LogicBender

Lets summarize: You suggest a shaped charge was retrofitted in a very small device (smaller than any world use examples) with targeting precision leaving no smoke and no visible scorching trace that was able to detonate in a one and done lethal delivery and also timed precisely with some sound of a shot fired at exactly the same time, a sound which witnesses claim came from behind them. All of this you say, is the most likely explanation. It sound least likely to me.

🚨 MEET THE 'NEW GARY': TPUSA’s Latest Talking Head Just Accidentally Proved Candace Owens Right.😂🤯 You have to almost feel sorry for Turning Point USA at this point. After their previous disinformation minister, "Gary," humiliated himself so thoroughly on this platform that he had to be memory-holed, Andrew Kolvet and Blake Neff dragged a "New Gary" onto The Charlie Kirk Show today to try and salvage their collapsing narrative. Their mission? To gaslight the American people into believing that the explosive Daily Mail report—which confirmed the bullet found in Charlie’s neck does NOT match the gun found at the scene—is just "misleading garbage." But "New Gary" (Justin Nazarov, CEO of Phoenix Ammunition, who they clearly brought on because he owns a gun company and has "takes") immediately fumbled the ball. In an unparalleled moment of accidental wit, he actually confirmed that Candace Owens was right weeks ago when she reported the bullet was fragmented. Thanks for the assist, Gary 2.0. It’s time to peel back the layers of this desperate, panicky gaslighting session and debunk their claims line-by-line using actual facts and the official court filing they are terrified you will read. THE BIG LIE: SPINNING THE BALLISTICS FAILURE: TPUSA’s entire segment was dedicated to attacking the Daily Mail headline: "Bullet used to kill Charlie Kirk, did not MATCH rifle allegedly used by suspect Tyler Robinson, new court filing claims." Kolvet, Neff, and the New Gary tried to spin this as "completely and utterly misleading," arguing that the only reason it didn't "match" is because it was fragmented, making toolmark analysis "best guess pseudoscience." They are desperately trying to convince you that this is just a spin by the defense team. THE FACT-CHECK: They are lying to you to contaminate the jury pool. If you actually look at the official defense filing (attached below), it doesn't say "the defense claims there is no match." It explicitly states on Page 2, Paragraph 2: "...but his defense attorneys now argue that the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms ATF was unable to identify the bullet recovered at autopsy to the rifle allegedly tied to Mr. Robinson." The ATF—the federal government's own ballistics experts—are the ones who cannot match that fragment to that gun. Period. The New Gary can talk about hollow points all he wants, but he cannot change the fact that the actual physical evidence does not connect the patsy to the alleged murder weapon. THE SECOND LIE: THE DNA EVIDENCE: During the segment, New Gary tried to argue that even without a bullet match, they will have other "conclusions" to present, hinting at DNA. THE FACT-CHECK: Again, read the filing (Page 3, Paragraph 1). The defense explicitly notes that the delay is needed because the FBI and ATF DNA reports indicate that "several different DNAs were found on some items of evidence." It is NOT just Tyler Robinson's DNA. This was a contaminated crime scene with at least five different persons' DNA profiles found on various items recovered. They are trying to pretend it’s a neat "lone gunman" scene when the physical evidence screams that this was a multi-person operation. THE THIRD LIE: THE FAMILY 'BETRAYAL' MYTH: The most disgusting part of the TPUSA segments is their relentless attempt to frame Tyler’s family. Andrew Kolvet smirked about how the prosecution plans to call Tyler’s parents and his boyfriend, Lance Twiggs, to testify. They use this fact to perpetuate the lie that the family suspects Tyler and turned him in. THE FACT-CHECK: This is classic gaslighting. Just because the state calls someone as a witness does not mean they are supporting the state’s narrative. Have these high-paid "political operatives" never heard of a hostile witness? They are trying to imply that the family’s presence in court proves Tyler's guilt, which is an absurd logical fallacy. Let's look at what the family actually says: Tyler Robinson’s grandmother has gone on record stating she does NOT believe Tyler shot Charlie Kirk. She further confirmed Tyler doesn't even own a rifle, is not a "gun guy," had no experience firing weapons, and actively disliked guns. Independent journalists Brandi and Billie from the Brandi & Billie Show on YouTube spoke directly to Tyler's family at a hearing. The family told them they don't think he could have done it and that only 2% of what the mainstream media has reported is actually true. THE REAL STORY: THE VOLUNTARY SURRENDER: Kolvet and Neff are again lying about how Tyler was apprehended, claiming endless documentation proves his parents recognized the gun on the news and turned him in. THE FACT-CHECK: This is another easily debunked lie that TPUSA hopes you won't check. Candace Owens has a source close to the Robinson family who explicitly confirms Tyler's parents did NOT recognize the gun from the news, nor did they turn him in because they suspected him. We know this is fact because the initial gun photo circulating during the manhunt was not even the actual gun found. It was stock footage of a different weapon, not the WWII-era Mauser rifle allegedly recovered. How could his dad have noticed a gun that was never shown? The real reason Tyler surrendered, per Candace’s source, is that he was terrified of armed thugs—aka the SWAT team—busting down his and his parents’ door, destroying their home, and potentially shooting them. He came in voluntarily to clear his name and protect his family. Furthermore, we now know that Tyler Robinson did NOT confess to anything and has officially plead NOT GUILTY! Most damning of all? ALL video footage allegedly showing Tyler Robinson and his parents entering the sheriff's station to turn himself in has mysteriously gone missing or was allegedly destroyed. Multiple news outlets have confirmed that their FOIA requests for this crucial video have been denied because the footage conveniently no longer exists. THE DAMNING ADMISSION: TPUSA’S FEAR The final piece of this storytelling narrative is the most telling. Ask yourself: Why are Andrew Kolvet, Blake Neff, and Jack Posobiec—who claim to have been Charlie's "friends"—actively against the defense’s motion to postpone the preliminary hearing? Why are they trying to rush this trial along and railroad this kid despite overwhelming evidence that he is a patsy? If they were real friends who actually wanted justice for Charlie Kirk, they would welcome more time for a thorough investigation to ensure the correct assassins faced justice. Instead, they are terrified of the six-month delay the defense is asking for to review the 20,000 files and 700 hours of video. This rush to judgment, this attempt to sweep everything under the rug, is in my journalistic opinion, an admission of guilt. They are freaking out because their entire fed-slop narrative is falling apart in real-time. They know that once Tyler Robinson is found not guilty, the spotlight will turn inward—toward the people closest to Charlie, the ones who had significant motive to see him dead. That is what they are truly terrified of.🇺🇸

Believe it or not, Elon has actually known that the Sun doesn’t shine at night since at least 2016, possibly even earlier.