Nobell0824

1.6K posts

Nobell0824 banner
Nobell0824

Nobell0824

@MoojongSong

대한민국 김포시 เข้าร่วม Kasım 2021
445 กำลังติดตาม198 ผู้ติดตาม
Artikyoul8 🇯🇲
Artikyoul8 🇯🇲@iamartikyoul8·
@ZeusRWA All assets on chain 💯 Tx just built the compliant marketplace🚀
English
1
1
9
163
Bitrue
Bitrue@BitrueOfficial·
🔥 #Gold is back in the SPOTlight and now paired with #XRP on #Bitrue! By pairing gold $PAXG directly against XRP, we reinforces our identity as the premier #XRP hub while offering TradFi diversification. 💰 Hedge market swings with $PAXG that protects your portfolio.Trade tradition. Move at #XRP speed ⚡ 👉 Start trading $PAXG/XRP now: bitrue.com/trade/paxg_xrp… Details: support.bitrue.com/hc/en-001/arti…
Bitrue tweet media
Bitrue@BitrueOfficial

🤩 Have you discovered $PAXG, the new digital gold? ⭐️ $PAXG is tokenized gold where one token represents one troy ounce of gold ⭐️ $PAXG brings this real-world asset onchain as an ERC20 token ⭐️ Trade 24/7, own on-chain and fractionally, and transfer instantly Tip: $PAXG makes gold borderless, liquid, and programmable for the new digital age Already trading #XRP and $PAXG? 👀 Stay tuned! We're preparing something exciting!

English
13
77
375
39.7K
Bitrue
Bitrue@BitrueOfficial·
🚀 #Bitrue has completed the merger and migration of Coreum ( $COREUM ) and Sologenic ( $SOLO ) to TX ( $TX ). @txEcosystem 🔹 Deposits for $TX are now OPEN 🔹 $TX/ $USDT trading starts: 9:00 UTC, Mar 25, 2026 👉 More Details: support.bitrue.com/hc/en-001/arti…
Bitrue tweet media
English
17
39
145
21.3K
BRW_Solo🔥
BRW_Solo🔥@BRW_Solo·
@UpholdInc Hey @UpholdInc where are the 🟩 $TX coins you were supposed to swap? Why are you not providing a little transparency to the community? 🤦
English
6
3
25
1.2K
Uphold
Uphold@UpholdInc·
📣 Update for SEI holders: Uphold will support the upcoming SEI network upgrade (Cosmos → EVM). 🔄 The network upgrade is scheduled to complete between by 9 April 2026. This may be subject to delays. ✅ No action required if you hold SEI on Uphold. ⏸️ Buys and sells may be paused from 1 April 2026 (3PM UTC/ 10AM EST). ℹ️ After the upgrade, only EVM-compatible addresses will be supported for SEI withdrawals. 🛑 Risk Warning: Don’t invest unless you're prepared to lose all the money you invest. This is a high-risk investment and you should not expect to be protected if something goes wrong. uphold.com/en-gb/legal/ri…
English
11
12
66
5K
Raymond Salazar | $TX
Raymond Salazar | $TX@Raymovazar·
@MoojongSong You can easily move your solo and Coreum tokens to a self custodial wallet and use the migration tool to convert your tokens to the newly launched $TX. DM I'll walk you through the steps.
English
1
0
0
14
Bitrue
Bitrue@BitrueOfficial·
The token swap process for both COREUM and SOLO remains in progress. Due to the migration taking longer than originally anticipated, completion has been delayed beyond the expected timeline. We are working closely with the project team to complete the swap for users as soon as possible under safe and secure conditions. Thank you for your patience and understanding. Further updates will be announced via our official X account.
Bitrue@BitrueOfficial

Bitrue will support the merger and migration of $COREUM and $SOLO to $TX. @txEcosystem If you hold $COREUM or $SOLO on Bitrue, please refer to the announcement for migration details: support.bitrue.com/hc/en-001/arti…

