Alex

Christian Zionist Pastor John Hagee tells the Zionist Organization of America that they need to target elementary school children in the fight against anti-Semitism. He says that his group, Christians United for Israel, is already going after them.

“The only way we are going to stop the islamification of Texas and America is not just by banning sharia law, not just by banning the call to prayer, not just by banning halal slaughter, which are all things I have called for, but more importantly, we have to send them all home.”

HEARTBREAKING 💔 Netanyahu has posted a video at a cafe holding up his hands to show 5 fingers. Dammit.

Israeli PM Benjamin Netanyahu: ‘We will make it to the return of the Messiah’

Some people are saying Iran should cave or at least tread carefully before the US, but especially Israel gets desperate and uses nuclear weapons. They say this as if a nuke is some kind of holistic magic bullet. But here’s the thing, contrary to popular belief, modern military-industrial nations, which Iran is firmly one, are designed with “survival deltas” for exactly this kind of situation. (Think of Russsia’s “Dead Hand”.) From the start, it needs to be clear that any use of a nuke by the US-Israel Axis of Death would not be about destroying Iran’s nuclear facilities, which as we all know, were “completely obliterated” last year. It would instead be aimed at decapitating Iran’s warmaking capabilities, which in simple terms refers to its military facilities dispersed across the country. The problem here is that the attacker would need what military people call an “area-denial strategy” and to meaningfully degrade dispersed missile farms and military logistics spread across a country the size of Iran, you’re not talking about one or two tactical nuclear weapons. Instead you’re looking at a campaign that would require multiple detonations across a wide geographic area and yields large enough to render vast areas of land operationally unusable. (But even if the targets are indeed underground facilities, Iran has sites like Oghab 44 and the Fordow enrichment plant which are buried so deeply that even high-yield tactical nuclear weapons are not guaranteed to destroy the assets within.) This current war is showing in real time how Iran is deploying a missile farm model where it disperses launch capabilities across thousands of unmarked square kilometers, meaning a strike on Tehran or Natanz would not necessarily turn off the country’s ability to fire back. And fire back they would. So whichever facilities are hit, there are thousands more launchers waiting to continue sending out missiles and drones. Yes, Israel could cynically nuke Tehran but then there would be no Israel after that, military, diplomatically or politically. Then there are those who swear that a nuclear blast’s Electromagnetic Pulse would permanently fry every circuit in Iran. Yes, the initial E1 pulse would destroy small electronics like phones, computers, while the E3 pulse targets long-line infrastructure like power grids. However, Iran has invested heavily in its National Information Network, designed to operate in digital isolation. So, while the civilian internet would collapse, the state’s internal communication would reboot using hardened, older-generation technology or localized mesh networks. In fact, Iran’s military specifically operates on legacy analog and semi-analog systems precisely because they’re EMP-resistant. This is is core part of their doctrine. Much of their command-and-control infrastructure deliberately avoids digital dependencies for this reason. So, in essence, the very thing that makes Iran’s missile farms hard to destroy with conventional weapons also makes them hard to destroy with tactical nukes without the kind of mass civilian casualties that would be impossible to frame as proportionate. Furthermore, Iran has specifically warned it would target Israel’s Dimona nuclear facility in the Negev desert, which would create radiological fallout within Israel’s own borders. Interestingly, Israel’s Dimona nuclear facility is lightly shielded by modern standards, and a successful hit wouldn’t necessarily produce a nuclear explosion, but it would produce highly radiological dispersal. The irony is that Israel’s nuclear ambiguity policy has meant Dimona was never built to the hardening standards of a declared military facility. This is a significant vulnerability which Iran would expose without hesitation. This brings us to the environmental impact of a nuclear blast: Radioactive fallout doesn’t see borders. So, while Israel and Iran are about 1000 km apart, prevailing wind patterns would easily carry radioactive particles across borders, and depending on the yield and altitude of the detonation, toxic dust could contaminate water sources and agriculture across the region. As we speak, strikes on Iranian oil infrastructure have already caused “toxic rain” warnings. A nuclear event worsens this exponentially, leading to long-term soil degradation and groundwater poisoning that does not respect national boundaries. So, while the goal would be regime change in Tehran, the resulting catastrophe would solidify anti-Israel sentiment worldwide, making integration in the region and the world at large impossible. Israel would become a defacto terrorist group. The reality is that Iran’s warmaking capability is so dispersed that no realistic nuclear strike package can destroy it cleanly. Yes a nuke would cause enormous humanitarian catastrophe but still leaving Iran with strike capability. This is the worst of both worlds. Israel would have paid the full political and environmental price without achieving the military objective. The uncomfortable reality for the Zionists is that Iran has essentially achieved functional deterrence without possessing a nuclear weapon. That’s the real strategic achievement, and it’s why the “just nuke them” argument reflects a misunderstanding of what deterrence actually requires. Deterrence is about making the cost of attack exceed any plausible benefit, and Iran has painstakingly done that without nuclear weapons. So, the idea that Iran should simply capitulate to threat of US-Israeli nukes ignores the fact that their entire security doctrine has been built around making such capitulation unnecessary.