Controversies of Science

112.9K posts

Controversies of Science banner
Controversies of Science

Controversies of Science

@controscience

I track scientific controversies

San Francisco, CA เข้าร่วม Ocak 2018
863 กำลังติดตาม4.9K ผู้ติดตาม
ทวีตที่ปักหมุด
Controversies of Science
Controversies of Science@controscience·
The documentary I'm putting together is VERY long, + is really more like a freshman-level university course on scientific controversies. First of its kind. Will include curated reading materials, short videos, thought-provoking conversations + some relevant comedy.
English
3
0
14
629
News from Science
News from Science@NewsfromScience·
Some kinds of static electricity are easy to understand. Rub a balloon against your hair, and negative charges will accumulate on the rubber because it has a greater affinity for holding charges. Your hair, now positively charged, will be attracted to the balloon. And because like charges repel, strands of your hair will splay out from each other. But identical materials with identical affinities can also exchange charges, seemingly without rhyme or reason. Particles in volcanic ash plumes somehow build up enough charge to trigger lightning; dust in grain silos can spark and explode. In a new study, researchers say they have finally found the culprit: trace amounts of surface contamination by carbon-bearing molecules from the air. Learn more: scim.ag/4cY6MTa
News from Science tweet media
English
1
9
18
1.6K
Children’s Health Defense
Dr. Larry Palevsky: “Vaccines are MADE to cause inflammation.” “Every child vaccinated is injured because inflammation has to happen.” “By definition, we cause inflammation when we give vaccines.” “How long does that inflammation go on?” “We have no data.” “Where does that inflammation go in the body?” “We have no data.” “When you look at the studies… there are no real understandings of what happens.” “We have so many kids with chronic inflammation.” “We are administering a medical procedure that causes inflammation without data to understand how long it lasts and where it goes in the body.” “We owe it to our children to find these answers before we keep causing inflammation.” @MAHA_Institute
English
19
428
893
10.1K
Controversies of Science รีทวีตแล้ว
Controversies of Science รีทวีตแล้ว
Science girl
Science girl@sciencegirl·
A farmer in Brazil calls each cow by name, and they answer back, one by one
English
187
1.1K
7.1K
228.4K
Controversies of Science รีทวีตแล้ว
Jamie Andrews
Jamie Andrews@JamieAA_Again·
AND the Controlled Opposition are rolled out. "Biolabs in Manchester" "A couple of Hours away"... lol this may work on Americans... to British people Manchester is the other end of the country from Canterbury. Gain of Function is bollocks. Contagious Pathogens are a myth.
Peter A. McCullough, MD, MPH®@P_McCulloughMD

UK Meningitis B Outbreak Suspicious for Laboratory Derived, Highly Pathogenic Strain Emerging from National Meningococcus Bio-Lab Just a few hours away from Kent University work is being done on highly infectious and deadly stains of same bacteria. Connection should be investigated. @johnsearsleake @McCulloughFund @NHSEngland @Johnincarlisle @johnleake734116/note/p-191707036?r=ohptw&utm_medium=ios&utm_source=notes-share-action" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">substack.com/@johnleake7341

English
9
12
47
1.1K
Controversies of Science
Controversies of Science@controscience·
@JamieAA_Again With nitrous oxide, the visual veil can even become lifted s/t you actually witness a sort of transparent "screen" overlaid onto your vision which appears to be created by the subconscious. In this way, you can directly converse w your subconscious.
English
0
0
1
19
Controversies of Science
Controversies of Science@controscience·
@JamieAA_Again Many famous authors found their "muse" from alcohol in particular. I noticed this early on as well that alcohol depresses the rational brain, while empowering the subconscious - sometimes w disastrous results (lol). A far more pronounced effect can occur w nitrous oxide.
English
1
0
2
43
Jamie Andrews
Jamie Andrews@JamieAA_Again·
It's an interesting point. Probably agree with you. The only time you could break the shackles of indoctrination was tied into slowly poisoning the body instead.
Controversies of Science@controscience

@JamieAA_Again When I reflect back to my school + uni days, it's hard not to think that the partying I did actually reduced the amount of programming I received, + it was really mostly bc of that reduced focus on schooling that I retained some sense of curiosity + critical thinking as an adult.

