762NATO

@BettyBoochichi2 ‘These are serious offences’ Gives him a community order.

A troubled teenager who grabbed a wooden spear when two police officers tried to arrest him has been given a community order. Cameron Hilland kicked out at the officers and spat at one of them after they were called to his Newton Aycliffe home. The 19-year-old, who has been diagnosed with autism spectrum disorder and ADHD, reacted angrily when the police tried to detain him, Newton Aycliffe Magistrates' Court heard. Syed Ali, prosecuting, said: “The defendant kicked one of them to the body, pushed to the face and pushed her onto the sofa.” “The defendant kicked the second officer to the legs, pushed him and spat towards him.” “The defendant has obtained a wooden spear and tried to assault them. They were able to disarm him with the help of his family.” In a victim impact statement, one of the officers said: “There was only one reason why he got hold of the spear and that was to cause us injury.” Hilland, of Ashfield, Newton Aycliffe, pleaded guilty to two charges of assaulting an emergency worker and two counts of obstructing a police officer following his arrest on November 13 last year. Tokeer Amin, mitigating, said his client had been diagnosed with autism and ADHD and his family was working hard to support the troubled teenager. “It was a spontaneous incident,” he said. “It arose when he had just been woken up and was in heightened state – it was not premeditated.” Sian Allan-Gilbert, the chairwoman of the bench, said: “These are very serious offences.” "When you attack an emergency worker, not one but two, in the manner that you did and also to spit and use a spear, if you hadn’t been disarmed – goodness only knows what the end result might have been.” “There is an awful lot of work you need to do with the Probation Service and they can help you.” Hilland was issued with an 18-month community order with 20 rehabilitation activity requirement days attached. He was also ordered to pay £150 in compensation to both officers and £199 in court costs. Link to the article: thenorthernecho.co.uk/news/26027605.…

@WasAcop TVP has one not so long ago. Hit the national news and people complained there was no description. A week later they said it didn’t happen. bbc.co.uk/news/articles/…

There’s a real possibility the reason Surrey Police haven’t released any suspect descriptions in the Epsom case is because the incident didn’t happen as reported — or the details don’t add up yet. This is not me denying the possible victim or dismissing her experience. In rare cases, false or exaggerated allegations do occur, and police sometimes hold back when the evidence is thin or inconsistent. People need to accept that this sometimes happens too. Police also need to be better at communications — keeping the public in the dark only fuels unnecessary tension and speculation. Let the investigation run its course properly.

@1PlatQCoy @afneil ‘Virtually defenceless’. America was giving Ukraine old stock that was due for destruction and old cold war kit.

It should be possible to deplore the Russian invasion of Ukraine while simultaneously believing that maintaining the defence of the homeland is more important than stripping one’s armed forces, war stocks and one’s treasury to give to a far away country, leaving one’s own virtually defenceless.

Ukraine is victim of an unprovoked invasion by a barbaric totalitarian killing machine. And the VP of the USA says he’s proud not to be helping it. Immoral, callous charlatan. Let’s hope we never hear of him again after 2028.

They lifted the cup… and THIS happened to their wedding cake 😳

@bobbygmam85 @JeremiahDJohns You no want to see an officer take a shit, whatever you’re into.

@JeremiahDJohns They should be on 24/7 and streamed for the review board. I wonder how much police committed crime goes unreported

Body cams should be absolutely universal for police. They're a win for good cops. They're a win for innocent people falsely accused. They're a win for the public who just want to see evidence of the truth. The only people negatively impacted are bad cops and criminals.

@epiamedia It’s dangerous to go alone, take this.

@87Mrdavidc @BettyBoochichi2

@BettyBoochichi2 And what's the issue with that? So what you've just admitted is you don't believe the public should be treated with dignity and respect Typical copper basically, an all round nasty piece of work who will abuse their position. You probably would have protected Wayne cousins

