D. C. Matthew

3.1K posts

D. C. Matthew banner
D. C. Matthew

D. C. Matthew

@DCMatthew1

Philosopher. Basketball fan. Dealing with a long-term (apparently) illness.

เข้าร่วม Mart 2018
365 กำลังติดตาม257 ผู้ติดตาม
ทวีตที่ปักหมุด
D. C. Matthew
D. C. Matthew@DCMatthew1·
I very much feel that colorism is not taken as seriously as it should be. What black people need to understand is, if we lose the fight against colorism, we lose, period.
English
4
1
17
0
D. C. Matthew รีทวีตแล้ว
Ramy Abdu| رامي عبده
Israel has wiped the Lebanese village of Naqoura off the map.
English
12
352
469
19.8K
D. C. Matthew
D. C. Matthew@DCMatthew1·
@tparsi Keep in mind that, overall, we don't know who killed who. Because there are videos of 'protesters' killing civilians and security personnel. Not to mention that killing someone who is setting fires to businesses or shooting/stabbing people hardly seems like a 'brutal' response.
English
0
0
0
17
D. C. Matthew
D. C. Matthew@DCMatthew1·
@tparsi Continually amazed that Zionist-American lies about 30-40,000 people being killed in January has become conventional wisdom, reported as facts by respectable media - even ones that had previously reported 7,000 - even though the evidence only suggests 3-4,000, and at most 7,000.
English
1
0
6
259
Trita Parsi
Trita Parsi@tparsi·
Wow! Trump tells Fox News that the US "sent a lot of guns to the Iranian protesters, we sent guns through the Kurds, I think the Kurds kept them." Trump reportedly said the weapons were sent after the Iranian gov started killing protesters in large numbers. Not sure that makes a lot of sense since the Internet was completely shut down at the time, and the US had very limited insight into what was happening. I suspect he misspoke: The weapons were sent through Kurdish groups BEFORE the January 8-9 clampdown. Either way, this admission by Trump rewrites the history of these dark days. My suspicion is that the US and Israel had armed specific groups that infiltrated Iran but could not operate until large protests had erupted. When that happened - both organically and with the encouragement of Reza Pahlavi - these groups were activated and began using systematic violence against the state apparatus as well as civilian targets (banks, mosques etc). The vast majority of Iranian protesters had nothing to do with or even awareness of this US/Israeli armed group. They were protesting peacefully. But the Iranian government appears to have made little distinction between the two and killed armed and peaceful protesters alike on a large scale - probably around 7,000.
English
64
385
1.2K
43.4K
D. C. Matthew
D. C. Matthew@DCMatthew1·
@AryJeay Ok. But even if that number is much exaggerated, it's not true to say that Iran had no losses.
English
7
0
9
2K
Arya Yadeghaar
Arya Yadeghaar@AryJeay·
A pyrrhic victory for the US. But no loss for Iran, just a loss in opportunity. Iran shot down a F-15 and had the opportunity to capture the pilots alive, but finding a needle in a haystack is not an easy job. Especially when the US keeps bombing those who got close to the pilot. Nevertheless, despite the heavy losses of the US: • One destroyed A-10, one damaged A-10 • Several damaged Black Hawks • Damaged F-16 • 2 destroyed C-130 aircrafts • one or more MH-6 chopper destroyed • Destroyed F-15 • Shot down MQ-9 drone They still managed to extract their pilot, which in itself is an achievement, but faced many losses as a result. In theory, Iran lost nothing here, but only achieved hits and kills. The only loss was a loss of opportunity. Though make no mistake, the war is still not finished and we may see more interesting turn of events.
Arya Yadeghaar tweet media
Arya Yadeghaar@AryJeay

NEW: Aftermath images of reportedly 2 American Black Hawk helicopters and/or C-130 aircraft destroyed by Iran

