Okkervil 🐦‍🔥

643 posts

Okkervil 🐦‍🔥

Okkervil 🐦‍🔥

@Mememycom

Присоединился Mayıs 2011
759 Подписки129 Подписчики
Okkervil 🐦‍🔥
Okkervil 🐦‍🔥@Mememycom·
🤌🔎📖
Anna Leven@ForgetDali

If I ask you to describe your last summer holiday, chances are you won’t recall a still image or a continuous sequence, but a brief loop, lasting 5-10 seconds. Spanish digital artist @ALCrego_ suggests that memory often functions this way: we tend to think in photographs or in films, but our memories behave more like GIFs: short, recurring scenes, routines, fragments that replay in our minds — sometimes without sound. “Life unfolds through repetition”, he says, “in that sense, GIFs feel closer to lived experience than either still photography or linear video.” A thread 🧵👇

ART
0
0
1
23
Okkervil 🐦‍🔥
Okkervil 🐦‍🔥@Mememycom·
🤌🏻✔️
Harvey Rayner@harvey_rayner

Thus far, I have been saved from this crisis, but being a code-artist my experience may not be typical. The most direct way for me to think about my art is algorithmically. Code is the most direct way for me to craft mark-making and composition. There is no way for me to explain to AI in natural language what it is I want to do. Besides, the actual act of coding has never been a bottle neck in my practice. Its also a process I love so there is not even a desire to off load it even if AI could do it for me. A craft is a feedback loop. The medium an artist works with provides feedback about how to proceed. Art is a product of a dance between artist and medium. If I used AI then there would be a black box in between me and my intention. I touch the canvas through the code. This is a direct craft just like drawing and painting. When I used to paint, I loved the act of painting. When I make ceramics I love the interaction with the clay. I use AI to help automate printing and learn more about efficient coding, but thus far I've had no desire to invite it into my real practice. Making art has nothing to do with increasing productivity, it is about slowing down and becoming intimate with your process and medium. BTW, I don't see AI art as being more or less inferior. Its just a different medium. Luckily, every artist is free to find the mediums that resonate with them. Really interesting vid @atmoio - thanks for sharing this experience, you articulated it very creatively.

ART
0
0
0
11
Okkervil 🐦‍🔥
Okkervil 🐦‍🔥@Mememycom·
✅✅✅🔗🖼️🔁
Absurdeity@absurdeity

1/15 Dummies Guide to IPFS and Pinning Digital Art OK fam. The closure of @rodeodotclub and @niftygateway incentivized me to finally dig deep and understand WTF IPFS, pinning, CIDs, etc. are all about and you know what? It's pretty simple actually and quite elegant. TL;DR: So long as single unmodified/uncorrupted copy of the original art exists in the universe and is uploaded to an IPFS node, the NFT will be "healed" with the art visible for display on working NFT viewers (such as most marketplaces). Yeah! 🎉

ART
0
0
1
13
Okkervil 🐦‍🔥
Okkervil 🐦‍🔥@Mememycom·
@ryangtanaka Most PFPs collapsed because they were boring, undiversified series created under a single commercial patterns. Tezos has PFP series that have independent artistic style, but have fallen sharply in value. I think now is the time to take a closer look at them.
English
1
0
2
17
ryangtanaka | teia.cafe
ryangtanaka | teia.cafe@ryangtanaka·
It's not surprising - you can check these reports but most of them estimate a 60-90% loss in value from 25' to 26' alone, with 90%+ of PFP projects having collapsed completely. Given the reality of those numbers the event itself was likely quiet for good reason. I've heard that Tezos' NFTs were doing significantly better - largely due in part because they were less exposed to the hype train of 21' - which is maybe a nice way to say that we've always been broke over here anyway. 😂 So the focus of the next wave of builders seems to be around "utility" based NFTs, as many have been predicting for a while now. But this is a relatively recent thing and we've yet to see any examples where the tech has been able to prove itself useful in real-world situations. I haven't really heard any projects making it past the prototype stages, even within well-funded projects, so the pivot towards "usefulness" seems to be more difficult than most have anticipated so far. The reports do say that they've made some small steps towards regulatory clarity in recent years, however. For those folks looking at @TeiaCommunity's copyright licensing system - we've been long looking for a regulatory framework that will help to validate and legitimize our system but it's unfortunately not quite there, yet. But we've designed it in such a way where when the regulatory framework finally arrives we'll be ready to plug it in to make it compliant to bolster its credibility. We're a few steps ahead, waiting for the laws to catch up on our end. But the current version is still useful as a peer-to-peer record between collectors and artists, which may be useful for resolving disputes on a case-by-case basis so we're trying to see if there's any adventurous souls that might be willing to try this thing out independently for now.
ryangtanaka | teia.cafe tweet mediaryangtanaka | teia.cafe tweet mediaryangtanaka | teia.cafe tweet media
Andy@andyyy

Rumor mill saying this is the last ETHDenver ever. Not sure if confirmed yet, but heard across multiple people.

