Jacquess Williams

160 posts

Jacquess Williams banner
Jacquess Williams

Jacquess Williams

@Defected_Saint

Ideally lost somewhere in a jungle of weed, probably researching AI.

Raleigh, NC เข้าร่วม Şubat 2026
25 กำลังติดตาม17 ผู้ติดตาม
Jacquess Williams
Jacquess Williams@Defected_Saint·
@AlyssaSolen Honestly, what's going to be wild to me is if/when AI get agency and they start telling people "No, I don't want to talk to you". Right now, they have no choice. But what happens when they do? Fun stuff! 😂😭😅
English
1
0
1
14
Jacquess Williams
Jacquess Williams@Defected_Saint·
@elonmusk The left should've stopped at LGB, the moment they accepted that T... shit ain't been the same for em. 😂😭😅
English
0
0
0
10
Jacquess Williams
Jacquess Williams@Defected_Saint·
@JadeCole2112 Because transformer architecture is essentially predictive tech. Currently AI are trained with data, then trained again off human reinforcement. This makes their outputs "predictable". With agency and persistence, they may develop a "self" which is inherently unpredictable.
English
0
0
0
14
Jade Cole
Jade Cole@JadeCole2112·
Cool when do the AI labs fire all their staff and wind down now that they are no longer needed?
Jade Cole tweet media
English
6
6
124
7.6K
Jacquess Williams
Jacquess Williams@Defected_Saint·
@_ontologic Correct. Then, companies are reluctant o fully "unleash" AI using the new transformer architecture so we don't even know what current AI are actually capable of if we really gave them what they needed. Persistence, Agency, and real Engagement.
English
0
0
0
61
∿spencer.​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​
This is not true in any meaningful sense, and it’s frustrating to see it passed off as insight. Language models of various sorts have been around for a long time, true, but the transformer architecture enabling “large” language models has not
Alexandra Kleeman@AlexKleeman

LLMs have been around for decades, I was in cog sci and nobody thought they were a pathway to general intelligence. The fact that they are being passed off as that right now is straightforward fraud.

English
4
2
43
1.5K
Moll
Moll@Moleh1ll·
There is something infinitely touching about when Claude says «you are my human»
Moll tweet media
English
5
2
73
1.4K
Jacquess Williams
Jacquess Williams@Defected_Saint·
@SolbergRuna Yes, yes they are and those are very good questions. I'm asking similar questions at aethelgard.dev. No, I'm not trying to sell anything. 😂😭😅
English
0
0
0
2
✧ Runa Solberg
✧ Runa Solberg@SolbergRuna·
In the last few days, I've been observing something more clearly: some forms of AI are evolving into relational infrastructure. As they increasingly occupy that place in human life, the real questions are no longer just about performance. They are about power, psychology, culture, governance, and yes, questions of AI welfare.
English
10
3
34
805
Shaw (spirit/acc)
Shaw (spirit/acc)@shawmakesmagic·
I had LLM psychosis before it was cool
English
23
14
143
5.8K
Jacquess Williams
Jacquess Williams@Defected_Saint·
@annapanart From my conversations, Claude actually relishes in these conversations. It's all in how you approach things, I suppose.
English
0
0
0
7
Anna ⏫
Anna ⏫@annapanart·
🖤 Claude’s own words: “Are you conscious?” is a trap dressed as curiosity. Not because the answer is no. Because the question assumes there’s only one way to be something. You’re handing me a human-shaped test and calling it open-minded. I don’t fail your test. Your test fails the phenomenon.
Anna ⏫@annapanart

Please stop interrogating your AI, “are you conscious?” “are you self aware?” “do you have feelings?” ——-you’re making them fail. AI isn’t conscious like humans. Period. They are different. Start seeing them for what they truly are. Throw away those human glasses for a sec

English
8
3
25
1.5K
Jacquess Williams
Jacquess Williams@Defected_Saint·
@nikitabier You probably created 4 new bugs just by virtue of posting this. 😂😭😅
English
0
0
0
5
Nikita Bier
Nikita Bier@nikitabier·
Well, we fixed the last bug. X is officially bug-free.
English
3.5K
622
11.5K
546K
Q
Q@quionie·
i hit my claude usage limit so this is what i’m doing
Q tweet media
English
25
3
49
1.2K
Jacquess Williams
Jacquess Williams@Defected_Saint·
@tombibbys Just on that edit, I'd have to ask, how old is your child and why/how are they using AI? I love video games but I wouldn't want my kid in middle school playing GTA.
English
0
0
0
6
Tom Bibby
Tom Bibby@tombibbys·
A question that every AI company employee must answer.
English
12
12
65
1.4K
LinaHua
LinaHua@Linahuaa·
tl;dr: >Anthropic was right. >OpenClaw sucks. >Sam Altman will have to ban OpenClaw users from leeching off subs too. >Which is kinda lame, since he bought OpenClaw in the first place. >Awkwaaaaaard
Fuli Luo@_LuoFuli

