Eric Tailor

@SternDrewCrypto Lol they won’t land on the moon because they can’t. The Blue Origin lander didn’t even get out of the vacuum chamber test until next week. Axiom hasn’t finished building the space suit. Y’all are the psyop.

🚨 BREAKING: THE ARTEMIS LAUNCH IS THE DEEPEST COVER-UP YET. THEY ARE NOT GOING TO THE MOON. THEY ARE HIDING WHAT IS ALREADY THERE! 🚨 Yesterday's so-called historic Artemis II blast-off from Kennedy Space Center was not a triumphant return to the Moon after 50 plus years. It was Stage 2 of the greatest psyop in human history. They rolled out that bloated SLS rocket built with your tax dollars funneled through endless delays and cost overruns carrying four so-called heroes on a 10-day joyride. But ask yourself: Why no landing? Why just a quick lap around the Moon and back? Because they cannot risk showing you what is really on the lunar surface. The original Apollo missions? All filmed on a Hollywood soundstage. Van Allen radiation belts? Deadly. Flag waving in vacuum? Studio fans. No stars in the photos? Convenient lighting. Buzz Aldrin himself looked uncomfortable when pressed. Now they are rebooting the narrative with Artemis because the old lie is crumbling under scrutiny. This launch was pure theater: - Perfect timing right after years of technical issues and budget black holes. - Crew includes international players, Canadian astronaut and all, to make it look global while the real players pull strings from the shadows. - That convenient toilet fan glitch hours in? Classic distraction. Oh no, the billion-dollar potty broke! Meanwhile, the real payload, surveillance tech or alien artifact retrieval protocols, slips under the radar. Why now? Distraction from Earthly chaos. Keep the sheep cheering fireworks in the sky while the real power consolidates control over space narrative, resources, and the coming disclosure they will script themselves. The sheep are celebrating humanity's return. The awake see the strings. They faked it before. They are faking it better now. Question everything.

@guyfelicella @RodKahx It is ours. It certainly isn’t yours.

@RodKahx Americans think the moon is theirs the same way they think everything else is. Smh 🙄

Our moon. The average US citizen in a nutshell.

@Ac7ionMann Why is it impossible? I can show you the math that proves you are wrong.

Launching this crap on April fools day with no space POV? Guys it’s impossible to go to the moon. We didn’t do it in 69’ and we aren’t doing it now. They are going to sit in orbit for a week and have cgi do the rest. Fake and gay.

@Treeclimbergabe @tweettruth2me Because this is a practice run for the next mission. This lets the astronauts, Mission Control, the engineers see how it’s going to go on game day. There will be 10000 changes to Artemis III and IV as a result of Artemis II.

@tweettruth2me Even if you support a trip around the moon, why is it manned? Why risk lives? Everything is automated. You can make it smaller and cheaper. Cameras and videos are all you need, humans seeing it with their eyes do us no good.

Let’s say goodbye to $100 billion plus in taxpayer dollars.

@tweettruth2me @BigTexJames NASA isn’t the problem. Congress and corporations are the ones turning this into a moondoggle. NASA is doing a good job with the tiny budget they have.

@BigTexJames NASA is one of our biggest scams.

@Tazerface16 @jeffkelehernb What are you talking about? Your prediction is about getting to orbit, not deorbiting. Clearly Starship can get to orbit if SpaceX wants it to.

@jeffkelehernb Velocity means nothing. Control is everything. How would they have deorbited it, kiddo?

I'm an aerospace engineer. I made this prediction over five years ago, and I'm still correct. I'm not interested in non-engineers trying to explain to me how I'm wrong somehow. Elon Musk is not an engineer.

@anon8mous @Tazerface16 You don’t need a degree if you have experience. There’s very little I know with two Astronautical Engineering degrees that Elon doesn’t know.

@Tazerface16 Elon Musk has a Bachelor of ARTS in physics, not science, but calls himself a physicist/engineer,😂. He has never done an experiment or set foot in laboratory his whole life. The guy steals credit & put his name on research papers/patents of his employees b/c he owns the company.

@TSharp12086 @NavyStrang We lost three great astronauts. Grissom, White, and Chaffee. Yes we will likely lose more astronauts in the future, after Apollo 1, Challenger, and Columbia, NASA changed risk posture. Our systems now are many times safer than the Apollo systems.

@ToolTimeTailor @NavyStrang I expect you are correct on their purpose. No lives were lost on the moon. And if anyone thinks there will be no more lives lost because there is better tech these days, Welllllllll. well

One of them is on its way to the moon, the other keeps blowing up. I guess NASA concentrated on the important stuff.

@HighImpactFlix NASA didn’t have the budget to add a bunch of cabling, transmitters, and cameras. They could barely pull this off with minimum set of requirements. This rocket is years behind schedule and way over budget.

Holy Hell!! The Artemis 2 launch was PATHETIC and had horrible video feeds. They were better in the 1960s! How can this not be all by design? At least when Elon does a launch, there are multiple camera angles and it's entertaining. Even NASA's animation sucks!

