate right now.
English
If you want to avoid needless death, you have two options to coordinate around. Blue has a 50% threshold and red has a 100% threshold. Only one of these is actually feasible…
delaniac 🌹🌱@ChadNotChud
every time this goes around I’m honestly flabbergasted by this justification for picking “red” everyone won’t do that. like that’s just an empirical fact. moreover the fact that there’s discourse about it should immediately prove that to you. many, many people will choose blue
English
@jankulveit I really just don't think it's this complicated, if you press red you always survive no matter the outcome. I'd expect everyone else to realise this and also press red, why would I press blue?
English
Funny little illustration of levels of understanding of game theory and rationality, or: why basic game theory is evil
1. Non-sociopaths going by intuition: blue sounds pro-social, blue
2. People who reason explicitly and use some naive game theory or naive rationality: red!
3. People who actually understand game theory: blue (if you want an explicit reason, because of trembling hand, Schelling points, theory of mind)
A simple explanation of "why 3." is ...imagine you are forced to play the game tens of thousand of times, at random points of your life from birth to death. What strategy you want to play?
"1." being in agreement with "3." often makes sense if you think about the origins of "1.".
Unfortunately there are few pieces of knowledge which in expectation makes you more dumb and more evil if you don't progress beyond the basic level; some of the more prominent I know about are basics of game theory, especially prisoners dilemma; basic econ; Elephant in the brain
vittorio@IterIntellectus
why would anyone even press blue?!?
English
@choffstein @FlowTraderTM It's not neccesarily selfless. It's in my interest to have as many people as possible to live.
English
@FlowTraderTM Your solution requires 50% of the population acting selflessly. I'm too jaded to gamble on that.
English
Red looks selfish until you realize: if everyone presses red, everyone lives.
The "cooperative" answer requires coordination and trust.
The "selfish" answer just requires everyone making the same selfish choice.
Tim Urban@waitbutwhy
Everyone in the world has to take a private vote by pressing a red or blue button. If more than 50% of people press the blue button, everyone survives. If less than 50% of people press the blue button, only people who pressed the red button survive. Which button would you press?
English
@oliveegger They've been exposed as cowardly and selfish. Some are so ashamed thay they wish blue voters died and didnt judge them.
English
@BrianBurtner @sonic7ischaos @AdsoOfBelk Dude chill, blue won again, we saved everyone. And we know now how much of a selfish midwit are you.
English
Option A: "Nobody dies, except the idiots who willingly risked suicide for no baseline reason"
Option B: "Either me and every other idiot that risked suicide for no baseline reason dies, or nobody dies, depending on how many idiots there were in the pool"
This question doesn't require calculating any odds. There is no cost-benefit analysis to do, because there is no benefit anywhere in the matrix. At all.
The "BEST" (most "sympathetic" but still immoral and wrong) basis for picking blue is as an extremely improbable/ineffectual errand to disallow the small minority of explicitly suicidal people from KNOWINGLY killing themselves (something that - like it or not - is their right).
The WORST basis (the one you provide) is to save the lives of people that are too stupid to recognize that they are killing themselves in the first place. Someone incapable of recognizing that they are committing suicide here is a present and ongoing danger to themselves and to others. They need to be identified, fully stripped of the possibility of any political influence, and, ideally, removed from our society via indefinite quarantine or deportation.
That now includes you. Recant now in the light of these explained facts or forever be retarded.
English
Two buttons lie before you
Button A - if you can get 50%+1 of people to agree with you, no one dies
Button B - if you can get 100% of people to agree with you, no one dies
English
@RedactedDeGen @BarneyFlames The red one requires EVERYONE to hald hands and sing "we're very smart, you shouldve picked blue, bye bye and die"
English
@BarneyFlames One requires 50%+ of people to hold hands and sing kumbaya
The other requires everyone to stop for a second, think about the options, and make the rational one
Of course all the retards and women wanna sing kumbaya
English
- Button A: nothing happens to you
- Button B: <you might randomly die>
Sorry no one except total weirdos would choose B
Total NIMBY Death@BarneyFlames
The red/blue thing is happening again, I am 100% sure if that happened IRL something like 99% of people would press red and all the people who donate to NGOs would just kill themselves into extinction
English
@YahhSirio @Sirgay142726 @yaawei @TheOmniLiberal Every single person got the option to press red and guarantee that they would live. And everyone knows that everyone else also got the same exact option. Picking blue at that point is just stupid
English
The people who choose red are the same people who abandon their carts in the parking lot.
