stupidsexyflanders
335 posts


The President’s threat that “a whole civilization will die tonight” cannot be excused away as an attempt to gain leverage in negotiations with Iran.
This type of rhetoric is an affront to the ideals our nation has sought to uphold and promote around the world for nearly 250 years. It undermines our long-standing role as a global beacon of freedom and directly endangers Americans both abroad and at home.
The oppressive, terror-spreading regime of the Islamic Republic must be distinguished from the people and the civilization of Iran. Everyone involved—especially the President and Iran’s leaders—must de-escalate their unprecedented saber-rattling before it is too late.
English

@RepMariaSalazar With Republicans like this, who needs Democrats?🙄
English

READ. THE. BILL. BEFORE. YOU. OPEN. YOUR. MOUTH.
Calling the DIGNITY Act “amnesty” isn’t just wrong. It’s a deliberate distortion and it exposes just how little you know about the bill.
This is enforcement first: zero tolerance for criminals, permanent border security, and hard, earned requirements to step forward and face the law, so American workers are protected, not undercut.
Amnesty is the chaos you’ve defended, millions in the shadows, no control, no accountability, and a system that stopped working a long time ago.
No shortcuts. No giveaways. No blanket forgiveness. That’s law and order. That’s DIGNITY.
Congressman Brandon Gill@RepBrandonGill
The Dignity Act is mass amnesty and would constitute a terrible betrayal of our voters.
English


Amnesty is a free pass. It is what exists now.
With the DIGNITY Act, you come forward, you face the law, you pass background checks, you pay what you owe, and you earn your place or you get deported.
Criminals? Gone.
American workers? Protected.
Our national security depends on it. Our economy demands it. Our communities need it. And yes, our faith calls us to do this the right way, with order and accountability.
That’s enforcement. That’s DIGNITY.
Calling this amnesty is a lie that keeps a broken system alive and Americans paying the price.
Samuel Rodriguez@nhclc
Dignity Act= No amnesty No citizenship No welfare No open borders No illegal immigration Dignity Act= Yes to protecting economic sectors Yes to deporting the criminal element Yes to fulfilling President Trump’s promise Yes to providing dignity @RepMariaSalazar
English

🚨BREAKING: 20 Republicans and 20 Democrats just co-sponsored the Dignity Act — the first serious bipartisan immigration bill in decades.
What it actually does:
No amnesty. No citizenship. No handouts. A pathway to legal work status for long-term undocumented immigrants who meet strict requirements — fully funded by restitution payments from immigrants themselves, requiring zero taxpayer dollars.
Mike Lawler’s own words: “This is not amnesty. It’s accountability, it’s fairness, it is dignity.”

English

@thecinelost Tasteless mash up of the Diary of Anne Frank with Hogan's Heroes. Tried to be funny and moving but wound up being neither.
English

@cordypage @ItIsHoeMath It never should have happened, we were warned about the consequences of giving women political power for literally centuries, and it WILL end civilization if we don't end it. One way or another it has to stop.
English

@ItIsHoeMath I don’t see a realistic path to repealing a constitutional amendment like that without overwhelming support which would need to include most rw women. Seems like you are trying to hurt your own side’s chances of winning for no reason.
English

@overton_news This blowhard has no clue what "subject to the jurisdiction thereof" means. Then again, neither does Ketanji Brown Jackson.
English

🚨 Stephen A. Smith dropped a SURPRISING take on birthright citizenship.
“When the president walked in to the Supreme Court...to attend oral arguments...I’m here to tell you ladies and gentlemen, I don’t blame him.”
Smith then asked his audience the uncomfortable question about birthright citizenship: “Is it right?”
SMITH: “The issue that I wanted to get into is birthright citizenship by simply asking this question.”
“When the president walked in to the Supreme Court today...to hear their thoughts, their questions, their inquiry, their opinions on birthright citizenship in the United States of America.”
“How’d you feel about that?”
“I’m here to tell you, ladies and gentlemen, I don’t blame him.”
“He campaigned on this issue.”
“He’s been accused of not paying attention to stuff that’s happening on our home soil.”
“You want to do something politically expedient to your benefit, if you’re President Donald Trump, this is the fight you fight, because millions of Americans flow with him on this issue.”
“And the reason why it’s an issue that’s important to tackle is because remember what the 14th amendment of the United States Constitution states.”
“Remember what it states!”
“All persons born or naturalized in the United States and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States.
“Meaning if you are born on U.S. soil, you are a U.S. citizen automatically. Automatically!”
“Here’s the part that we have to ask ourselves, and this is where the conversation gets uncomfortable, do you believe in birthright citizenship as an American citizen?”
“Do you believe that somebody that crosses our borders illegally, to give birth on American soil, that their children, their newborn should automatically be an American citizen?”
“According to the United States Constitution, there is no argument there.”
“What I’m asking you is, is it right?”
“Should it happen?”
English
stupidsexyflanders รีทวีตแล้ว


@Oilfield_Rando @neoavatara Seems more like we have an undead Constitution.
English

@neoavatara We have a living constitution regardless of what side we’re on or what we advocate for. It’s done.
Look how many infringements there are on the second amendment. Hell, on the fourth amendment. It’s a moot debate.
English

@WallStreetMav Let's not get too bent out of shape over questions during oral argument. Except maybe those from Ketanji Brown Jackson because it shows she has no business being there.
English

@EndWokeness That's not what they meant by "subject to the jurisdiction." Everybody is expected to follow the laws of the jurisdiction they're physically in. No serious jurist would accept that argument.
English

@ksorbs All the Abrahamic religions are middle eastern. Some Hebrew scholars read Plato's Republic years ago, liked the part about the "Noble Lie", and came up with the Moses fable. It's all unrealistic egalitarian nonsense that's doing white people more harm than good.
English

"Let in more refugees because Jesus said to be nice somewhere in the Bible. No I'm not a Christian, and I have nothing for disdain for you, but I'm going to misquote Scripture in the hopes that it makes you bend the knee to me."
Cheri Jacobus@CheriJacobus
English

@ItIsHoeMath @FromKulak “freedom is the ability to live reasonably” -Aristotle.
English

You are talking about accepting responsibility for your own sovereignty.
I am talking about allowing people to live lives with no social pressures or expectations. Each individual chooses his own beliefs and morals.
If you allow that, the vast majority of people will adapt to the path of least resistance. That's how you get men dressed as women going in the girls bathroom. That's just easier than becoming someone respectable.
English













