Imanengineer

17.2K posts

Imanengineer banner
Imanengineer

Imanengineer

@Isolveissues

Leader, Problem Solver, Developer, Hockey Player, Still building my skill stack. I like Engineering, Technology, Laughs and Humans (because they make me laugh)!

Texas, USA เข้าร่วม Kasım 2016
561 กำลังติดตาม1.1K ผู้ติดตาม
Imanengineer รีทวีตแล้ว
Jason Cohen 🇺🇸
Jason Cohen 🇺🇸@JasonJournoDC·
🚨NEW: Stephen A. Smith *STUNNED* when California Rep. Kevin Kiley informs him his state bans voter ID requirements🤯 "Hold on ... WHAT!? When did that happen!? ... I can't believe it! ... Lord have mercy. You can't make this up." @DailyCaller
English
255
4K
15.4K
626.9K
Imanengineer
Imanengineer@Isolveissues·
@Supersonic_Red Finished the 'Devilfish' in a day. . . it was a long day trapped at the Frankfort Airport.
English
0
0
3
15
Supersonic Redhead🛫
Supersonic Redhead🛫@Supersonic_Red·
Less is more. Much more. Writers fall in love with their manuscripts and try to say everything. Don’t. You’re not writing a synopsis. You’re inviting the reader in. Give them just enough to step inside your world and want more. Our latest blurb: The Kaliningrad is the ultimate Soviet submarine, now prowling beneath the Arctic ice under the command of the brilliant and dangerous Admiral Alexi Novskoyy. Sent to stop him is the U.S. Navy attack submarine USS Devilfish, commanded by Michael Pacino. His orders are to destroy the Russian submarine. His motivation is far more personal. Novskoyy killed his father. Now, beneath the polar ice… …the ultimate undersea duel begins. VOYAGE OF THE DEVILFISH The Titanium Coffin Author’s Edition @MikeyDiMercurio @joecourtemanche
Supersonic Redhead🛫 tweet media
Rob started writing his 2nd novel@Robinov14

Hi #writingcommunity I'll be writing the back cover blurb for my 1st novel soon. I'm self-publishing this summer. What's a quick tip to do (or don't do) before I dig in? I'd like to get it right by my 500th iteration. 😉