Police officers have been told they must treat suspects whom they stop and search with “dignity” in the wake of race rows over the tactic. The College of Policing, the standards body for officers’ conduct, has launched a consultation on new guidance for officers, which it says “places greater emphasis on the quality of the encounter itself”. The guidance says officers must explain “clearly” why they are searching a suspect and treat people with “dignity and respect throughout”. It also gives officers a list of up to eight checks they should make before they search a person whom they suspect of cannabis possession if they smell the drug in the street. The list includes whether the smell can be attributed to a specific person, whether it came from somewhere else, the likelihood of finding cannabis on a specific person and whether a reasonable person would judge a search to be justified. The proposed new guidance has been criticised by the Tories. Chris Philp, the Shadow Home Secretary, said: “This is yet more woke nonsense. The College of Policing should be making it easier to conduct stop and search, not harder. Stop and search takes knives and drugs off the streets and saves lives.” “The Conservative plan is to make stop and search easier and triple its use. Yet these guidelines bleat about racial disproportionality. The fact is, when stop and search rates are compared to the profile of offenders rather than the whole population, there is no disproportionality.” “The success rates of stop and search are the same across ethnic groups, showing that no one - including the black community - is being unfairly picked on. These new guidelines are a waste of time and will simply make stop and search more difficult, putting lives at risk and missing the chance to confiscate illegal drugs.” “I urge the College to cancel this consultation and instead make stop and search easier.” There has been a decline in the number of stop-and-searches by police. They reached a peak of 1.5 million in 2008-2009 before collapsing to 279,000 in 2017 after Theresa May, the then home secretary, issued revised guidance because of her concerns that the tactic was being disproportionately applied in black communities. The number has since risen with successive home secretaries and police chiefs defending the use of “intelligence-led” stop-and-searches to combat rising knife crime. However, the most recent data show that the number of stops and searches fell by 1.4 per cent in the year to March 2025 to 528,582 from 536,217 in the previous year, amid fears by officers that they could be subject to complaints and criticism of the disproportionate use of the tactic. ‘Culture of discrimination’ The college said the new guidance was a direct response to three reports by watchdogs. One found there was still a perception within black communities that it was being used “disproportionately” and that this could “reinforce” the sense that there was a “culture of discrimination within the police”. A second disciplinary action followed against three police officers for “gross misconduct” after they strip-searched a 15-year-old boy in his home without an appropriate adult present. The college said the guidance was designed to address “disproportionality affecting children, young people and other vulnerable groups”. “It strengthens safeguarding requirements and places greater emphasis on the quality of the encounter itself, not just whether a search takes place, but how it is conducted,” it said. It placed “greater focus on communication, helping officers explain clearly why a search is taking place and treating people with dignity and respect throughout”. It also provided guidance on de-escalation, recognising that “how officers engage can significantly affect the outcome of an encounter and its impact on community trust”. Continued…

@corruptuk1 @LBC @NickFerrariLBC They didn’t post the custody picture because it wasn’t released by the police until after he was convicted in line with the law.

@LBC @NickFerrariLBC

'The whole of society failed here.' Counter-terrorism expert Neil Basu tells @NickFerrariLBC where things went wrong with preventing the Southport attacks.

@Risinglondon8 @CrimeLdn Yes, next question.

@CrimeLdn Kneeing him? Is that police training?

Undercover police try and arrest a man outside screwfix in Brixton for dealing Class a drugs and as they try to arrest him the drugs go everywhere..

@DomAdlerUK @liam43102 @NJ_Timothy Sadly not enough.

@liam43102 @NJ_Timothy I'm glad Nick's chickens are coming home to roost.

Legacy of Theresa May and our current crime woes given a deserved kicking here. Certain advisors not mentioned by name, but we know who they are. @NJ_Timothy theguardian.com/commentisfree/…

@BettyBoochichi2 Delusional shits think they are the victims.

Two brothers attacked an armed police officer in an airport brawl using a 'high level of violence', a court heard on Monday. Mohammed Fahir Amaaz, 21, and his elder brother Muhammad Amaad, 26, rained 'repeated blows' on PC Zachary Marsden as he tried to arrest Amaaz in the parking payment area at Terminal Two in Manchester airport. Amaaz also acted 'in a cowardly manner' when he struck unarmed officer PC Lydia Ward by punching her in the face, breaking her nose and also hit PC Ellie Cook, an armed officer with 'a flurry of blows'. The fracas in July 2024 was caught on CCTV and the jury was shown the footage yesterday by prosecutor Paul Greaney KC. The CCTV sequence showed how violence flared when the officers tried to arrest Amaaz and showed the punch that broke PC Ward's nose. Jurors also saw Amaaz being wrestled to the floor after aiming punches at PC Cook and a kick aimed by PC Marsden at the head of Amaaz when the defendant was on the floor. Mr Greaney said that in response to having been assaulted, PC Marsden kicked Amaaz to the face and then brought his foot down towards the top of his head 'in what looks like a stamping motion.' He told the jury: 'Those actions look rather shocking in the cold light of day, but we suggest they need to be judged in the context of the very serious level of threat posed by the defendants to an officer who was concerned that his firearm might be taken from him at an international airport. 'In any event, those actions all occurred after the violence of the defendants. The position of the prosecution is that they are logically entirely irrelevant to the lawfulness of the conduct of Amaaz and Amaad.' The court heard on Monday that Amaaz was found guilty at a trial last year of assaulting the two women police officers. He was also found guilty of an assault on Qatari citizen Abdulkareem Ismaeil in a Starbucks cafe minutes before the incident in the parking payment area. The jury heard that the brothers had gone to the airport to meet their mother on a flight from Pakistan via Qatar and 'something had happened' between the mother and Mr Ismaeil which had made her unhappy. It was when the mother pointed out Mr Ismaeil in the cafe that Amaaz had confronted him and headbutted him in the face and struck further blows. The jury heard that the assaults on PCs Cook and Ward and the alleged assault on PC Marsden happened after they tried to arrest Amaaz for the attack on Mr Ismaeil. The jury heard that Amaaz still believes the jury in the first trial was wrong to convict him and claims he was acting in lawful self-defence. The jury in the first trial was unable to reach a verdict on both brothers over the alleged assault on PC Marsden. At a retrial Monday, Amaaz also claimed that he was acting in self-defence when he struck PC Marsden. Muhammad Amaad claims he was acting in defence of his brother and both men, from Rochdale, Greater Manchester, pleaded not guilty to assaulting PC Marsden, causing him actual bodily harm. Paul Greaney KC, prosecuting, told the jury: 'This is not a complicated case. The events were captured on CCTV and body-worn cameras of the police officers.’ 'You will be able to see with your own eyes what happened. What occurred is plain to see beyond any sensible argument.’ 'The defendants say the violence they used against PC Marsden was lawful because they were acting in self-defence or in defence of each other.’ 'Indeed, Amaaz goes further and claims that he was acting lawfully throughout and that the jury in the first trial was wrong.’ 'You have to decide whether you are sure that it may be they were acting in self-defence when they delivered repeated blows to PC Marsden.’ 'Our prediction is that you will readily conclude that the defendants were not acting in lawful self-defence and that their conduct was unlawful.' Mr Greaney told the jury that the two brothers walked from Starbucks to the pay station, a journey of just two minutes. Continued…

