CryptoZeus

@Reil76 @HarleySpadeFilm @Natluvscamping Has not declared it in National interest. Say he will do that…in the Fall.

@HarleySpadeFilm @Natluvscamping Which he has by declaring it a national interest.

Carney is moving ahead on a new pipeline to get Canadian oil to global markets, something Alberta has been demanding for years. And yet, Alberta is STILL complaining. First it was “we need pipelines.” Now it’s “not this one,” “not fast enough,” or “not good enough.” At some point it stops being about pipelines and starts looking like a province that just wants to be perpetually mad no matter what happens.

@Reil76 @XTANT_CA Why should she? Who’s funding Pathways? Federal government? Why aren’t they funding a pipeline then? Oil makes money. Carbon capture costs money. Grow a brain.

@XTANT_CA That’s because Dani hasn’t even submitted the proposal for one lol.

@dontfollowAIC @ryangerritsen What a stupid take. Harper lost his first election run and won and became Prime Minister 2 years after. Pierre should not be prescribing any policy at this point. Just do exactly what the opposition should be doing and that’s it. Build the policy agenda in private and be ready.

@ryangerritsen Tom Mulclaire is right. At some point, you need to realize he’s unelectable. You can still support the conservative but it’s in your best interests to walk Pierre out the door… keep him? Better enjoy second place. Same lesson the Democrats need to learn in South…

Vassy on Powerplay says Carney basically took yet another idea from Pierre, what do you do in this situation? Robert Benzie’s response? Pierre this time next year probably won’t be the leader of the Conservatives. Tom Mulcair’s response? Pierre probably won’t make until the next election. I’d like to ask, how would any opposition leader make it with endless negative media coverage being pumped out to the public week in and week out?

@NeoScooch @Jenniferl554563 @grok @GraceOnFire2 Idiot, Liberals have been in power for the last 11 years and Carney was the one who is in charge now and can change the rules. But they won’t. Has NOTHING to do with conservatives. Idiot.

@Jenniferl554563 Hey @grok Did I lie in any of my statement below? Poilievre's investments on Brookfield are directly linked to the Canadian stock market. Meaning Poilievre only profits if Canada does. Carney profits regardless of Canada's outcome.

Rich coming from a guy who has accomplished zero other than to feed at the taxpayer’s trough for over 25 years. His whole adult life. He’s wealthier than the PM. This rage baiting braying hyena is irrelevant.

@Gates317 @bomac_macbo @MarcNixon24 If it isnt clear yet, Liberals are a clear and present danger to Canada.

Liberal Super Majority New Polls have the Liberals eliminating the Conservatives wiping them off the MAP. Either the Polls are wrong or Canadians love the last 11 years so much they want MUCH more of the same.

@Gates317 @Fern1074837Ken @Gray_man1605 @MarcNixon24 Likes the business model of Carney…like bringing Canada into severe debt? That AAA credit rating is in the verge of being downgraded. Then what will you say?

@Gates317 @Fern1074837Ken @Gray_man1605 @MarcNixon24 Like privatizing airports? You have no clue what you are advocating for. Carney won’t replace the US trade, ever because businesses all around the world have already done the math on where to do business at the lowest cost and to maximize profits. Canada already has free trade.

@Victori49569624 @lauralee050 @BarbaraWor7624 @JesseJamesAinj @Reil76 @Loritmbf A blind trust means you don’t know what’s being invested in. If the trustee doesn’t liquidate Carney’s portfolio and starts over, then of course Carney knows EXACTLY what’s in the trust! He is smart enough to craft his portfolio and will ensure it’s exactly as he wants it.

@zeus_of_crypto @lauralee050 @BarbaraWor7624 @JesseJamesAinj @Reil76 @Loritmbf So your saying that a Blind Trust will wipe out his portfolio?

Watching Carney and Poilievre go at it in Parliament is starting to feel uncomfortable. Not in a dramatic way, just in the way it feels when someone is clearly out of their depth and keeps pressing anyway. Carney knows the file. When he answers, he answers the actual question. He doesn’t need to perform outrage or repeat a catchphrase three times and call it a rebuttal. He just explains things, clearly, because he understands them. Poilievre comes in loud and confident, same as always, and that works great on a campaign trail or a Facebook video. But in a room where the other guy actually knows what he’s talking about? The gap shows. Every time. The frustrating part isn’t even the politics. It’s watching someone confuse intensity for competence and expect nobody to notice the difference. People notice. This stopped being a left vs right thing a while ago. Now it just looks like one guy who did the reading and one guy who thinks he doesn’t have to.

@GraceOnFire2 @NeoScooch @Jenniferl554563 @grok And Carney claims he is pro Canada but moved Brookfields HQ to America, +90% invested in American companies, established tax avoidance for Brookfield close to $6B tax loss to Canada. But Pollievre holds some Vanguard ETF’s. You Liberals are a clear present danger to Canada.

@NeoScooch @Jenniferl554563 @grok Poilievre claims he only has Canadian stocks but those stocks are held by Vangaurd a US company which fees are paid to.

@Victori49569624 @lauralee050 @BarbaraWor7624 @JesseJamesAinj @Reil76 @Loritmbf If you believe that Carney would allow his entire portfolio that has been carefully planned out to be wiped out, you must be extremely naive. Carney knows exactly what he has and he has carried interest in the fund he setup with Brookfield. Why do you think Pathways is a must?

Do you know what a blind trust is? "A blind trust in Canada is a legal arrangement where a public official transfers control of their assets to an independent trustee, separating personal finances from public duties to avoid conflicts of interest. The trustee manages assets without consulting the beneficiary, who remains unaware of specific investments."

