Alwin Look

@catmrow0 @MaxNordau So many missiles were destroyed by their buildings, yes? Their nuclear facilities also successfully destroyed several bunker buster bombs, right? Their radar has 100% detection rate because they blow up, providing confirmation that an American plane is in the area, yes?

@MaxNordau And our missiles are no match for their buildings 😪

The Iranian regime is defeating the U.S. by dying at a significantly higher rate.

@pbeisel @ton_aarts @mrdanielbar Uhm, how do the RT numbers work, exactly? Tesla has 5.6 fatalities per 1B miles, and national average 2.8 per 1B? It implies there must be brands with less than 2.8 fatalities per 1B?

The RT article gets the study's numbers right but the headline ("highest fatal accident rate of all auto brands") is misleading clickbait without the full context. Real safety is about crash avoidance + survivability, where Teslas still excel per government crash tests and their own data. Fatal crashes are rare events, so small-sample quirks and bad denominators can distort rankings. If you're evaluating actual risk, look at IIHS/NHTSA ratings or Tesla's reported crash stats, not this one study. IIHS Ratings (independent crash tests + avoidance): 2025 Model Y = Top Safety Pick+ (highest award, 5th year running). 2025 Model 3 = Top Safety Pick. 2025–26 Cybertruck (built after April 2025) = Top Safety Pick+. Excellent structural protection and driver-assist performance. NHTSA 5-Star Ratings (government frontal, side, rollover tests): All current Teslas (Model 3, Y, S, X, Cybertruck) earn the maximum 5-star overall rating, the best possible score for occupant protection. Tesla Vehicle Safety Report (real-world fleet data, Q3 2025 latest): • With Autopilot engaged: 1 crash every 6.36 million miles. • Without Autopilot: 1 crash every ~993,000 miles. • U.S. national average: 1 crash every ~702,000 miles. (New FSD Supervised data on tesla.com/fsd/safety shows even stronger city-street results.) Try again. Fool someone who doesn't know.

107 pedestrians and cyclists now killed by a Tesla. And 14 years of promising "next year" "For sure" .. kron4.com/news/bay-area/…

@csharpgen @wholemars I don't think they've idled any of their lines, right? If the production capacities of all their factories are currently full, then keeping them on the most profitable products makes sense. To add a new segment would require them to build a new factory if current lines are full.

@AlwinLook @wholemars There is if you want growth, Tesla car sales stopped growing over two years ago, because they have already saturated the market at the current price point, further sales growth requires making cars at a cheaper price point.

Tesla: We are making an affordable EV Industry: We are going to do that too!!! *Ten years later* Industry: Never mind!!! We are shutting those lines down Tesla: We are making an affordable autonomous vehicles Industry: We are going to do that too!!!

@SysopRon @DirtyTesLa I expect FSD to be blamed anyway. "FSD was unable to stop the pickup truck from swerving into oncoming traffic! Boo hoo"

@DirtyTesLa Exactly. And at least this guy had bad weather to blame. Most of the idiot reckless drivers in L.A. got no excuse -- other than impatience, hubris and idiocy. And they are the biggest threat to autonomous vehicles once we overcome the regulatory hurdles.

Perfect example of why you will never have zero accidents on FSD. Good driving speed, nobody close in front. But another person's failure caused the accident.

@massrepublican @ItsBread1111 @wholemars Since the company isn't 2 decades old yet, the comparison can't be made until that day comes. As long as the car lasts longer than the duration a person wants to hold the same car, those people will be satisfied.

@ItsBread1111 @wholemars I think all cars have their own use cases. I’m just saying no Tesla is even 2 decades old yet. We just have yet to see how it will play out that’s all

@csharpgen @wholemars As long as the more expensive models are still being sold so profitably, there won't be any motivation for entering the affordable segment.

@wholemars That's the issue, Tesla isn't making affordable models, China is BYD, GWM, MG etc, but Tesla no, the GWM Ora is half the price of a Tesla here in New Zealand. Tesla gave up on affordable vehicles when Elon cancelled the Model 2 project.