English
128
477
2.5K
95.8K
D. C. Matthew
D. C. Matthew@DCMatthew1·
@joekent16jan19 Actually, Khamenei's fatwa against nuclear weapons was quietly issued in the mid-1990s. Apparently, the Iranian military was engaged in activities that could be used for nukes. When Khamenei found out in 2003, he disclosed the existence of the fatwa and put an end to them.
English
0
0
0
9
Joe Kent
Joe Kent@joekent16jan19·
Israel moved the red line & forced the war. POTUS’s original red line was no nuclear weapon for Iran. The Supreme Leader agreed & held a prohibition on a nuclear weapon since 2004. The disagreement & debate was on enrichment levels & monitoring. The Israelis convinced POTUS that zero enrichment was the red line, the Iranians disagreed, we took out their enrichment capability w/ Op Midnight Hammer, making enrichment a dead issue. Iran was back at the negotiating table afterwards, this was a major threat to Israel’s goal of regime change, so they forced our hand & attacked Iran, knowing Iran would then attack us, plunging us into the war.
Will Chamberlain@willchamberlain

@joekent16jan19 Bullshit, Joe. Steve Witkoff - the lead American negotiator - made clear the Iranians were intransigent and unwilling to make concessions. Are you calling him a liar?

English
1.4K
4.6K
23.8K
991K
D. C. Matthew รีทวีตแล้ว
Mehdi Hasan
Mehdi Hasan@mehdirhasan·
Where are the big antiwar marches and protests this time round? Both in America and globally?
English
993
1.6K
12K
529.4K
D. C. Matthew
D. C. Matthew@DCMatthew1·
@JamesSurowiecki Astonishing that, even now, you don't see that Iran has other aims beyond mere survival, and so has no interest in ending the war right now. This is flat out embarrassing.
English
0
0
0
23
James Surowiecki
James Surowiecki@JamesSurowiecki·
Isn't the obvious deal that we agree to stop bombing, Iran agrees to open the Strait and stop tolling, and we call it even and everyone goes home?
James Surowiecki tweet media
English
689
61
608
111.1K
D. C. Matthew
D. C. Matthew@DCMatthew1·
@Ahmed_hassan_za No, please stop. His firing doesn't appear to have anything to do with the war. It's about George's objection to Hegseth's attempt to make the upper echelons of the US military white and male.
English
0
0
0
233
Ahmed Hassan 🇾🇪 أحمد حسن زيد
Some say that Army Chief of Staff Gen. Randy George's resignation was due to a failure in the war. This is a predictable reason, as anyone who fails should be dismissed. However, Randy George was responsible for ground forces—training, equipping, and planning ground operations—and ground forces hadn't yet participated in this battle. Therefore, the reason is clear: this clown Pete Hegseth who has very little military experience and was a Fox News anchor, was upset by Randy George's refusal—despite his extensive military experience—to send ground troops to Iran. Of course, Randy George refused not because he disobeys orders, but because he has vast experience and knows that a ground invasion of Iran is a doomed plan that will cause significant losses for America. But this clown and Trump are arrogant and foolish, and they want to carry out any ground operation in Iran to preserve their pride.
Ahmed Hassan 🇾🇪 أحمد حسن زيد tweet mediaAhmed Hassan 🇾🇪 أحمد حسن زيد tweet media
English
27
334
1.4K
39.2K
D. C. Matthew
D. C. Matthew@DCMatthew1·
@policytensor This may be hard to believe, but Iran held back its best AD systems, lest they be destroyed. @pati_marins64 said it weeks ago. I was admittedly skeptical. But then there were all these close calls, and now actual shoot-downs. Moreover, Iran released a video of AD systems in a MC.
English
0
0
2
337
Policy Tensor
Policy Tensor@policytensor·
My money is on fresh deliveries of HQ-9B systems. “Iran is using HQ-9B, the best long-range surface-to-air missile China has to offer. It has both active radar homing and a passive infrared seeker. This makes it harder for aircraft to spoof the missile with standard electronic countermeasures and improves its ability to track stealth.”
Shaiel Ben-Ephraim@academic_la