English
23
18
98
12.9K
BRW_Solo🔥
BRW_Solo🔥@BRW_Solo·
🟩 $TX 🚨 If you held roughly close to 426,000 🔴 #Sologenic coins on @UpholdInc or @BitrueOfficial You have lost out close to $5,000 - $8,500 on PSE rewards 📝Definitely recommend moving your coins out these exchanges (when you can) and on to trusted Validators who are actually trying to help the $TX community rather than stealing the rewards for themselves🤦
English
12
9
50
3.1K
KINGVALEX
KINGVALEX@VALELORDX·
It’s unfortunate that my tokens are currently held hostage in Uphold. I believe this situation will persist until the TX migration is complete, and the price will be determined at that time, with whatever the solo price is at that time.
KINGVALEX tweet media
English
8
3
48
5.3K
EndTimesB
EndTimesB@AwarenessLvL10·
You guys clearly don’t see what’s at stake, or maybe you do and don’t care. This is protecting the community by limiting access to the PSE for staking and community growth, nothing else. Right now OUR community pool is vulnerable! Projects that want funding- founders use our pool, founders want PSE- they circumvent the loopholes and bleed off as much as they can. And they will bleed off the community PSE to the point of death. They will drain it. Then what? Legacy holders and future community members are left holding the bag AGAIN because there were no guardrails in place BEFORE they start staking their bags an sucking the life (%) of PSE until we are no longer willing to stake for some measly amount we unstake, then the PSE % goes back up became the ecosystem is dry w limited stakers. I kept it simple- It’s much more detailed than this. Both of you have ZERO dogs in this fight. This proposal doesn’t effect you one bit except get you predictable PSE every month… it doesn’t taper it stay constant ( w growth) but constant. It helps shield and protect Every. Single. Staker. Your lack of support shows where your loyalties are. Both of your rebuttals/ comments are straw man arguments. They don’t exist. We see an existential threat to our PSE allocation and seek support to bring awareness to the dangers it brings- and you shrug it off. SMH I think I know who owns you. Chang my mind.
English
4
3
11
546
BRW_Solo🔥
BRW_Solo🔥@BRW_Solo·
🟩 $TX 🚨 📝(Regarding the PSE Community Pool Distribution Changes) I have to agree with @007TXValidator🤝 🔸"not the right moment to modify how the ecosystem is structured." 🔹We don't want to make unnecessary changes just because we have been acclimated to a bear market over the last 5 years 🔹When the market changes direction here soon, (and very soon) demand will come in powerful waves and demand will either outpace the supply or equalize it 🙅‍♂️We don't want to do anything that could potentially hurt investors (Early and laggards alike)
007TX Validator@007TXValidator

Thanks for taking the time to clarify the proposal and explain the mechanics behind it. I understand the intention and the effort to create predictability and transparency around the community allocation. That said, my view remains that this is not the right moment to modify how the ecosystem is structured. The current tokenomics — including the 40B community allocation — were already known when Proposal-29 was discussed and ultimately passed with strong community support. For that reason, I don’t think it makes sense to revisit or reshape its spirit so early in the life of the network. I also want to clarify something important for anyone delegating to our validator (or any validator), because this is often misunderstood: delegating does not remove your voting power. In TX (Cosmos-based governance), delegators always keep their own vote: • If you do not vote, your validator’s vote is applied to your delegated tokens. • If you vote yourself, your vote overrides the validator’s vote for the tokens you delegated. So even if a validator votes one way, your own vote will be counted according to your choice for your stake. The validator’s vote therefore only represents: • their own self-stake, and • the stake of delegators who choose not to vote themselves. In other words, if proposals move forward, every delegator still has a direct voice in governance. I’m simply making my position transparent. Anyone delegating to our validator who disagrees with this view can vote differently, and their vote will be counted exactly as they cast it in the final tally.

