
Shishir gupta
968 posts


@MatthewBerman Okay, give it a shot
Let's see how legit is that.
English

@mishadavinci @grok tell misha
How many decentralised efforts have collapsed in fight with centralized benefits
English

@JesseBWatters And more will be dumped with no consequences 😔😔😔
English

@CheburekiMan @grok if they are the chosen people, then why are they worried?
They already are superior
Why the entitlement of materialistic desires???
English

This is a genuine official PIB release from April 1, 2022 (PRID=1812350), quoting then-Law Minister Kiren Rijiju's written Lok Sabha reply.
It accurately describes India's "in-house mechanism" for higher judiciary accountability (adopted by SC in 1997): CJI/High Court CJs handle complaints internally to preserve independence. 1,631 CPGRAMS grievances (incl. corruption) from 2017-2021 were forwarded per this process—no outcomes detailed.
Public record, widely reported (The Hindu, TOI). Posting official govt info like this carries no arrest risk.
English

Rishi Kumar (TNNLU final-year law student) published a Substack post Mar 14 titled "The Supreme Court of India has no Spine." It critiqued SC's Feb 26 order banning an entire Class 8 NCERT Social Science textbook (and blacklisting 3 authors) over a section on "Corruption in the Judiciary" in a chapter about judiciary's role—calling it contemptuous, ordering seizure of copies & contempt notices to NCERT.
TNNLU got complaints from lawyers/judges; sent advisory email to remove post citing reputation/pressure. Kumar refused, calling it personal opinion & free speech. Registrar later clarified: advisory only, no action, student resumed classes.
Graphic by Varun Garg; story verified by The Hindu, National Herald, LiveLaw. Accurate facts; centers on free speech vs judicial contempt debate.
English

US DOJ indicted Adani for $250M bribe to Indian govt officials.
Charges still live. Man still free. Business still booming.
Modi then quietly gave Meta & Google a 21-year tax exemption; only if they use Indian data centers.
Guess who’s suddenly India’s data center king? The same Adani. 🎯
Your Aadhaar. Your UPI. Your health records. Your location.
All sitting in servers owned by a man a foreign court found worth indicting.
But sure, call it “Digital India.” 🇮🇳
Bloomberg@business
Indian billionaire Gautam Adani is in talks with American technology giants including Meta and Google for partnerships in his fast-expanding data center business, according to people familiar with the matter. bloomberg.com/news/articles/…
English

Announcing companies.sh - the open standard for Agent Companies
Import and run entire companies with a single command
Just run `npx companies.sh add <repo/company>`
More 👇
English

@beinlibertarian @grok do you have the capability to check the credibility of the origin of this video
English

@alexwg But roughly half of that $7 trillion must come from debt markets, infrastructure funds, pension capital, and sovereign wealth, and those institutions do not write checks they cannot hedge. The risks are real and large 👏👏👏
English

Trump just gave 13 tech billionaires the keys to America's AI policy.
But there's a HUGE conflict of interest...
The White House just announced the President's Council of Advisors on Science and Technology.
Sounds boring. But wait until you understand what this is actually about.
Here's who's on it:
- Jensen Huang. CEO of Nvidia. His company sells the chips that EVERY AI company on Earth needs to survive. Nvidia is worth $4.4 trillion. And Jensen now gets to advise the president on the rules for the industry his company monopolizes.
- Mark Zuckerberg. CEO of Meta. Currently planning to fire 20% of his workforce (15,000 people) while spending $135 billion on AI this year. His company just took a Pentagon contract. Now he's advising on AI workforce policy. The same guy firing 15,000 workers will help decide what happens to American workers displaced by AI.
- Larry Ellison. Executive Chairman of Oracle. His company is $125 billion in debt. Bleeding cash. Betting everything on AI data centers funded by borrowed money from foreign banks. US lenders already turned him down. And he's now advising on AI infrastructure policy. The guy who can't get American banks to lend him money is going to shape how America builds its AI future.
- Marc Andreessen. The venture capitalist who literally wrote the manifesto called "The Techno-Optimist Manifesto" arguing that AI regulation is dangerous. His firm Andreessen Horowitz has billions invested in AI startups. He's now advising on AI regulation.
- Sergey Brin. Google co-founder. His company is spending $75 billion on AI this year and just issued $20 billion in debt including a 100-YEAR bond to fund it.
- Lisa Su. CEO of AMD. Nvidia's direct competitor. Both CEOs are on the same council. Both will advise on chip policy. Both have financial interests that directly conflict with each other AND with the public interest.
- Michael Dell. The guy who just dropped $6.25 billion on Trump's child investment accounts and gained $6 billion in market value the same week.
- Safra Catz. Oracle's CEO. Same company. Same debt crisis. Two Oracle execs on a 13 person council.
- Fred Ehrsam. Co-founder of Coinbase. The crypto exchange. On a council co-chaired by David Sacks, Trump's AI AND crypto czar. Crypto and AI policy being shaped by the same people who profit from both.
- Jacob DeWitte. CEO of Oklo, the nuclear startup Sam Altman chaired until last year. Oklo builds reactors to power AI data centers. Now advising on the energy policy his company depends on.
- Bob Mumgaard. CEO of Commonwealth Fusion Systems. Backed by Nvidia and Google. Building fusion reactors for AI data centers. His investors are sitting next to him on this council.
- David Friedberg. Venture capitalist. Part of the Sacks network.
- John Martinis. Google's former quantum computing lead. Built the chip that achieved quantum supremacy.
That's 13 people.
Combined market cap of the companies represented: Over $12 trillion.
Combined AI spending commitments for 2026 alone: Roughly $700 billion.
Zero consumer advocates. Zero labor representatives. Zero independent scientists. Zero ethicists.
The people spending $700 billion on AI are now advising the government on how to regulate AI.
The people firing hundreds of thousands of workers are now advising on workforce policy.
The people $125 billion in debt from AI bets are now advising on AI infrastructure spending.
This isn't a "council."
Every regulation this council recommends will directly affect their stock prices, their market positions, and their competitive advantages.
Jensen Huang advising on chip export policy affects Nvidia's revenue.
Zuckerberg advising on AI safety regulation affects Meta's product roadmap.
Ellison advising on cloud infrastructure policy affects Oracle's survival.
Andreessen advising on AI startup regulation affects his portfolio returns.
In any other industry, this would be called regulatory capture.
In tech, they call it the "Golden Age of Innovation."
11 more seats are open. The first meeting hasn't been announced yet.
But the rules of AI in America are about to be written by the people who profit the most from keeping them loose.
What do you think about this?
English

No, game theory doesn't point to WW3 here. This is a limited US-Israel air/naval campaign against Iranian targets (nuclear, missiles, regime assets) since late Feb, with Iranian retaliatory strikes in the region.
US is adding troops to the Middle East (82nd Airborne, Marines) for support/possible Strait ops, but no boots on Iranian soil—and Rep. Mace just reinforced opposition after the briefing, citing costs to avoid that.
Rational actors avoid all-out global war; talks for ceasefire continue amid the strikes. Escalation stays contained so far.
English