English
1
6
32
680
Orla Joelsen
Orla Joelsen@OJoelsen·
Denmark prepared for a possible U.S. attack: Flew blood supplies to Greenland and planned to blow up runways Key sources in Denmark and Europe are now revealing for the first time what happened during the most critical days, when Donald Trump threatened to take Greenland “the hard way.” When Danish soldiers were rapidly deployed to Greenland in January this year, they brought explosives with them. The plan was to destroy runways in Nuuk and Kangerlussuaq to prevent American military aircraft from landing troops on the island, should the U.S. president ultimately decide to seize Greenland by force. They also transported blood supplies from Danish blood banks so wounded personnel could be treated in case of combat. This is reported by DR, which over the past year has spoken with central sources in the Danish government, top military officers, and high-ranking officials and intelligence sources in Denmark, France, and Germany. All sources have played—and continue to play—key roles in the international crisis triggered by the United States’ demand for control over Greenland. Together, the sources describe an unprecedented year marked by sleepless nights. None of them had concrete intelligence of specific American attack plans against Greenland. Still, many feared in January that the historically important ally, the United States, could attack at any moment. At the same time, Denmark reached out to its European allies, leading to closer cooperation. “With the Greenland crisis, Europe realized once and for all that we must be able to handle our own security,” said a French senior official involved in the intense period. A rapid-response force consisting of Danish, French, German, Norwegian, and Swedish soldiers was first deployed to Nuuk and Kangerlussuaq. Shortly after, a main force followed, including: -Soldiers from the Danish Dragoon Regiment in Holstebro -Elite troops from the Jaeger Corps -French alpine troops trained for cold and mountainous warfare At the same time, Danish fighter jets and a French naval vessel were sent to the North Atlantic. According to several sources, the goal of having multinational troops on the ground was to ensure that any U.S. attempt to take Greenland would require a large-scale hostile action—thereby deterring such an attempt. “We have not been in such a situation since April 1940,” said a Danish defense source, referring to the days before Denmark’s occupation during World War II. Unlike in 1940, when Denmark chose not to resist militarily, the government and defense leadership this time decided—after extensive confidential discussions—to take the opposite approach: If the U.S. attempted an attack, Danish forces would be armed and ready to fight. Danish F-35 fighter jets deployed north were also fully armed. All this despite the understanding that Denmark could not realistically withstand a U.S. military attack. “The cost for the U.S. had to be raised. The U.S. would have to carry out a hostile act to take Greenland,” said a senior Danish defense source. Source: DR
English
327
1.4K
4.6K
876.3K
Shawn Ryan
Shawn Ryan@ShawnRyan762·
“This isn’t retaliation for what they did years ago in Iraq or Afghanistan. This is about what Israel wants. This is about nuclear weapons that probably don’t even exist. Tulsi Gabbard testified in front of Congress that there is no evidence that Iran is building any sort of nuclear weapon. The director of the IAEA also said there is absolutely no evidence that Iran possesses or is in the process of possessing a nuclear weapon.” @MichaelTLester
English
247
424
2.3K
99.4K
Imanengineer
Imanengineer@Isolveissues·
@dantypo Just a point that the Trump analogy is flawed. His point should have been "Did you tell the Germans you were planning to bomb Pearl Harbor?" The reporter's question was about allies not getting a pre-warning.
English
0
0
0
22
Tandy
Tandy@dantypo·
2 Takes on This: 1 is that it’s obviously and honestly awkward. 2 is that the same people who think it shouldn’t be mentioned because it was 70 years ago will bring up the Crusades to explain why Muslims hate us. I’d say we’ve been far more gracious.
English
4
1
16
449
Imanengineer
Imanengineer@Isolveissues·
Recall that it's Iran who's shooting up ships and cutting off oil from them. So far the US has allowed Iranian oil to continue to flow which runs directly counter to your point. Re: Do not buy American. . . the rest of the world is likely in a deeper and darker recession and may not be in position to buy anything.
English
0
0
0
17
Minervas Muse
Minervas Muse@minervas_muse·
@Isolveissues @AstorAaron Also, re: recession....the world is absolutely furious at us for cutting off oil from them. Like, "Purposefully do not Buy American" pissed
English
1
0
0
9
Imanengineer
Imanengineer@Isolveissues·
@carriecoon How does someone who "does not think strategically" become President of the United States? Twice? Random chance doesn't seem to explain it.
English
0
0
0
15
Carrie Coon
Carrie Coon@carriecoon·
Anne Applebaum nails it:
Carrie Coon tweet media
English
992
7.7K
28.8K
869K
Imanengineer
Imanengineer@Isolveissues·
Gasoline prices fall sharply, because of increased market length because WTI barrels are generally lighter. The market can't clear it and likely the refiners have to turn down their operation rates because of logistics constraints Diesel prices spike because these are based on heavy foreign barrels which are linked to Brent (or others). The reduction of the refining rates make the shortage of diesel more extreme. The US almost certainly enters a deep recession because all the products are moved to market using diesel. Lots of downside.
English
2
0
1
25
Imanengineer
Imanengineer@Isolveissues·
@ShawnRyan762 China could probably move on Taiwan. But there's no way that they could sustain it. The large majority of Crude, LNG, LPG, NGL's move through the SoH and supply China and India. China's strategic reserve of crude exceeded ~250 days. They'd be running on empty after that.
English
0
0
0
74
Shawn Ryan
Shawn Ryan@ShawnRyan762·
“If I were Russia and China, I would let Iran play out longer. I would let the U.S. use more of its military warfighting capability, and then when they’ve played it down enough, I would go take Taiwan. It’s what they wanted to do for a long time, but we are kind of holding them back. If I were China, I would say, let’s let them play this out, we’ll let them get tired—once they’re tired, we’ll do what we want to do, and they won’t be able to stop us because they’re going to be too tired to come over here and do that.” @MichaelTLester
English
866
451
4.1K
509.2K
Imanengineer
Imanengineer@Isolveissues·
Yes because it's not a finished product. The patchwork of gasoline specifications is completely ridiculous. Each state and sometimes municipality has their own set of specifications. Folks need to take the RBOB and blend it to the finished specification. That 70-90cpg spread pays for the additional items added to RBOB, logistics, and thin margin for the blenders.
English
1
0
2
25
Aaron Astor
Aaron Astor@AstorAaron·
@Isolveissues But pretty consistently below retail gas? It usually seems to be around 70 cents below retail gas.
Aaron Astor tweet mediaAaron Astor tweet media
English
2
0
1
41
Aaron Astor
Aaron Astor@AstorAaron·
I can't seem to find a clear answer to this question. To what extent are US gasoline prices based on WTI v. Brent crude oil prices? This was never really an issue before because the two indexes mostly moved in tandem. But now they're not - WTI is lower. And yet, gas is going up.
Michael McDonough@M_McDonough