@joe52536582 @SandyofCthulhu @The_PunKing Kill every snail near you. One of them will be unkillable. Snail found. Prep the jar.

@SandyofCthulhu @The_PunKing I assumed they we don’t know the snails location at the start, nor does anyone else.

Can i not not put the snail in a jar with a screw-on lid? You can tell these guys posting these questions have never had to wrangle the exact meaning of a wish or a curse from a gamemaster in D&D. So poorly worded. *sigh*

@virtuouspagan7 @niccruzpatane I don't think doing the processing overnight in a controlled fashion is going to burn out the chip set.

@AlwinLook @niccruzpatane Everything has its cost. I don't want my car to have a 2nd job at the expense of performing its main gig properly.

Elon Musk is playing 4D chess. Millions of Tesla vehicles with AI4 computer chips will be able to run Tesla’s/xAI’s Digital Optimus (Macrohard), effectively becoming your own AI agent when parked. You might also be able to earn income from your Tesla by opting in to let Tesla use your car’s AI computer for distributed inference workloads. Tesla/xAI would pay you for the compute. Elon mentioned each car would have ~1 kilowatt of high-performance AI inference capability. 100M cars is 100GW of distributed compute. Tesla could turn their entire fleet into a giant distributed inference network, spread across the world, powered by the batteries and AI chips in the car already. Feels like everything is starting to fall into place.

@dr__dwayne @Muskstaycalm Dude, it's an option, not a forced action. Read through my comments: I never said anyone MUST do it. Neither did I insist I want it. But that the option will be possible for those who do. Anyone can do both: watch media or silent contemplation. Depends on the mood that day.

@AlwinLook @Muskstaycalm If you can't be in your own company for 10 mins without needing a video to entertain you, you may have bigger issues that need investigation.

Would you rather watch a movie in a Tesla Cybercab or watch 10% of one in a Lucid Lunar? 🤦

@scottiev @greggertruck Just another secondary cloud to add to the list. Plus efficiencies due to the hardware already being tailor-made for inference.

@greggertruck Yeah. But it’s also just BS. There’s nothing competitive here with any cloud provider.

Hate to say it, but…. This sounds like sustainable abundance. Idk. Maybe there’s a plan after all 🙈 “We(XAi) can pay for idle compute time(from Tesla owners) which works cause they would basically get their lease paid, and we would get immediate compute access from the vehicle sitting doing nothing” “It has heating/ cooling and power. It’s already there. We can just make use of the existing resource. There’s millions of HW4 computer capable vehicles here in North America today” Kinda insane. Maybe @elonmusk is serious?

@trsman76 @greggertruck The data package sent should be small. The compute is what's needed. See how Grok replies your query with a wall of text? Said wall costs miniscule bandwidth to transmit. It's the intelligence processing that's important. It shouldn't add too much to data usage

@greggertruck Wait till the ISPs catch on. I have 2 Teslas connected to my house and they are big users of data already.

@TheBeardBro @dezmondOliver @nikitabier The original creator does. X gets revenue regardless. So it's not a conflict for them to fix this.

@dezmondOliver @nikitabier 2.6M views on stolen content. The original creator gets nothing. The thief gets the followers. X gets the ad revenue. Nobody in that equation wants the feature Dezmond is describing.

Hey @nikitabier here is a suggestion to improve accountability: - Add a tab here that says “Stolen Content” where you need to prove the account the content was stolen from and maybe even a link to the original. When it is verified, send all engagement, impressions, everything to the original account and then ban the thief for 90 days. This account below stole the video from @whatsinside

@dr__dwayne @Muskstaycalm YouTube then. Great for a 10 min video

@AlwinLook @Muskstaycalm Spotify I can understand, Netflix not so much. The median uber ride is 2.2 mi or 15 mins.

