Be Water

813 posts

Be Water banner
Be Water

Be Water

@bewaterltd

Multiflation • Choice, Not Chance • Not Investment Advice

More Here ⇒ เข้าร่วม Mayıs 2024
1.4K กำลังติดตาม1.9K ผู้ติดตาม
Be Water รีทวีตแล้ว
Mojo
Mojo@MrMojoRisinX·
Simple Approach: Step 1) Select any event/arb morning note or a few (TD, Wolf, MS, Goldman). Or just download all event/corporate actions and combine 2/3 below 2) Make necessary exclusions 3) Bucket into merger arb, spec arb/pre event, spin/split, announced strategic alternatives, companies that have emerged from BK over the last 12 months, spin/splits coming up 2 year anniversary as an easy way to segment. 4) Change options alerts from 5k or 1k contracts trades to 200 contracts size; remove all down 30% OI (these are center book RoF trades), and just look at down 5/10/15/20 and can prob stop there. Anything with similar OI re down 5/15 are likely spreads. The outliers are the outright higher OIs re likely not to be spreads. This is where you want to dig in and look at implied vol, absolute stock price levels vs pre deal trading range, as well as beta adjusted break prices. (Look at number of 200 contract trades in OI vs prior month(s). Leading question...but tell me what you find) 5) Look at total OI m/m and m vs prior quarter by bucket and by name (some seasonality in there and book turnover, but not much)...can also segment by duration vs implied timing/close for deeper look (hint: nothing stands out here, re this is wholistic short corporate actions trades going up and someone looking for some gamma hamma) 7) Subscribe to Mojo and @bewaterltd Let me know if this helps.
GIF
ArbSensei@ArbSensei

@MrMojoRisinX which names are you seeing and why do you think that could be? overall board is pretty tight imo with a few exceptions

English
2
1
12
2.8K
Hunter 🌆
Hunter 🌆@rhunterh·
Followers, I have let my Grants subscription lapse as a result of periodical budget cuts from upper mgt (my wife) but I would very much like to read the Murray Stahl obit if anyone cares to share it. DMs open.
English
3
0
34
6.4K
Be Water
Be Water@bewaterltd·
Ahem His modern disciples mostly kept the catechism and threw away the rest of Graham’s toolkit. They inherited the noun “value” and discarded the verbs—the acts of forcing, compelling, and engineering convergence between price and value that actually drove Graham’s most successful investments. In short, they discarded Graham’s brass knuckles... bewaterltd.com/p/value-contin…
Korea Value Hunter@koreavaluehunt

Finding cheap Korean stocks in 2026 is the closest thing in modern public markets to running Benjamin Graham’s original 1934 playbook in the market it was actually written for, which was a market full of small, profitable, debt-free companies whose stock prices had drifted so far below the value of the assets on the balance sheet that the only rational explanation was that nobody was looking, which is exactly the condition that exists in Korea today, on a scale that has not been seen in any developed market in 40 years. You start with the universe of all KOSPI and KOSDAQ listed companies. There are more than 2,700 of them. You filter for market cap below $500 million, because the deep value lives in the small and mid caps where the institutions cannot go and the activists have not yet arrived. You filter for price-to-tangible-book below 0.7. You filter for net cash on the balance sheet, meaning total cash and marketable securities exceeding total debt. You filter for profitability in at least 8 of the last 10 years. You filter for positive operating cash flow in the most recent year. The screen, when you run it, returns hundreds of companies, and a meaningful subset of those are trading below net current asset value, which is the Graham-defined bar that almost no American company has cleared in 40 years. You then do what Graham did, which is read. You read the financial filings, you look at the land carried on the balance sheet at acquisition cost from the 1970s, you look at the cash hoarded by founding families who have run the company for two generations and have never paid a meaningful dividend. You look at the age of the chairman. You look at whether the company has disclosed a Corporate Value Up plan, because companies that have are statistically more likely to act on it. You look at the shareholder register for activist accumulations, which are increasingly common in Korea now that the legal framework has shifted to require directors to act in the interests of all shareholders. Then you build a basket. Graham did not buy one stock. He bought 30 of them, equal weighted, and held until they reverted to fair value, at which point he sold and redeployed into the next batch. You do the same. You buy 30 to 50 Korean deep value names, you size each position small, you hold for a decade, and you let the math do what the math has always done. Some will go nowhere for years and then re-rate 4x in a quarter when the activist arrives, the founder retires, or the government applies the next round of Value Up pressure. You cannot predict which one will be which. You do not need to. You need to be in the basket when the catalysts arrive, and the catalysts are arriving faster, in 2026, than they have at any point in the modern history of the Korean market. This is Graham. Not the late Graham of the postscript, who acknowledged that the original strategy had been arbitraged out of the American market by the 1970s. The early Graham, the 1934 Graham, the Graham who walked into the corner of the market everyone else had abandoned and bought dollars for sixty cents and held them while the world figured out what they were worth. That market does not exist in America anymore. It exists, intact, in Korea, in 2026, and the only thing standing between you and it is a brokerage account, a translation tool, and the willingness to do the unglamorous work that almost nobody else will do. Graham would recognize it instantly. He would, if he were alive today, be on a plane.