English
8
5
25
3.1K
James Crypto Space
James Crypto Space@JamesCrypto87·
I might be complaining about the massive dilution of #TX lately, but I have been staking all of my coins since the earliest days! Bdw, does anyone know how to interpret the 'Score points'? @BRW_Solo @TXFuckland
James Crypto Space tweet media
English
19
1
30
3.4K
Nobell0824
Nobell0824@MoojongSong·
@BRW_Solo @bage_TX @KIWIXRP1 When coreum token come out first time someone said like that exactly and the team changed total supply..now they changed solo and coreum token to the TX and the total supply is 200x more unbelievable!!
English
1
0
2
73
BRW_Solo🔥
BRW_Solo🔥@BRW_Solo·
You nailed out my friend🔥 And just another way of looking at it👇 This is the same way how it's possible that someone who puts $100 in Bitcoin in 2010 can turn that into $424,000 in just 5 years 🚨It's about how early you get in🚨 The only difference is one's taking advantage of a low price the other one's taking advantage of early Supply rewards
English
4
3
23
1.8K
BRW_Solo🔥
BRW_Solo🔥@BRW_Solo·
🟩 $TX #RWA #Tokenization 🥩Understanding the $TX Rewards System (Math Deep Dive) 📍On the "Native Rewards" side, So the 12.5% APR you're seeing on 🔥#BRWCapital is 100% the "Native Staking" rewards only 👉its from the 3.5% inflation module 👉PSE has nothing to do with it 🔹️The 3.5% is network wide inflation per year, not your APR 📋So right now only "28%" of the circulating $TX is staked🥩 🔸️it's low, but normal post TGE as we are super early 🔸️in 5 months this will change drastically, so staking early is key🔑 👨‍🔬The "Native Rewards" math👇 3.5% (network wide inflation) ÷ 28% (total $TX circulating staked) 🔸️means 12.5% APR per year for you as the delegator 🔸️it's a little lower (11.35%) if you didn't authorize auto compound via Restake.app 👈(highly recommend) 📍On the PSE side, 🔹️PSE adds a fixed chunk every 6th of every month starting April 6th, it gets added straight to the staking balance 🔸️so you don't have to do anything 🔹️The exact 40% PSE calculation total community pool👇 🔸️40,000,000,000 $TX (7 Years) 🔸️476,190,476 $TX (monthly) 🔸️682,000,000 $TX (bonded) 👉the bonded will grow over time 👉682,000,000 ÷ circulating supply = 28% (network staked) 🚨👨‍🔬Example PSE formula if you invested 20,000 $TX coins staked the whole month👇 (20,000 $TX × 30 days) ÷ (682 million bonded × 30 days) × 476,190,476 = 13,965 $TX free every month (not including 12.5% "Native Rewards") 🔥13,965 (PSE) + 208 (Native) = 14,173 (Total monthly rewards) So you start April 6th with 34,173 $TX (20,000 + first month's rewards) 📋As long as you are staked🥩 all you have to do is watch the 👀👉"Marketcap" 🔸️The system is designed to protect you from dilution🚫🚿
English
25
28
102
12.9K
Chris
Chris@txconcepts·
March 6th was the TGE date and was a success as far as merge tool and V6 upgrade, the mechanics. Many exchages are yet to have completed conversion and have stated it could be up to March 14th. Day 1 Issuers likely not meant as March 6th, more likely meant as very soon. I understand your concerns we should let everything settle and then evaluate in days/weeks ahead. I think we have much to be excited about. Getting on the RWA leaderboard is a needed 1st step.
English
4
5
26
780
Nobell0824 รีทวีตแล้ว
James E. Thorne
James E. Thorne@DrJStrategy·
For the record. Jamie Dimon says he wants a “level playing field” for stablecoins. What he really wants is to make sure nobody can offer you a better deal on your own money than tradtional banks can. The president is right to call the banks out on this. We’ve seen this before. In the 1970s, money market funds started paying real yields while banks were locked under deposit caps. Banks cried “unfair” and “unsafe,” lobbied furiously, and lost. Policymakers chose competition over protection; savers got paid, and banks had to adapt instead of suffocating the threat. Today’s script is the same, just with better technology. Stablecoin issuers now operate under licensing, 1:1 high‑quality reserves, liquidity and risk rules, audits and strict AML standards. This is not the Wild West. Yet Dimon still talks as if they exist with “no reserves, no compliance, no oversight.” He’s not describing reality; he’s describing a story that justifies shutting down a rival funding system. The Clarity Act is the real battlefield. On paper, it’s about integrating crypto into U.S. market structure. In practice, the big banks are fighting to ensure that anything that looks like a deposit with yield must either become a bank product or be regulated into irrelevance. “Level playing field” in their vocabulary means: everyone wears the bank straitjacket, or no one plays. Why? Because yield‑bearing stablecoins blow up the quiet cartel behind record profits. Banks live on deposits that pay close to nothing even when risk‑free rates are high. They earn a clean spread and interest on balances parked at the Fed, while passing little of it through. Savers get crumbs; banks get the margin; inertia does the rest. A credible, regulated stablecoin that passes through money‑market yields detonates that racket: with a few clicks, your cash can leave the cartel. The president’s critique goes straight at this arrangement: Americans should “earn more money on their money,” and banks should not be allowed to undermine laws designed to make that possible or to stall a market‑structure bill so the whole “powerful Crypto Agenda” decamps overseas. He’s not attacking banking; he’s attacking a model that treats low‑yield deposits as an entitlement and regulation as a weapon. Crypto‑native firms, for all their flaws, behave like they live in a real market: they build new instruments, disclose, and pay up to attract capital. The banks build talking points and hire lobbyists. Stablecoins don’t just threaten their funding; they threaten their chokehold on payment rails and transaction data. Call this debate what it is: not a fight over “safety,” but a fight over whether a protected deposit cartel gets veto power over technologies that finally let savers earn something closer to the risk‑free rate. In the 1970s, policymakers chose competition. In the 1970s, banks were forced to stop hiding behind regulation and compete. If Jamie Dimon wants a level playing field, he should stop complaining and start doing the same.
Rapid Response 47@RapidResponse47