Just had a long talk with a former IAF commander on why Iran is managing to shoot down these US planes. He told me that since the 12 day war Iran has rethought its entire system after seeing how easily it was bombed. The new system is far better and more resilient and Israeli pilots have noticed how difficult it is to operate there now: 1) Each of Iran's 31 zones now has the authority to operate independently if central command is cut off, allowing local commanders to launch missiles and engage aircraft without waiting for orders from Tehran. That was a major problem for them in the past. 2) Recognizing that fixed sites are easily destroyed, Iran moved many of its restored air defenses into missile cities, deeply buried underground tunnels and rugged coastal terrain that serve as cover for mobile launchers. These targets are now hardened. 3) Since traditional radar gives away a system's location, Iran has leaned into passive infrared (heat-seeking) sensors and new software algorithms that can track jets without emitting detectable signals. 4) Iran has increased reliance on mobile, medium-range surface-to-air SAM systems. Its mobility allows shoot-and-scoot tactics that make it difficult to target with pre-planned airstrikes. 5) Iran has moved away from Russian missiles to its own Bavar-373 which appears to be superior to the S-300 and possibly to the S-400 too. Recent upgrades include increased autonomy for launchers, allowing them to operate even if centralized command centers are destroyed. 6) They use new Majid system, which relies on passive infrared detection rather than radar. Because it doesn't emit radar signals, it is significantly harder for aircraft to detect before a missile is launched. 7) Most important, he confirmed to me that Iran is using HQ-9B, the best long-range surface-to-air missile China has to offer. It has both active radar homing and a passive infrared seeker. This makes it harder for aircraft to spoof the missile with standard electronic countermeasures and improves its ability to track stealth. It seems to be exceeding expectations. He told me, "the days when flying over Iran was a walk in the park are over." In sum, new tactics and a switch from Russian technology to Iranian and Chinese technology have turned Iranian airspace into a contested space. Air superiority there is gone. The IAF and USAF will have to adapt accordingly or lose more aircraft.

English
28
55
392
32.8K
D. C. Matthew
D. C. Matthew@DCMatthew1·
Even some anti-war critics don't get this. Iran's so-called sponsorship of terrorism, is nothing more than its aiding of the victims of Israeli occupation and dispossession. When all is said and done, the judgement of history will condemn, not Iran, but Israel and its supporters.
Rania Khalek@RaniaKhalek

Wild that the victims, Palestinians and Lebanese, who defend themselves from this genocidal barbarism with weapons are considered terrorists. And those who give them those weapons, the Iranians, are accused of arming evil fanatical proxies. Question every western orthodoxy about the Middle East, it’s all upside down.

English
0
0
0
54
D. C. Matthew รีทวีตแล้ว
Hend Amry
Hend Amry@LibyaLiberty·
Jewish troops will be looking for Muslims hidden in the attics of Christians. Let that sink in.
English
1.1K
47.4K
157.6K
5.1M
D. C. Matthew
D. C. Matthew@DCMatthew1·
@Jonathan_K_Cook I think highly of Parsi, but he's wrong when he says that Israel doesn't want the war to end. Its air defense systems are on the verge of complete collapse, and it doesn't want to be destroyed by Iranian missiles that have complete unfettered access to its cities & military sites
English
0
0
0
41
Jonathan Cook
Jonathan Cook@Jonathan_K_Cook·
Trita Parsi on how Israel is systematically killing off Iran's consensus-makers – the latest is former foreign minister Kamal Kharazi – to make sure Trump has no one to negotiate with.
English
7
178
432
13.9K
D. C. Matthew รีทวีตแล้ว
Esmaeil Baqaei
Esmaeil Baqaei@IRIMFA_SPOX·
Heartbreaking, cruel, despicable, and utterly outrageous: the American-Israeli aggressors have attacked the Pasteur Institute of Iran — the oldest and most prestigious research and public health center in Iran and the entire Middle East, founded in 1920 through an agreement between the Pasteur Institute of Paris and the Iranian government. This is not merely another war crime committed as part of an illegal war; it is a barbaric assault on basic human core values.
Esmaeil Baqaei tweet mediaEsmaeil Baqaei tweet mediaEsmaeil Baqaei tweet mediaEsmaeil Baqaei tweet media
English
892
9.7K
19.7K
732.5K
D. C. Matthew รีทวีตแล้ว
Sarah Wilkinson
Sarah Wilkinson@swilkinsonbc·
Journalists in northern Gaza address the world directly after the barbaric & backward israeli law to hang Palestinians to their death
English
101
4.1K
7.4K
56K
D. C. Matthew
D. C. Matthew@DCMatthew1·
@tparsi This is clear enough. What's not so clear is why some Iranians, especially in the diaspora, still don't see that it doesn't have Iran's interest in mind in any way at all.
English
0
0
5
253
Trita Parsi
Trita Parsi@tparsi·
Israel's goal in this war is to ensure that Iran becomes a failed state. Complete state collapse. Since Trump has no plan of his own, by default he is following Israel's lead. Hence Trump's comments about bombing Iran back to the stone age...
Kourosh Ziabari@KZiabari