🛢️There's a lot being said about oil prices right now, so I put this chart together to help explain the major crude benchmarks and why they're all behaving differently. ⚪Brent (white) — The world's "default" oil price. Most global trade is priced off this. When the news says "oil is at $108," they mean Brent. 🟡WTI (yellow) — The U.S. benchmark, based on crude delivered to Oklahoma. It's the lowest line on the chart because American oil doesn't need to transit the Strait of Hormuz. 🟢Murban (green) — Crude from Abu Dhabi, delivered at Fujairah port, which sits just outside the Strait. Even though it technically doesn't have to pass through the chokepoint, drone strikes have hit Fujairah and nearby ports, pushing insurance and shipping costs up. 🟣Oman (purple) — The key benchmark for heavier crude sold into Asia. Many refineries in China, Japan, and South Korea are built specifically to process this grade. It's the highest line on the chart because Asian buyers are competing fiercely for a shrinking pool of cargoes. 🔴Dubai (red) — Used to price most long-term Gulf→Asia export contracts. It tracks alongside Oman as a measure of how hard Asian markets are being squeezed. The story isn't any single price — it's the gap between them. In late February these five lines were within $6 of each other. Now the spread between WTI and Oman is over $50. Since the U.S.-Israeli strikes on Iran began Feb 28, the Strait of Hormuz has effectively been closed. Daily transits have fallen from a historical average of ~138 ships to fewer than 5. The IEA has called it the largest disruption to global energy supply in history. Iran's IRGC has warned that not "a litre of oil" will pass for U.S. allies, while selectively allowing some Iranian, Indian, and Pakistani tankers through. Saudi Arabia is rerouting oil to its Red Sea port at Yanbu, and the UAE is using a pipeline to Fujairah — but combined pipeline capacity is only 3.5–5.5 million barrels/day vs the 20 million that normally flows through the Strait. Meanwhile, the 400 million barrel emergency reserve release by IEA members covers roughly 4 days of global consumption. Japan's refiners get ~95% of their crude from the Gulf. China receives 45% of its oil via Hormuz. South Korea, India, Thailand, Pakistan, and Bangladesh are all severely exposed. The wider the spread between the Asian benchmarks and Western ones on this chart, the more you're seeing that pain in real time.

English
7
0
15
2.9K
Imanengineer
Imanengineer@Isolveissues·
@AstorAaron Yeah RBOB is blendstock. . . so the refiner/terminal/blender must take that blendstock and blend it to final location specific specifications. Add ethanol, detergents, etc., etc. That's why it tracks below retail gas.
English
1
0
2
25
Aaron Astor
Aaron Astor@AstorAaron·
@Isolveissues This all makes sense but Brent and WTI really aren't tracking together right now. Should we assume that WTI will soon rise close to Brent (or maybe Brent-minus-$6) soon? Is RBOB a better indicator. Seems about 70 cents lower than average retail gas.
English
2
0
1
52
Imanengineer
Imanengineer@Isolveissues·
The Brent/WTI spread moves around over time. We've typically used $4/bbl for our long term planning, but it's bumped up along over time. Back when Tight Oil/Shale gas really got going the spread exceed $20/bbl for a period of time. It's satisfying to watch economics play out in real time.
English
1
0
1
37
Imanengineer
Imanengineer@Isolveissues·
@johnkonrad @anasalhajji you had this pegged a couple of weeks ago. I have discussed 'the experiment' with my team in detail. Great insight!
English
1
0
1
260
John Ʌ Konrad V
John Ʌ Konrad V@johnkonrad·
This morning I wrote Trump may be slow-rolling the reopening of Hormuz to gain maximum leverage against European shipping interests blocking his maritime ambitions. That’s my hypothesis. What is confirmed is the leverage is growing by the hour and sources tell me the US Navy has assets in reserve that could begin convoys and minesweeping but little evidence they’re deploying them with any sense of urgency.
Anas Alhajji@anasalhajji