English
289
1.2K
5.3K
431.3K
Bitrue
Bitrue@BitrueOfficial·
Which #crypto will pump 100x in 2026? 👀
English
142
13
131
14.1K
Nobell0824 รีทวีตแล้ว
Jungle Inc Crypto News
Jungle Inc Crypto News@jungleincxrp·
TradFi just plugged into the XRPL. 🌉 Hidden Road ($HRFI) is now LIVE in the DTCC’s NSCC directory. That’s the clearing backbone of U.S. markets. DTCC clears ~$2.5 quadrillion a year. Legacy trades sit 24–48 hours in T+2. Now? Clear through NSCC. Settle on XRPL in seconds. Idle capital → deployable capital. This is infrastructure, not hype. #XRP #Ripple #Crypto
Jungle Inc Crypto News tweet media
David 'JoelKatz' Schwartz@JoelKatz

Seems important.

English
9
96
431
19.9K
Flare ☀️
Flare ☀️@FlareNetworks·
🔥@firelightfi Onchain staking primitive designed to generate yield for FXRP holders. • Stake FXRP → receive stXRP • Use stXRP across other Flare DeFi apps • Earn points and soon yield while keeping your capital productive firelight.finance
Flare ☀️ tweet media
English
5
24
118
4.2K
Flare ☀️
Flare ☀️@FlareNetworks·
$FXRP and $stXRP are designed to be composable capital primitives on @FlareNetworks. Here are the main ways people are using them across the ecosystem🧵👇
Flare ☀️ tweet media
English
13
79
316
27.2K