English
1
1
6
376
Controversies of Science
Controversies of Science@controscience·
@JamieAA_Again When I reflect back to my school + uni days, it's hard not to think that the partying I did actually reduced the amount of programming I received, + it was really mostly bc of that reduced focus on schooling that I retained some sense of curiosity + critical thinking as an adult.
English
0
0
6
435
Jamie Andrews
Jamie Andrews@JamieAA_Again·
This IS the sole purpose of the Religious Cult that is Science. Only teenagers and students that have been partying, drinking and doing recreational drugs to excess after huge Covid/HPV/Flu Vaccine Campaigns specifically for their age group suddenly become susceptible to a bacteria readily found in healthy people, the experts admitting the only reason these normal bacteria turn into killers is because of a "change in internal environment" (i.e Terrain from abusing your body with things that claim to effect the "immune System" like drink/pharma drugs/recreational drugs/stress etc). These Flu like symptoms only seeming to kill in hospitals. Instead of coming to the logical, observable conclusion that students are poisoning themselves with debauched lifestyles and hospitals are finishing them off they reject these personal senses and hand their ability to think over to the State who have told them something they can't see ( A bacteria) is the culprit and to stop it they must further poison themselves.
Jamie Andrews tweet media
English
6
33
89
1.7K
Controversies of Science
Controversies of Science@controscience·
This triple-pronged approach is clearly intended as a takeover of the American educational system!
English
0
0
0
23
Controversies of Science
Controversies of Science@controscience·
This is why you should be angry: Bill Gates is quietly imposing a new badge-based system of surveillance into the American educational system at the same time that Marxists are imposing the completely non-educational "CRITICAL" constructivist pedagogy. x.com/Hannibal997248…
Hannibal999@Hannibal9972485

Warning Congress that Bill gates and Tech companies are conspiring to collapse the EDUCATION SYSTEM , they have a MONOPOLY being SET UP where they control the entry point to the workforce of ENTIRE AMERICA by REMOVING the human-based judgment of hiring (degrees, interviews, gut feeling) with a centralized, algorithmic, data-driven system controlled by private tech monopolies. 🚨🚨🚨it’s very similar to The **"Nomenklatura" system** used in the Soviet Union. Or the "Party Card" in COMMUNIST Russia you need Party approval. You didn't apply; you were vetted. You needed a "file" (dossier) proving your loyalty and competence. This matches the "Digital Dossier" (Skills Graph). The Party (Microsoft) holds the keys to the career. The PARTY DECIDES if you’re “WORTHY” to exist. 🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨 They are conspiring to turn education into a data-mining operation. They have a SYSTEM being SET UP a "Credential Ecosystem" a surveillance tool. That tracks your attention span, your memory, your speed, and your compliance. This data will be the NEW FORM of MONEY (DATA A CURRENCY) . They are building a "Psychological Resume" on AMERICANS on every human being, which they will sell to employers.🚨🚨 The way it works ? 1. You log into a centralized learning platform (like LinkedIn Learning, Coursera, or a Microsoft-certified system)⚠️⚠️⚠️ The modules determine & measures **time-on-task**: Did you finish in 2 hours or 10? It measures **struggle**: How many times did you rewind the video? How many times did you fail the practice quiz?⚠️⚠️ It measures **engagement**: Did you click away to other tabs? Did you skip the "theory" parts and go straight to the answers? 2. You do not just get a "Certificate of Completion." The system generates a **Behavioral Dataset**. It proves you learned the skill, but it also records *how* you learn and how fast.‼️‼️‼️ 3. The system issues a digital badge. This is not a JPEG image. It is a **cryptographic token** (often using blockchain technology). It is linked to your unique digital ID (your login). It proves the training came from an approved provider (e.g., Microsoft/Google), not a fake diploma mill. **Score:** It contains the granular data from Phase 1 (your quiz scores, your speed). The badge lives in your digital wallet or profile, but the *validity* of that badge relies on the issuer's server. If they want to revoke it, they can. You "own" the badge, but they control the truth of it. —- 4. The platforms share data (via APIs or common parent ownership). - You learn Excel on a learning platform -> That updates your profile on LinkedIn -> That connects to your code on GitHub. The system builds a **Skills Graph** for you. - It sees you learned "Java" (Badge 1). - It sees you built a Java app (GitHub Code). It sees you passed the "Java Interview Prep" quiz (Badge 2). People are no LONGER see as a RESUME You are a web of data points. The system can see your entire intellectual history in one view. 5. FINALLY when you apply for a job. You do not send a resume; you grant the employer access to your Graph. The company inputs: "I need a Data Analyst with high attention to detail and fast learning speed." **The AI Sort:** The hiring software scans every applicant's Graph. - **Check 1 (Qualification):** Do you have the badges? Yes/No. - **Check 2 (Behavior):** Did you learn quickly? Did you struggle? - **Check 3 (Prediction):** The AI runs a predictive model based on your Phase 1 data. "Applicant A learns 40% faster than average. Probability of high productivity: 90%." In the end The system rejects anyone who does not have the verified badge. It ranks the rest based on their hidden "Learning Speed" score. The employer only sees the top 1% of applicants. The other 99% are rejected by a machine before a human reads their name. @RepThomasMassie @Rep_Stansbury @tedlieu @RepJasmine @SenSanders @AOC