Tpohnka🗽🇺🇸@Tpohnka
@TheOmniLiberal Destiny have you seen the blue/red button dilemma? What’s your take
English
The majority of people pressing blue is the epitome of virtue signaling. 100% of people should just press red and guarantee survival. There’s absolutely zero reason for anyone to press blue, but these sheep think it’s the virtuous choice so they vote for it anyway
Tim Urban@waitbutwhy
Everyone in the world has to take a private vote by pressing a red or blue button. If more than 50% of people press the blue button, everyone survives. If less than 50% of people press the blue button, only people who pressed the red button survive. Which button would you press?
English
@villiam_xd @TheOmniLiberal You are the midwit meme incarnate. "If OnLy EvErYoNe" do you even hear yourself
English
@TheOmniLiberal If everyone chooses red, everyone lives. Red means you save yourself, blue means you gamble your life on others also gambling their life. Red is the only logical choice.
English
@hereticalintent @TrueSlazac "what's the issue? We only need LITERALLY EVERYONE do thr thing."
Are you hearing yourself
English
@TrueSlazac Is it me or is this poorly written as a dilemma? What's the negative to 100% of people pressing red? Are we worried that we'll accidentally kill the red-blue color blind or that people will press blue out of spite?
English
Every time this poll goes viral, “blue” starts winning and it angers a lot of people who desperately want to see half of the human population dead to be correct in an argument
Tim Urban@waitbutwhy
Everyone in the world has to take a private vote by pressing a red or blue button. If more than 50% of people press the blue button, everyone survives. If less than 50% of people press the blue button, only people who pressed the red button survive. Which button would you press?
English
@bledensow @notabotRachel @MorganGermani @IterIntellectus The game allows for multiple scenarios that will save everyone so what are you even saying.
English
@yaawei @notabotRachel @MorganGermani @IterIntellectus You can never save everyone. The people who want to be saved will pick red.
English
why would anyone even press blue?!?
Tim Urban@waitbutwhy
Everyone in the world has to take a private vote by pressing a red or blue button. If more than 50% of people press the blue button, everyone survives. If less than 50% of people press the blue button, only people who pressed the red button survive. Which button would you press?
English
@IterIntellectus It's easier to coordinate 51% of people than 100% and we want to save everyone because it's possible.
English
@bledensow @notabotRachel @MorganGermani @IterIntellectus It's easier to coordinate 51% of people than 100% and we want to save everyone because it's possible.
English
@notabotRachel @MorganGermani @IterIntellectus If everyone pushes red they guarantee their own survival and everyone also lives.
English
@DMerollini4281 @gloccnem Imagine feeling this threatened by vegan meatballs.
English
@gloccnem Not just look they make it it taste like it. Which is stupid. If youre gonna be vegan or vegetarian just own it but don't call you stupid vegan mushroom ball and meatball. And if you call it a meatless meatball I'm flipping the fucking table
English
i never understood why vegans don’t eat meat and then go make everything else they eat look just like meat
Minga@KillaMinga
At this point just eat the meat 🥺 Vegan fried chicken Smash✨️or trash🗑?
English
@DlonTrusk @american_tatty @benjamincowen Even better if he said they rose by 50%, you check it and they dropped by half lmao
English
@american_tatty @benjamincowen Does a 100% rise results in no change then?
Imagine ur accountant said all ur stocks went up by 100% today and you saw nothing changed 😄
English
The crazy thing is that going from $100 to $600 is a 500% increase, not even 600%.
So even the part of the math they think is right is still wrong.
Acyn@Acyn
RK JR: One of the Democrats was ridiculing President Trump for his math, and she was saying it's in mathematically impossible to have any drug drop by 600% cost. And I said, well, if the drug was $100 and it raised the price of $600. That would be a 600% rise. If it drops from 600 to 100, that's a 600% savings. Trump: That’s right. RFK JR: The president used that mathematical device to illustrate the magnitude of the theft.
English
@KeruboSk > I'll just do this other thing quickly and then shower.
English