@Thegreatunwoken @NumberCrun77 @epiamedia Are not

@Thegreatunwoken @NumberCrun77 @epiamedia Magazines are restricted in any way in the UK. I’ve got 15 30 round PMAGS sat under my bed.

@elonmusk @AlexanderSoros

@AlexanderSoros *Soros Organization has taken over Hungary

The people of Hungary have taken back their country! A resounding rejection of entrenched corruption and foreign interference. 🇭🇺 🇪🇺

RIP Hungary. You’re about to be conquered by Muslims.

@joncoopertweets The boat.

Orbán, Putin, Netanyahu and Trump are in a rowboat that’s sinking in the middle of a lake. You can only save one of them — who would you choose?

@Fishhunter53603 @stsheelaghs @JohnCleese Decided to stop all military assistance to Ukraine since he came to power, ignored that Russia is assisting Iran in targeting American troops, eased sanctions on Russian oil.

@stsheelaghs @JohnCleese List the decisions President Trump has “constantly” made over the US and its allies. Not the made up shit.

If we accept that the Trump administration is on Russia's side, everything then makes sense

@derrickvanorden @VeryBrexitProbs

@VeryBrexitProbs Remember that time you guys very narrowly avoided getting your ass kicked by an Argentina? Might want to sit this one out, sailor.

General Dan Caine, Trump’s handpicked Chairman of the Joint Chiefs, boast is not the flex he thinks it is. 10,000 missions. Sounds like an impressive display of independent US airpower until you see where they actually flew from. Some flew from carriers in the Arabian Sea, primarily the USS Abraham Lincoln. But one carrier can only generate around 70-80 sorties a day. The USS Gerald R. Ford? Damaged by fire and pulled out for repairs. Its replacement is still sailing from Norfolk, Virginia. You can’t run a war from one ship. 62 bomber missions. Only 18 flew from the US. Most of the remaining 44? RAF Fairford in Gloucestershire, England. A British airfield in the Cotswolds is the heart of America’s bomber war against Iran. The F-35s and F-15Es? RAF Lakenheath, Suffolk. The F-15E shot down over Iran last week? 48th Fighter Wing based in England. The F-16 Wild Weasels suppressing Iranian air defences? Spangdahlem Air Base, Germany. The munitions? Likely drawn from US stockpiles at Ramstein, Germany. The aerial refuelling tankers that made all of it possible? Around 50 across the UK, Germany and Portugal. Another 35 in Spain, Italy, Greece and Bulgaria. That’s 85 tankers on European NATO soil. The US has zero permanently based fighters in the Middle East. Outside of one operational carrier, every fighter that flew over Iran came from or through European NATO bases. Without European NATO this war could not have been fought. That is not an opinion. It is a logistics fact. Trump told the world “the United States does not need the help of anyone.” Except the overwhelming majority of the 10,000 missions was only made possible thanks to the European NATO allies he spent two months insulting Maybe General Caine should remind Trump who actually holds all the cards. Has he even said thank you yet?

The Strait of Hormuz was closed for 47 years by the Mad Mullahs of Iran. But tonight, Donald Trump opened it.

‘College of Policing can’t meet all demands – but it is needed more than ever before’ policeoracle.com/article-librar…