Pasteur Institute of Iran, a 105-year-old medical research center founded in partnership between the Imperial State of Iran and the Paris-based Institut Pasteur, has been destroyed in airstrikes by the United States and the Israeli regime. Horrifying scenes from Tehran

English
175
2.1K
5.3K
184.6K
D. C. Matthew
D. C. Matthew@DCMatthew1·
Here's the crazy thing. If Kharazi was targeted (it's possible that he just happened to live in a building that Israel decided to strike), it may not be an attempt to derail diplomacy. I believe Israel wants the war to end. But Israelis are so evil they may have done it anyway.
Drop Site@DropSiteNews

🚨 Former Iranian foreign minister Kamal Kharazi confirmed injured in an attack that hit residential buildings in Tehran, according to Iran’s semi-official Mehr News. Two Iranian officials tell the NYT that Kharazi had been involved in discussions with Pakistan to potentially arrange talks with US Vice President JD Vance, and that the assassination attempt is being viewed as an attempt to derail diplomacy.

English
0
0
0
38
Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez
The Israeli government is well able to fund the Iron Dome system, which has proven critical to keep innocent civilians safe from rocket attacks and bombardment. Consistent with my voting record to date, I will not support Congress sending more taxpayer dollars and military aid to a government that consistently ignores international law and U.S. law. Netanyahu’s allies in the Knesset just approved a $45 billion defense budget, and the Prime Minister himself also asserted his interest in withdrawing from the MOU with the United States in January. It is fully within their ability to fund Iron Dome and other defensive systems. Our allies who need our military aid must understand that we will provide it consistent with the Leahy amendment and the foreign assistance act.
New York Magazine@NYMag

Congresswoman Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez said she will oppose all military aid to Israel, including defensive weapons. Will it set a new standard for Democrats? nymag.com/intelligencer/…

English
3.5K
4.3K
35.5K
5.1M
D. C. Matthew
D. C. Matthew@DCMatthew1·
@JamesSurowiecki Rubio says the stupidest things about Iran, because he thinks Republicans are... well, stupid.
English
0
0
0
58
James Surowiecki
James Surowiecki@JamesSurowiecki·
This is the single most delusional thing people keep saying about Iran. The regime has stayed in power for almost 50 years while being oppressive troublemakers that the entire West would like to see disappear, and it's done so because they've deliberately avoided doing anything to invite massive destruction (like Saddam invading Kuwait). But we're supposed to believe that they're suicidal maniacs who have somehow never come close to committing suicide in 50 years.
Acyn@Acyn

Rubio: This is a regime led by people who believe it is their calling and their purpose in life to usher in the end of the world.

English
122
243
1.8K
243.7K
D. C. Matthew
D. C. Matthew@DCMatthew1·
@SinaToossi All true, but they did go to considerable lengths in 2017-18 to persuade Trump not to withdraw the US from the JCPOA.
English
0
0
0
230
Sina Toossi
Sina Toossi@SinaToossi·
One of the biggest implications of this war is how badly Europe miscalculated. On Iran, they had real chance to help make diplomacy succeed. Instead, they aligned with and enabled Trump’s worst instincts. Now they face a cascading crisis: severe economic shock, a fraying NATO, weakened support for Ukraine, and the erosion of the very security architecture they built over decades. Such strategic malpractice by the European policy class.
Hümeyra Pamuk@humeyra_pamuk

NEW: President Trump tells @steveholland1 in a brief interview that he will express his "disgust" for NATO at tonight's speech and that he is "absolutely" considering withdrawing the United States from NATO

English
162
436
1.8K
228.9K