English
1
0
2
45
Controversies of Science
Controversies of Science@controscience·
A lot of people are gonna miss the significance of this ... but this type of test is called a force concept inventory (FCI), + it is a powerful constructivist pedagogy technique. Its deployment by a tech co at the same time that conventional schooling is collapsed is significant.
Controversies of Science tweet media
Evan Luthra@EvanLuthra

🚨BREAKING: ANTHROPIC IS GIVING AWAY THE SAME CERTIFICATION THAT DELOITTE IS MASS-TRAINING 15,000 EMPLOYEES TO GET. It costs $0. You need a laptop. That's it. It's called the "Claude Certified Architect." Think of it like the AWS cert but for AI. If you were around when AWS certs started, you know what happened. They went from "cool to have" to "you're not getting hired without one." That took about 5 years. This is going to happen way faster. Look at who's already moving: Accenture - training 30,000 people on Claude Cognizant - rolled it out to 350,000 employees Deloitte - opened Claude access to 470,000 people Infosys - anchor partner These aren't startups experimenting. These are billion dollar consulting firms restructuring their entire workforce around Claude. And the certification they need? You can take it right now from your bedroom. Let me be real though. This is not one of those "watch 2 videos and get a badge" type certs that nobody respects. This thing is hard. 60 questions. 2 hours. Proctored. Webcam on. No breaks. No googling. They drop you into real scenarios like designing a customer support agent that handles refunds or setting up Claude in a CI/CD pipeline. The wrong answers look right on purpose. They're the exact mistakes real engineers make in production. 720 out of 1000 to pass. People who took it are saying the agentic architecture and multi-agent orchestration sections are brutal. Most of the exam is about building AI systems that actually work in the real world. Not prompting. Not chatting with Claude. Architecting production systems. All the prep? Free. Anthropic put out 13 courses on their Academy. No paywall. The cert itself is free for the first 5,000 people. After that $99 per attempt. How to get it: 1. Join the Claude Partner Network (free) → partnerportal.anthropic.com 2. Start the free prep courses → anthropic.com/learn 3. Register for the exam → anthropic.skilljar.com 4. Take the official practice exam 5. Book the real one when you're ready It launched 10 days ago. Almost nobody has it yet. That's the whole point. Get it before it becomes the thing everyone has.

English
1
0
3
149
Controversies of Science รีทวีตแล้ว
Cosmic Ptolemy 2.0
Cosmic Ptolemy 2.0@CosmicPtolemy·
5/ 𝐀 𝐓𝐚𝐥𝐞 𝐨𝐟 𝐓𝐰𝐨 𝐕𝐨𝐲𝐚𝐠𝐞𝐫𝐬 𝐍𝐨𝐰 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐬𝐨𝐥𝐚𝐫 𝐰𝐢𝐧𝐝 𝐬𝐞𝐞𝐦𝐬 𝐭𝐨 𝐛𝐞 𝐨𝐧 𝐟𝐢𝐫𝐞….. Plasma density jumped sharply at the heliopause. Both Voyagers measured this. The local interstellar medium immediately outside proved far hotter than anticipated, up to 50,000 K, forming a distinct “wall” or compressed layer. This was absolutely not predicted by the standard model and had no business being there. None. It was reported that « tsunami » waves from solar outbursts continued to propagate beyond the heliosphere boundary. Absolutely not. What the Voyagers actually measured were plasma oscillations or vibrations, but of course these are (falsely) interpreted within the framework of the standard model. Astronomers were astonished (yet again) and lamely attributed this « wall of fire » to compression, shocks, or magnetic reconnection. Plasma density and temperature profiles required repeated tuning of standard models. The persistence of solar influences far outside the heliopause perplexed astronomers and forced yet more patchwork explanations, revealing the model’s inability to account for the energetic boundary. From an Electric Sun perspective, there is no surprise whatsoever. Double layers dissipate electrical energy through particle acceleration and plasma instabilities, naturally producing the observed hot, dense sheath boundary and ongoing oscillations. The “wall of fire” is the 𝐯𝐨𝐥𝐭𝐚𝐠𝐞 𝐝𝐫𝐨𝐩 across the Sun’s galactic-circuit sheath. Almost the entire voltage drop between the Sun and the surrounding galactic plasma occurs across this thin boundary sheath. This strong radial electric field energizes galactic electrons and ions, accelerating them to cosmic-ray energies and producing the observed particle fluxes and “anomalous” cosmic rays. Just like our Corona «waterfall». Thornhill predicted such a structured, electrically active boundary in 2005, long before Voyager crossed it. Has his work been credited? Has his work been studied in later missions? Of course not. Astronomers prefer to cling to a manifestly flawed model.
English
0
3
7
96
Controversies of Science รีทวีตแล้ว
Jen k 🇬🇧🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿
Over 300 cases of meningitis last year & nothing. 32 cases of meningitis this year with a population of over 70million & mass panic & mass vaccinations. Does anyone else think this is all a bit weird & very deja vu?
English
403
1.3K
5.1K
72.6K