Thomas Troy
1.8K posts


@JM_speakss Bitcoin is my biggest asset but I’m not 100% because I have high conviction in other investment themes as well:
Ai infrastructure
Genomics/healthcare advancements
Robotics
Rare Earths
English

I own a multi million dollar house.
I retired my parents and they live with me.
No kids.
One dog.
Two cars.
All on a $150,000 salary.
I have enough to provide for everyone, take care of myself, and still stack Bitcoin. I even pull equity out of my house every 3-5 years and put it into Bitcoin.
90% of my net worth is probably in Bitcoin.
Does that make me retarded?
Maybe.
Will that stop me from stacking more?
Never.
A lot of people will tell you $150,000 isn’t enough to survive anymore.
I’m living proof that it is.
But you can’t live like a consumer zombie and then cry that life is expensive.
Live below your means.
Eat real food.
Workout.
Stop buying shit you don’t need. Stop trying to impress people who would forget you existed in 24 hours.
And save in assets that actually matter.
Because here’s the ugly truth:
If you put $10,000 into QQQ 15 years ago, you’d have roughly $130,000 today.
Insane return.
If you put $10,000 into Bitcoin around the same time, you’d be sitting on roughly $80M+.
That’s the difference between buying growth and buying monetary escape velocity.
So be honest:
What’s actually stopping you from putting 100% of your networth in Bitcoin?
English

Traders calling a $BTC bear cycle are missing the bigger picture — they're completely ignoring the stock market.
S&P 500, Nasdaq, and Russell 2000 are all surging to fresh all-time highs.
A real Bitcoin bear market typically hits when stocks are also getting crushed and liquidity is being drained from the system.
Right now? Risk assets are still flush with capital.
x.com/KillaXBT/statu…
English

@TommyTypey @MktMavPro Thomas do you know the comapany can be worth 100B and share price still be $50?
Stockprice need momentum.
English

@FinanceLancelot Good luck waiting for that limit buy to trigger
English

Bitcoin's typical down cycle is 364 days.
The top was October 6, 2025 putting the $BTC bottom at October 5, 2026
Based on the parabolic support, that's roughly around $19,000

Financelot@FinanceLancelot
Federal Reserve chair change timed for Bitcoin's down cycle? I've seen stranger things. According to the chart $BTC it should begin in MAY bottom around November 2026. This would align with Kevin Warsh's appointment.
English

@twistartups @Jason 🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡
Barely anyone understands Bitcoin. Adoption is just getting started. SOL and TAO are great projects but they’re window dressing on the Bitcoin train.
English

Is Bitcoin on a decline? @jason seems to think so!
Most people who want exposure are already hodling. Stablecoins replaced the “move money” use case, and builders are shipping on newer rails (TAO, SOL, etc.).
So where will new buyers come from? Not investment advice!
English

@LeveredUSTs Velocity of capital increases compounding.
And it will further stabilize $STRC volatility which will enable $MSTR to acquire more $BTC which further strengthens the collateral base.
Which part of this is confusing?
English

Help me understand, $STRC holders. What problem are bi-weekly return of capital distributions solving for you that once a month isn’t?
Strategy@Strategy
$MSTR & $STRC holders, check your inboxes & mailboxes. Brokerages have started sending voting notices on the proposed amendment to pay dividends twice a month instead of once. Be sure to cast your vote for both share classes. Learn how to vote: strategy.com/strc/vote
English

@BitcoinErrorLog The product is $STRC, which everyone wants.
It’s the most liquid preferred stock in the world.
Single-day trading volumes reached record highs of $1.156 billion in April.
I think people like the product.
Maybe that’s why people are bullish on $MSTR?
English

@scottmelker @cz_binance Exactly. Lightbulbs didn’t compete with candles they just become lighting.
English

Crypto is not competing with traditional finance.
It is becoming the next evolution of finance.
@cz_binance
English

@SenWarren @JetBlue @SpiritAirlines @JusticeATR @USDOT Spirit is a deplorable airline. It’s the only box I check when excluding carriers during a Google search.
English

I've warned for months that a @JetBlue-@SpiritAirlines merger would have led to fewer flights and higher fares.
@JusticeATR and @USDOT were right to stand up for consumers and fight against runaway airline consolidation.
This is a Biden win for flyers! apnews.com/article/jetblu…
English

@LeveredUSTs Searching for the substance of your argument…
Every novel idea shocks people. That’s why it’s novel.
English

Since at least the late 19th century, semi-annual coupon payments have been the standard in U.S. bond markets. The British consols -- history's most famous and geopolitically significant perpetual credit instrument-- paid quarterly.
If the promoters' claims that bi-monthly payments represent a game-changing "structural refinement" designed to "improve cash-flow utility, reduce dividend-cycle friction, support price stability, increase trading liquidity, and potentially expand the investor base" ... why in the span of 200+ years haven't all credit issuers converged on this standard earlier?
Or is this latest "innovation" to shrink the distribution cycle just another demonstration of Saylor's unmatched genius, sitting right under the nose of everyone ever involved in the history of credit markets until now?
Roxom@roxom
English

$MSTR
Strategy has the tools to build its Rome in the capital markets.
It could be one of the longest lasting companies the world has seen…
Saylor made an observation
that got me thinking;
During the Revolutionary War,
the average human life expectancy
was 32.
Sterilizing a surgical knife,
harnessing antibiotics,
got us from there to 80.
Technology is what takes
the human race from a world where you die at 30 to one where you live to 80.
The question I started asking myself
is what happens when you apply the same
to a company.
The average S&P 500 company today
lasts 15 to 20 years.
In the 1950s that number was over 60.
Companies are dying faster.
Most are capitalized
on assets that erode.
Their cash devalues,
their debt compounds,
which eventually bleeds the balance sheet.
BUT…
What happens
when a company stops bleeding?
@Strategy has made one defining decision.
To capitalize itself on an asset
that doesn’t erode.
As long as the network holds
and the company never sells
its Bitcoin…
the foundation remains intact.
The only threat is the temptation
to overcomplicate.
Rome didn’t fall because it lacked leadership
or power.
It overextended itself.
The mission here is simple.
Accumulate.
Preserve.
Don’t deviate.
As Saylor says, “maintain laser like focus.”
As long as Strategy holds that line,
the world is looking at something
that has never existed before.
A company built to outlast its era.
$BTC $MSTR $STRC


English











