
1337Bart
741 posts

1337Bart
@1337_bart
Crypto Class of 2021 | NFTs | Blockchain Biz-dev | Data Science. Self-learning to become a quant










We would not do that, because it violates the constitution. Also, I cannot overstate how much the DoW has been extremely aligned on this point. However, maybe this is the question you are really asking: what would we do if there were a constitutional amendment that made it legal? Maybe I would quit my job. I very deeply believe in the democratic process, and that our elected leaders have the power, and that we all have to uphold the constitution. I am terrified of a world where AI companies act like they have more power than the government. I would also be terrified of a world where our government decided mass domestic surveillance was ok. I don't know how I'd come to work every day if that were the state of the country/Constitution.









Went ahead and added both strategies into a singular forecast. Will now work on diversifying with the top 20 crypto assets. I basically did equal weight, then moved on to inverse volatility weighting. Super happy with the results.






There are libraries full of laws governing a very wide variety legible content online, and extremely few, if any, lawyers in the crypto space who have strong experience in them and are also strongly familiar with the unique nature of most blockchains (e.g. the often extreme functional disruption that comes from deleting data once it is on a blockchain). Here is just the tip of the the tip of the iceberg -- a small fraction of relevant U.S. federal law -- not even considering the 50 State laws, the 100s of foreign country and provincial laws, etc. “Whoever, … having unauthorized possession of, access to, or control over … any document, writing … or information relating to the national defense … willfully communicates, delivers, transmits … or attempts to communicate, deliver, transmit … the same to any person not entitled to receive it … shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both.” — 18 U.S.C. § 793(e) “Whoever … communicates, delivers, or transmits … to any foreign government … any … information relating to the national defense … shall be punished by death or by imprisonment for any term of years or for life …” — 18 U.S.C. § 794(a) “Any person who commits an offense under section 506(a)(1)(A) … shall be imprisoned not more than 5 years … or fined … or both … if the offense … consists of … distribution, including by electronic means, … during any 180-day period, of at least 10 copies … of 1 or more copyrighted works, which have a total retail value of more than $2,500” … “shall be imprisoned not more than 10 years … if … a second or subsequent offense.” — 18 U.S.C. § 2319(b) 18 U.S.C. § 1462 — Importation or transportation of obscene matters: “Whoever … knowingly uses … any … interactive computer service (as defined in section 230(e)(2) …), for carriage in interstate or foreign commerce — … any obscene, lewd, lascivious, or filthy … matter … Shall be fined … or imprisoned not more than five years, or both …” 18 U.S.C. § 1465 — Production and transportation of obscene matters for sale or distribution: “Whoever knowingly … uses … a facility or means of … an interactive computer service … in or affecting such commerce, for the purpose of sale or distribution of any obscene, lewd, lascivious, or filthy … matter … shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than five years, or both.” 18 U.S.C. § 1466 — Engaging in the business of selling or transferring obscene matter: “Whoever is engaged in the business of producing with intent to distribute or sell, or selling or transferring obscene matter, who knowingly receives or possesses … any obscene … recording … which has been shipped or transported in interstate or foreign commerce, shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than 5 years …” There are libraries full of this kind of thing, covering an extremely wide variety of kinds of legible content.