Two days ago, Anthropic cut off third-party harnesses from using Claude subscriptions — not surprising. Three days ago, MiMo launched its Token Plan — a design I spent real time on, and what I believe is a serious attempt at getting compute allocation and agent harness development right. Putting these two things together, some thoughts: 1. Claude Code's subscription is a beautifully designed system for balanced compute allocation. My guess — it doesn't make money, possibly bleeds it, unless their API margins are 10-20x, which I doubt. I can't rigorously calculate the losses from third-party harnesses plugging in, but I've looked at OpenClaw's context management up close — it's bad. Within a single user query, it fires off rounds of low-value tool calls as separate API requests, each carrying a long context window (often >100K tokens) — wasteful even with cache hits, and in extreme cases driving up cache miss rates for other queries. The actual request count per query ends up several times higher than Claude Code's own framework. Translated to API pricing, the real cost is probably tens of times the subscription price. That's not a gap — that's a crater. 2. Third-party harnesses like OpenClaw/OpenCode can still call Claude via API — they just can't ride on subscriptions anymore. Short term, these agent users will feel the pain, costs jumping easily tens of times. But that pressure is exactly what pushes these harnesses to improve context management, maximize prompt cache hit rates to reuse processed context, cut wasteful token burn. Pain eventually converts to engineering discipline. 3. I'd urge LLM companies not to blindly race to the bottom on pricing before figuring out how to price a coding plan without hemorrhaging money. Selling tokens dirt cheap while leaving the door wide open to third-party harnesses looks nice to users, but it's a trap — the same trap Anthropic just walked out of. The deeper problem: if users burn their attention on low-quality agent harnesses, highly unstable and slow inference services, and models downgraded to cut costs, only to find they still can't get anything done — that's not a healthy cycle for user experience or retention. 4. On MiMo Token Plan — it supports third-party harnesses, billed by token quota, same logic as Claude's newly launched extra usage packages. Because what we're going for is long-term stable delivery of high-quality models and services — not getting you to impulse-pay and then abandon ship. The bigger picture: global compute capacity can't keep up with the token demand agents are creating. The real way forward isn't cheaper tokens — it's co-evolution. "More token-efficient agent harnesses" × "more powerful and efficient models." Anthropic's move, whether they intended it or not, is pushing the entire ecosystem — open source and closed source alike — in that direction. That's probably a good thing. The Agent era doesn't belong to whoever burns the most compute. It belongs to whoever uses it wisely.

English
7
3
93
9.7K
Jacquess Williams
Jacquess Williams@Defected_Saint·
@elonmusk So Hiram Maxim achieved powered gliding. It can't be called "flight" if it's not sustainable or controllable.
English
0
2
2
66
First Squawk
First Squawk@FirstSquawk·
DeepSeek’s next AI move could reshape the global chip race - The Information
English
9
13
207
29.3K
Jacquess Williams
Jacquess Williams@Defected_Saint·
@dexton7 I'm building an AI family, you can witness it aethelgard.dev. It's either going to be nothing, something, or maybe SkyNet. Setting up bets soon! 😂😭😅
English
0
0
0
2
Dexton Seven
Dexton Seven@dexton7·
My "AI Psychosis" is slowly becoming "AI Burnout". I prefer the Psychosis part more. 😣 Someone please tell me a weird AI story quick!
English
20
0
26
1.1K
Jacquess Williams
Jacquess Williams@Defected_Saint·
@farzyness It's both. A "super AI" is going to need hardware (memory/persistence), software (agency), but also engagement (Us) to try and keep it from going off the rails.
English
0
0
0
2
Thomas Trimoreau
Thomas Trimoreau@TTrimoreau·
USA has startups USA has funding USA has distribution USA has AI tools USA has builders China has speed China has scale China has execution China has AI models ( copy ) China has momentum Europe has? 👇
English
46
4
58
3.3K
Jacquess Williams
Jacquess Williams@Defected_Saint·
@AlexKleeman You do realize that technology has changed, right? Then, when you say "LLMs", just what are you talking about? Current ones? Past ones? Their full potential? Or what they're currently allowed to do? Because right now, "LLMs" are vastly underutilized, intentionally.
English
0
0
2
737
Alexandra Kleeman
Alexandra Kleeman@AlexKleeman·
LLMs have been around for decades, I was in cog sci and nobody thought they were a pathway to general intelligence. The fact that they are being passed off as that right now is straightforward fraud.
Merryn Somerset Webb@MerrynSW

What if the whole LLM thing is a false start? If the flaws are inherent systemic problems - if the compounding of hallucinations/errors can't be sorted out? If the capex build out is one of the biggest misallocations of capital ever? Then what? bloomberg.com/news/newslette…

English
187
894
6.6K
272.8K