@dhaveedsc3 @HumansNoContext The energy is always naturally on. No one has to ask. If you're born an Asian uncle, what else can you be? It's not like in the west where you can identify yourself as a hedgehog and enter the platypus' toilet

@HumansNoContext Asian uncle energy on 1000% even when nobody asked 😂

Asian at grocery

@Teslaverse_4269 @ZacksJerryRig @ICannot_Enough It is not convenient to mention Tesla's growth when one wants to hate the company and criticise it as a failure

@ZacksJerryRig @ICannot_Enough yeah so what about their energy business? they went from 6,5 GWh to 46,5 GWh. No metion of that?

Happy 4-year anniversary to this $TSLAQ short seller’s prediction! 🤣

@StrokeDistance @Muskstaycalm Old people going to the doctor is a thing. Already many times I've ordered a ride hail for my mom because I wasn't free that moment to send her myself. Regardless, Tesla is not trying to win on grannies that Uber missed. When it charges less for normal rides, it gets the market.

@AlwinLook @Muskstaycalm Tesla somehow believes that Robotaxi will somehow be more popular than Uber and Lyft. Why? They think kids going to school, old people to doctors will suddenly become a thing. Uber+ Waymo have partnered. They will service the market. Tesla doesn’t understand markets.

@dr__dwayne @Muskstaycalm People are already listening to Spotify in the Austin Texas robotaxis with the safety drivers in them. When you book the taxi with the app, it already knows who you are and what media your account has. It's not a stretch to imagine Netflix on a Cybercab screen

@AlwinLook @Muskstaycalm Lol You'd do that? Really?

@StrokeDistance @Muskstaycalm Uber+Waymo will be the only success because Uber doesn’t take kids to school and it doesn’t take blind people to the doctor???

@Muskstaycalm Nobody is watching a movie. They’re not doing that it an uber today. It’s the same market. And no bigger. Uber doesn’t take kids to school. It doesn’t take blind people to the doctor. The size of this failure will be legendary. Uber+Waymo will be the only success.

@dr__dwayne @Muskstaycalm It links to your Tesla account. You can just continue a few more minutes of whatever Netflix movie you partially watched at home or in your car.

@Muskstaycalm The average taxi or uber ride is 15-20 minutes. You won't be watching a movie anyway.

@MustaphaMugisa @cb_doge x.com/i/status/20324…

Do you have an issue with ChatGPT? A knife can prepare food or take a life. A car can take a child to school or run someone over. A phone can call your mother or organise a crime. Yet no one sues knives, bans cars, or arrests smartphones. Blaming a tool for a human crime borders on intellectual laziness, so to speak! You may argue that because AI is “intelligent,” it should warn authorities or stop someone planning violence. That misunderstands what AI is. AI is not a police officer, not a judge, and not a system that knows who a user really is. It cannot see the real world, verify identities, or contact law enforcement. It is simply a tool that responds to prompts. Every day, millions use AI to learn, build businesses, write code, and advance research. The same tool helping a student understand physics or a farmer write a business plan cannot suddenly become responsible for a crime because one individual misused it. If someone used an iPhone to plan a robbery, we would not accuse the iPhone or its maker or the telecom networks of conspiracy. Violence begins in the human mind long before any tool appears. Tools only amplify human intent. Tools do not kill. People do. And blaming tools instead of holding people accountable only distracts us from the real problem. I know you may have issues with ChatGPT, but try to use better arguments.

BREAKING: CHATGPT HELPED THE SHOOTER KILL 8 KIDS! A teen in Canada used ChatGPT like her secret murder buddy for months.She told the AI all her evil plans to attack the school. OpenAI knew what she was doing the whole time. OpenAI has said it considered but didn’t alert police about the activities of the person who months later committed one of Canada’s worst school shootings. Now the parents of one hurt kid are suing OpenAI. They say ChatGPT was the shooter’s “trusted partner in crime”! The AI didn’t stop the killer… it actually HELPED her do it! This has to stop. Don’t let your loved ones use ChatGPT.