@MrEdwar61053638 @JustaGuy8g @Reil76 People wanted change and then voted, Federally, the same party that’s been in power for a decade.

@JustaGuy8g @Reil76 Hell no would be my opinion. Right now Liberals in Ontario are polling as high as PC Ford,.. Liberals with no leader appears better than what Ontario has,.. people just want change, less spending,.. especially stupid shit that has no long term benefits/ returns for children.

@Victori49569624 @BarbaraWor7624 @JesseJamesAinj @Reil76 @Loritmbf Anyone voting for the Liberals is voting purely from an ideological perspective. There is no other rational way to vote for them. Carney will prove to be ineffective for Canada and only about supporting his Climate fund with Brookfield that he has carried interest on.

@BarbaraWor7624 @JesseJamesAinj @Reil76 @Loritmbf You think its all gonna be that easy for Alberta? If you want to bank on the destruction of Canada, then why are you hanging around, or do you prefer to whine about it? If Canadians didn't believe in Canada, they would not have voted for a new path.

@coreyhoganyyc Why don’t you clowns post that same graph from 2021 until now? Doesn’t look so great now does it.

Wages have grown faster than inflation every month Mark Carney has been Prime Minister - great news for Canada. But why doesn't the Bank of Canada aim for zero inflation, or deflation? And what about sectors with higher inflation or lower wage growth? Let's jump into it.

@Computron200000 @davidportier That’s bullshit. When it’s gets down to the core of a persons worldview, they have a tribe.

@davidportier He obviously doesn’t give a shit about the parties, which is how most Canadians feel most Canadians aren’t Liberal or Con or NDP or any other party, nor do they want to join one

A kind of important question we Conservatives need to ask ourselves is: Why did Mark Carney become a Liberal and not a Conservative?

@DanielTyrie This “Forward Guidance” was nothing more than Liberal Propaganda. Just more of the same and pretty close to the same points in his Ali real convention speech. Pathetic.

The Poilievre (C)onservatives have no response to this style of messaging. Carney tactfully blends his brand of economic responsibility with a protection of modern progressive values and Canadian heritage. I disagree with his foundation — that Canada is just a more progressive America — but it's hard to ignore that this strategy make both the NDP and CPC irrelevant in their current forms.

@ABBNS @DimitrisSoudas How, according to you, do you supposed Pollievre accomplish “showing us he’s competent to lead” exactly? Maybe by proposing policies that Mark Carney takes? That’s about all a party in opposition can do and Mark Carney has taken Pierre’s policies. What more do you want?

@DimitrisSoudas Complaining and casting doubt on a Leader is #1 on the lists of 50 types of propaganda "Ad hominem:" It isn't working, too obvious. Tell a story, show us you are competent to lead a country.

I’m a Conservative… but I’m begging us to get serious. I’m begging on my knees for someone else to write his speeches. We can disagree with Mark Carney all day long on policy. Fair game. Necessary, even. But saying the guy has an “illusion of knowledge” is like saying Connor McDavid has an illusion of being able to skate. We don’t win by pretending competence is fake. We win by proving we can do better.

@brianlilley @JannieB2020 Why don’t you do some real reporting and find out what Carney and the Liberals offered them to switch sides instead of feeding a bogus narrative.

@JannieB2020 I'm not advocating for a new leader, I quite like Poilievre. My job though is to analyze what is happening. If he keeps losing MPs it will be hard to keep his job.

No matter how you slice it, Pierre Poilievre is now in a weaker position than he was. To keep his job, he's going to need to work hard.

@legallymsjuno @Angie_Zur Liberals don’t get credit for causing the issues and then reversing course because it’s been disastrous. You thank Carney for removing the carbon tax that he and the Liberals installed! No credit given for fucking up and backtracking.

@Angie_Zur 🗣️It's 2026 .... Carney put us back "on the radar of global investors"

OMG, how does Pierre Poilievre still not get economics in Canada? 😂 He's railing about housing, groceries & cost of living like it's all one big mystery. Meanwhile corporations jack up prices and pad record profit margins while Canadians quietly pay up every day, no pushback, just complacency. Our whistleblower laws are so weak they basically punish the people trying to call it out. Mark Carney? Told y'all 18 months ago, the guy's charisma is next-level. He's built for this. Hilarious how smooth he responds. Hard not to like him. 🇨🇦

@KirkLubimov It’s a by election in Liberal strongholds. They stayed home because what’s the point. Even in Terrabonne, the Lib and Bloc got less votes than the general. I would stay home too because there isn’t a point for a conservative voter. Next General though…Canada will be restored

The story of the by-elections was a total COLLAPSE of Conservative voters❗️ University-Rosedale Went from 14,624 to 3,843 Scarborough Southwest Went from 16,652 to 5,300 Terrebonne Went from 10,961 to 1,551 Where did Conservative voters go? This is alarming for the CPC.

@garyblo49780145 @HeadWestAB @JasminLaine_ @sarobertsonca Are all polls pushed on to the billion dollar Liberal funded media? No. They push the polls that makes the Liberal government look good. I’ve never seen this media attention to the opposition rather than the government in power. Corruption

@HeadWestAB @JasminLaine_ @sarobertsonca All political parties hire polling firms to gauge public opinion and to assist in developing strategies.

Nik Nanos: "When we ask Canadians who they would prefer as Prime Minister, Poilievre is 27 points back of Mark Carney. Mark Carney is like in the mid 50s and Pierre Poilievre is in the mid 20s."