@ThomasRGolden @Helloimmorgan That’s what happens when you take away 90% of NASA’s budget.

@Helloimmorgan With as much as tech has advanced we should be piloting the starship enterprise at this point, but no we've regressed to just taking a ride around the moon.

Why are they just going around the moon and not stepping on it…

@Helloimmorgan Because the landers and space suit aren’t ready yet, and we don’t want to wait. This is a practice run for the astronauts, Mission Control, and engineers who never did this before. Also, better to work out any kinks with SLS and Orion before we commit our people to the surface.

@seditiorebellum @WayneWaldropW Just because someone climbed Mt Everest once doesn’t mean it’s not an insanely dangerous challenge for anybody else trying it next.

@WayneWaldropW Makes you wonder, did we really land on the moon?

We are flying by the moon this time instead of landing on it despite it being 50 years since we last "landed on the moon". Why does this seem like a step back instead of progress?

@WayneWaldropW Because we don’t have and dont want to use that old dangerous tech. And so far, all we have ready is a rocket to get to the moon but not a lander to land on it, or suits to wear on the surface. Those are coming very soon but not ready for Artemis II.

You look at the United States today and of course you don't believe they put a man on the moon in 1969 But go watch the Apollo 11 documentary on Amazon What you'll see is an entirely different country full of people that basically no longer exist today A serious, focused, rational, and united people with a common goal They had a pack of tin foil and less computing power than a microwave oven... But they understood physics They knew how to build things And most of all, they had belief Why wouldn't they? They were from the country that invented flight itself If two bike mechanics from the midwest could accomplish something that even the great da Vinci only dreamed of... Why couldn't a team of the brightest minds in the most powerful country in the world come together to put a man on the moon? As time goes on, fewer people believe that the scientists and engineers of the 60's actually put a man on the moon But that says more about our own time than theirs Go tour the Mont Saint-Michel in France and you'll realize that progress isn't always linear They built that place 500+ years ago, but no one could imagine us building it today Yet no one denies it's there. It sits there as a high watermark in architectural history, reminding us what we are no longer capable of. The moon landing is a lot easier to deny. You can't see it with your own eyes. And what you do see with your own eyes makes it hard to believe it was possible.

@Truthful_ast People should demand Congress spend more money on NASA.

I understand frustrations with the Artemis II flyby as it’s not that grand of a flight plan compared to all the manned Apollo lunar missions But remember, this is humanity’s return to the Moon! it may be slow and disappointing currently but we will have an Artemis landing in 2028, a NASA moon base in the 2030s, SpaceX’s Moonbase Alpha in the 2030s, China will land in 2030, China will also build a base in the 2030s, and we will start industrialization of the rock. We sadly have to take baby steps towards it but this is far better than the stagnation of very little spaceflight accomplishments for the past 3-4 decades.

@ForwardCarolina @SonofKiese That’s only one answer. There are more than one answers. Do you really think they intended for tourists to gain instant citizenship? Do we not have the ability to think critically and rationally about our own system of government?

@SonofKiese Because it refers to people with diplomatic immunity. Otherwise, you'd be suggesting that undocumented immigrants are legally immune from U.S. law, which is obviously not the case.

Here's the thing: if you oppose birthright citizenship, that's an opinion you're allowed to hold. It's a free country. It means you support changing the United States Constitution, which very clearly and explicitly says anyone born on American soil is a citizen. But pretending that the U.S. Constitution doesn't say that, just because you don't like it, is a silly child's game. Birthright citizenship is a foundational principle of what America is all about, and no President, no matter how ignorant or delusional, is able to change that with the stroke of a pen. That's just not how America works. 🇺🇸

@TSharp12086 @NavyStrang You did it at the cost of several human lives. The tech was dangerous and unsustainable. There was no meaningful moon science performed. Didn’t learn much about how to stay on the moon for long. NASA is trying to do it better now.

@NavyStrang I just don't know what all the excitement is about, my generation did this 50 years ago.

@NavyStrang SpaceX isn’t building a rocket that won’t blow up. They are building a rocket to test the boundaries of what will blow up and what won’t. Also the SpaceX rocket is reusable, so it needs to survive the harsh reentry. NASA didn’t have to do that. Their rocket just has to go up.

@Retiremyass I was in charge of testing the new Collins suit but corporate pulled out of the contract because it was much more expensive to develop than what was anticipated. So now Axiom is the only contractor building a new suit.

@Retiremyass NASA doesn’t have moon suits yet. The old ones for the moon were junk and it’s been a challenge to design new ones quickly enough for this mission. The ones they were developing failed to meet needs, so they are using the old proven suits until Axiom finishes the new ones.

They are still wearing the old Challenger suits from over 40 years ago. Where is the progress? Is it all a scam?

@Retiremyass @FionnoSull2024 The SpaceX suit is for indoors or emergencies only. You can’t go outside or walk on the moon in those suits. It isn’t pressurized to the levels needed for space. That’s why they are more mobile.