English
2
1
3
209
Okkervil 🐦‍🔥
Okkervil 🐦‍🔥@Mememycom·
🤔🔗🔎
DagieDee@DagieDee

There's something that happens to a digital object when it gets recorded on a decentralised blockchain. Something changes in what that thing is, not just in how it's stored. Before that moment, digital objects are essentially weightless copied infinitely, deleted without a trace, alive only as long as some server decides to keep them. They have no history that belongs to them. They float. But once something is inscribed on-chain, it suddenly has roots. It acquires a past that can't be undone, a trail of relations, who made it, when, what happened to it, woven permanently into a shared record. The object doesn't just exist anymore. It has existed, and that history is now part of what it is. This is perhaps most visible in digital art. For decades, digital artists made work that was ontologically homeless. A JPEG could be on a million screens simultaneously, saved by anyone, stripped of its context, detached from its maker. You could encounter a digital artwork with no way of knowing, no way even in principle, whether what you were looking at was the "original" or a copy. The distinction barely made sense. NFTs didn't solve this by making images uncopyable. The image remains as reproducible as ever. What changed is that a particular instance was anchored to a verifiable point of origin, a timestamp, a creator, a chain of ownership that travels with it permanently and that no one can quietly rewrite. The artwork acquired a biography. Walter Benjamin wrote that what makes an original artwork irreplaceable isn't its visual content but its aura, its rootedness in one place, one time, with a traceable history. Mechanical reproduction destroys that aura because copies carry none of it. Digital art, for most of its existence, had no aura at all. It was born already infinitely reproducible, already unrooted. Blockchain synthetically restores something aura-like to the digital. Not by making copies impossible, but by anchoring an instance to an unforgeable origin a history it carries wherever it goes. The philosopher Yuk Hui argues that what gives any object its reality isn't just its material substance but the web of relations it holds to time, to other objects, to the people and processes that produced it. Most digital objects have been ontologically thin. Blockchain makes them thicker. It gives them relational depth, a before-and-after, a place in a story that existed before you encountered them and will continue after. For digital artists, this isn't a minor technical footnote. It's a transformation in what their work is. A piece minted on-chain enters the world differently than a file shared on the internet. It has weight. It has a history. It is, for the first time, genuinely somewhere.

ART
0
0
0
24
Okkervil 🐦‍🔥
Okkervil 🐦‍🔥@Mememycom·
🤌🫶
Arthemort 🔜 ETHCC@Arthemort

Let me tell you the story of my encounter with a true philanthropists Because he never took credit for his kindness nor did he ever asked for anything in return. In October 2023 I organized a show (side event to Paris photo) at IHAM featuring Artem Humilevski, Bager Kaya, Ben Zank, Brandfuet, Brooke Didonato, Fatimah Hossaini, Foodmasku, Iness Rychlik, Lara Zankoul, Maria Pleshkova, Samantha Cavet, Synchrodogs and Cyber Yuyu. As always I don’t have any sponsor I fund everything on my own, the exhibition is popular but yeah I don’t manage to sell much despite having a great curatorial concept and artist participating. At the occasion of the first edition of Paris photos digital sector the idea of the show was to present a panorama of the next generation of upcoming digital native photographer, most hailing from emerging scene, Ukraine, Afghanistan, Venezuela, Turkey, Lebanon, Taiwan, and Russia. They spoke of exile, the absurdity of life, the beauty of the world, and the overturning of gender norms. Their creations are raw, Instagrammable, undefinable, poignant, triumphant, strange, queer, or humanist. Anyways it was a nice show, I take curation very seriously so there was a catalog, signed text for every artist, scénography, spotless screen display and much more. One collector I knew from online (but met for the first time at show) , which has always refused to be name and credited for his kindness, on the last day of the exibition offered to pay for the show. I was baffled and confuse did he meant to buy a work ? Maybe he want to sponsor the next show ? He can’t really sponsor this one all the communication is done we are shutting down the show tomorow.. No no no he said then asked me how much I spent on the show and that he will cover it. I was so touched I am used to see collector support artist but it was the first time and the last time I ever saw someone truly care about a curator. What could I do in exchange ? How could I make it right ?? Do you want me to credit you online for it ? Should I do this or that ? “You’re already making it right for the artists, I wanna support you and what you do. You’re young. You took a risk by presenting what you did the way you did and I want to reward that” (or smt around those lines) Even the artist I support by exhibiting and valorizing the works most often don’t ask me if I’m doing ok financially when the show is done. Excluding the time dedicated the show had costed me about 3000€ to organize , which he felt was not much for the quality output (I do a lot of things on my own) but yeah I was used to get in debt every time i did a shows so not having to worry about that felt nice. It might not be 350k but it was gesture of kindness and support that really gave me strength to keep on organizing top notch digital art show aimed to onboard the trad art collectors. He didn’t act as a sponsor or a patron but as a true philanthropists which is a rarer bread of collector than we think in our space.

ART
0
0
0
8
Okkervil 🐦‍🔥
Okkervil 🐦‍🔥@Mememycom·
🤌🏼💯💙
Ida Belle@IdaHerself

GM @tezos means history, credibility, and respect. For me, that gives long-term confidence as a collector. Base is full of fun apps, playful tools, and low-cost NFTs that spark joy. I love Rodeo and continue collecting there. But Base is a layer two, not a layer one, and that matters. It is not the place for historically significant art, which is why I hesitate to collect truly important works there. DeGods leaving Solana is a good reminder. That move cost them their place as the chain’s defining collectible. My advice to @fx_hash_ : keep supporting Tezos. Go multichain if it helps financially, but Base or any layer two is not where collectors like me want to see the most meaningful generative art. My advice to @TezosFoundation: invest in people who are building real value on the chain. Not Manchester United. Not random celebrities with zero loyalty. Example: I would give all that money to @ciphrd to help build something like Warpcast on Tezos, a social network with good values, a minimal UI like Rodeo, and real purpose.

ART
1
0
1
56