English
1
0
5
870
Be Water
Be Water@bewaterltd·
Radigan's piece is worth reading, as is the Deden essay linked within. Garet Garrett wrote about this in The Revolution Was (1938), calling it a "revolution within the form" Deden: Democratic forms are preserved and popular sovereignty is invoked even as real sovereignty erodes. Moreover, the language of rights endures even as rights themselves become conditional, revocable, and subject to administrative discretion. Western societies behave as though they remain democratic, even as their institutional and moral architecture is gradually being dismantled in plain sight. Garrett: [It was accomplished] not only within the form but within the word, so that people were all the while fixed in the delusion that they were talking about the same things because they were using the same words. Opposite and violently hostile ideas were represented by the same word signs. This was the American people’s first experience with dialectic according to Marx and Lenin. Edward Gibbon observed the same strategy nearly two millennia earlier in Rome: Augustus was sensible that mankind is governed by names…the senate and people would submit to slavery, provided they were respectfully assured that they still enjoyed their ancient freedom.
Radigan Carter@radigancarter

radigancarter.com/p/the-invisibi…

English
1
0
7
630
Be Water
Be Water@bewaterltd·
What
RTN@RTNToronto

#NEW: Canadian radio host sentenced to 5.5 years in prison after getting caught with 238 pounds of meth at border.

English
0
1
6
1.2K
Be Water
Be Water@bewaterltd·
@Austen Order of operations matters
English
0
0
1
86
Austen Allred
Austen Allred@Austen·
Sometimes it feels like I’m the only person who thinks AI will create far more jobs than it destroys. Isn’t that the obvious outcome of this?
English
231
13
521
31.9K
Be Water รีทวีตแล้ว
Kalani o Māui
Kalani o Māui@MauiBoyMacro·
“The U.S. national debt now exceeds 100% of gross domestic product, crossing a once-unthinkable threshold, on the way toward breaking the record set in the wake of World War II.” 👇🏼 wsj.com/economy/u-s-de…
Kalani o Māui tweet media
English
0
5
16
701
Be Water รีทวีตแล้ว
Ethan Mollick
Ethan Mollick@emollick·
"Load bearing," "I keep coming back to," "Not X, but Y" A curse of using AI a lot is that you realize how much of the writing around you is just AI, now People who don't use AI have been unable to identify AI prose on sight, but those who use it a lot can spot the tells easily
Ethan Mollick tweet media
English
71
73
680
40.4K
Ronnie Stoeferle
Ronnie Stoeferle@RonStoeferle·
"Inflation is a tragedy that makes a whole people cynical, hardhearted and indifferent." Thomas Mann
English
4
9
67
3.4K