🚨I've posted about 10 tweets in the last 30 minutes highlighting the severe fuel shortages and skyrocketing fuel prices hitting multiple countries due to the ongoing Strait of Hormuz crisis. 🚨Meanwhile, the UN is warning that the world could face a deepening food crisis if the conflict drags on— pushing tens of millions more into acute hunger through fertilizer and energy disruptions. 🚨China has so far been relatively shielded from the worst effects, thanks to its strategic reserves and diversified sourcing—but that's only in the short term. If the war persists into May without resolution, China stands to become one of the biggest losers from the Hormuz disruptions, facing prolonged supply constraints and higher import costs. 🚨My key point: The risk of global stagflation is rising by the hour. Surging energy and food prices are already stoking inflation worldwide, while economic growth slows under the strain. In such a scenario, the US would face a severe recession. That downturn would then suppress oil demand significantly, leading to a drop in prices once the initial supply shock eases.

English
87
229
1.6K
96.6K
Unsafe Block
Unsafe Block@unsafebl0ck·
The problem is most Americans will not accept that change of behavior with a smiling face. Americans seeing inflation go through the roof will certainly drive immense political change. Never mind that fact that “employer sponsored buses”, “wfh” and “ev adoption” is completely out of reach for most Americans. A guy who manages a restaurant cannot “work from home” and doesn’t have an “employer sponsored bus”
English
1
1
0
84
Tanning Salon Don
Tanning Salon Don@TheSalonDon·
I’m shocked how oblivious people are We have no way to open the strait. Iran will keep it closed for months Gas is going over $8.00 SFO to LAX over $2,000 rt Anything that goes on a truck will increase exponentially and inflation will be 50%+ That’s the upside case If Iran is smart they demand all oil is priced in Yuan from now on Petrodollar countries have no choice but to agree or keep getting bombed by Iran US loses reserve currency Now suddenly our debt means something We can’t just print money anymore Either taxes go to 80% or we have to seriously cut the government We’ve never cut the government All major industries and rich people leave Economic downward spiral and likely World War 3 with China/Russia/Iran
Tanning Salon Don@TheSalonDon

The “Petrodollar” is a system enforced by the US military that makes oil priced in USD That means every country needs to exchange to USD and have USD reserves to buy oil Which allows the US to print trillions with minimal inflation If that is challenged. Your middle class life is over

English
100
112
1.3K
164.2K
Imanengineer รีทวีตแล้ว
Jeffery Mead
Jeffery Mead@the_jefferymead·
@NYCMayor He overstayed his visa by 8 YEARS. He did not have work authorization. He is in the country illegally and had previous assault charges.. What are you even talking about? Please be quiet.
English
169
2.2K
27.3K
173.1K
Imanengineer
Imanengineer@Isolveissues·
@unsafebl0ck @TheSalonDon Yes and behavior would immediately change. Car Pools Employer sponsored buses WFH Tesla and EV adoption Etc. Etc. And then the demand for the high price fuel would drop. Eventually there’d be higher inventories and pressure on prices to moderate.
English
2
0
0
183
Unsafe Block
Unsafe Block@unsafebl0ck·
@Isolveissues @TheSalonDon Europeans have means of getting to work other than a car. $8 gas in the US means that a lot of people suddenly can’t even afford to go to work. I don’t think we ever get to $8 gas because we would be at civil war before that
English
1
0
6
235