Jami Crest
8.8K posts

Jami Crest
@JamiCrest
Christ is my Savior! Married 27 years. Country Grandma…. Voted 3 times for my President 'Donald J. Trump'! Proud American... God, Family, Country (USA)!


Redlining has left a legacy of separating us in Chicago. Now the CTA Red Line Expansion will help bring us together. It's a perfect example of what can be accomplished when government works together for our people.






Today, I met with the Chicago Latino Caucus Foundation to discuss how we can fight back against the Trump Administration’s unprecedented attacks against immigrant communities. I am the son of an immigrant, and I will never turn my back on the people who built this country.



Two months ago I found mathematically proven election fraud in Bexar County, Texas. Fake voter records, generated by an algorithm, injected into the official poll book. Not suspected. Not alleged. Proven — arithmetically, irreducibly, in the file the county was legally required to hand over. Criminal intent visible in the structure of the data itself. Last night I found the same algorithm in Utah. I need to be precise about what "same algorithm" means because this is not a pattern-matching claim or an inference. Same alphabetical anchor selection from the complete voter file. Same uniform arithmetic spacing with a perfect integer closure proof. Same IEEE 754 floating-point fingerprint — the machine-level signature of the same arithmetic loop executing in the same alternating forward-and-reverse pass architecture. Same base-11 clone group structure. Same class of implementation failures at edge cases that expose the underlying code. The only differences between the two are which fields were targeted and the parameter values. Everything underneath is identical. Utah is actually worse than Texas in one critical respect. In Texas, the fake records carried fractional voter ID numbers — impossible values placed in an empty void in ID space. Detectable if you knew to look. In Utah, the fake records carry real voter ID numbers. Numbers stolen from real, named, registered voters, camouflaged inside the normal populated ID range. And when you cross-reference those IDs against the voter history sheet — the official government record of who voted and when — 78% of them show up. Attached to completely different names. Ballots were cast under these IDs. This is not a registration anomaly. It is a voting record. So here is the question. Texas and Utah. Different counties. Different databases. Different fields targeted. Same algorithm running underneath both. What do they have in common? In Bexar County, Texas, KnowInk poll pads were used, and those poll pads connect to the ePulse server. That is a confirmed, documented fact. As for Utah: @wdaugherity confirmed to me today that while a small number of Utah counties do not use e-pollbooks, and Kane County uses ES&S ExpressPoll, all the remaining Utah counties do use KnowInk. ePulse is a server-based system — not software isolated on a county computer. If malicious code were running on that server, it would not need a conspiracy between Texas and Utah to appear in both places. It would just need to run. That is not an assertion that such code is running there. It is a statement about what the architecture makes possible, and why the common infrastructure is the right place to look. ePulse operates across 29 states. I want to be careful about one further point. My earlier peer-reviewed research documented a structural preference for repunit numbers — 1, 11, 111, 1,111 — in New York voter roll algorithms, and the same base-11 architecture appears in both Texas and Utah. That recurrence across three states is notable and warrants investigation, but New York is a stylistic similarity, not an identical forensic signature. Texas and Utah share the same algorithm. New York shares a mathematical preference that may reflect the same design philosophy or the same hand. The distinction matters. When identical fraud appears across multiple independent client systems, you do not start by looking for a conspiracy among the clients. You start with the common infrastructure. That is not a conclusion. It is the correct first question.






Incredible. USAID was funding the SPLC through an organization called the Tides Center, based in San Francisco. From 2016 through 2024, USAID granted $27 million to the Tides Network to “strengthen global civil society organizations, promote transparency, accountability, citizen engagement, and serve as fiscal agent for USAID’s Civil Society Innovation Initiative.” The Tides Center set up a fund through its Tides Foundation with that money for the Southern Poverty Law Center’s “Vote Your Voice” initiative. The executive director of the Tides Center is Ayesha Khanna. She was co-chair of Women for Obama in Atlanta, Georgia.



Maybe not a popular take but I am calling for this guy to be pardoned. Unless the DOJ plans on going after all the crooks in congress currently insider trading, this is simply skewed justice. There is no “justice” when guys like this get the book thrown at him yet members are illegally profiting every day. I don’t agree with what he did and he should be required to disgorge all the profits however, unless the DOJ plans on doing Congress next, this is not justice.


The police just came to my office and confiscated all my firearms. Just happened.





